From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0734D13E043; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.193 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717752218; cv=none; b=MZ6X3IiG9BM7wz9LDRR0ALZe/68YPsgz23VOhCnzIRGDZ2JZV7wavQ3T2luH5KyziSJvRdppk5lfQMpavb40J24yPU7i1ZyQtXht0cp9MdARUdmeJVz/HQZZoXn6UEL/BVjm3SroemYqKW616nBuy5q4cx4kLsZYuad1ODKQyvI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717752218; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j85mgkeTusRS4Itc43hUJSsb/34CpqaC5r9jA8gYgZ0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dWbM1QImsW716+bN2sjB+hhGSuG/5fDXz16uWLBjefDpTIu6Q0LHcBN9ShB5yZKtNdt8RUhiDWR/6SAbrEv5V157OCKmOZaWDWrsXlqlCsRhgCFbBXh6JmeAfyskPHCe5XGDzheT0VqpWkEQu1FrT7xHEeeVmWEPsEIe7KxuuGY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=UyZ3qryQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.193 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="UyZ3qryQ" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACD0C240007; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:23:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1717752208; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3W3sbBCarayP1thGCleMHMWpqnuZCVKbvI3U++3tYEI=; b=UyZ3qryQfLn/9lb2wCaaS4EvO/2/n0QeRtdYGr6SZjP3SFy/C9O4lHylDlZz/2VcqhSBLS eKJLjNDFFh+rTIHauAiBqx/L0Qh4Z+uBG6DCAPeP8CNG3BlKMvZJdyIAAUWFsIe3Woi/8X AXekPWROEVNTWsf3FezYGaLWmPyKR0IYZo6TUxm7O9Tmt/QnE8npZABBaQwuQvbCvgNuhp tJndOY8PNDVTuLJbrznPaBCQ23lXMkWcZrnysIYgdOwGw8EItzGRMrqtmIzqq2Ck072JCz j0y9GkxfrvR/qFnCgrCA7/BqWZ1kZy9bNbWV07ikJaazn+rt9aUBxF+liPJQyg== Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:23:25 +0200 From: Herve Codina To: Matti Vaittinen Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Matti Vaittinen , Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] irqdomain: Allow giving name suffix for domain Message-ID: <20240607112325.27e23671@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: References: <87plst28yk.ffs@tglx> <045828bd-4aeb-4d8d-b152-44a816a07221@gmail.com> <20240607101356.3ede2a17@bootlin.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-GND-Sasl: herve.codina@bootlin.com On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:49:07 +0300 Matti Vaittinen wrote: > On 6/7/24 11:13, Herve Codina wrote: > > Hi Matti, > > > > On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:38:31 +0300 > > Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > > > ... > > > >> Herve, do you have any idea when you plan to do further sketching on > >> this? Do you want me to try seeing if I can add the struct > >> irq_domain_info and maybe use that in the __irq_domain_add() to get the > >> name-suffix added? I might be able to send one version out during next > >> week - but then I plan to be offline for couple of weeks ... so it may > >> be I am not much of a help here. > >> > > > > On my side, I plan to work on it next week too. > > If you are off a couple of weeks after, I think I can start and move forward > > on this topic. > > Thanks for the prompt reply and thanks for working with this :) I'll > leave it to you for now then, as I don't think it makes much sense to > intentionally do conflicting changes. I'll see what you've been up to > when I return to the keyboard :) I'd appreciated if you added me to CC > when sending the irqdomain refactoring patches (but I can dig them up if > you don't). Sure, you will CC you. Also, I am not sure that I will perfectly take into account your use-case but it should not be a big deal to add it on top of my commits afterwards. > > Have fun! > Cheers, Hervé