From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F0CA47; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 04:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726116099; cv=none; b=sY5lZqI8LkCxEUuIRil3TGhxXSbxFhAm5COjNnURaNHjXk46GLz7YmodwfzFvkFzBJd+70bRUlJdwLP3X5OafFr1gR5MQmVf65zweYBuEerZQJDe7XdNHol1LYCaxr1fbAmwxjnMkVjscgrJl9Ok0S+Wm8axxzK9WRvEH/HqcSc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726116099; c=relaxed/simple; bh=J+voR34oci4p2IIVjc3qd0YparHlcuZTim//SkaanKw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FOkjP5rKW3CGq9iEWpUhjU73FfevahILjZE5PkGo4w1MHbX9HBUprzzZWQr836g7A4YJxh/ASz5FrnXVso1T+oJNEqTJqShTdoEbHOmv3IoqaWXbXH7ksaj3nM1+sZdm9bU2a9w09LicGtz449AvUufGebfNkD6tA3v3i1n9yyk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=eyjbzGUw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="eyjbzGUw" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726116097; x=1757652097; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=J+voR34oci4p2IIVjc3qd0YparHlcuZTim//SkaanKw=; b=eyjbzGUwP1GKQ4eBBwoFd2UzDTWgN9y9cHylvnUaRFDhoggC7u8yj3GU VcjG9T0Q0uXyOfeynrEZXqS8QmVFPiwo/fNKqfMhPi1zIXyAf53r8K1X4 3wvCPRQ+BfiNFGVQPbjteD1H1o/I7BDb5tjtqYLEdkXLeUb3ykbMWdhMh 4hxvypnE5s4n/CDcssRmSqoZr6vaELGTRV/p1LHy2cDcEJkPyuimVKAPG vSvp+3M26ZWEgoe8YA13UGxDKqAZAkfn102Hs5kDNJO/H+CD+7NOGIYp7 xAeansf3aj18fWGBclmc8O7lj4zYJNunoUS2ixDrK6PEq8jhFNZnSmAHV w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2VkQ9vXvSrakro1FHA+pfw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: X6bj7WsBTJinA+bvPauhkg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11192"; a="25051008" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,221,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="25051008" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Sep 2024 21:41:36 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: CwOQcPi0Rqy9ZzuC58xUVQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: bv3X29aXRbWeaiGw38nICg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,221,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="67822998" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 53e96f405c61) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2024 21:41:32 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 53e96f405c61 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sobe6-0004XK-1J; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 04:41:30 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:41:16 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Ciprian Costea , Alexandre Belloni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, NXP S32 Linux Team , Ciprian Marian Costea , Bogdan Hamciuc , Bogdan-Gabriel Roman , Ghennadi Procopciuc Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] rtc: s32g: add NXP S32G2/S32G3 SoC support Message-ID: <202409121103.EX9BTDFT-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240911070028.127659-3-ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240911070028.127659-3-ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com> Hi Ciprian, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on abelloni/rtc-next] [also build test WARNING on robh/for-next arm64/for-next/core linus/master v6.11-rc7 next-20240911] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ciprian-Costea/dt-bindings-rtc-add-schema-for-NXP-S32G2-S32G3-SoCs/20240911-150205 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git rtc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240911070028.127659-3-ciprianmarian.costea%40oss.nxp.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/4] rtc: s32g: add NXP S32G2/S32G3 SoC support config: sh-randconfig-r073-20240912 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240912/202409121103.EX9BTDFT-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240912/202409121103.EX9BTDFT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409121103.EX9BTDFT-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/rtc/rtc-s32g.c:668:34: warning: 'rtc_dt_ids' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 668 | static const struct of_device_id rtc_dt_ids[] = { | ^~~~~~~~~~ vim +/rtc_dt_ids +668 drivers/rtc/rtc-s32g.c 667 > 668 static const struct of_device_id rtc_dt_ids[] = { 669 {.compatible = "nxp,s32g-rtc" }, 670 { /* sentinel */ }, 671 }; 672 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki