Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: support vcc-supply regulator

[Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>]

Hi Miquel,

On 24-09-30, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> peng.fan@oss.nxp.com wrote on Mon, 30 Sep 2024 17:22:25 +0800:
> 
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > 
> > SPI NOR flashes needs power supply to work properly. The power supply
> > maybe software controllable per board design. So add the support
> > for an vcc-supply regulator.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> > index 9d6e85bf227b..5249c8b13916 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/mtd/spi-nor.h>
> >  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >  #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
> >  #include <linux/sizes.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > @@ -3462,6 +3463,10 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name,
> >  	if (!nor->bouncebuf)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > +	ret = devm_regulator_get_enable(dev, "vcc");
> 
> 					_optional ?

The regulator optional API is different compared to other optional APIs.
If we would use optional here, we would need to check the returned error
code. On the other hand if the non optional API is used and the
regualtor is missing, a dummy regualtor is returned (as pointed out by
Marc).

Please see the _optional API doc to see more information about the
_optional usage.

Regards,
  Marco

> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> >  	ret = spi_nor_hw_reset(nor);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> > 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
>