From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13B121C32EC; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729524777; cv=none; b=DTla6Hl18sOEJqhCWsAr7bEs6XFWil9FeNNzoQBX6zBnhpQfWE19Urx56SqnQ5tC2tQKRJmu48PL/1xI38Bvzm8M3uYDvMHlL3OSmAL6NZdqa73XsyT5yvqigmycQ6speIdmF8gw47TDBfx4oQBIrqKLulREUGIrQ8gBdd5wMhs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729524777; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6KqBrAM2rowiy+BRqWdxd75yZdcwS8oxbQCE1r36X+8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=APQL3a+q1LiHpo5H08emFtPSRIdepKUmxjV4FJohST32fYGxBrt0R4UzUnEx6YFbxQ1NGbBC4WZmC5D4rzVBFnCaJ7k/JMRNyE16CK2tCjz614oh/sIaPklmbbRN01Y4FjQv1YrcDQMClVDDnkbMllot5BdHlnBXi7d3eIDLzN0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=BpWe5frt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="BpWe5frt" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51BF540003; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:32:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1729524772; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2JM1lkviEBAN8knYxaV/WvdX5AeMGlXwcLME1sHr2g4=; b=BpWe5frtyig2XRBNqfPwnq9QVM+wy3y7O2efHsExuA29kSKCLycPh84p3K0OV/5XXWKsfo 9HgJG1JK0nGXO9c1u7Fag9dU6EfxgjCVbcZ8mz1N6Oqlgl62gTciU09OrzPl63iQJFV0rP 3CTtMxw6ZGp04d5l+r9V5DCjKYj3ClDO7VZk1wDc2hp4BPG7xJreYeyjgSsjQk+WMMZmln fWJFOWNLrlOb+M153tPMpQ7eT/yT6ruVO6WWW8N9aFJi+ZkuepI5jKCfAJrIUK9wZZSCGj 7BKt9C+6hRotH+tz8XI1+RjBKzxXMGkBrBK8KOCb/jT0s0A8tfdNhvXNCYSevA== Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:32:49 +0200 From: Herve Codina To: Philipp Zabel Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Andy Shevchenko , Simon Horman , Lee Jones , Arnd Bergmann , Derek Kiernan , Dragan Cvetic , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Bjorn Helgaas , Lars Povlsen , Steen Hegelund , Daniel Machon , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Saravana Kannan , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Horatiu Vultur , Andrew Lunn , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Allan Nielsen , Luca Ceresoli , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/6] Add support for the LAN966x PCI device using a DT overlay Message-ID: <20241021173249.297c3ad5@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20241014124636.24221-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> <20241021164135.494c8ff6@bootlin.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-GND-Sasl: herve.codina@bootlin.com Hi Philipp, On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:02:24 +0200 Philipp Zabel wrote: ... > > All patches have received an 'Acked-by' and I didn't receive any > > feedback on this v10. > > > > Is there anything that blocks the whole series merge? > > > > Let me know if I need to do something else to have the series applied. > > Not that I am aware of. If there are no objections, I'll interpret the > Acked-bys on patch 1 as permission to merge the whole series into > reset/next. Seems consistent. Thanks Philipp. Best regards, Hervé