From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFA5E13D260; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 21:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725311562; cv=none; b=K50RCm7hYyvpNZoGIjh8ygblbzuHGfsj+0Jm4WuoRaum01EMRn/QywOu4GA1XijjA3dCYZ8cZjlqJB0a8P52pJb71NMlMC612dmkdMxXUzwWDwcY+fCyFNpm857Q7iYv58rjpBBLs0PdThlBtGBk8bSzbG033LkdK8sBmJYJkbI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725311562; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lORzwTXT57dhMR/bpO4ifz86tt0oau7aGv/z53yqMO0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oJHe9HsUZN0JIXHh42QNf1x2Lu68vz3UQFAlG1Tc3hiFxzoAloILXoRqsNGEGuApQ3UW1urVKogFsHGBTWS8rdPPKffckkRc0tIfbdqhxFRsK6hB3KC5U6b34EeBEd4eXQba0jfUIEE8bYMLTEJSlWn8BUk+YNAVGcM7y//yJ3U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jg0uee8T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jg0uee8T" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8D4FC4CEC2; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 21:12:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1725311562; bh=lORzwTXT57dhMR/bpO4ifz86tt0oau7aGv/z53yqMO0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=jg0uee8T0ltCRUGD1+vdZHV/vbB3c/HU4kHMjKDCxwFNnHXuDy/8MtuUhiAJlv7Um h7L0kO+mzDv0sVQEq0Gw05RbsWfVldBEc30kzimFaE++oAAiXbQ0iMZOU8y7wmBP4L JG8f+UPARiORk54IZXT2rtx3gpqjmXMHZcm5J6aMrOva4K/Yrc2f2KlhhfmfzcylzS NAoRIfSrKNxKzRpMdqLq6pPT7ltEVj7o7hZYitqobbCvdVuJnxVHnbKeGS4dA3gCiH huMgIdf07m5vERDMH5l6B1dyl6XtW9oqlNfpeGaPUXu9bZIhrbWjrbWlPCiCz9kXk4 tBy7SRjo+AgxQ== Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 16:12:40 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Frank Li Cc: Richard Zhu , Lucas Stach , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Philipp Zabel , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] PCI: imx6: Fix establish link failure in EP mode for iMX8MM and iMX8MP Message-ID: <20240902211240.GA228125@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240729-pci2_upstream-v8-1-b68ee5ef2b4d@nxp.com> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 04:18:08PM -0400, Frank Li wrote: > From: Richard Zhu Maybe "iMX8MP" in this subject should be "i.MX8MP" as in the subject of the next patch? And if so, maybe it should be "i.MX8MM" here, too? That seems to match usage in the rest of the series (although "PCI: imx6: Add i.MX8Q PCIe Root Complex (RC) support" uses "iMX8MP" once in the commit log).