From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F587404F; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 12:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719836319; cv=none; b=lHiRrpVvbiy/B4o8SRA2vRllcoBXRgD7aWSHXtjBPZ/30G/10T4HBU9G9O2RqaElpC2M1CMWP070vJbcouuh76ekBw+VpC22+9Qao/pppiVm2uxn94TpRBdFVxpsMmq9MRT5OXBhvfbXO9AAvqvJxkj5tK5XwdJ0PyMQ9sRrEtg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719836319; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ngfLZvGV6uNktSmrI51yAbmgEtk/48MHEWS6ypeymyk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hb5Bsj2n7/MQevw6WFpuqPnHIqMneAChBiRNpZzAJLODZy2IVqaSPPQAJKVSwoGJJ1neBybMEJymReIjlMns5mS1jh/6JOze1Ml9089JKkWcD11HN00dxYamWI3OhyRRlFQSIE4UdxmWqhdlpPPlSb7MNGhW5oxoijbC7vnezZs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MT4f8WEL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MT4f8WEL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43F0AC116B1; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 12:18:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719836318; bh=ngfLZvGV6uNktSmrI51yAbmgEtk/48MHEWS6ypeymyk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MT4f8WELSRTQzhacSmF5U6XENMjFHm/V1ehqU/8RQFmoiEN3M63QkYwdNIWGpjjax 50w04mD01aEgUvzPqhwE9/T2zPRk7wM+W5iKB5J/erAhOnGYleoUgb9HiJLqWE0hbC nmFwK9jcUAAntb0ckGzTNW9W3jCgXSn3MkAniGaWpnjQJ1sVvwICrz+oGmz5MX2Zav utyhyQzEuZ/Wxg8UjLI2d5IKmLKb7RWTy7YokMimNoOL7JKFR91JzTSIFmlLwKy80F ri8F2stJDEOBoLd06AjZeRBIv3wyFPFklCjBTYrfos0Z6KZZcRld7ffXfLJf5AbOwX ysxOybwj3We0Q== Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 13:18:35 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Minda Chen Cc: "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: starfive: add pcie1 on the star64 Message-ID: <20240701-jaundice-enroll-1473aecce983@spud> References: <20240626-traverse-excitable-a1d9be38a9da@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xupLm0cCcA85XjGZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --xupLm0cCcA85XjGZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 10:45:15AM +0000, Minda Chen wrote: >=20 >=20 > >=20 > > From: Conor Dooley > >=20 > > It was reported to me that the star64 actually /does/ have an exposed P= CIe port, > > despite the commit message there. In my original conversation with Mind= a, > > they said that pcie1 was available there and pcie0 was not, but the v2 = patch > > didn't actually add pcie1 on the star64. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley > > --- > > I think I'll just squash this in and fixup the commit message, since th= e patch is still > > at the top of my branch. > >=20 > > CC: Minda Chen > > CC: Conor Dooley > > CC: Rob Herring , > > CC: Emil Renner Berthing > CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski > CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > > CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > CC: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > > --- > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-pine64-star64.dts | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > >=20 > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-pine64-star64.dts > > b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-pine64-star64.dts > > index 2d41f18e0359..b720cdd15ed6 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-pine64-star64.dts > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-pine64-star64.dts > > @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ phy1: ethernet-phy@1 { > > }; > > }; > >=20 > > +&pcie1 { > > + status =3D "okay"; > > +}; > > + > > &phy0 { > > rx-internal-delay-ps =3D <1900>; > > tx-internal-delay-ps =3D <1500>; > > -- > > 2.43.0 >=20 > Hi Conor >=20 > The jh7110-pine64-star64.dts is in linux-next tree. I have not noticed it= before. > Should I squash this to my patch? Can my dts patch be accepted in kernel = 6.11? Thanks > (The same with Starfive PCIe patch set in linux-next, which will be merge= in 6.11, right?) I already applied your patch, I'll squash this into your patch and queue the result for 6.11. Thanks, Conor. --xupLm0cCcA85XjGZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZoKemwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0hl5AP4tq/0cGJ4J8cwlO45COR2B2WBVRKqZ2766zlqVGyzPxAD/UBj0CMvcQrG6 TqLmV/Av2kgk7raSUv6G+/bKAKfz7gw= =OgkJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xupLm0cCcA85XjGZ--