From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10B074D5A2; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 12:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723379291; cv=none; b=fkU0fsoXGVHs2DRvCSpTEs7HkIAFFM5RqRlEGdaVtKDOSLK7SjeYsrKyomoPz3r29c3XPUUEAuxH+aDh36e7yQdtctxTpkgOx1w4Ah+3HdLQQzh1Nn3hlSCrRtUixIhtyK3eTlYTdDu2D9tGVOHyLfUmC927o0Rg6XIpRbFh8TA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723379291; c=relaxed/simple; bh=myINd92mK7N+lJXX188asMi3yAV6ZM9LCZIFfM5I/Ss=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hHv3s5GR5Jc+CTd5rMlOJxHzWNkbS5CwNhoE5a5vYVHnLf6964wcVwcHwLFsfOpZuYuzgukU+HveQgTyeTzs+BNLtRQpJkdBV+sKgpWtkRUEgzH9puFY+9BtfRdUhDnxLM2ZtAObtwh+vZOW6BkVnJb0MA4fLL7mV0KmsG6LGDQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=TGKyUjvk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="TGKyUjvk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1723379290; x=1754915290; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=myINd92mK7N+lJXX188asMi3yAV6ZM9LCZIFfM5I/Ss=; b=TGKyUjvk0LL3RGdXM80wZipWSsz4XD9w5tDSomNLDjefSh9M+ymoRHLp g6gY9iYG1d7sNl7RkdQVYZgKguxqYCHDAgrEwGu+ysn1UC2rR1+ns/Pp3 2HdTsLqNqeEjC4Egfr9VFZ49douyb4rqVn14T6CEdzbV73V1dJ3Nm83IT 3oQnz1HdiLxXZrGOsi1A5UupHVT8KlcFBRgg1bzhjYQ3IKBXtjPYO9pV5 iXcITrWYwIaXwPpzj/4Je94nH5qsA8FnShdNdYPyQEpu6xTDsEDDra83a Z5uyQccet62A6PQInpablUn0T5Q2zo+JnL4Wqiq5Y7E+nXTSJTU9zYdyq w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: FtsSRg14R2SjGYUNouL8mg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4uFewO0uTBW34B/B5eAn3Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11161"; a="25262665" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,281,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="25262665" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Aug 2024 05:28:07 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fm/ti8VLQfGddUKzExIY+A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Cj/8OOLkTYunIQPmt7lIjw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,281,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="62932466" Received: from unknown (HELO b6bf6c95bbab) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Aug 2024 05:28:04 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b6bf6c95bbab with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sd7g1-000ApH-2s; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 12:28:01 +0000 Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 20:27:48 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Florian Fainelli , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Florian Fainelli , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Sudeep Holla , Cristian Marussi , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, justin.chen@broadcom.com, kapil.hali@broadcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Support 'reg-io-width' property for shared memory Message-ID: <202408112013.dn8y7Fg4-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240810214621.14417-3-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240810214621.14417-3-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> Hi Florian, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on next-20240809] [cannot apply to robh/for-next soc/for-next linus/master v6.11-rc2 v6.11-rc1 v6.10 v6.11-rc2] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Florian-Fainelli/dt-bindings-sram-Document-reg-io-width-property/20240811-055659 base: next-20240809 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240810214621.14417-3-florian.fainelli%40broadcom.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Support 'reg-io-width' property for shared memory config: sh-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240811/202408112013.dn8y7Fg4-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240811/202408112013.dn8y7Fg4-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408112013.dn8y7Fg4-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c: In function 'shmem_tx_prepare': >> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:39:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'iowrite64'; did you mean 'iowrite32'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 39 | iowrite##s(((u##s *)(xfer->tx.buf))[i / shmem_io_width], \ | ^~~~~~~ drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:98:25: note: in expansion of macro '__shmem_copy_toio_tpl' 98 | __shmem_copy_toio_tpl(64); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +39 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c 36 37 #define __shmem_copy_toio_tpl(s) \ 38 for (unsigned int i = 0; i < xfer->tx.len; i += shmem_io_width) \ > 39 iowrite##s(((u##s *)(xfer->tx.buf))[i / shmem_io_width], \ 40 shmem->msg_payload + i); 41 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki