Re: [PATCH 14/17] dt-bindings: soc: microchip: mpfs-sys-controller: Add PIC64GX compatibility

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1665 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 01:16:06PM +0100, pierre-henry.moussay@microchip.com wrote:
> From: Pierre-Henry Moussay <pierre-henry.moussay@microchip.com>
> 
> PIC64GX is compatible with mpfs-sys-controller driver without additional
> feature

Bindings are about hardware, not drivers. Are you sure a fallback is
appropriate here? Does the system controller expose the same features as
it does on PolarFire SoC? For example, FPGA reprogramming: the driver
creates a platform device to which the auto update driver is bound - I
don't think that that is appropriate on a pic64gx.

Thanks,
Conor.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Henry Moussay <pierre-henry.moussay@microchip.com>
> ---
>  .../soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml        | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml
> index a3fa04f3a1bd..af89d5959747 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml
> @@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ properties:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
>    compatible:
> -    const: microchip,mpfs-sys-controller
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - const: microchip,pic64gx-sys-controller
> +          - const: microchip,mpfs-sys-controller
> +      - const: microchip,mpfs-sys-controller
>  
>    microchip,bitstream-flash:
>      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]