devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
	Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	<chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/10] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:55:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240916115525.000078a3@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZugKHrzs5BWoDr1c@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 13:36:14 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 12:44:13PM +0200, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 12:25 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:  
> > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 03:27:44PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:  
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > +int i2c_of_probe_component(struct device *dev, const struct i2c_of_probe_cfg *cfg, void *ctx)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     const struct i2c_of_probe_ops *ops;
> > > > +     const char *type;
> > > > +     struct device_node *i2c_node;
> > > > +     struct i2c_adapter *i2c;
> > > > +     int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +     if (!cfg)
> > > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > +     ops = cfg->ops ?: &i2c_of_probe_dummy_ops;
> > > > +     type = cfg->type;
> > > > +
> > > > +     i2c_node = i2c_of_probe_get_i2c_node(dev, type);  
> > >
> > >
> > >         struct device_node *i2c_node __free(of_node_put) =
> > >                 i2c_...;  
> > 
> > cleanup.h says to not mix the two styles (scoped vs goto). I was trying
> > to follow that, though I realize now that with the scoped loops it
> > probably doesn't help.

The problem pattern is (IIUC)

	if (x)
		goto bob;

	struct device_node *i2c_node __free(of_node_put) = i2c_....


bob:
	return ret;


So a goto that jumps over registration of a cleanup function.

Jonathan

> > 
> > I'll revert back to having __free().
> >   
> > > > +     if (IS_ERR(i2c_node))
> > > > +             return PTR_ERR(i2c_node);
> > > > +
> > > > +     for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix(i2c_node, node, type) {
> > > > +             if (!of_device_is_available(node))
> > > > +                     continue;
> > > > +
> > > > +             /*
> > > > +              * Device tree has component already enabled. Either the
> > > > +              * device tree isn't supported or we already probed once.
> > > > +              */
> > > > +             ret = 0;  
> > >
> > > Shouldn't you drop reference count for "node"? (See also below)  
> > 
> > This for-each loop the "scoped". It just doesn't have the prefix anymore.
> > I believe you asked if the prefix could be dropped and then Rob agreed.  
> 
> Hmm... I have looked into the implementation and I haven't found the evidence
> that this is anyhow scoped. Can you point out what I have missed?
> 
> > > > +             goto out_put_i2c_node;
> > > > +     }
> > > > +
> > > > +     i2c = of_get_i2c_adapter_by_node(i2c_node);
> > > > +     if (!i2c) {
> > > > +             ret = dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "Couldn't get I2C adapter\n");
> > > > +             goto out_put_i2c_node;
> > > > +     }
> > > > +
> > > > +     /* Grab resources */
> > > > +     ret = 0;
> > > > +     if (ops->get_resources)
> > > > +             ret = ops->get_resources(dev, i2c_node, ctx);
> > > > +     if (ret)
> > > > +             goto out_put_i2c_adapter;
> > > > +
> > > > +     /* Enable resources */
> > > > +     if (ops->enable)
> > > > +             ret = ops->enable(dev, ctx);
> > > > +     if (ret)
> > > > +             goto out_release_resources;
> > > > +
> > > > +     ret = 0;
> > > > +     for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix(i2c_node, node, type) {
> > > > +             union i2c_smbus_data data;
> > > > +             u32 addr;
> > > > +
> > > > +             if (of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &addr))
> > > > +                     continue;
> > > > +             if (i2c_smbus_xfer(i2c, addr, 0, I2C_SMBUS_READ, 0, I2C_SMBUS_BYTE, &data) < 0)
> > > > +                     continue;
> > > > +
> > > > +             /* Found a device that is responding */
> > > > +             if (ops->free_resources_early)
> > > > +                     ops->free_resources_early(ctx);
> > > > +             ret = i2c_of_probe_enable_node(dev, node);  
> > >
> > > Hmm... Is "node" reference count left bumped up for a reason?  
> > 
> > Same as above.  
> 
> Same as above.
> 
> > > > +             break;
> > > > +     }
> > > > +
> > > > +     if (ops->cleanup)
> > > > +             ops->cleanup(dev, ctx);
> > > > +out_release_resources:
> > > > +     if (ops->free_resources_late)
> > > > +             ops->free_resources_late(ctx);
> > > > +out_put_i2c_adapter:
> > > > +     i2c_put_adapter(i2c);
> > > > +out_put_i2c_node:
> > > > +     of_node_put(i2c_node);
> > > > +
> > > > +     return ret;
> > > > +}  
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-16 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-11  7:27 [PATCH v7 00/10] platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] of: dynamic: Add of_changeset_update_prop_string Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] of: base: Add for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-12 20:31   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] regulator: Split up _regulator_get() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 10:27   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] regulator: Add of_regulator_get_optional() for pure DT regulator lookup Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] i2c: core: Remove extra space in Makefile Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 14:59   ` Andi Shyti
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 10:25   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-15 10:44     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 10:36       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-16 10:55         ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-09-16 14:59         ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 15:22           ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-13 23:43   ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-15 11:32     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 14:15       ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-16 14:31         ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 10:13     ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-15 10:09   ` Andrey Skvortsov
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] i2c: of-prober: Add simple helpers for regulator support Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 10:46   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-13 23:43   ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] i2c: of-prober: Add GPIO support to simple helpers Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 10:52   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-13 23:43   ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-17 12:41     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-23 19:11       ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-15  9:46   ` Andrey Skvortsov
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] platform/chrome: Introduce device tree hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 23:43   ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-16 14:58     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 15:23       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8173-elm-hana: Mark touchscreens and trackpads as fail Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 18:08 ` (subset) [PATCH v7 00/10] platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240916115525.000078a3@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=wenst@chromium.org \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).