* Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM support
2024-10-11 10:27 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM support Aleksandr Shubin
@ 2024-10-29 8:41 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-11-12 14:13 ` Parthiban
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2024-10-29 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksandr Shubin
Cc: linux-kernel, Brandon Cheo Fusi, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland,
Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Philipp Zabel,
linux-pwm, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-sunxi, linux-riscv
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 15314 bytes --]
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 01:27:33PM +0300, Aleksandr Shubin wrote:
> [...]
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7d1b47843bb6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * PWM Controller Driver for sunxi platforms (D1, T113-S3 and R329)
> + *
> + * Limitations:
> + * - When the parameters change, current running period will not be completed
> + * and run new settings immediately.
> + * - It output HIGH-Z state when PWM channel disabled.
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2@gmail.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
> +
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG(chan) (0x20 + ((chan) * 0x4))
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_SRC GENMASK(8, 7)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M GENMASK(3, 0)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_DIV_M_MAX 8
> +
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE 0x40
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE_BYPASS(chan) BIT((chan) + 16)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE_GATING(chan) BIT(chan)
> +
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE 0x80
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE_EN(chan) BIT(chan)
> +
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CTL(chan) (0x100 + (chan) * 0x20)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CTL_ACT_STA BIT(8)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX field_max(SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K)
> +
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD(chan) (0x104 + (chan) * 0x20)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD_ENTIRE_CYCLE GENMASK(31, 16)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD_ACT_CYCLE GENMASK(15, 0)
> +
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE BIT(16)
It's a bit unfortunate that SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG is passed hwpwm/2 while
SUN20I_PWM_CTL gets a plain hwpwm. I suggest to at least name the
parameters differently.
> +/*
> + * SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is used to quickly compute the values of the clock dividers
> + * div_m (SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M) & prescale_k (SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K)
> + * without using a loop. These dividers limit the # of cycles in a period
> + * to SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE by applying a scaling factor of
> + * 1/(div_m * (prescale_k + 1)) to the clock source.
> + *
> + * SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is derived by solving for div_m and prescale_k
> + * such that for a given requested period,
> + *
> + * i) div_m is minimized for any prescale_k ≤ SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX,
> + * ii) prescale_k is minimized.
> + *
> + * The derivation proceeds as follows, with val = # of cycles for requested
> + * period:
> + *
> + * for a given value of div_m we want the smallest prescale_k such that
> + *
> + * (val >> div_m) // (prescale_k + 1) ≤ 65536 (SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE)
^
I'd add a = here ---------------------------------' to make it clear
that SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE is a description for 65536 and this isn't a
multiplication.
> + *
> + * This is equivalent to:
> + *
> + * (val >> div_m) ≤ 65536 * (prescale_k + 1) + prescale_k
> + * ⟺ (val >> div_m) ≤ 65537 * prescale_k + 65536
> + * ⟺ (val >> div_m) - 65536 ≤ 65537 * prescale_k
> + * ⟺ ((val >> div_m) - 65536) / 65537 ≤ prescale_k
> + *
> + * As prescale_k is integer, this becomes
> + *
> + * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537 ≤ prescale_k
> + *
> + * And is minimized at
> + *
> + * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537
> + *
> + * Now we pick the smallest div_m that satifies prescale_k ≤ 255
> + * (i.e SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX),
> + *
> + * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537 ≤ 255
> + * ⟺ (val >> div_m) - 65536 ≤ 255 * 65537 + 65536
> + * ⟺ val >> div_m ≤ 255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536
> + * ⟺ val >> div_m < (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1)
> + * ⟺ div_m = fls((val) / (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1))
> + *
> + * Suggested by Uwe Kleine-König
> + */
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1)
> +
> +struct sun20i_pwm_chip {
> + struct clk *clk_bus, *clk_hosc, *clk_apb;
> + struct reset_control *rst;
clk_bus and rst are only used in probe and so can be a local variable there.
