From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.154.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 157C618635; Thu, 16 May 2024 06:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=68.232.154.123 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715842650; cv=none; b=uGjxvQx0wnUEwHHODsr6QbeCBc08FXbffpuKIcA/GaWYa5MstDRVlg/mjIL+tqYBQ43eoD/1AloqTAETJN43oErfdOM6tfIn1hzAensQ2uBcaH2OLy2YFFmTcbb0wNLlPkX7YxlHwtMmk+62xeSmh8GKhQCa7twlSH4khMRf9mI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715842650; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6IjZadEQJIHv5tk4TwGJe6gpZ6evHRuOZzcAlcgqyk4=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QY43erfnUZGkQRl6yfqceBu6A2Im+9KcUMZBBUkCryeC3S2ovwyb2/iDd1DYUPp7/PuGE/pwkaJxkAkM/ak8ykwqA/KdmFU8CoVzjhMOAKJaPczeLxlyra+NxsBq+J2m9ItzJnkU0dBs/nel9H7fHRLOxvFmlv/U2CchWsRN710= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=microchip.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microchip.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b=p0LJDtuV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=68.232.154.123 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microchip.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b="p0LJDtuV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1715842648; x=1747378648; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=6IjZadEQJIHv5tk4TwGJe6gpZ6evHRuOZzcAlcgqyk4=; b=p0LJDtuVNwwpeiwCLxUHPDE/K/aflfKnpZ3nj9jem7NwYNocUI5ps2Lt 1fwScxiXsvfbLZ3bD33YNcC8KlYYFoTTs1j3c7eVlOsUSYzcJXvIENWfa XD3BYh0gtLEhPVjniU3Cp5ac1fn+pVTYrD9Ru3qnlL0ZyrdA1vR6dj4vx yelrdZUPhPXXt82zIMRZcylJ2D8spxsQBT38ddxbSUxwPQsyzRqk3cBMb Y8bakWJUOo+Eg8UrPc//i8YMFnm2b7ngMw2vXjVAWl6AirVNWYrZyWx4z Xq04Eiy7RZ4HnabTckEcsQ565ezL+bG8eZJmeSOi3T5dCO0ayf2E1Z2fn g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: muChaTU1T4yrMkfn1JCFOg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OTNc74XwSLi6GypTtBzPMw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,163,1712646000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="192313660" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 15 May 2024 23:57:26 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 15 May 2024 23:56:56 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.85.11) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 15 May 2024 23:56:53 -0700 Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 07:56:39 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Kanak Shilledar CC: Conor Dooley , , Kanak Shilledar , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Florian Fainelli , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , Broadcom internal kernel review list , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: spi: brcm,bcm2835-spi: convert to dtschema Message-ID: <20240516-encourage-bouncing-77e9c14c9887@wendy> References: <20240514070051.2959-1-kanakshilledar111@protonmail.com> <20240514-sitting-ritzy-498d35eb5ac8@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0nhWKHEN5fKFMQ8b" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --0nhWKHEN5fKFMQ8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:44=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley = wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 12:30:47PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote: > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > - Updated DCO email address > > > > I was really hoping you'd tell me why you'd not used the same email > > address, rather than just sending another version. My ulterior motive is > > that I wrote the section in email-clients.rst saying that protonmail had > > WKD issues with kernel.org accounts but apparently proton added a > > workaround and have yet to be sent an email that confirmed that the > > workaround fixed things. (I'm not sure that the WKD issues ever applied > > as there's no GPG key posted for conor+dt@kernel.org, only > > conor@kernel.org). >=20 > Oh, I am primarily using protonmail and I am aware that there are some > issues with protonmail and kernel.org so for that reason I am sending my > patches via @gmail.com address. I was trying out some things with > gmail and proton so had changed my signing email address to @gmail.com > apart from sending emails I have no motive on using gmail.com account. > Also I am adding my protonmail account in the `CC`. > Hope this helps. > If this is not the intended route then I will change it and stick > to one email address. I don't care what email you use for stuff, that's your business. I just want to know if we can remove the section from the docs that says not to use proton. Maybe you could send me an off-list email to conor@kernel.org from your proton account, so I can see if it ends up getting encrypted? That'd be helpful if you could. > > The patch is fine IMO though, so > > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley >=20 > Do I need to roll out another version with this reviewed by flag? No, Mark should be able to pick that up. There's usually no need to resend patches solely pick up tags, that's the maintainer's responsibility. If you're resending for any other reason, then yes, pick up tags. Cheers, Conor. --0nhWKHEN5fKFMQ8b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZkWuJwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0gN/AQCnEN4vuOOsE6DO4QFtsxZtw+1x1mtb49PyKpWtqtPQ8QD/RhI9DwfjF5Tp CnTBU0ZQV31OVZpr1OkYHZWVykwLGwM= =uPOG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0nhWKHEN5fKFMQ8b--