devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Rick Wertenbroek" <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
	"Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
	"Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Fix address translation unit programming
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 12:32:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241010070242.3i2f53kpdpr4fgl6@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007041218.157516-2-dlemoal@kernel.org>

On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 01:12:07PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> The rockchip PCIe endpoint controller handles PCIe transfers addresses
> by masking the lower bits of the programmed PCI address and using the
> same number of lower bits masked from the CPU address space used for the
> mapping. For a PCI mapping of <size> bytes starting from <pci_addr>,
> the number of bits masked is the number of address bits changing in the
> address range [pci_addr..pci_addr + size - 1].
> 
> However, rockchip_pcie_prog_ep_ob_atu() calculates num_pass_bits only
> using the size of the mapping, resulting in an incorrect number of mask
> bits depending on the value of the PCI address to map.
> 
> Fix this by introducing the helper function
> rockchip_pcie_ep_ob_atu_num_bits() to correctly calculate the number of
> mask bits to use to program the address translation unit. The number of
> mask bits iscalculated depending on both the PCI address and size of the
> mapping, and clamped between 8 and 20 using the macros
> ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MIN_NUM_BITS and ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MAX_NUM_BITS.
> 

How did you end up with these clamping values? Are the values (at least MAX
applicable to all SoCs)?

Btw, it would be helpful if you referenced the TRM and the section that
describes the outbound mapping. I'm able to find the reference:

Rockchip RK3399 TRM V1.3 Part2, Section 17.5.5.1.1

- Mani

> Fixes: cf590b078391 ("PCI: rockchip: Add EP driver for Rockchip PCIe controller")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h    |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> index 136274533656..27a7febb74e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> @@ -63,16 +63,23 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_clear_ep_ob_atu(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
>  			    ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_OB_REGION_DESC1(region));
>  }
>  
> +static int rockchip_pcie_ep_ob_atu_num_bits(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
> +					    u64 pci_addr, size_t size)
> +{
> +	int num_pass_bits = fls64(pci_addr ^ (pci_addr + size - 1));
> +
> +	return clamp(num_pass_bits, ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MIN_NUM_BITS,
> +		     ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MAX_NUM_BITS);
> +}
> +
>  static void rockchip_pcie_prog_ep_ob_atu(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip, u8 fn,
>  					 u32 r, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr,
>  					 size_t size)
>  {
> -	int num_pass_bits = fls64(size - 1);
> +	int num_pass_bits =
> +		rockchip_pcie_ep_ob_atu_num_bits(rockchip, pci_addr, size);
>  	u32 addr0, addr1, desc0;
>  
> -	if (num_pass_bits < 8)
> -		num_pass_bits = 8;
> -
>  	addr0 = ((num_pass_bits - 1) & PCIE_CORE_OB_REGION_ADDR0_NUM_BITS) |
>  		(lower_32_bits(pci_addr) & PCIE_CORE_OB_REGION_ADDR0_LO_ADDR);
>  	addr1 = upper_32_bits(pci_addr);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> index 6111de35f84c..15ee949f2485 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> @@ -245,6 +245,10 @@
>  	(PCIE_EP_PF_CONFIG_REGS_BASE + (((fn) << 12) & GENMASK(19, 12)))
>  #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_VIRT_FUNC_BASE(fn) \
>  	(PCIE_EP_PF_CONFIG_REGS_BASE + 0x10000 + (((fn) << 12) & GENMASK(19, 12)))
> +
> +#define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MIN_NUM_BITS  8
> +#define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MAX_NUM_BITS  20
> +
>  #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_IB_EP_FUNC_BAR_ADDR0(fn, bar) \
>  	(PCIE_CORE_AXI_CONF_BASE + 0x0828 + (fn) * 0x0040 + (bar) * 0x0008)
>  #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_IB_EP_FUNC_BAR_ADDR1(fn, bar) \
> -- 
> 2.46.2
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-10  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-07  4:12 [PATCH v3 00/12] Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Fix address translation unit programming Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  7:02   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-10-10  8:41     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10 10:36       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Use a macro to define EP controller .align feature Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  7:03   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve rockchip_pcie_ep_unmap_addr() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  7:09   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-11  8:22     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve rockchip_pcie_ep_map_addr() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  7:13   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12  9:31     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 12:02       ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 12:39         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Implement the .map_align() controller operation Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  2:43   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-10  3:44   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Refactor rockchip_pcie_ep_probe() memory allocations Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  7:23   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Refactor rockchip_pcie_ep_probe() MSI-X hiding Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  7:25   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-10  8:09     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-10  8:37       ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-11  8:30       ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 12:14         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-11  8:25     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 12:12       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Refactor endpoint link training enable Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  8:22   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-11  8:45     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] PCI: rockship-ep: Introduce rockchip_pcie_ep_stop() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  8:24   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve link training Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10 10:35   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-11  8:55     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 12:16       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-17  0:52         ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] dt-bindings: pci: rockchip,rk3399-pcie-ep: Add ep-gpios property Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  6:12   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-07  6:50     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  6:54       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-07  6:58         ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  7:00           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-07  7:22             ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  7:27               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Handle PERST# signal in endpoint mode Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  4:35   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-10 10:49   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-11  9:30     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 12:31       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-15  6:24         ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  4:45 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07 10:02 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-10-07 10:26   ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241010070242.3i2f53kpdpr4fgl6@thinkpad \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).