> + void __iomem *base;
> + struct mutex mutex; /* Protect PWM apply state */
Since commit 1cc2e1faafb3 ("pwm: Add more locking") that currently waits
in next for the merge window the callbacks for a single chip are
serialized, so (unless I miss something) this mutex can be dropped.
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct sun20i_pwm_chip *to_sun20i_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> +{
> + return pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 sun20i_pwm_readl(struct sun20i_pwm_chip *chip,
> + unsigned long offset)
> +{
> + return readl(chip->base + offset);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void sun20i_pwm_writel(struct sun20i_pwm_chip *chip,
> + u32 val, unsigned long offset)
> +{
> + writel(val, chip->base + offset);
> +}
> +
> +static int sun20i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> + struct sun20i_pwm_chip *sun20i_chip = to_sun20i_pwm_chip(chip);
> + u16 ent_cycle, act_cycle, prescale_k;
> + u64 clk_rate, tmp;
> + u8 div_m;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&sun20i_chip->mutex);
> +
> + val = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG(pwm->hwpwm / 2));
> + div_m = FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M, val);
> + if (div_m > SUN20I_PWM_CLK_DIV_M_MAX)
> + div_m = SUN20I_PWM_CLK_DIV_M_MAX;
> +
> + if (FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_SRC, val) == 0)
SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_SRC is two bits wide. Do all values != 0 mean APB?
> + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_hosc);
> + else
> + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_apb);
> +
> + val = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_CTL(pwm->hwpwm));
> + state->polarity = (SUN20I_PWM_CTL_ACT_STA & val) ?
> + PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL : PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
> +
> + prescale_k = FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K, val) + 1;
> +
> + val = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE);
> + state->enabled = (SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE_EN(pwm->hwpwm) & val) ? true : false;
> +
> + val = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&sun20i_chip->mutex);
> +
> + act_cycle = FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD_ACT_CYCLE, val);
> + ent_cycle = FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD_ENTIRE_CYCLE, val);
> +
> + /*
> + * The duration of the active phase should not be longer
> + * than the duration of the period
> + */
> + if (act_cycle > ent_cycle)
> + act_cycle = ent_cycle;
> +
> + /*
> + * We have act_cycle <= ent_cycle <= 0xffff, prescale_k <= 0x100,
> + * div_m <= 8. So the multiplication fits into an u64 without
> + * overflow.
> + */
> + tmp = ((u64)(act_cycle) * prescale_k << div_m) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> + state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(tmp, clk_rate);
> + tmp = ((u64)(ent_cycle) * prescale_k << div_m) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> + state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(tmp, clk_rate);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sun20i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + const struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> + struct sun20i_pwm_chip *sun20i_chip = to_sun20i_pwm_chip(chip);
> + u64 bus_rate, hosc_rate, val, ent_cycle, act_cycle;
> + u32 clk_gate, clk_cfg, pwm_en, ctl, reg_period;
> + u32 prescale_k, div_m;
> + bool use_bus_clk;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&sun20i_chip->mutex);
> +
> + pwm_en = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE);
> +
> + if (state->enabled != pwm->state.enabled) {
> + clk_gate = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE);
> +
> + if (!state->enabled) {
> + clk_gate &= ~SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE_GATING(pwm->hwpwm);
> + pwm_en &= ~SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE_EN(pwm->hwpwm);
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, pwm_en, SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE);
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, clk_gate, SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE);
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ctl = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_CTL(pwm->hwpwm));
> + clk_cfg = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG(pwm->hwpwm / 2));
> + hosc_rate = clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_hosc);
> + bus_rate = clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_apb);
> + if (pwm_en & SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE_EN(pwm->hwpwm ^ 1)) {
> + /* if the neighbor channel is enabled, check period only */
> + use_bus_clk = FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_SRC, clk_cfg) != 0;
> + val = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->period,
> + (use_bus_clk ? bus_rate : hosc_rate),
> + NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +
> + div_m = FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M, clk_cfg);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Select the clock source based on the period,
> + * since bus_rate > hosc_rate, which means bus_rate
> + * can provide a higher frequency than hosc_rate.
