From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"David Jander" <david@protonic.nl>,
"Martin Sperl" <kernel@martin.sperl.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/9] spi: add basic support for SPI offloading
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:15:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240727141512.6dfecc03@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240722-dlech-mainline-spi-engine-offload-2-v3-2-7420e45df69b@baylibre.com>
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:57:09 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> SPI offloading is a feature that allows the SPI controller to perform
> transfers without any CPU intervention. This is useful, e.g. for
> high-speed data acquisition.
>
> This patch adds the basic infrastructure to support SPI offloading. It
> introduces new callbacks that are to be implemented by controllers with
> offload capabilities.
>
> On SPI device probe, the standard spi-offloads devicetree property is
> parsed and passed to the controller driver to reserve the resources
> requested by the peripheral via the map_channel() callback.
>
> The peripheral driver can then use spi_offload_prepare() to load a SPI
> message into the offload hardware.
>
> If the controller supports it, this message can then be passed to the
> SPI message queue as if it was a normal message. Future patches will
> will also implement a way to use a hardware trigger to start the message
> transfers rather than going through the message queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
A few trivial comments inline.
J
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> index d4da5464dbd0..d01b2e5c8c44 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -2477,6 +2477,51 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi,
> of_spi_parse_dt_cs_delay(nc, &spi->cs_hold, "spi-cs-hold-delay-ns");
> of_spi_parse_dt_cs_delay(nc, &spi->cs_inactive, "spi-cs-inactive-delay-ns");
>
> + /* Offloads */
Might be good to factor this out as a little utility function.
> + rc = of_count_phandle_with_args(nc, "spi-offloads", "#spi-offload-cells");
> + if (rc > 0) {
> + int num_offload = rc;
> +
> + if (!ctlr->offload_ops) {
> + dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "SPI controller doesn't support offloading\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + for (idx = 0; idx < num_offload; idx++) {
> + struct of_phandle_args args;
> + const char *offload_name = NULL;
> +
> + rc = of_parse_phandle_with_args(nc, "spi-offloads",
> + "#spi-offload-cells",
> + idx, &args);
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to parse offload phandle %d: %d\n",
> + idx, rc);
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + if (args.np != ctlr->dev.of_node) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "Offload phandle %d is not for this SPI controller\n",
> + idx);
> + of_node_put(args.np);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + of_property_read_string_index(nc, "spi-offload-names",
> + idx, &offload_name);
Check for errors? If not, perhaps a comment on why not.
> +
> + rc = ctlr->offload_ops->map_channel(spi, offload_name,
> + args.args,
> + args.args_count);
> + of_node_put(args.np);
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to map offload channel %d: %d\n",
> + value, rc);
> + return rc;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
...
> +/**
> + * spi_offload_prepare - prepare offload hardware for a transfer
> + * @spi: The spi device to use for the transfers.
> + * @id: Function ID if SPI device uses more than one offload or NULL.
> + * @msg: The SPI message to use for the offload operation.
> + *
> + * Requests an offload instance with the specified ID and programs it with the
> + * provided message.
> + *
> + * The message must not be pre-optimized (do not call spi_optimize_message() on
> + * the message).
> + *
> + * Calls must be balanced with spi_offload_unprepare().
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, else a negative error code.
> + */
> +int spi_offload_prepare(struct spi_device *spi, const char *id,
> + struct spi_message *msg)
> +{
> + struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!ctlr->offload_ops)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + msg->offload = true;
I'd set this later perhaps as...
> +
> + ret = spi_optimize_message(spi, msg);
> + if (ret)
It otherwise needs clearing here so it doesn't have side
effects if an error occurs.
> + return ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ctlr->io_mutex);
> + ret = ctlr->offload_ops->prepare(spi, id, msg);
> + mutex_unlock(&ctlr->io_mutex);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + spi_unoptimize_message(msg);
> + msg->offload = false;
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_offload_prepare);
...
> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> index d7a16e0adf44..4998b48ea7fd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct spi_transfer;
...
