Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] RISC-V: Detect unaligned vector accesses supported.

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1803 bytes --]

On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 10:28:17AM -0400, Jesse Taube wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/14/24 04:40, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 09:36:55AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 03:16:13PM -0400, Jesse Taube wrote:
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
> > > > @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
> > > >   #define MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER get_order(MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE)
> > > >   #define MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE ((MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE / 2) - 0x80)
> > > > -DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed);
> > > > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed) = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN;
> > > > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, vector_misaligned_access) = RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED;
> > > >   #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> > > >   static cpumask_t fast_misaligned_access;
> > > > @@ -268,12 +269,18 @@ static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
> > > >   	if (riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICCLSM)) {
> > > >   		for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_VECTOR_MISALIGNED
> > > > +			per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu) = RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_FAST;
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED
> > > >   			per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST;
> > > > +#endif
> > > 
> > > Can you IS_ENABLED()-ify these two as well please?
> > 
> > Ah, you can't cos the variable doesn't exist in the other case.
> 
> Yeah kinda just dealing with how it was originally written ideally we would
> use IS_ENABLED. I don't really want to have a 500+ diff patch
> IS_ENABLED()-ifying the original code as well. I can do that if necessary
> though.

No, dw about it. I made a mistake.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]