> + */
> + use_bus_clk = false;
> + val = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->period, hosc_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> + if (val <= 1) {
Why is val == 1 already problematic?
> + use_bus_clk = true;
> + val = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->period, bus_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> + if (val <= 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + div_m = fls(DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(val, SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC));
> + if (div_m > SUN20I_PWM_CLK_DIV_M_MAX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* set up the CLK_DIV_M and clock CLK_SRC */
> + clk_cfg = FIELD_PREP(SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M, div_m);
> + clk_cfg |= FIELD_PREP(SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_SRC, use_bus_clk);
> +
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, clk_cfg, SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG(pwm->hwpwm / 2));
> + }
Does writing SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG already influence the output? If so this
needs mentioning in the Limitations paragraph at the driver's top as the
output might glitch more than suggested there currently.
> + /* calculate prescale_k, PWM entire cycle */
> + ent_cycle = val >> div_m;
> + prescale_k = DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(ent_cycle, 65537);
A #define for 65537?
> + if (prescale_k > SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX)
> + prescale_k = SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX;
> +
> + do_div(ent_cycle, prescale_k + 1);
> +
> + /* for N cycles, PPRx.PWM_ENTIRE_CYCLE = (N-1) */
> + reg_period = FIELD_PREP(SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD_ENTIRE_CYCLE, ent_cycle - 1);
Is ent_cycle known to be ≥ 1?
> + /* set duty cycle */
> + val = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->duty_cycle,
> + (use_bus_clk ? bus_rate : hosc_rate),
> + NSEC_PER_SEC);
> + act_cycle = val >> div_m;
> + do_div(act_cycle, prescale_k + 1);
> +
> + /*
> + * The formula of the output period and the duty-cycle for PWM are as follows.
> + * T period = PWM0_PRESCALE_K / PWM01_CLK * (PPR0.PWM_ENTIRE_CYCLE + 1)
> + * T high-level = PWM0_PRESCALE_K / PWM01_CLK * PPR0.PWM_ACT_CYCLE
> + * Duty-cycle = T high-level / T period
> + */
> + reg_period |= FIELD_PREP(SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD_ACT_CYCLE, act_cycle);
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, reg_period, SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + ctl = FIELD_PREP(SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K, prescale_k);
> + if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> + ctl |= SUN20I_PWM_CTL_ACT_STA;
> +
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, ctl, SUN20I_PWM_CTL(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + if (state->enabled != pwm->state.enabled && state->enabled) {
> + clk_gate &= ~SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE_BYPASS(pwm->hwpwm);
> + clk_gate |= SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE_GATING(pwm->hwpwm);
> + pwm_en |= SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE_EN(pwm->hwpwm);
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, pwm_en, SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE);
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, clk_gate, SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE);
> + }
There is an early return at the start of the function for
state->enabled != pwm->state.enabled && !state->enabled
. So just checking for
if (state->enabled != pwm->state.enabled)
is enough.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pwm_ops sun20i_pwm_ops = {
> + .apply = sun20i_pwm_apply,
> + .get_state = sun20i_pwm_get_state,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id sun20i_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun20i-d1-pwm" },
> + { },
No comma after the sentinel entry please.
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sun20i_pwm_dt_ids);
> +
> +static void sun20i_pwm_reset_ctrl_release(void *data)
> +{
> + struct reset_control *rst = data;
> +
> + reset_control_assert(rst);
> +}
> +
> +static int sun20i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct pwm_chip *chip;
> + struct sun20i_pwm_chip *sun20i_chip;
> + int ret;
> +
> + chip = devm_pwmchip_alloc(&pdev->dev, 8, sizeof(*sun20i_chip));
> + if (IS_ERR(chip))
> + return PTR_ERR(chip);
> + sun20i_chip = to_sun20i_pwm_chip(chip);
> +
> + sun20i_chip->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(sun20i_chip->base))
> + return PTR_ERR(sun20i_chip->base);
> +
> + sun20i_chip->clk_bus = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "bus");
> + if (IS_ERR(sun20i_chip->clk_bus))
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(sun20i_chip->clk_bus),
> + "failed to get bus clock\n");
I like error messages starting with a capital letter. Would you mind
converting accordingly?
