devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
	claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, xiaoning.wang@nxp.com, Frank.Li@nxp.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: enetc: optimize the allocation of tx_bdr
Date: Wed,  9 Oct 2024 17:51:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241009095116.147412-10-wei.fang@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241009095116.147412-1-wei.fang@nxp.com>

From: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>

There is a situation where num_tx_rings cannot be divided by
bdr_int_num. For example, num_tx_rings is 8 and bdr_int_num
is 3. According to the previous logic, this results in two
tx_bdr corresponding memories not being allocated, so when
sending packets to tx BD ring 6 or 7, wild pointers will be
accessed. Of course, this issue does not exist for LS1028A,
because its num_tx_rings is 8, and bdr_int_num is either 1
or 2. So there is no situation where it cannot be divided.
However, there is a risk for the upcoming i.MX95, so the
allocation of tx_bdr is optimized to ensure that each tx_bdr
can be allocated to the corresponding memory.

Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 121 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
index 032d8eadd003..b84c88a76762 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
@@ -2965,13 +2965,70 @@ int enetc_ioctl(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_ioctl);
 
+static int enetc_bdr_init(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int i, int v_tx_rings)
+{
+	struct enetc_int_vector *v __free(kfree);
+	struct enetc_bdr *bdr;
+	int j, err;
+
+	v = kzalloc(struct_size(v, tx_ring, v_tx_rings), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!v)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	bdr = &v->rx_ring;
+	bdr->index = i;
+	bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
+	bdr->dev = priv->dev;
+	bdr->bd_count = priv->rx_bd_count;
+	bdr->buffer_offset = ENETC_RXB_PAD;
+	priv->rx_ring[i] = bdr;
+
+	err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&bdr->xdp.rxq, priv->ndev, i, 0);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&bdr->xdp.rxq,
+					 MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED, NULL);
+	if (err) {
+		xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&bdr->xdp.rxq);
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	/* init defaults for adaptive IC */
+	if (priv->ic_mode & ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE) {
+		v->rx_ictt = 0x1;
+		v->rx_dim_en = true;
+	}
+	INIT_WORK(&v->rx_dim.work, enetc_rx_dim_work);
+	netif_napi_add(priv->ndev, &v->napi, enetc_poll);
+	v->count_tx_rings = v_tx_rings;
+
+	for (j = 0; j < v_tx_rings; j++) {
+		int idx;
+
+		/* default tx ring mapping policy */
+		idx = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
+		__set_bit(idx, &v->tx_rings_map);
+		bdr = &v->tx_ring[j];
+		bdr->index = idx;
+		bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
+		bdr->dev = priv->dev;
+		bdr->bd_count = priv->tx_bd_count;
+		priv->tx_ring[idx] = bdr;
+	}
+
+	priv->int_vector[i] = no_free_ptr(v);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = priv->si->pdev;
+	int v_tx_rings, v_remainder;
 	int num_stack_tx_queues;
 	int first_xdp_tx_ring;
 	int i, n, err, nvec;
-	int v_tx_rings;
 
 	nvec = ENETC_BDR_INT_BASE_IDX + priv->bdr_int_num;
 	/* allocate MSIX for both messaging and Rx/Tx interrupts */
@@ -2985,65 +3042,11 @@ int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
 
