From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D30A155CB3; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722358204; cv=none; b=jsEUrfzLKpU7oOckTFlOKbQRZD5J/RqIQ4qR0ewrvP4uiAwOHxXoUwsMcjrMY4t5NQb3TxC8XjcdgVWrbJU+7eM8wliF8ZDevtKBkFiOvUbRVYAXEabO4c2LYxJ1j6ZDq7I3opweJxXQivEy/b2gwk7iHKUBQPPia4deA+1yA9Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722358204; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r3X8C/3sWlCsyEECb963nRYST3e36OQCZGpGejhXErU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UV6AVJIAEo58YMNPNTM+HES3reTvBMa1McS+MTbO6C7RWkQ3Rmhr9RghGJcW0kz717ZJda5N/ZbXCaHupV0yiA/3OOW/LX0d/63Pe8vzps4a7t8cB0rQAJYDZNi641A46Ah+aMfUbXSVj5scfdFDiBHcTexD8HdFEk9mpdmHGo0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ko3XZPEd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ko3XZPEd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE6B2C4AF0F; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:50:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1722358204; bh=r3X8C/3sWlCsyEECb963nRYST3e36OQCZGpGejhXErU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ko3XZPEdtdl2sPr6s46xPFbd66QXg+miej6Cbb1GsG7uIIPEsup07vHsotmwHVoOB essYkhUabKD4F8O7z3jtNn/S0QHbBE4PPv5/AzRZjgjJC5O1U3Ppa56X4N+Butlnkt 0K1Zws/MmxgMirLHC6tUgdXbniQGKXvNGZcZ7dcBsBBJ1RD/0aaE8VdfgjkMaGqNAL DQMtIXgDQZk+uc2klppC42Uup+oafEGnEfIK0UyATrQVagWUjbMn7BV1HjBwj8Zh3y SBTAHM7c74Cij2tOr/CemKxTtcm9dy274vhurvWGkgVqy7J9z/0ievfXL3qZ4JqTNn RGx1+0o3z71vA== Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:50:02 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Varshini Rajendran Cc: lee@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, ychuang3@nuvoton.com, schung@nuvoton.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/27] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: add microchip's sam9x7 sfr Message-ID: <20240730165002.GA1508552-robh@kernel.org> References: <20240729065603.1986074-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com> <20240729070603.1990265-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240729070603.1990265-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:36:03PM +0530, Varshini Rajendran wrote: > Add compatible for sam9x7 SoC's SFR. That's (kind of) obvious from the diff. How is the block on the new SoC the same or different from the prior chip? It's kind of strange that one of these blocks which tend to be register bit soup of left over controls would be the same or a superset of another SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran > --- > Changes in v6: > > - New patch in v6 as the syscon devices are moved to a new file > upstream. > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml | 188 +++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-) Put this in your own schema file. I don't think we want get into more complicated cases here. Rob