> + sun20i_chip->clk_hosc = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "hosc");
> + if (IS_ERR(sun20i_chip->clk_hosc))
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(sun20i_chip->clk_hosc),
> + "failed to get hosc clock\n");
> +
> + sun20i_chip->clk_apb = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "apb");
> + if (IS_ERR(sun20i_chip->clk_apb))
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(sun20i_chip->clk_apb),
> + "failed to get apb clock\n");
> +
> + if (clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_apb) > clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_hosc))
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "apb clock must be greater than hosc clock");
> +
> + sun20i_chip->rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(sun20i_chip->rst))
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(sun20i_chip->rst),
> + "failed to get bus reset\n");
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "allwinner,pwm-channels",
> + &chip->npwm);
error checking for ret?
> + if (chip->npwm > 16) {
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "limiting number of PWM lines from %u to 16",
> + chip->npwm);
> + chip->npwm = 16;
Layer violation; drivers are not supposed to assign npwm. Also above you
only allocated 8. Better check allwinner,pwm-channels before calling
devm_pwmchip_alloc().
> + }
> +
> + /* Deassert reset */
> + ret = reset_control_deassert(sun20i_chip->rst);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to deassert reset\n");
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, sun20i_pwm_reset_ctrl_release, sun20i_chip->rst);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
There is devm_reset_control_get_exclusive_asserted() scheduled to go
into v6.13-rc1. Please group the operations concerning rst together such
that it can be converted trivially to that function.
> + chip->ops = &sun20i_pwm_ops;
> +
> + mutex_init(&sun20i_chip->mutex);
> +
> + ret = devm_pwmchip_add(&pdev->dev, chip);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to add PWM chip\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Best regards
Uwe
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM support
2024-10-11 10:27 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM support Aleksandr Shubin
2024-10-29 8:41 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2024-11-12 14:13 ` Parthiban
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Parthiban @ 2024-11-12 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksandr Shubin, linux-kernel
Cc: Brandon Cheo Fusi, Uwe Kleine-König, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec,
Samuel Holland, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou,
Philipp Zabel, linux-pwm, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-riscv, parthiban
On 10/11/24 3:57 PM, Aleksandr Shubin wrote:
> Allwinner's D1, T113-S3 and R329 SoCs have a quite different PWM
> controllers with ones supported by pwm-sun4i driver.
>
> This patch adds a PWM controller driver for Allwinner's D1,
> T113-S3 and R329 SoCs. The main difference between these SoCs
> is the number of channels defined by the DT property.
Thanks for your efforts. A133 uses the same IP and tried using the pwm for
LVDS backlight with below diff,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi
index 2b4ecbf3e724..67a8d52fccf0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi
@@ -204,6 +204,16 @@ watchdog@30090a0 {
clocks = <&dcxo24M>;
};
+ pwm: pwm@300a000 {
+ compatible = "allwinner,sun20i-d1-pwm";
+ reg = <0x300a000 0x400>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_PWM>, <&dcxo24M>, <&ccu CLK_APB1>;
+ clock-names = "bus", "hosc", "apb";
+ resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_PWM>;
+ #pwm-cells = <0x3>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a133-helper-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a133-helper-board.dts
index aa82c1d2799f..3355df370812 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a133-helper-board.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a133-helper-board.dts
@@ -19,6 +19,14 @@ aliases {
serial0 = &uart0;
};
+ backlight: backlight {
+ compatible = "pwm-backlight";
+ pwms = <&pwm 0 50000 0>;
+ brightness-levels = <0 5 10 15 20 30 40 55 70 85 100>;
+ default-brightness-level = <2>;
+ enable-gpios = <&pio 3 23 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PD23 */
+ };
+
Although the backlight tunrned on and pwm probed fine, I couldn't really
control the backlight brightness levels.