> @@ -1122,6 +1127,7 @@ struct spi_transfer {
> * @pre_optimized: peripheral driver pre-optimized the message
> * @optimized: the message is in the optimized state
> * @prepared: spi_prepare_message was called for the this message
> + * @offload: message is to be used with offload hardware
> * @status: zero for success, else negative errno
> * @complete: called to report transaction completions
> * @context: the argument to complete() when it's called
> @@ -1131,6 +1137,7 @@ struct spi_transfer {
> * @queue: for use by whichever driver currently owns the message
> * @state: for use by whichever driver currently owns the message
> * @opt_state: for use by whichever driver currently owns the message
> + * @offload_state: for use by whichever driver currently owns the message
> * @resources: for resource management when the SPI message is processed
> *
> * A @spi_message is used to execute an atomic sequence of data transfers,
> @@ -1159,6 +1166,8 @@ struct spi_message {
>
> /* spi_prepare_message() was called for this message */
> bool prepared;
> + /* spi_offload_prepare() was called on this message */
> + bool offload;
offloaded? To match with prepared.
>
> /*
> * REVISIT: we might want a flag affecting the behavior of the
> @@ -1191,6 +1200,11 @@ struct spi_message {
> * __spi_optimize_message() and __spi_unoptimize_message().
> */
> void *opt_state;
> + /*
> + * Optional state for use by controller driver between calls to
> + * offload_ops->prepare() and offload_ops->unprepare().
> + */
> + void *offload_state;
>
> /* List of spi_res resources when the SPI message is processed */
> struct list_head resources;
> @@ -1556,6 +1570,49 @@ static inline ssize_t spi_w8r16be(struct spi_device *spi, u8 cmd)
>
> /*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
> +/*
> + * Offloading support.
> + *
> + * Some SPI controllers support offloading of SPI transfers. Essentially,
> + * this allows the SPI controller to record SPI transfers and then play them
> + * back later in one go via a single trigger.
> + */
> +
> +/**
> + * struct spi_controller_offload_ops - callbacks for offload support
> + *
> + * Drivers for hardware with offload support need to implement all of these
> + * callbacks.
> + */
> +struct spi_controller_offload_ops {
> + /**
> + * @map_channel: Required callback to reserve an offload instance for
> + * the given SPI device. If a SPI device requires more than one instance,
> + * then @id is used to differentiate between them. Channels must be
> + * unmapped in the struct spi_controller::cleanup() callback.
Probably a good idea to talk about possible return values as well.
> + */
> + int (*map_channel)(struct spi_device *spi, const char *id,
> + const unsigned int *args, unsigned int num_args);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-27 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-22 21:57 [PATCH RFC v3 0/9] spi: axi-spi-engine: add offload support David Lechner
2024-07-22 21:57 ` [PATCH RFC v3 1/9] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-offload properties David Lechner
2024-07-26 11:47 ` Rob Herring
2024-07-22 21:57 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/9] spi: add basic support for SPI offloading David Lechner
2024-07-23 7:44 ` Nuno Sá
2024-07-27 13:15 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-07-30 19:35 ` David Lechner
2024-08-03 9:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22 21:57 ` [PATCH RFC v3 3/9] spi: add support for hardware triggered offload David Lechner
2024-07-23 7:53 ` Nuno Sá
2024-07-23 14:30 ` David Lechner
2024-07-24 12:59 ` Nuno Sá
2024-07-27 13:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22 21:57 ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/9] spi: add offload TX/RX streaming APIs David Lechner
2024-07-22 21:57 ` [PATCH RFC v3 5/9] spi: dt-bindings: axi-spi-engine: document spi-offloads David Lechner
2024-07-26 12:38 ` Rob Herring
2024-07-26 19:17 ` David Lechner
2024-08-14 15:58 ` Conor Dooley
2024-08-14 17:14 ` David Lechner
2024-07-22 21:57 ` [PATCH RFC v3 6/9] spi: axi-spi-engine: implement offload support David Lechner
2024-07-23 8:01 ` Nuno Sá
2024-07-23 14:19 ` David Lechner
2024-07-24 13:07 ` Nuno Sá
2024-07-22 21:57 ` [PATCH RFC v3 7/9] iio: buffer-dmaengine: generalize requesting DMA channel David Lechner
2024-07-27 13:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22 21:57 ` [PATCH RFC v3 8/9] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad7944: add SPI offload properties David Lechner
2024-07-22 21:57 ` [PATCH RFC v3 9/9] iio: adc: ad7944: add support for SPI offload David Lechner
2024-07-23 8:22 ` Nuno Sá
2024-07-27 13:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-23 7:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 0/9] spi: axi-spi-engine: add offload support Nuno Sá
2024-07-23 13:48 ` David Lechner
2024-07-24 13:16 ` Nuno Sá
2024-07-23 8:58 ` Conor Dooley
2024-08-14 16:06 ` Conor Dooley
2024-09-05 11:33 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240727141512.6dfecc03@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david@protonic.nl \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=kernel@martin.sperl.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).