From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
Kim Seer Paller <kimseer.paller@analog.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] iio: ABI: add ABI file for the LTC2664 DAC
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:22:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240420112227.68577ac0@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79734a9f54e320cd09aab83015f1c0e6d93e700c.camel@gmail.com>
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:45:52 +0200
Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 16:25 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:26:17 -0500
> > David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:21 PM Kim Seer Paller
> > > <kimseer.paller@analog.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Define the sysfs interface for toggle capable channels.
> > > >
> > > > Toggle enabled channels will have:
> > > >
> > > > * out_voltageY_toggle_en
> > The big missing thing in this ABI is a reference to existing precedence.
> > You aren't actually defining anything new, it just hasn't yet been generalized
> > beyond 1 device (unless you include PSK / FSK DDS drivers that are 'still'
> > after
> > 13+ years in staging!)
> >
> > This patch needs to be generalizing that documentation from the ltc2688.
> >
> > Probably in sysfs-bus-iio-dac
> >
> > >
> > > It looks like there are 3 toggle modes.
> > >
> > > Two involve the notion of "enabled" outputs that I assume this attribute is
> > > for:
> > >
> > > 1. Toggling all enabled pins at the same time using a software trigger
> > > (global toggle bit)
> > > 2. Toggling all enabled pins at the same time using a hardware trigger
> > > (TGP pin) and toggling pins
> > >
> >
> > This is presumably the tricky one as that hardware toggle may not be in
> > control of the host CPU.
> >
> > > The third mode though looks like it uses the same toggle select
> > > register for selecting A or B for each channel instead of enabling or
> > > disabling each channel.
> > >
> > > 3. Toggling all pins to A or B based on the toggle select register. No
> > > notion of enabled pins here.
> > >
> > > I haven't looked at the driver implementation, but it sounds like
> > > out_voltageY_toggle_en and out_voltageY_symbol would be writing to the
> > > same register in conflicting ways. So maybe we need yet another custom
> > > attribute to select the currently active toggle mode?
> >
> > This one feels like it could be handled as a software optimisation over
> > just changing the DAC value directly.
>
> Things may be slightly different in these devices. But for ltc2688 and AFAIR,
> the symbol attribute is about toggling between A and B through SW (not really
> enabling the mode). That interface will only pop up if there's no HW (PWM for
> example) toggle present.
I can't remember if we discussed it at the time of that driver,
but from a userspace interface point of view, for a single channel there would
be little point in this. I guess the key is it simultaneously switches
a bunch of channels. Perhaps we can make that clearer in the ABI docs
(if it isn't already clear enough!)
So a software interface does seem appropriate.
There is a fun question of whether the toggle select is useful to software.
That is picking which of A or B each output uses for next toggle.
At first glance I don't think so, but I'm open to people suggesting why
that might need a userspace interface.
Superficially feels like anything that can be done with that interface can
also be done keeping all channels toggling to A or all to B at one time and
potentially a few more register writes.
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-20 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 3:20 [PATCH 0/4] Add driver for LTC2664 and LTC2672 Kim Seer Paller
2024-04-12 3:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: dac: Add adi,ltc2664.yaml Kim Seer Paller
2024-04-12 5:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-13 14:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-16 14:16 ` Paller, Kim Seer
2024-04-12 21:23 ` David Lechner
2024-04-13 15:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-13 15:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-13 16:21 ` David Lechner
2024-04-13 17:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-16 14:40 ` Paller, Kim Seer
2024-04-20 10:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 3:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] iio: ABI: add ABI file for the LTC2664 DAC Kim Seer Paller
2024-04-12 21:26 ` David Lechner
2024-04-13 15:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-13 20:38 ` David Lechner
2024-04-15 12:45 ` Nuno Sá
2024-04-20 10:22 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-04-12 3:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] iio: ABI: add ABI file for the LTC2672 DAC Kim Seer Paller
2024-04-13 15:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-16 14:18 ` Paller, Kim Seer
2024-04-20 10:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 3:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] iio: dac: ltc2664: Add driver for LTC2664 and LTC2672 Kim Seer Paller
2024-04-13 15:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240420112227.68577ac0@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=kimseer.paller@analog.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).