root@helper-board-a133:~# dmesg | grep -i pwm
[ 0.969739] sun20i-pwm 300a000.pwm: apb clock must be greater than hosc clock
[ 1.486000] sun20i-pwm 300a000.pwm: .apply is not idempotent (ena=1 pol=0 5000/49959) -> (ena=1 pol=0 5000/49917)
[ 410.760633] sun20i-pwm 300a000.pwm: .apply is not idempotent (ena=1 pol=0 49959/49959) -> (ena=1 pol=0 49917/49917)
[ 425.284650] sun20i-pwm 300a000.pwm: .apply is not idempotent (ena=1 pol=0 5000/49959) -> (ena=1 pol=0 5000/49917)
[ 428.180657] sun20i-pwm 300a000.pwm: .apply is not idempotent (ena=1 pol=0 2500/49959) -> (ena=1 pol=0 2500/49917)
[ 431.952648] sun20i-pwm 300a000.pwm: .apply is not idempotent (ena=1 pol=0 49959/49959) -> (ena=1 pol=0 49917/49917)
Did I miss something?
>
> Co-developed-by: Brandon Cheo Fusi <fusibrandon13@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brandon Cheo Fusi <fusibrandon13@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 10 ++
> drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c | 379 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 390 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> index 0915c1e7df16..778151aa3860 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> @@ -652,6 +652,16 @@ config PWM_SUN4I
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> will be called pwm-sun4i.
>
> +config PWM_SUN20I
> + tristate "Allwinner D1/T113s/R329 PWM support"
> + depends on ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on COMMON_CLK
> + help
> + Generic PWM framework driver for Allwinner D1/T113s/R329 SoCs.
> +
> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> + will be called pwm-sun20i.
> +
> config PWM_SUNPLUS
> tristate "Sunplus PWM support"
> depends on ARCH_SUNPLUS || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> index 9081e0c0e9e0..85ad1fe0dde1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STM32) += pwm-stm32.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STM32_LP) += pwm-stm32-lp.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STMPE) += pwm-stmpe.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SUN4I) += pwm-sun4i.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SUN20I) += pwm-sun20i.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SUNPLUS) += pwm-sunplus.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TEGRA) += pwm-tegra.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TIECAP) += pwm-tiecap.o
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7d1b47843bb6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * PWM Controller Driver for sunxi platforms (D1, T113-S3 and R329)
> + *
> + * Limitations:
> + * - When the parameters change, current running period will not be completed
> + * and run new settings immediately.
> + * - It output HIGH-Z state when PWM channel disabled.
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2@gmail.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
> +
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG(chan) (0x20 + ((chan) * 0x4))
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_SRC GENMASK(8, 7)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M GENMASK(3, 0)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_DIV_M_MAX 8
> +
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE 0x40
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE_BYPASS(chan) BIT((chan) + 16)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE_GATING(chan) BIT(chan)
> +
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE 0x80
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE_EN(chan) BIT(chan)
> +
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CTL(chan) (0x100 + (chan) * 0x20)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CTL_ACT_STA BIT(8)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX field_max(SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K)
> +
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD(chan) (0x104 + (chan) * 0x20)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD_ENTIRE_CYCLE GENMASK(31, 16)
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD_ACT_CYCLE GENMASK(15, 0)
> +
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE BIT(16)
> +
> +/*
> + * SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is used to quickly compute the values of the clock dividers
> + * div_m (SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M) & prescale_k (SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K)
> + * without using a loop. These dividers limit the # of cycles in a period
> + * to SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE by applying a scaling factor of
> + * 1/(div_m * (prescale_k + 1)) to the clock source.
