Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: rename gw7905 to gw75xx

Rob Herring
2024-08-19T13:17:50Z

On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:10 AM Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 9:34 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 13/08/2024 18:22, Tim Harvey wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:13 AM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:50 PM Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> The GW7905 was renamed to GW7500 before production release.
> > >>
> > >> Maybe some summary of the discussion and how this changed from one-off
> > >> to wider availability.
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 4 ++--
> > >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > What is the status of this patch? I'm not clear what tree the
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings go through.
> >
> > Always via given subsystem. Which subsystem is here? Maintainers should
> > tell you - ARM Freescale/NXP.
> >
> > See also:
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11-rc3/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L79
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >
>
> Krzysztof, thanks - that makes sense.
>
> Shawn, what is the status of this series [1]

No maintainer is going to look at 3 month old patches and may or may
not see some reply on it. Generally, if there's any discussion on a
patch, I assume a new version will be the result and move on. So
resend your patch.

Rob