Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for J742S2 SoCs and Boards

[Manorit Chawdhry <m-chawdhry@ti.com>]

Hi Siddharth,

On 12:28-20240903, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 05:56:51PM +0530, Manorit Chawdhry wrote:
> > Add devicetree bindings for J742S2 family of devices.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manorit Chawdhry <m-chawdhry@ti.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Notes:
> >     v6: No change
> > 
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
> > index 5df99e361c21..b0be02f9d125 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
> > @@ -144,6 +144,12 @@ properties:
> >                - ti,j722s-evm
> >            - const: ti,j722s
> >  
> > +      - description: K3 J742S2 SoC
> 
> Is it J742S2 or J742s2? The naming seems to be inconsistent considering
> that it is a lowercase 's' for J784s4 below.

Even am not sure... I see the above one using J722S and there are
examples like AM62A7 as well, can see the majority being capitalized.
The delta's are AM62x, J784s4 and J721s2. I believe they should be
capitalized correctly if we need to go for any change.

Regards,
Manorit