From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEC4115E86; Fri, 10 May 2024 22:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715379766; cv=none; b=YGZ9vmj7VQjc67Allnw3DhFetXO+wbOvrbfawNc8ARi4wmqnGclm3sRITPltp0QTMVJEPl4r7HbzkvOcrbbkjYxvag8eYyy02U78JPnbAa5cBpOz9nDOL9KdZpj3mygBvg3//4sO1qZCmsi+tIzUMXGagSDkKgTDG5tLC5OWi1M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715379766; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1eupN9In0SKeHI6aNxZYRKBeLC1ty/HA2POqcDmV410=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DzApeIR2ld9e1OCMM/RANPC7bgD/WIUJ5tWdWWMw7/IEEjlAsZYGJ42cvEDmAFaAhMsce3AKYX1zBSGXApD+sGJAmvUpSnhPo0K6ipVlpGLeL5QGjT6oPmC5Gim9X0Xk5BzHS4FBV3iwhN34gszTcqa6ybeTKgZ8/f03rCwZ78w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=kYKln0oH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="kYKln0oH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1715379765; x=1746915765; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1eupN9In0SKeHI6aNxZYRKBeLC1ty/HA2POqcDmV410=; b=kYKln0oHHS86QfbDEhydxEQeCC/FqOyOk7XuKpM9L5Ob1mJH3JMYu0DJ eGFuJ63Co/1M0OtGcE5TtzL8OY1f3h84huCaStoo1HgBec824WcDJT1hc 6TNRqsKY0hse+l31fE7h4aASEB43m66VFdr2j6U75H8nmOjzc/PoMHdRl VeUCxel+FoLf+8VL8rl0EGse7fO0EEo6upv+ESd5pudxKvhCFuLmBhjj1 eYNR8yy4E0Jk8qfw/O5nMMPv4IeA3+hOtGenMt8op4tIq2R2vns1yO0c1 KtCmGp2faiBUB+S86Mjjpno648nNLXKJTl2B7my/GZ6bMV5axeCWsOR3o g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: weJCvV3aQSWIyGTs6UTOJA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: H07Tv299QvuLmzIOiWrjGQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11069"; a="11540583" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,152,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="11540583" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 May 2024 15:22:37 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: RZOv4w4eTTaxQPDK1oR0xg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ZJmwQYcKQ4We5Xo0hvmsaw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,152,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="34514195" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO f8b243fe6e68) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 May 2024 15:22:35 -0700 Received: from kbuild by f8b243fe6e68 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s5YdM-0006dn-2o; Fri, 10 May 2024 22:22:32 +0000 Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 06:21:53 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Ramona Gradinariu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jic23@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, nuno.sa@analog.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Ramona Gradinariu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] iio: imu: adis_buffer: Add buffer setup API with buffer attributes Message-ID: <202405110642.5PmTepVs-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240508131310.880479-5-ramona.bolboaca13@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240508131310.880479-5-ramona.bolboaca13@gmail.com> Hi Ramona, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on jic23-iio/togreg] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.9-rc7 next-20240510] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ramona-Gradinariu/dt-bindings-iio-imu-Add-ADIS16501-compatibles/20240508-211559 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git togreg patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240508131310.880479-5-ramona.bolboaca13%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] iio: imu: adis_buffer: Add buffer setup API with buffer attributes config: m68k-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240511/202405110642.5PmTepVs-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240511/202405110642.5PmTepVs-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405110642.5PmTepVs-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/iio/imu/adis16400.c:24: >> include/linux/iio/imu/adis.h:530:60: warning: 'struct iio_dev_attr' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration 530 | const struct iio_dev_attr **buffer_attrs); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +530 include/linux/iio/imu/adis.h 524 525 int 526 devm_adis_setup_buffer_and_trigger_with_attrs(struct adis *adis, 527 struct iio_dev *indio_dev, 528 irq_handler_t trigger_handler, 529 const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops *ops, > 530 const struct iio_dev_attr **buffer_attrs); 531 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki