From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: "Richard Zhu" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
"Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/10] PCI: imx6: Introduce SoC specific callbacks for controlling REFCLK
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 21:34:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240630160404.GA5264@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240617-pci2_upstream-v6-4-e0821238f997@nxp.com>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 04:16:40PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> Instead of using the switch case statement to enable/disable the reference
> clock handled by this driver itself, let's introduce a new callback
> set_ref_clk() and define it for platforms that require it. This simplifies
Should this be called 'enable_ref_clk' since the callback is supposed to enable
REFCLK?
> the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index 47134e2dfecf2..ff9d0098294fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct imx_pcie_drvdata {
> const u32 mode_mask[IMX_PCIE_MAX_INSTANCES];
> const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
> int (*init_phy)(struct imx_pcie *pcie);
> + int (*set_ref_clk)(struct imx_pcie *pcie, bool enable);
> };
>
> struct imx_pcie {
> @@ -585,21 +586,19 @@ static int imx_pcie_attach_pd(struct device *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int imx_pcie_enable_ref_clk(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
> +static int imx6sx_pcie_set_ref_clk(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool enable)
> {
> - unsigned int offset;
> - int ret = 0;
> + regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12, IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN,
> + enable ? 0 : IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN);
>
> - switch (imx_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> - case IMX6SX:
> - regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12,
> - IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN, 0);
> - break;
> - case IMX6QP:
> - case IMX6Q:
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx6q_pcie_set_ref_clk(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool enable)
> +{
> + if (enable) {
> /* power up core phy and enable ref clock */
> - regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> - IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD, 0 << 18);
> + regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1, IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD, 0);
> /*
> * the async reset input need ref clock to sync internally,
> * when the ref clock comes after reset, internal synced
> @@ -608,54 +607,34 @@ static int imx_pcie_enable_ref_clk(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
> */
> usleep_range(10, 100);
> regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> - IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN, 1 << 16);
> - break;
> - case IMX7D:
> - case IMX95:
> - case IMX95_EP:
> - break;
> - case IMX8MM:
> - case IMX8MM_EP:
> - case IMX8MQ:
> - case IMX8MQ_EP:
> - case IMX8MP:
> - case IMX8MP_EP:
> - offset = imx_pcie_grp_offset(imx_pcie);
> - /*
> - * Set the over ride low and enabled
> - * make sure that REF_CLK is turned on.
> - */
> - regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, offset,
> - IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE,
> - 0);
> - regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, offset,
> - IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE_EN,
> - IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE_EN);
> - break;
> + IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN, IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN);
> + } else {
> + regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> + IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN, 0);
> + regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> + IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD, IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD);
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> -static void imx_pcie_disable_ref_clk(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
> +static int imx8mm_pcie_set_ref_clk(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool enable)
> {
> - switch (imx_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> - case IMX6QP:
> - case IMX6Q:
> - regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> - IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN, 0);
> - regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> - IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD,
> - IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD);
> - break;
> - case IMX7D:
> - regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12,
> - IMX7D_GPR12_PCIE_PHY_REFCLK_SEL,
> - IMX7D_GPR12_PCIE_PHY_REFCLK_SEL);
> - break;
> - default:
> - break;
> - }
> + int offset = imx_pcie_grp_offset(imx_pcie);
> +
> + /* Set the over ride low and enabled make sure that REF_CLK is turned on.*/
This comment provides no useful info. So please remove it.
> + regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, offset, IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE,
> + enable ? 0 : IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE);
> + regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, offset, IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE_EN,
> + enable ? IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE_EN : 0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx7d_pcie_set_ref_clk(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool enable)
> +{
> + regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12, IMX7D_GPR12_PCIE_PHY_REFCLK_SEL,
> + enable ? 0 : IMX7D_GPR12_PCIE_PHY_REFCLK_SEL);
> + return 0;
Previously imx6_pcie_enable_ref_clk() was bailing out for IMX7D. But now you are
explicitly enabling it. What is the reason?
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-30 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-17 20:16 [PATCH v6 00/10] PCI: imx6: Fix\rename\clean up and add lut information for imx95 Frank Li
2024-06-17 20:16 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] PCI: imx6: Fix establish link failure in EP mode for iMX8MM and iMX8MP Frank Li
2024-06-29 12:23 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-17 20:16 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] PCI: imx6: Fix i.MX8MP PCIe EP's occasional failure to trigger MSI Frank Li
2024-06-29 13:05 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-01 18:32 ` Frank Li
2024-07-06 17:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-17 20:16 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] PCI: imx6: Rename imx6_* with imx_* Frank Li
2024-06-17 20:16 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] PCI: imx6: Introduce SoC specific callbacks for controlling REFCLK Frank Li
2024-06-30 16:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-06-17 20:16 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] PCI: imx6: Simplify switch-case logic by involve core_reset callback Frank Li
2024-06-30 16:10 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-17 20:16 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] PCI: imx6: Improve comment for workaround ERR010728 Frank Li
2024-06-30 16:13 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-01 0:10 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-06-17 20:16 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] PCI: imx6: Consolidate redundant if-checks Frank Li
2024-06-17 20:16 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add i.MX8Q pcie compatible string Frank Li
2024-06-17 20:16 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] PCI: imx6: Call: Common PHY API to set mode, speed, and submode Frank Li
2024-06-30 16:23 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-08 16:01 ` Frank Li
2024-06-17 20:16 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] PCI: imx6: Add i.MX8Q PCIe root complex (RC) support Frank Li
2024-06-30 16:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-01 18:28 ` Frank Li
2024-06-25 14:47 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] PCI: imx6: Fix\rename\clean up and add lut information for imx95 Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240630160404.GA5264@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).