> + *
> + * SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is derived by solving for div_m and prescale_k
> + * such that for a given requested period,
> + *
> + * i) div_m is minimized for any prescale_k ≤ SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX,
> + * ii) prescale_k is minimized.
> + *
> + * The derivation proceeds as follows, with val = # of cycles for requested
> + * period:
> + *
> + * for a given value of div_m we want the smallest prescale_k such that
> + *
> + * (val >> div_m) // (prescale_k + 1) ≤ 65536 (SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE)
> + *
> + * This is equivalent to:
> + *
> + * (val >> div_m) ≤ 65536 * (prescale_k + 1) + prescale_k
> + * ⟺ (val >> div_m) ≤ 65537 * prescale_k + 65536
> + * ⟺ (val >> div_m) - 65536 ≤ 65537 * prescale_k
> + * ⟺ ((val >> div_m) - 65536) / 65537 ≤ prescale_k
> + *
> + * As prescale_k is integer, this becomes
> + *
> + * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537 ≤ prescale_k
> + *
> + * And is minimized at
> + *
> + * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537
> + *
> + * Now we pick the smallest div_m that satifies prescale_k ≤ 255
> + * (i.e SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX),
> + *
> + * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537 ≤ 255
> + * ⟺ (val >> div_m) - 65536 ≤ 255 * 65537 + 65536
> + * ⟺ val >> div_m ≤ 255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536
> + * ⟺ val >> div_m < (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1)
> + * ⟺ div_m = fls((val) / (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1))
> + *
> + * Suggested by Uwe Kleine-König
> + */
> +#define SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1)
> +
> +struct sun20i_pwm_chip {
> + struct clk *clk_bus, *clk_hosc, *clk_apb;
> + struct reset_control *rst;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + struct mutex mutex; /* Protect PWM apply state */
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct sun20i_pwm_chip *to_sun20i_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> +{
> + return pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 sun20i_pwm_readl(struct sun20i_pwm_chip *chip,
> + unsigned long offset)
> +{
> + return readl(chip->base + offset);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void sun20i_pwm_writel(struct sun20i_pwm_chip *chip,
> + u32 val, unsigned long offset)
> +{
> + writel(val, chip->base + offset);
> +}
> +
> +static int sun20i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> + struct sun20i_pwm_chip *sun20i_chip = to_sun20i_pwm_chip(chip);
> + u16 ent_cycle, act_cycle, prescale_k;
> + u64 clk_rate, tmp;
> + u8 div_m;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&sun20i_chip->mutex);
> +
> + val = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG(pwm->hwpwm / 2));
> + div_m = FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M, val);
> + if (div_m > SUN20I_PWM_CLK_DIV_M_MAX)
> + div_m = SUN20I_PWM_CLK_DIV_M_MAX;
> +
> + if (FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_SRC, val) == 0)
> + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_hosc);
> + else
> + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_apb);
> +
> + val = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_CTL(pwm->hwpwm));
> + state->polarity = (SUN20I_PWM_CTL_ACT_STA & val) ?
> + PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL : PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
> +
> + prescale_k = FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K, val) + 1;
> +
> + val = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE);
> + state->enabled = (SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE_EN(pwm->hwpwm) & val) ? true : false;
> +
> + val = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&sun20i_chip->mutex);
> +
> + act_cycle = FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD_ACT_CYCLE, val);
> + ent_cycle = FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD_ENTIRE_CYCLE, val);
> +
> + /*
> + * The duration of the active phase should not be longer
> + * than the duration of the period
> + */
> + if (act_cycle > ent_cycle)
> + act_cycle = ent_cycle;
> +
> + /*
> + * We have act_cycle <= ent_cycle <= 0xffff, prescale_k <= 0x100,
> + * div_m <= 8. So the multiplication fits into an u64 without
> + * overflow.