 	/* # of tx rings per int vector */
 	v_tx_rings = priv->num_tx_rings / priv->bdr_int_num;
+	v_remainder = priv->num_tx_rings % priv->bdr_int_num;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
-		struct enetc_int_vector *v;
-		struct enetc_bdr *bdr;
-		int j;
-
-		v = kzalloc(struct_size(v, tx_ring, v_tx_rings), GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!v) {
-			err = -ENOMEM;
-			goto fail;
-		}
-
-		priv->int_vector[i] = v;
-
-		bdr = &v->rx_ring;
-		bdr->index = i;
-		bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
-		bdr->dev = priv->dev;
-		bdr->bd_count = priv->rx_bd_count;
-		bdr->buffer_offset = ENETC_RXB_PAD;
-		priv->rx_ring[i] = bdr;
-
-		err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&bdr->xdp.rxq, priv->ndev, i, 0);
-		if (err) {
-			kfree(v);
-			goto fail;
-		}
-
-		err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&bdr->xdp.rxq,
-						 MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED, NULL);
-		if (err) {
-			xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&bdr->xdp.rxq);
-			kfree(v);
-			goto fail;
-		}
-
-		/* init defaults for adaptive IC */
-		if (priv->ic_mode & ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE) {
-			v->rx_ictt = 0x1;
-			v->rx_dim_en = true;
-		}
-		INIT_WORK(&v->rx_dim.work, enetc_rx_dim_work);
-		netif_napi_add(priv->ndev, &v->napi, enetc_poll);
-		v->count_tx_rings = v_tx_rings;
-
-		for (j = 0; j < v_tx_rings; j++) {
-			int idx;
-
-			/* default tx ring mapping policy */
-			idx = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
-			__set_bit(idx, &v->tx_rings_map);
-			bdr = &v->tx_ring[j];
-			bdr->index = idx;
-			bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
-			bdr->dev = priv->dev;
-			bdr->bd_count = priv->tx_bd_count;
-			priv->tx_ring[idx] = bdr;
-		}
-	}
+	for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++)
+		enetc_bdr_init(priv, i,
+			       i < v_remainder ? v_tx_rings + 1 : v_tx_rings);
 
 	num_stack_tx_queues = enetc_num_stack_tx_queues(priv);
 
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-09 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09  9:51 [PATCH net-next 00/11] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
2024-10-09  9:51 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] dt-bindings: net: add compatible string for i.MX95 EMDIO Wei Fang
2024-10-09 16:26   ` Frank Li
2024-10-10  1:42     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-09  9:51 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] dt-bindings: net: add i.MX95 ENETC support Wei Fang
2024-10-09 16:29   ` Frank Li
2024-10-09 20:53     ` Rob Herring
2024-10-10  2:14       ` Wei Fang
2024-10-10 15:16         ` Frank Li
2024-10-11  1:56           ` Wei Fang
2024-10-10  2:00     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-09  9:51 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control Wei Fang
2024-10-09 16:36   ` Frank Li
2024-10-10  2:10     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-09  9:51 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: enetc: add initial netc-blk-ctrl driver support Wei Fang
2024-10-09 17:02   ` Frank Li
2024-10-10  2:31     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-09  9:51 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] net: enetc: add enetc-pf-common " Wei Fang
2024-10-09 17:16   ` Frank Li
2024-10-10  3:19     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-10 14:16   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-10 17:10   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-13  2:27   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-09  9:51 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] net: enetc: only enable ERR050089 workaround on LS1028A Wei Fang
2024-10-09  9:51 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] PCI: Add NXP NETC vendor ID and device IDs Wei Fang
2024-10-10 19:34   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-11  2:06     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-09  9:51 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] net: enetc: add i.MX95 EMDIO support Wei Fang
2024-10-09  9:51 ` Wei Fang [this message]
2024-10-09 17:25   ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: enetc: optimize the allocation of tx_bdr Frank Li
2024-10-10  3:25     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-09  9:51 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF Wei Fang
2024-10-09 17:41   ` Frank Li
2024-10-10  4:59     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-10 15:22       ` Frank Li
2024-10-11  2:02         ` Wei Fang
2024-10-11  4:11           ` Frank Li
2024-10-11  7:16             ` Wei Fang
2024-10-14  9:06   ` Simon Horman
2024-10-14  9:13     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-09  9:51 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] MAINTAINERS: update ENETC driver files and maintainers Wei Fang
2024-10-10 19:20   ` Frank Li
2024-10-11  2:05     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-11  4:13       ` Frank Li
2024-10-11  7:29         ` Wei Fang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241009095116.147412-10-wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --to=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).