From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bao Cheng Su <baocheng.su@siemens.com>,
Chao Zeng <chao.zeng@siemens.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: Add everlight pm16d17 binding
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 20:10:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240814200946.59bd8435@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6476e06cd8d1cf3aff6563530612c536cd45716.1723527641.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 07:40:41 +0200
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
> From: Chao Zeng <chao.zeng@siemens.com>
>
> Add the binding document for the everlight pm16d17 sensor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Zeng <chao.zeng@siemens.com>
> Co-developed-by: Baocheng Su <baocheng.su@siemens.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baocheng Su <baocheng.su@siemens.com>
hi Jan,
From a first read at least, almost everything in here
is stuff we should be controlling from the driver, not
providing as fixed values from firmware.
Specific comments inline.
Jonathan
> ---
> .../iio/proximity/everlight,pm16d17.yaml | 95 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/everlight,pm16d17.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/everlight,pm16d17.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/everlight,pm16d17.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..fadc3075181a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/everlight,pm16d17.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/proximity/everlight,pm16d17.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Everlight PM-16D17 Ambient Light & Proximity Sensor
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Chao Zeng <chao.zeng@siemens.com>
> +
> +description: |
> + This sensor uses standard I2C interface. Interrupt function is not covered.
> + Datasheet: https://en.everlight.com/sensor/category-proximity_sensor/digital_proximity_sensor/
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - everlight,pm16d17
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + ps-gain:
> + description: Receiver gain of proximity sensor
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + enum: [1, 2, 4, 8]
> + default: 1
This should I think be a userspace control.
Given it's not related to proximity as such, probably
in_proximity0_hardwaregain
> +
> + ps-itime:
> + description: Conversion time for proximity sensor [ms]
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> + enum:
> + - "0.4"
> + - "0.8"
> + - "1.6"
> + - "3.2"
> + - "6.3"
> + - "12.6"
> + - "25.2"
> + default: "0.4"
Definitely a userspace control. Is this actually integration time
which we'd expect to affect the hardwaregain or is it just
1/ frequency of sampling (with fixed integration time).
Looking at datasheet it's coupled to resolution which may
make this oversampling related. Hard to tell.
> +
> + ps-wtime:
> + description: Waiting time for proximity sensor [ms]
I guess the above was the integration time and this sets
the sampling_frequency. In that case definitely a userspace
thing, doesn't belong in DT.
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> + enum:
> + - "12.5"
> + - "25"
> + - "50"
> + - "100"
> + - "200"
> + - "400"
> + - "800"
> + - "1600"
> + default: "12.5"
> +
> + ps-ir-led-pulse-count:
> + description: IR LED drive pulse count
This needs more information. Why would this be changed?
Seems from datasheet that this is effectively a different
form of gain. Why would we choose one rather than the other?
Or are they both ways of increasing the overall sensitivity?
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + minimum: 1
> + maximum: 256
> + default: 1
> +
> + ps-offset-cancel:
> + description: |
> + When PS offset cancel function is enabled, the result of subtracting any
> + value specified by the PS offset cancel register from the internal PS
> + output data is written to the PS output data register.
That sounds like a calibbias userspace control, but more info needed.
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + default: 0
> + maximum: 65535
> +
As Conor mentioned, need to describe the hardware as fully as possible so interrupts
and power supplies (even if they are always on for your particular board)
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + i2c {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + lightsensor: pm16d17@44 {
> + compatible = "everlight,pm16d17";
> + reg = <0x44>;
> +
> + ps-gain = <1>;
> + ps-itime = "0.4";
> + ps-wtime = "12.5";
> + ps-ir-led-pulse-count = <1>;
> + ps-offset-cancel = <280>;
> + };
> + };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-14 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-13 5:40 [PATCH 0/3] iio: Add Everlight PM16D17 proximity sensor Jan Kiszka
2024-08-13 5:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add EVERLIGHT Jan Kiszka
2024-08-13 15:41 ` Conor Dooley
2024-08-13 15:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-13 15:53 ` Conor Dooley
2024-08-13 5:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: Add everlight pm16d17 binding Jan Kiszka
2024-08-13 15:52 ` Conor Dooley
2024-08-16 1:48 ` Li, Hua Qian
2024-08-16 16:11 ` Conor Dooley
2024-08-17 13:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-26 7:12 ` Li, Hua Qian
2024-08-26 9:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-14 19:10 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-08-15 8:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2024-08-13 5:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio: proximity: Add support for everlight pmd16d17 sensor Jan Kiszka
2024-08-15 5:51 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-15 21:54 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-17 14:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240814200946.59bd8435@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=baocheng.su@siemens.com \
--cc=chao.zeng@siemens.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox