devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: tony@atomide.com, Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] power: supply: initial support for TWL6030/32
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:43:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240918144325.0ccca89c@akair> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89a7e86b-8866-4148-9f9e-13ca84c1aede@kernel.org>

Am Wed, 18 Sep 2024 12:43:01 +0200
schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>:

[...]
> Drop {}, see checkpatch.
> 
> > +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> > +				     "could not request irq %d\n",
> > +				     charger->irq_chg);
> > +	}
> > +

Apparently checkpatch only moans about {} around single *lines*
not single *statements*, even with --strict.

Coding-style says single statements,  so maybe checkpatch should be
fixed?

Same for other appearance of this pattern.

> > +	/* turing to charging to configure things */
> > +	twl6030_charger_write(CONTROLLER_CTRL1, 0);
> > +	twl6030_charger_interrupt(0, charger);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id twl_charger_of_match[]
> > __maybe_unused = {
> > +	{.compatible = "ti,twl6030-charger", },
> > +	{.compatible = "ti,twl6032-charger", },  
> 
> So they are compatible? Why two entries in such case?
> 
There is one device_is_compatible() in the file.

Regrads,
Andreas

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-18 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-18  8:41 [PATCH 0/3] power: supply: twl6030/32 charger Andreas Kemnade
2024-09-18  8:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: power: supply: Add TI TWL603X charger Andreas Kemnade
2024-09-18 10:46   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-18  8:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: mfd: twl: add charger node also for TWL603x Andreas Kemnade
2024-09-18 10:47   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-18 11:35     ` Andreas Kemnade
2024-09-21  0:51     ` Rob Herring
2024-09-26  7:26       ` Andreas Kemnade
2024-09-18  8:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] power: supply: initial support for TWL6030/32 Andreas Kemnade
2024-09-18 10:43   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-18 12:43     ` Andreas Kemnade [this message]
2024-09-18 12:53       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-23 16:29     ` Andreas Kemnade
2024-09-24  8:00       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-18 21:11   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240918144325.0ccca89c@akair \
    --to=andreas@kemnade.info \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sre@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).