From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"Jon Lin" <jon.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Simon Xue" <xxm@rock-chips.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/13] PCI: dw-rockchip: Refactor the driver to prepare for EP mode
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:36:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240605080640.GJ5085@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240529-rockchip-pcie-ep-v1-v4-9-3dc00fe21a78@kernel.org>
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:29:03AM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> This refactors the driver to prepare for EP mode.
> Add of-match data to the existing compatible, and explicitly define it as
> DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE. This way, we will be able to add EP mode in a follow-up
> commit in a much less intrusive way, which makes the follup-up commit much
> easier to review.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Few nitpicks below. With those addressed,
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> index 1380e3a5284b..e133511692af 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> @@ -49,15 +49,20 @@
> #define PCIE_LTSSM_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
>
> struct rockchip_pcie {
> - struct dw_pcie pci;
> - void __iomem *apb_base;
> - struct phy *phy;
> - struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
> - unsigned int clk_cnt;
> - struct reset_control *rst;
> - struct gpio_desc *rst_gpio;
> - struct regulator *vpcie3v3;
> - struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> + struct dw_pcie pci;
> + void __iomem *apb_base;
> + struct phy *phy;
> + struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
> + unsigned int clk_cnt;
> + struct reset_control *rst;
> + struct gpio_desc *rst_gpio;
> + struct regulator *vpcie3v3;
> + struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> + const struct rockchip_pcie_of_data *data;
I prefer to avoid aligning the struct members just for this reason. Once you add
a member with a bigger name, then you need to align others also. Please just use
space.
> +};
> +
> +struct rockchip_pcie_of_data {
> + enum dw_pcie_device_mode mode;
> };
>
> static int rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip, u32 reg)
> @@ -195,7 +200,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
> struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
> - u32 val = HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE);
> int irq, ret;
>
> irq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "legacy");
> @@ -209,12 +213,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, rockchip_pcie_intx_handler,
> rockchip);
>
> - /* LTSSM enable control mode */
> - rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val, PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL);
> -
> - rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE,
> - PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -294,13 +292,35 @@ static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> .start_link = rockchip_pcie_start_link,
> };
>
> +static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> +{
> + struct dw_pcie_rp *pp;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + /* LTSSM enable control mode */
> + val = HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE);
> + rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val, PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL);
> +
> + rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE,
> + PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL);
> +
> + pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
> + pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
> +
> + return dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> +}
> +
> static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip;
> - struct dw_pcie_rp *pp;
> + const struct rockchip_pcie_of_data *data;
> int ret;
>
> + data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + if (!data)
> + return -EINVAL;
-ENODATA?
> +
> rockchip = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rockchip), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!rockchip)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -309,9 +329,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> rockchip->pci.dev = dev;
> rockchip->pci.ops = &dw_pcie_ops;
> -
> - pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
> - pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
> + rockchip->data = data;
>
> ret = rockchip_pcie_resource_get(pdev, rockchip);
> if (ret)
> @@ -347,10 +365,21 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> goto deinit_phy;
>
> - ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> - if (!ret)
> - return 0;
Thanks a lot for getting rid of this ugly piece of code!
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-05 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-29 8:28 [PATCH v4 00/13] PCI: dw-rockchip: Add endpoint mode support Niklas Cassel
2024-05-29 8:28 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] dt-bindings: PCI: snps,dw-pcie-ep: Add vendor specific reg-name Niklas Cassel
2024-06-05 7:22 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-05-29 8:28 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] dt-bindings: PCI: snps,dw-pcie-ep: Add vendor specific interrupt-names Niklas Cassel
2024-06-05 7:24 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-05-29 8:28 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] dt-bindings: PCI: snps,dw-pcie-ep: Add tx_int{a,b,c,d} legacy irqs Niklas Cassel
2024-06-05 7:34 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-05 16:20 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-06-06 6:25 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-07 9:49 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-05-29 8:28 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] dt-bindings: PCI: rockchip-dw-pcie: Prepare for Endpoint mode support Niklas Cassel
2024-06-05 7:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-05-29 8:28 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] dt-bindings: PCI: rockchip-dw-pcie: Fix description of legacy irq Niklas Cassel
2024-06-05 7:36 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-05-29 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe Endpoint controller Niklas Cassel
2024-06-05 7:42 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-05-29 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] PCI: dw-rockchip: Fix weird indentation Niklas Cassel
2024-05-29 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] PCI: dw-rockchip: Add rockchip_pcie_get_ltssm() helper Niklas Cassel
2024-06-05 7:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-05-29 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] PCI: dw-rockchip: Refactor the driver to prepare for EP mode Niklas Cassel
2024-06-05 8:06 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-06-05 17:57 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-06-06 6:27 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-05-29 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] PCI: dw-rockchip: Add endpoint mode support Niklas Cassel
2024-06-05 8:17 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-05 18:58 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-06-06 6:31 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-07 11:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-05-29 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add support for rockchip rk3588 Niklas Cassel
2024-05-29 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add PCIe endpoint mode support Niklas Cassel
2024-06-05 8:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-05-29 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rock5b overlays for PCIe endpoint mode Niklas Cassel
2024-06-04 1:45 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] PCI: dw-rockchip: Add endpoint mode support Kever Yang
2024-06-04 1:51 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240605080640.GJ5085@thinkpad \
--to=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=jon.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=xxm@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).