public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
Cc: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"David Jander" <david@protonic.nl>,
	"Martin Sperl" <kernel@martin.sperl.org>,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/8] spi: dt-bindings: spi-peripheral-props: add spi-offloads property
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 15:31:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240523-divided-herbicide-11396549e05f@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ad0b5782434eaf4cf565cffb0e4c14b7414ae38.camel@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2060 bytes --]

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 02:15:35PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-05-22 at 19:24 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:54:39AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 7:53 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 11:51:58AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:32 PM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:56:47PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> > > > 
> > I think you're right something like that is a stretch to say that that
> > is a feature of the SPI controller - but I still don't believe that
> > modelling it as part of the ADC is correct. I don't fully understand the
> > io-backends and how they work yet, but the features you describe there
> > seem like something that should/could be modelled as one, with its own
> > node and compatible etc. Describing custom RTL stuff ain't always
> > strightforward, but the stuff from Analog is versioned and documented
> > etc so it shouldn't be quite that hard.
> > 
> 
> Putting this in io-backends is likely a stretch but one thing to add is that the
> peripheral is always (I think) kind of the consumer of the resources. Taking the
> trigger (PWM) as an example and even when it is directly connected with the offload
> block, the peripheral still needs to know about it. Think of sampling frequency...
> The period of the trigger signal is strictly connected with the sampling frequency of
> the peripheral for example. So I see 2 things:

Cherry picking this one thing to reply to cos I'm not sure if it was
understood as I intended. When I talked about io-backends I was not
suggesting that we drop the spi-offload idea, I was suggesting that if
something has a dedicated register region & resources that handles both
offloading and some usecase specific data processing that it should be a
device of its own, acting as a provider of both spi-offloads and
io-backends.
I'll look at the rest of the mail soonTM.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-23 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-11  0:44 [PATCH RFC v2 0/8] spi: axi-spi-engine: add offload support David Lechner
2024-05-11  0:44 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/8] spi: dt-bindings: spi-peripheral-props: add spi-offloads property David Lechner
2024-05-13 16:46   ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-13 17:06     ` David Lechner
2024-05-14 18:46       ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-14 22:56         ` David Lechner
2024-05-16 21:32           ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-17 16:51             ` David Lechner
2024-05-19 12:53               ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-21 14:54                 ` David Lechner
2024-05-22 18:24                   ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-23 12:15                     ` Nuno Sá
2024-05-23 12:45                       ` Mark Brown
2024-05-23 14:31                       ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2024-05-23 15:05                       ` David Lechner
2024-05-26 15:42                         ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-26 17:35                       ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-29  8:07                         ` Nuno Sá
2024-05-29  8:33                           ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-30 19:18                           ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-30 21:28                             ` David Lechner
2024-05-31 12:47                               ` Mark Brown
2024-05-31  7:39                             ` Nuno Sá
2024-05-30 19:24                           ` David Lechner
2024-05-31  7:33                             ` Nuno Sá
2024-06-04 19:33                             ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-04 19:39                               ` David Lechner
2024-06-04 19:42                                 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-04 20:04                                   ` David Lechner
2024-05-23 14:28                     ` David Lechner
2024-05-23 14:57                       ` Nuno Sá
2024-05-23 15:09                         ` David Lechner
2024-05-23 15:30                           ` Nuno Sá
2024-05-26 15:45                       ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-29 20:10                         ` David Lechner
2024-05-30 17:25                           ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-30 18:42                       ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-11  0:44 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/8] spi: add basic support for SPI offloading David Lechner
2024-05-21 11:57   ` Nuno Sá
2024-05-11  0:44 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/8] spi: add support for hardware triggered offload David Lechner
2024-05-11 16:51   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-11  0:44 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/8] spi: add offload xfer flags David Lechner
2024-05-11  0:44 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/8] spi: dt-bindings: axi-spi-engine: document spi-offloads David Lechner
2024-05-11  0:44 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/8] spi: axi-spi-engine: add offload support David Lechner
2024-05-21 12:31   ` Nuno Sá
2024-05-21 14:28     ` David Lechner
2024-05-22 12:08       ` Nuno Sá
2024-05-11  0:44 ` [PATCH RFC v2 7/8] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad7944: add SPI offload properties David Lechner
2024-05-11  0:44 ` [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] iio: adc: ad7944: add support for SPI offload David Lechner
2024-05-11 16:58   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-11 18:41     ` David Lechner
2024-05-12 11:52       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-13 15:15         ` David Lechner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240523-divided-herbicide-11396549e05f@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@protonic.nl \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@martin.sperl.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox