Re: [PATCH 7/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-mcu: Mark mcu_mcan0/1 as wakeup-source

[Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>]

On 09:53-20240523, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> From: Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@ti.com>
> 
> mcu_mcan0 and mcu_mcan1 can be wakeup sources for the SoC. Mark them
> accordingly in the devicetree. Based on the patch for AM62a.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
> index b973b550eb9d..e434b258e90c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
> @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ mcu_mcan0: can@4e08000 {
>  		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  			     <GIC_SPI 27 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>  		interrupt-names = "int0", "int1";
> +		wakeup-source;
>  		status = "disabled";
>  	};
>  
> @@ -177,6 +178,7 @@ mcu_mcan1: can@4e18000 {
>  		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  			     <GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>  		interrupt-names = "int0", "int1";
> +		wakeup-source;
>  		status = "disabled";
>  	};
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Curious:
https://software-dl.ti.com/tisci/esd/latest/2_tisci_msgs/pm/lpm.html#supported-low-power-modes
Does not seem to call out am62p. Is that an documentation oversight?

what happens to j722s?

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D