devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/11] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 17:47:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240605234720.GA3441001-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240603223811.3815762-6-sboyd@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 03:38:02PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Test the KUnit test managed overlay APIs. Confirm that platform devices
> are created and destroyed properly. This provides us confidence that the
> test managed APIs work correctly and can be relied upon to provide tests
> with fake platform devices and device nodes via overlays compiled into
> the kernel image.
> 
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>
> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/of/.kunitconfig            |   1 +
>  drivers/of/Kconfig                 |  10 +++
>  drivers/of/Makefile                |   1 +
>  drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso |   9 +++
>  drivers/of/overlay_test.c          | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/overlay_test.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/.kunitconfig b/drivers/of/.kunitconfig
> index 5a8fee11978c..4c53d2c7a275 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/.kunitconfig
> +++ b/drivers/of/.kunitconfig
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>  CONFIG_KUNIT=y
>  CONFIG_OF=y
>  CONFIG_OF_KUNIT_TEST=y
> +CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY_KUNIT_TEST=y
> diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> index dd726c7056bf..0e2d608c3e20 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> @@ -107,6 +107,16 @@ config OF_OVERLAY
>  	  While this option is selected automatically when needed, you can
>  	  enable it manually to improve device tree unit test coverage.
>  
> +config OF_OVERLAY_KUNIT_TEST
> +	tristate "Device Tree overlay KUnit tests" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +	depends on KUNIT
> +	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +	select OF_OVERLAY
> +	help
> +	  This option builds KUnit unit tests for the device tree overlay code.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say N here, but this option is safe to enable.
> +
>  config OF_NUMA
>  	bool
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/of/Makefile b/drivers/of/Makefile
> index 2ae909adde49..abd9c578343b 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/of/Makefile
> @@ -21,5 +21,6 @@ endif
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += of_kunit_helpers.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OF_KUNIT_TEST) += of_test.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY_KUNIT_TEST) += overlay_test.o kunit_overlay_test.dtbo.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST) += unittest-data/
> diff --git a/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso b/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..85f20b4b4c16
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/dts-v1/;
> +/plugin/;
> +
> +&{/} {
> +	kunit-test {
> +		compatible = "test,empty";
> +	};
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay_test.c b/drivers/of/overlay_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9a8083c3a659
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/of/overlay_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * KUnit tests for device tree overlays
> + */
> +#include <linux/device/bus.h>
> +#include <linux/kconfig.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +
> +#include <kunit/of.h>
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +static const char * const kunit_node_name = "kunit-test";
> +static const char * const kunit_compatible = "test,empty";
> +
> +/* Test that of_overlay_apply_kunit() adds a node to the live tree */
> +static void of_overlay_apply_kunit_apply(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0,
> +			of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, kunit_overlay_test));
> +
> +	np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> +	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Test that of_overlay_apply_kunit() creates platform devices with the
> + * expected device_node
> + */
> +static void of_overlay_apply_kunit_platform_device(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0,
> +			of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, kunit_overlay_test));
> +
> +	np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> +	of_node_put_kunit(test, np);

Moving target, but we now have of_node_put() cleanups. Would that work 
here instead?

> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> +
> +	pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
> +	if (pdev)
> +		put_device(&pdev->dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int of_overlay_bus_match_compatible(struct device *dev, const void *data)
> +{
> +	return of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, data);
> +}
> +
> +/* Test that of_overlay_apply_kunit() cleans up after the test is finished */
> +static void of_overlay_apply_kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct kunit fake;
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY))
> +		kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY");
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_EARLY_FLATTREE))
> +		kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_OF_EARLY_FLATTREE for root node");
> +
> +	kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, fake.status, KUNIT_SUCCESS);
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0,
> +			of_overlay_apply_kunit(&fake, kunit_overlay_test));
> +
> +	np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> +	of_node_put(np); /* Not derefing 'np' after this */
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> +
> +	pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);

Don't you need to hold a ref on np until here?


> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
> +	put_device(&pdev->dev); /* Not derefing 'pdev' after this */
> +
> +	/* Remove overlay */
> +	kunit_cleanup(&fake);
> +
> +	/* The node and device should be removed */
> +	np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, NULL, np);
> +	of_node_put(np);
> +
> +	dev = bus_find_device(&platform_bus_type, NULL, kunit_compatible,
> +			      of_overlay_bus_match_compatible);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, NULL, dev);
> +	put_device(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case of_overlay_apply_kunit_test_cases[] = {
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_overlay_apply_kunit_apply),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_overlay_apply_kunit_platform_device),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_overlay_apply_kunit_cleanup),
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Test suite for test managed device tree overlays.
> + */
> +static struct kunit_suite of_overlay_apply_kunit_suite = {
> +	.name = "of_overlay_apply_kunit",
> +	.test_cases = of_overlay_apply_kunit_test_cases,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suites(
> +	&of_overlay_apply_kunit_suite,
> +);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> -- 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sboyd/spmi.git
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-05 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-03 22:37 [PATCH v5 00/11] clk: Add kunit tests for fixed rate and parent data Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] of/platform: Allow overlays to create platform devices from the root node Stephen Boyd
2024-06-05 23:47   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-03 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] of: Add test managed wrappers for of_overlay_apply()/of_node_put() Stephen Boyd
2024-06-13  7:48   ` David Gow
2024-07-02 22:39     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add "test" vendor for KUnit and friends Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] dt-bindings: test: Add KUnit empty node binding Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-06-05 23:47   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2024-06-06 15:23     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-13  7:50   ` David Gow
2024-07-02 21:45     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] platform: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 13:48   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-13  7:50   ` David Gow
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] dt-bindings: test: Add single clk consumer Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 12:50   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-04 13:05   ` Rob Herring
2024-06-04 18:28     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 20:19       ` Rob Herring
2024-06-04 20:52         ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 20:53         ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] clk: Add test managed clk provider/consumer APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clk fixed rate basic type Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] dt-bindings: clk: Add clk_parent_data test Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clks registered with struct clk_parent_data Stephen Boyd
2024-06-13  7:56   ` David Gow
2024-07-02 22:25     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-07-02 22:34       ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240605234720.GA3441001-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).