From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.168.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9507BD2F0; Wed, 29 May 2024 15:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.168.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716995478; cv=none; b=iG6yg8iztnvpQIGl5Lte+2nVDilO5i2lmp1/Mi9o63aChLteQU1juFZVhVzcRYY1WNC+HzdVUSn9nt7o3c1+5QR8WPNqYXC+CRLR4t7X85gCQLcONkpqmXHk7RYIv7llr+66uXJcnlh2r8Enf8ntvbKK8tYzYfMtVRVULoA02mE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716995478; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LfsyLBuOEebZXf0FmvHKrivubLb0L6gjBUDj9eH0Mvk=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ik92q0e8bQD5YfUE4mPmexsWfXf5wx3+UDgQCR9+zyfzwCtVL5LewAOy75P4IStSPdzWlmcxgTPIkcEWpUS70gOG1yJKi+Ie+DUBJXHPhOAdOZ1kuP8BIgSCkYpSpod1yVOYWxajbTUTC9W1YBsdZvXlh5+n9Iy0iSrYSq2yNyA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b=lHOcXiUI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.168.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b="lHOcXiUI" Received: from pps.filterd (m0279864.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 44TBtabU021170; Wed, 29 May 2024 15:09:03 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=qcppdkim1; bh=owCWHyok5RQxLdu/CPu4P8FF 4Lb1VB7+ZRXHc1JgNB8=; b=lHOcXiUIFYq+7o7LX7m8c9WsSCx1mx48TDUcVZWf TPhARGnopuoQXUrj28nmdv45O7lRalQKej6nULa3/RICoeu9hEajjXaJHbUhTaYk zaXcM/VaepLISawmzfP64yXe6pgSnhyfJnjqh6AwkjPtJKSd2UkD2I5ePrNXFW7c Xzax3Ye9FTj3lDRt6EfXKfiuxnh5C5v8IGCvGXk34ys62F66rEEFMZzs/q5iwg5F xwA7v7966TP4RJTtk4IXISMFw2YCNbnLjwBmH1t20pDQbR5/ZmcxQNxnrJuFSsCI JrcIgkUcx6vSlTMmvpbwv0xP4wVHRNHS7Gu0cZWytIL7nA== Received: from nasanppmta05.qualcomm.com (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3yba0ps682-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 May 2024 15:09:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com [10.46.141.250]) by NASANPPMTA05.qualcomm.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 44TF92ca026153 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 May 2024 15:09:02 GMT Received: from hu-eberman-lv.qualcomm.com (10.49.16.6) by nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.9; Wed, 29 May 2024 08:09:01 -0700 Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 08:09:01 -0700 From: Elliot Berman To: Conor Dooley CC: Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Amrit Anand , "Peter Griffin" , Caleb Connolly , Andy Gross , Doug Anderson , Simon Glass , Chen-Yu Tsai , Julius Werner , "Humphreys, Jonathan" , Sumit Garg , "Jon Hunter" , Michal Simek , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 5/9] dt-bindings: board: Document board-ids for Qualcomm devices Message-ID: <20240526115810183-0700.eberman@hu-eberman-lv.qualcomm.com> References: <20240521-board-ids-v3-0-e6c71d05f4d2@quicinc.com> <20240521-board-ids-v3-5-e6c71d05f4d2@quicinc.com> <20240525-parachute-plutonium-ef8d1472ff50@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240525-parachute-plutonium-ef8d1472ff50@spud> X-ClientProxiedBy: nalasex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.197) To nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 0kYVmVeWY6R4bZ8uKCBfVzN1tngFO0WX X-Proofpoint-GUID: 0kYVmVeWY6R4bZ8uKCBfVzN1tngFO0WX X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.650,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-05-29_11,2024-05-28_01,2024-05-17_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2405170001 definitions=main-2405290104 On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 06:08:46PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 11:38:02AM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote: > > + > > +allOf: > > + # either describe soc or soc-version; it's confusing to have both > > Why not just use the one that has the most information and discard the > others? If your dtb picker for this platform doesn't care about the soc > version, then just don't look at that cell? The dtb picker for the platform doesn't know whether to care about the SoC version/platform version/whatever. That's a property of the DTB itself and I don't think it makes much sense to bake that into the DTB picker which would otherwise be unaware of this. > > Likewise for platform and PMIC, why can't you ignore the cells you don't > care about, rather than having a new property for each variant? Nothing > in this patch explains why multiple variants are required rather than > just dealing with the most informational. > Sure, I will explain in future revision. - Elliot