From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C270A1BC07E; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729615310; cv=none; b=AhIbLsmPAeKOkp9q4/Gn/2iHjU8oCPe9p1szCqsVMyAk4qgSRm/GjxjhFlAauCX/v2RBIZecsVwqRkDDF0L7l7xAfBBxfuPk2hSHxZnqRoR2YpY9aQ5msEdahbTOPqrXItBzxjViROQddlAbm2GMjnB3GA7dJyD90oCuHb3/DcQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729615310; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EoHMsRQGMuLx+P7zRHzX1qTnz0At3UXNDcHYzQo11LA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=neFPiey8kwCizCvRet/2eNG6ta9rGvZwFiGKpSdHVMtPrNVNA6pItPHEJw8N3aaLbjgfeScABPxRVf8V7H9xJ+NxTAbiFLMR0VTTJZBn0VphmZli9kvvuoseljj62FRY9RMqvViNLfqKPAV9X4x98yBizQL0wXunN/pnEJb95YM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mheeIFrW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mheeIFrW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEDA7C4CEC3; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:41:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729615310; bh=EoHMsRQGMuLx+P7zRHzX1qTnz0At3UXNDcHYzQo11LA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mheeIFrWDVR6zmPu0VxTdfTU066+am26va4z7qSRWIwYCxL1Ju1pY+feu1JqItBri OQjuVtqZKV0JnHWd14mLckTWO9g6x5LupHnBFWIfBSOMMKtVEp+OBKCiRVz0Ahx/tu ku4+UawUcLC12gH6Qs28lUYrc0kra27LFEYX2Fwv42mqos4hZvJyiUvTE+txNrMDlH /7NWRvRkWjk7/CEoyTRuyRQUjYKUvheJF+Khb+krEKvhFAsrRCkeS7/N9P+FznIJR7 Rzk6zGvnhXjIAuh+xWsOLWcIiOMhI2wFEBU+kJcyGX5DqrVT2jKcmz1DUBHUzOA5Q7 DQA0nT7UXk+zQ== Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:41:45 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: E Shattow Cc: Henry Bell , Emil Renner Berthing , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: starfive: Update ethernet phy0 delay parameter values for Star64 Message-ID: <20241022-amusement-overreach-c5d1d7fd797b@spud> References: <20241022061004.62812-1-e@freeshell.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5v1eMG7g4H4NB0I9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241022061004.62812-1-e@freeshell.de> --5v1eMG7g4H4NB0I9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 11:09:51PM -0700, E Shattow wrote: > Improve function of Star64 bottom network port phy0 with updated delay values. > Initial upstream patches supporting Star64 use the same vendor board support > package parameters known to result in an unreliable bottom network port. Should I add: Fixes: 2606bf583b962 ("riscv: dts: starfive: add Star64 board devicetree") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org ? "unreliable" sounds to me like something that is worthy of going to fixes/stable --5v1eMG7g4H4NB0I9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZxfVyQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0mXyAP4hE8X6wR9mN1YBx29ScBPlWDTvKS+zXqMNQTvwHnCExgEAmFDWhu4p3Ljj 9iV7Tk8QmQBu2ixOzU6EvXethK5Y3A4= =ZbHC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5v1eMG7g4H4NB0I9--