From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail2.andi.de1.cc (vmd64148.contaboserver.net [161.97.139.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2774D1AE096; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 14:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=161.97.139.27 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718895258; cv=none; b=TcLSUEy7KcgtxNINcPqYoahF9eizDvMU0iKrjrubRJ2jHyhGKhr6kLRHnlDhQu1nGEkuXMIj/Yb1J3GkEWjJk2V6as0H8S9K3q8VJBrUwWBoXgp2h5FDgZKhdgEVN1q+60V2u7AQnG60E6/zB+J3gmdTyv3VvXtIF68qryi5+AM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718895258; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rqz7mptSZXadmEmaYlv2lustuXRLeUAJmakIx5iONiA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FBUq3mOJXeJNKwX767y9j/aAHp5TohyDY44rw7vKta2tK+CcB0DsQWXlOnmeP9vcWBrOtnnZbIkP20UcIajXl91XDXKiLKZQDnOjNwWHQPU6oSuzSR6NFEMBTvYgXISp7IA4BjKUDT7u5xozYqHtuwzE76h7fsv5+cme9pyRsGY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kemnade.info; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kemnade.info; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b=E3ggvSCR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=161.97.139.27 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kemnade.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kemnade.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b="E3ggvSCR" Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc ([2a02:c205:3004:2154::1]) by mail2.andi.de1.cc with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sKIcd-000PnA-24; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:18:44 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kemnade.info; s=20220719; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rqz7mptSZXadmEmaYlv2lustuXRLeUAJmakIx5iONiA=; b=E3ggvSCRUiI5paGf9pWHQzxYiM fJJOmDPx+9i9GxFK1mhegpwerQoVzuoC6BTsI/xsf5oQgnIP0d7ziy2EjF8TgEWlFrXkcpWkSlvdb VAjdce6oPRnUbwF06ZLiB74N+f4QLBgr3oDzYkJCbK4/okZRIUwQFXtWc5byLLjs+15YgeA9TGyjF 4/M5IiipVBy7aS06D/JebOIffz+ugqmF8Ec2RQOrCwI5l02EQWskfDtNjszxf1aSgs53G/9s32VHc zBk4BoyZhzzIUge91RtlB2Z8WgPuUum03UHKIR9Q8r8MsB3CdNM7u8ZWLe1rtBUA4eflFwTdwKRFv NzJRWqZA==; Received: from p200300c20737c200b1839a3e94ddce00.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:c2:737:c200:b183:9a3e:94dd:ce00] helo=akair) by mail.andi.de1.cc with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sKIcb-003MgG-1O; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:18:42 +0200 Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:18:28 +0200 From: Andreas Kemnade To: Mithil Cc: =?UTF-8?B?QmVub8OudA==?= Cousson , Tony Lindgren , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: dts: twl6032: Add DTS file for TWL6032 PMIC Message-ID: <20240620161828.68e1975b@akair> In-Reply-To: References: <20240611132134.31269-1-bavishimithil@gmail.com> <20240611164951.51754ffc@aktux> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mithil, Am Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:15:19 +0530 schrieb Mithil : > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 8:19=E2=80=AFPM Andreas Kemnade > wrote: > > I think the twl6030.dtsi and twl6032.dtsi should be as similar as > > possible. =20 >=20 > Hey the values seem to be different for twl6030.dtsi, > omap4-epson-embt2ws.dts, and omap4-samsung-espresso-common.dtsi. > Should we just define the nodes in twl6032.dtsi and let them put > min/max volts and other properties in the board files? >=20 IMHO either the full range there and override board specific stuff in the *.dts files or no voltages. Regards, Andreas