From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D22201EF1D; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.198 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723646918; cv=none; b=gyOB11+WB0jIKUXPtM5X9wHFgIzej3OwLyitalZ+1Uuny0kZJW194sspr0e4IOXMaAO5Mzbb1/scoqgvR/hFHymor5CCtXiORdmUgyJNl/DChBaToQZWQAx6etKHGWr/xlZLg8eRwQms6KGQBYhxAwOVF7qRPm+HSG027/o99KE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723646918; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iBH/EKGzj7vcdFzXqvNwaURrKXDvWju/7ZkBckM/1Tk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BvByBV6gytBmTMpm2SqXLAgbu5911KkdRTx6aazhxndhYFBQvJkS9mOwIFHWQDWXZeNHa2Avj4pyBsxTq2CAuJesp4ecUSzeXfQ5pjyHjf9h06yo996sUvbMkqvmlb+azJFDK8s2Pj0ykwWmRB0D/Hfusfn5bpLXvQRB1FyWKxU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=bOwXC4O9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.198 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="bOwXC4O9" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D42FC0003; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:48:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1723646908; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vsvtyLqIUdSFch0aam54nIRgOyDlKRcYRX1ld/c3r+U=; b=bOwXC4O98tmMfIQq1u2pQCdj1qbCJxUlfYRCwaxA7rLeigiFBvaPYJcacO7Vqy9sjst+Z+ m2OYoiIBXIe07wKjZIG4mJ3hd3VPwyiimsu8iJdVX9WFUdvV7hUTNnAUyuLE2fa9+f1Blb 3bW+t66yPW4+znXAcPaB3l2axEr/MjtgmqG1K85/EQU+4msA6sxVlehpFZEK28PC0eVqcB LWCg49rd+G3Oa8enGhHnpyt2WtQYMezcqEDHRng/mi0uG+cbo53k4h1NjDJ1Cw+ezFqByM /ACgtMBMstUUEbpJRsiQQ1xC5RBetdOZzF/KkMrLZFWkCssqmHGP40HIfa2ZzA== Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:48:24 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Conor Dooley Cc: Keguang Zhang , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add Loongson-1 NAND Controller Message-ID: <20240814164824.5c4f18af@xps-13> In-Reply-To: <20240814-delicate-oil-d1eef61f0eda@spud> References: <20240808-loongson1-nand-v8-0-c96dea418b41@gmail.com> <20240808-loongson1-nand-v8-1-c96dea418b41@gmail.com> <20240808-backyard-unglue-3cf429ad8da5@spud> <20240809-smuggler-patrol-067003f0ba9b@spud> <20240814091231.1d9525be@xps-13> <20240814-delicate-oil-d1eef61f0eda@spud> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-Sasl: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com Hi Conor, conor@kernel.org wrote on Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:23:23 +0100: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 09:12:31AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Hi, > > =20 > > > > > When I first read "nfc" here I thought it was a copy-paste mistak= e, as > > > > > "nfc" is a technology of it's own. I think it would make sense to= rename > > > > > to "loongson,ls1b-nand-controller" etc to remove that sort of con= fusion. > > > > > These devices might not implement NFC, but what's to say that a f= uture > > > > > device will not? =20 > >=20 > > I believe the nfc (also, nc) abbreviation pre-dates the NFC spec. But I > > agree, it may be misleading. Even though I don't foresee any NAND > > controller with NFC coming, =20 >=20 > Hm, I think you misunderstood - I meant loongsoon SoCs that had nfc > controllers and nand controllers - not nand controllers with nfc! Ah! Well, yes, it may be even more misleading then :-) Cheers, Miqu=C3=A8l