> + */
> + tmp = ((u64)(act_cycle) * prescale_k << div_m) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> + state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(tmp, clk_rate);
> + tmp = ((u64)(ent_cycle) * prescale_k << div_m) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> + state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(tmp, clk_rate);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sun20i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + const struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> + struct sun20i_pwm_chip *sun20i_chip = to_sun20i_pwm_chip(chip);
> + u64 bus_rate, hosc_rate, val, ent_cycle, act_cycle;
> + u32 clk_gate, clk_cfg, pwm_en, ctl, reg_period;
> + u32 prescale_k, div_m;
> + bool use_bus_clk;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&sun20i_chip->mutex);
> +
> + pwm_en = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE);
> +
> + if (state->enabled != pwm->state.enabled) {
> + clk_gate = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE);
> +
> + if (!state->enabled) {
> + clk_gate &= ~SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE_GATING(pwm->hwpwm);
> + pwm_en &= ~SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE_EN(pwm->hwpwm);
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, pwm_en, SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE);
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, clk_gate, SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE);
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ctl = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_CTL(pwm->hwpwm));
> + clk_cfg = sun20i_pwm_readl(sun20i_chip, SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG(pwm->hwpwm / 2));
> + hosc_rate = clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_hosc);
> + bus_rate = clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_apb);
> + if (pwm_en & SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE_EN(pwm->hwpwm ^ 1)) {
> + /* if the neighbor channel is enabled, check period only */
> + use_bus_clk = FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_SRC, clk_cfg) != 0;
> + val = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->period,
> + (use_bus_clk ? bus_rate : hosc_rate),
> + NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +
> + div_m = FIELD_GET(SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M, clk_cfg);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Select the clock source based on the period,
> + * since bus_rate > hosc_rate, which means bus_rate
> + * can provide a higher frequency than hosc_rate.
> + */
> + use_bus_clk = false;
> + val = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->period, hosc_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> + if (val <= 1) {
> + use_bus_clk = true;
> + val = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->period, bus_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> + if (val <= 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + div_m = fls(DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(val, SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC));
> + if (div_m > SUN20I_PWM_CLK_DIV_M_MAX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* set up the CLK_DIV_M and clock CLK_SRC */
> + clk_cfg = FIELD_PREP(SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M, div_m);
> + clk_cfg |= FIELD_PREP(SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_SRC, use_bus_clk);
> +
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, clk_cfg, SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG(pwm->hwpwm / 2));
> + }
> +
> + /* calculate prescale_k, PWM entire cycle */
> + ent_cycle = val >> div_m;
> + prescale_k = DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(ent_cycle, 65537);
> + if (prescale_k > SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX)
> + prescale_k = SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX;
> +
> + do_div(ent_cycle, prescale_k + 1);
> +
> + /* for N cycles, PPRx.PWM_ENTIRE_CYCLE = (N-1) */
> + reg_period = FIELD_PREP(SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD_ENTIRE_CYCLE, ent_cycle - 1);
> +
> + /* set duty cycle */
> + val = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->duty_cycle,
> + (use_bus_clk ? bus_rate : hosc_rate),
> + NSEC_PER_SEC);
> + act_cycle = val >> div_m;
> + do_div(act_cycle, prescale_k + 1);
> +
> + /*
> + * The formula of the output period and the duty-cycle for PWM are as follows.
