From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2A282225D0; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728056668; cv=none; b=b6ubyyVAQhhjTKSjTw+iCnOsqjeHgaBwy04Vofmv3xgrOG4px/1h9CJlX/NnIbkQgxPsV2WfPKMwwZFsAklR3IMSJ+Rdq+HRQws6G8dp171dPf+lsE0G7iA7IRl5ZzVmAhMjqcxfPFiz0md83N+/sZg6WJfCakTKXDi7Uot24Xs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728056668; c=relaxed/simple; bh=g6L2Bd0g3xO/JW7h06BpQ1vhxFqlkDGXgOvZlFB2GyQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eeX+eh4xDdpepgZnfern3yzySj87mHheStqUR61uiDj4A1vQGxGPeqfm3ParXCS9RgS/fVKu3bkwG37n6sVpCfdJWeAG8WXq6L/wOWCh4b4a44JiCtKnUJZWfBCYjF9dfoLGGXrPpLovvgUjeqCE3x/TFxlgBZDZTSS4S8g3bd0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nLQGg7Vh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nLQGg7Vh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1052C4CEC6; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:44:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1728056668; bh=g6L2Bd0g3xO/JW7h06BpQ1vhxFqlkDGXgOvZlFB2GyQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nLQGg7Vh/tn2IRTrAxIRn5V40dXDv/GMXOCygwdLW5/hW6DtL+FS5wfMJdHCbwPes nKxn5p+kX8zYVVkYo9WQyoxISewuFRoNMlqNW4fvEfUD9ExEci9F/ee2tldOKxijZc 2rojaZkJNDEnm28gLd9yZWlG9aFBiau9vfboG/9y8Hvq1NpJ1zXt9d3SMaKYEGHwW0 7yY5tX3omTBSxHnFhLSOWG6Mbf5TcS7Ikj0ZzjCP3GkFEG1ecxRi8ebpD5dwHFcZfM LxldqVTk36BxwGVn3sCo6v0bakIUVo395jOte76YwrajrY4GD2s/Q4kMtPioe0rSxS QUf9yaldb85/g== Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 16:44:22 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Inochi Amaoto Cc: Chen Wang , Thomas Gleixner , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Peter Zijlstra , Inochi Amaoto , Guo Ren , Lad Prabhakar , Hal Feng , Heikki Krogerus , Geert Uytterhoeven , Yixun Lan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Sophgo SG2044 ACLINT SSWI Message-ID: <20241004-patronize-doily-8406fa214347@spud> References: <20241004080557.2262872-1-inochiama@gmail.com> <20241004080557.2262872-2-inochiama@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wpxj4kbF4P50H8T+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241004080557.2262872-2-inochiama@gmail.com> --wpxj4kbF4P50H8T+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 04:05:55PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > Sophgo SG2044 has a new version of T-HEAD C920, which implement > a fully featured ACLINT device. This ACLINT has an extra SSWI > field to support fast S-mode IPI. >=20 > Add necessary compatible string for the T-HEAD ACLINT sswi device. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto > --- > .../thead,c900-aclint-sswi.yaml | 58 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controlle= r/thead,c900-aclint-sswi.yaml >=20 > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/thead= ,c900-aclint-sswi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-contro= ller/thead,c900-aclint-sswi.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..0106fbf3ea1f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/thead,c900-a= clint-sswi.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interrupt-controller/thead,c900-aclin= t-sswi.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Sophgo sg2044 ACLINT Supervisor-level Software Interrupt Device > + > +maintainers: > + - Inochi Amaoto > + > +description: > + The SSWI device is a part of the riscv ACLINT device. It provides > + supervisor-level IPI functionality for a set of HARTs on a RISC-V > + platform. It provides a register to set an IPI (SETSSIP) for each > + HART connected to the SSWI device. If it is part of the aclint, why should it have a separate node, rather than be part of the existing aclint node as a third reg property? --wpxj4kbF4P50H8T+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZwANVgAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0l7VAQCcJwp5mlLQUBYVUFyXHgPf8BzF8Or/9vxp2k5AEk6RwQEA3f2kGou1G/QT TF05IWT4y9eslPEerl0gzCYGAYvw5Ao= =55Uy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wpxj4kbF4P50H8T+--