From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F3291EB25; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719153027; cv=none; b=Mr+LjSZdd6YGXly3ZilnTT/xfeEvlslvpAuR5UVpplaMqpY8w8LnHt5pY4AIxmscpiqLTqB/6ViQdIKPHjw/BBHBUQmQ3WRw2OZ9up2EaHfy/rj2UzX2ThqPorJDfUK6ETbpzj8tSx3M7kMCiKnYQ6oc4bYVagrwEyxgZ0oqHeY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719153027; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JeDwnT/5o/t4SulflNylysZnroxPO1yMnY77AG2371A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=q4lTO5ZIF2bnBMjQxBRlWrVJfJPiRhfuQeHM4Sczgly9AWYgC3wQBKU2JcacinaVdjN2q9wSmuqKaO/y+VXwm4VerHx4SAL3iX0ctzxZ2ycw2P6x7nHX7b0cARhTMrr6VY/bgGgnWhgvmKuKdnlNP361ZzvNT2ic53FFl8H3Bz8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=DqBVCtSf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="DqBVCtSf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16F8AC2BD10; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:30:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719153026; bh=JeDwnT/5o/t4SulflNylysZnroxPO1yMnY77AG2371A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DqBVCtSf3tjapxospQEitqB5uuhOSm4oGAc1Ni+y2Rys1edgdAKLj+JaB08lprST1 qkSXfGGjdWmXUJYlykuN9lXzjiip2fWrWNUAPz4ImJLoJHSA8HpJtIZ2LE4+OalJCI GlTRVLwec7QN9icUAXUX0iGUPiINVHC39FO+lSGRiTaNLxwz1/sfjXjRDPyg3PoYWg oUYVz+xJN9I61XouX9Xx1R95LKe60Q7wlmsIn5yahzXiI8/fTs/cda70Iw0yRpuJhH YSKZauQfLmiNFP31GxuOTSCJ4eMwOfZp3/WNu+1aPIpyD5iOUcCfvZlVe3mGT/M6gt 0+BrPo78XOR0g== Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 15:30:22 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Kaustabh Chakraborty , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, denis.ciocca@st.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] dt-bindings: iio: st-sensors: add LIS2DS12 accelerometer Message-ID: <20240623-lure-rubber-27c1f8f7ec66@spud> References: <20240622123520.39253-1-kauschluss@disroot.org> <20240622123520.39253-2-kauschluss@disroot.org> <20240623110305.5d961052@jic23-huawei> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="N3AVEEhuL/WRSAO2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240623110305.5d961052@jic23-huawei> --N3AVEEhuL/WRSAO2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 11:03:05AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 18:03:46 +0530 > Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote: >=20 > > LIS2DS12 is an accelerometer by STMicroelectronics. It is identifiable = by > > its WhoAmI value 0x43. > >=20 > > Its register interface is not compatible with existing parts. For examp= le: > >=20 > > - The full-scale values are present in register 0x20, in bits 2 and 3 > > (mask 0x0c). Most other supported sensors have the register address s= et > > to 0x21, 0x23, 0x24, or 0x25. There is one sensor setting though > > (bearing WhoAmI 0x3b) which has it's address set to 0x20, but the mas= k is > > set to 0x20, not 0x0c. > >=20 > > - The full-scale values 2G, 4G, 8G, and 16G correspond to the register > > values 0x00, 0x02, 0x03, 0x01 respectively. None of the sensor settin= gs > > have the value 0x01 associated with 16G. > >=20 > > Add the compatible string without any fallback. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty > Given the only requested change was this description and everyone seemed > happy with it in previous thread, I'll pick this series up now. ye, fine in my books. I should've prob acked explicitly when I assented to the wording on the previous version. --N3AVEEhuL/WRSAO2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZngxfgAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0prlAP9WTLKrzFB6YvuKX+72fa1nL+hHQqEIJZPBPwETp0JN8wEA52l724nen/9Z htbZbuUUNvAmtYwn1ng3PA1CE2wZcwM= =+j52 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --N3AVEEhuL/WRSAO2--