From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 01/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Fix address translation unit programming
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 21:13:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011121408.89890-2-dlemoal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241011121408.89890-1-dlemoal@kernel.org>
The rockchip PCIe endpoint controller handles PCIe transfers addresses
by masking the lower bits of the programmed PCI address and using the
same number of lower bits masked from the CPU address space used for the
mapping. For a PCI mapping of <size> bytes starting from <pci_addr>,
the number of bits masked is the number of address bits changing in the
address range [pci_addr..pci_addr + size - 1].
However, rockchip_pcie_prog_ep_ob_atu() calculates num_pass_bits only
using the size of the mapping, resulting in an incorrect number of mask
bits depending on the value of the PCI address to map.
Fix this by introducing the helper function
rockchip_pcie_ep_ob_atu_num_bits() to correctly calculate the number of
mask bits to use to program the address translation unit. The number of
mask bits is calculated depending on both the PCI address and size of
the mapping, and clamped between 8 and 20 using the macros
ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MIN_NUM_BITS and ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MAX_NUM_BITS. As
defined in the Rockchip RK3399 TRM V1.3 Part2, Sections 17.5.5.1.1 and
17.6.8.2.1, this clamping is necessary because:
1) The lower 8 bits of the PCI address to be mapped by the outbound
region are ignored. So a minimum of 8 address bits are needed and
imply that the PCI address must be aligned to 256.
2) The outbound memory regions are 1MB in size. So while we can specify
up to 63-bits for the PCI address (num_bits filed uses bits 0 to 5 of
the outbound address region 0 register), we must limit the number of
valid address bits to 20 to match the memory window maximum size (1
<< 20 = 1MB).
Fixes: cf590b078391 ("PCI: rockchip: Add EP driver for Rockchip PCIe controller")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c | 15 +++++++++++----
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
index 136274533656..27a7febb74e0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
@@ -63,16 +63,23 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_clear_ep_ob_atu(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_OB_REGION_DESC1(region));
}
+static int rockchip_pcie_ep_ob_atu_num_bits(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
+ u64 pci_addr, size_t size)
+{
+ int num_pass_bits = fls64(pci_addr ^ (pci_addr + size - 1));
+
+ return clamp(num_pass_bits, ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MIN_NUM_BITS,
+ ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MAX_NUM_BITS);
+}
+
static void rockchip_pcie_prog_ep_ob_atu(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip, u8 fn,
u32 r, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr,
size_t size)
{
- int num_pass_bits = fls64(size - 1);
+ int num_pass_bits =
+ rockchip_pcie_ep_ob_atu_num_bits(rockchip, pci_addr, size);
u32 addr0, addr1, desc0;
- if (num_pass_bits < 8)
- num_pass_bits = 8;
-
addr0 = ((num_pass_bits - 1) & PCIE_CORE_OB_REGION_ADDR0_NUM_BITS) |
(lower_32_bits(pci_addr) & PCIE_CORE_OB_REGION_ADDR0_LO_ADDR);
addr1 = upper_32_bits(pci_addr);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
index 6111de35f84c..15ee949f2485 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
@@ -245,6 +245,10 @@
(PCIE_EP_PF_CONFIG_REGS_BASE + (((fn) << 12) & GENMASK(19, 12)))
#define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_VIRT_FUNC_BASE(fn) \
(PCIE_EP_PF_CONFIG_REGS_BASE + 0x10000 + (((fn) << 12) & GENMASK(19, 12)))
+
+#define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MIN_NUM_BITS 8
+#define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MAX_NUM_BITS 20
+
#define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_IB_EP_FUNC_BAR_ADDR0(fn, bar) \
(PCIE_CORE_AXI_CONF_BASE + 0x0828 + (fn) * 0x0040 + (bar) * 0x0008)
#define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_IB_EP_FUNC_BAR_ADDR1(fn, bar) \
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 12:13 [PATCH v4 00/12] Fix and improve the Rockchip endpoint driver Damien Le Moal
2024-10-11 12:13 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2024-10-14 15:34 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Fix address translation unit programming Rick Wertenbroek
2024-10-11 12:13 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Use a macro to define EP controller .align feature Damien Le Moal
2024-10-11 12:13 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve rockchip_pcie_ep_unmap_addr() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-11 12:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve rockchip_pcie_ep_map_addr() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-11 12:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Implement the pci_epc_ops::get_mem_map() operation Damien Le Moal
2024-10-15 1:15 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-11 12:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Rename rockchip_pcie_parse_ep_dt() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-11 12:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Refactor rockchip_pcie_ep_probe() memory allocations Damien Le Moal
2024-10-11 12:14 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Refactor rockchip_pcie_ep_probe() MSI-X hiding Damien Le Moal
2024-10-11 12:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Refactor endpoint link training enable Damien Le Moal
2024-10-11 12:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] PCI: rockship-ep: Implement the pci_epc_ops::stop_link() operation Damien Le Moal
2024-10-11 12:14 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve link training Damien Le Moal
2024-10-11 12:14 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Handle PERST# signal in endpoint mode Damien Le Moal
2024-10-15 3:01 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-15 6:46 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-16 5:32 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] Fix and improve the Rockchip endpoint driver Anand Moon
2024-10-16 6:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-16 7:22 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-16 8:08 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-19 6:24 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-20 1:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-20 3:18 ` Anand Moon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241011121408.89890-2-dlemoal@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).