> + * T period = PWM0_PRESCALE_K / PWM01_CLK * (PPR0.PWM_ENTIRE_CYCLE + 1)
> + * T high-level = PWM0_PRESCALE_K / PWM01_CLK * PPR0.PWM_ACT_CYCLE
> + * Duty-cycle = T high-level / T period
> + */
> + reg_period |= FIELD_PREP(SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD_ACT_CYCLE, act_cycle);
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, reg_period, SUN20I_PWM_PERIOD(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + ctl = FIELD_PREP(SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K, prescale_k);
> + if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> + ctl |= SUN20I_PWM_CTL_ACT_STA;
> +
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, ctl, SUN20I_PWM_CTL(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + if (state->enabled != pwm->state.enabled && state->enabled) {
> + clk_gate &= ~SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE_BYPASS(pwm->hwpwm);
> + clk_gate |= SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE_GATING(pwm->hwpwm);
> + pwm_en |= SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE_EN(pwm->hwpwm);
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, pwm_en, SUN20I_PWM_ENABLE);
> + sun20i_pwm_writel(sun20i_chip, clk_gate, SUN20I_PWM_CLK_GATE);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pwm_ops sun20i_pwm_ops = {
> + .apply = sun20i_pwm_apply,
> + .get_state = sun20i_pwm_get_state,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id sun20i_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun20i-d1-pwm" },
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sun20i_pwm_dt_ids);
> +
> +static void sun20i_pwm_reset_ctrl_release(void *data)
> +{
> + struct reset_control *rst = data;
> +
> + reset_control_assert(rst);
> +}
> +
> +static int sun20i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct pwm_chip *chip;
> + struct sun20i_pwm_chip *sun20i_chip;
> + int ret;
> +
> + chip = devm_pwmchip_alloc(&pdev->dev, 8, sizeof(*sun20i_chip));
> + if (IS_ERR(chip))
> + return PTR_ERR(chip);
> + sun20i_chip = to_sun20i_pwm_chip(chip);
> +
> + sun20i_chip->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(sun20i_chip->base))
> + return PTR_ERR(sun20i_chip->base);
> +
> + sun20i_chip->clk_bus = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "bus");
> + if (IS_ERR(sun20i_chip->clk_bus))
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(sun20i_chip->clk_bus),
> + "failed to get bus clock\n");
> +
> + sun20i_chip->clk_hosc = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "hosc");
A133 also have r_pwm,
+ r_pwm: pwm@7020c00 {
+ compatible = "allwinner,sun20i-d1-pwm";
+ reg = <0x7020c00 0x400>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_R_APB1_PWM>, <&ccu CLK_R_APB1_BUS_PWM>, <&ccu CLK_APB1>;
+ clock-names = "bus", "mod", "apb";
+ resets = <&r_ccu RST_R_APB1_BUS_PWM>;
+ #pwm-cells = <0x3>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
with "bus" clock and "mod" clock for gating it. Calling it as "hosc" doesn't
makes sense IMO. pwm-sun4i.c handles it already. Do we also need to handled "mod"?
> + if (IS_ERR(sun20i_chip->clk_hosc))
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(sun20i_chip->clk_hosc),
> + "failed to get hosc clock\n");
> +
> + sun20i_chip->clk_apb = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "apb");
> + if (IS_ERR(sun20i_chip->clk_apb))
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(sun20i_chip->clk_apb),
> + "failed to get apb clock\n");
> +
> + if (clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_apb) > clk_get_rate(sun20i_chip->clk_hosc))
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "apb clock must be greater than hosc clock");
This is always the case if am not wrong. This condition check needed?
Thanks,
Parthiban
> +
> + sun20i_chip->rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(sun20i_chip->rst))
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(sun20i_chip->rst),
> + "failed to get bus reset\n");
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "allwinner,pwm-channels",
> + &chip->npwm);
> +
> + if (chip->npwm > 16) {
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "limiting number of PWM lines from %u to 16",
> + chip->npwm);
> + chip->npwm = 16;
> + }
> +
> + /* Deassert reset */
> + ret = reset_control_deassert(sun20i_chip->rst);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to deassert reset\n");
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, sun20i_pwm_reset_ctrl_release, sun20i_chip->rst);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + chip->ops = &sun20i_pwm_ops;
> +
> + mutex_init(&sun20i_chip->mutex);
> +
> + ret = devm_pwmchip_add(&pdev->dev, chip);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to add PWM chip\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver sun20i_pwm_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "sun20i-pwm",
> + .of_match_table = sun20i_pwm_dt_ids,
> + },
> + .probe = sun20i_pwm_probe,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(sun20i_pwm_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2@gmail.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Allwinner sun20i PWM driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread