* [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: add compatible string for i.MX95 EMDIO Wei Fang
` (12 more replies)
0 siblings, 13 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
This is first time that the NETC IP is applied on i.MX MPU platform.
Its revision has been upgraded to 4.1, which is very different from
the NETC of LS1028A (its revision is 1.0). Therefore, some existing
drivers of NETC devices in the Linux kernel are not compatible with
the current hardware. For example, the fsl-enetc driver is used to
drive the ENETC PF of LS1028A, but for i.MX95 ENETC PF, its registers
and tables configuration are very different from those of LS1028A,
and only the station interface (SI) part remains basically the same.
For the SI part, Vladimir has separated the fsl-enetc-core driver, so
we can reuse this driver on i.MX95. However, for other parts of PF,
the fsl-enetc driver cannot be reused, so the nxp-enetc4 driver is
added to support revision 4.1 and later.
During the development process, we found that the two PF drivers have
some interfaces with basically the same logic, and the only difference
is the hardware configuration. So in order to reuse these interfaces
and reduce code redundancy, we extracted these interfaces and compiled
them into a separate nxp-enetc-pf-common driver for use by the two PF
drivers.
In addition, we have developed the nxp-netc-blk-ctrl driver, which
is used to control three blocks, namely Integrated Endpoint Register
Block (IERB), Privileged Register Block (PRB) and NETCMIX block. The
IERB contains registers that are used for pre-boot initialization,
debug, and non-customer configuration. The PRB controls global reset
and global error handling for NETC. The NETCMIX block is mainly used
to set MII protocol and PCS protocol of the links, it also contains
settings for some other functions.
---
v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20241009095116.147412-1-wei.fang@nxp.com/
v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20241015125841.1075560-1-wei.fang@nxp.com/
v3 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20241017074637.1265584-1-wei.fang@nxp.com/
---
Clark Wang (2):
net: enetc: extract enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from
enetc_alloc_msix()
net: enetc: optimize the allocation of tx_bdr
Vladimir Oltean (1):
net: enetc: remove ERR050089 workaround for i.MX95
Wei Fang (10):
dt-bindings: net: add compatible string for i.MX95 EMDIO
dt-bindings: net: add i.MX95 ENETC support
dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
net: enetc: add initial netc-blk-ctrl driver support
net: enetc: extract common ENETC PF parts for LS1028A and i.MX95
platforms
net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module
PCI: Add NXP NETC vendor ID and device IDs
net: enetc: add i.MX95 EMDIO support
net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF
MAINTAINERS: update ENETC driver files and maintainers
.../bindings/net/fsl,enetc-mdio.yaml | 11 +-
.../devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc.yaml | 33 +-
.../bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml | 111 +++
MAINTAINERS | 7 +
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig | 40 +
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile | 9 +
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 213 ++---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h | 13 +-
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h | 151 ++++
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c | 753 ++++++++++++++++++
.../ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c | 36 +-
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h | 47 +-
.../ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c | 21 +
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c | 303 +------
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h | 37 +
.../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c | 340 ++++++++
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c | 2 +-
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c | 2 +
.../ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c | 438 ++++++++++
include/linux/fsl/netc_global.h | 19 +
include/linux/pci_ids.h | 7 +
21 files changed, 2180 insertions(+), 413 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h
create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/fsl/netc_global.h
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: add compatible string for i.MX95 EMDIO
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-24 14:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 02/13] dt-bindings: net: add i.MX95 ENETC support Wei Fang
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
The EMDIO of i.MX95 has been upgraded to revision 4.1, and the vendor
ID and device ID have also changed, so add the new compatible strings
for i.MX95 EMDIO.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
---
v2: remove "nxp,netc-emdio" compatible string.
v3: no changes
v4: no changes
---
.../devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc-mdio.yaml | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc-mdio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc-mdio.yaml
index c1dd6aa04321..71c43ece8295 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc-mdio.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc-mdio.yaml
@@ -20,10 +20,13 @@ maintainers:
properties:
compatible:
- items:
- - enum:
- - pci1957,ee01
- - const: fsl,enetc-mdio
+ oneOf:
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - pci1957,ee01
+ - const: fsl,enetc-mdio
+ - items:
+ - const: pci1131,ee00
reg:
maxItems: 1
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 02/13] dt-bindings: net: add i.MX95 ENETC support
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: add compatible string for i.MX95 EMDIO Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-22 16:13 ` Frank Li
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control Wei Fang
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
The ENETC of i.MX95 has been upgraded to revision 4.1, and the vendor
ID and device ID have also changed, so add the new compatible strings
for i.MX95 ENETC. In addition, i.MX95 supports configuration of RGMII
or RMII reference clock.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
---
v2: Remove "nxp,imx95-enetc" compatible string.
v3:
1. Add restriction to "clcoks" and "clock-names" properties and rename
the clock, also remove the items from these two properties.
2. Remove unnecessary items for "pci1131,e101" compatible string.
v4: Move clocks and clock-names to top level.
---
.../devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc.yaml | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc.yaml
index e152c93998fe..7a4d9c53f8aa 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc.yaml
@@ -20,14 +20,23 @@ maintainers:
properties:
compatible:
- items:
+ oneOf:
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - pci1957,e100
+ - const: fsl,enetc
- enum:
- - pci1957,e100
- - const: fsl,enetc
+ - pci1131,e101
reg:
maxItems: 1
+ clocks:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ clock-names:
+ maxItems: 1
+
mdio:
$ref: mdio.yaml
unevaluatedProperties: false
@@ -40,6 +49,24 @@ required:
allOf:
- $ref: /schemas/pci/pci-device.yaml
- $ref: ethernet-controller.yaml
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - pci1131,e101
+ then:
+ properties:
+ clocks:
+ maxItems: 1
+ description: MAC transmit/receiver reference clock
+
+ clock-names:
+ const: ref
+ else:
+ properties:
+ clocks: false
+ clock-names: false
unevaluatedProperties: false
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: add compatible string for i.MX95 EMDIO Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 02/13] dt-bindings: net: add i.MX95 ENETC support Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-22 16:17 ` Frank Li
2024-10-23 6:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 04/13] net: enetc: add initial netc-blk-ctrl driver support Wei Fang
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 2 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
Add bindings for NXP NETC blocks control. Usually, NETC has 2 blocks of
64KB registers, integrated endpoint register block (IERB) and privileged
register block (PRB). IERB is used for pre-boot initialization for all
NETC devices, such as ENETC, Timer, EMDIO and so on. And PRB controls
global reset and global error handling for NETC. Moreover, for the i.MX
platform, there is also a NETCMIX block for link configuration, such as
MII protocol, PCS protocol, etc.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
---
v2 changes:
1. Rephrase the commit message.
2. Change unevaluatedProperties to additionalProperties.
3. Remove the useless lables from examples.
v3 changes:
1. Remove the items from clocks and clock-names, add maxItems to clocks
and rename the clock.
v4 changes:
1. Reorder the required properties.
2. Add assigned-clocks, assigned-clock-parents and assigned-clock-rates.
---
.../bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml | 111 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0b7fd2c5e0d8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: NETC Blocks Control
+
+description:
+ Usually, NETC has 2 blocks of 64KB registers, integrated endpoint register
+ block (IERB) and privileged register block (PRB). IERB is used for pre-boot
+ initialization for all NETC devices, such as ENETC, Timer, EMIDO and so on.
+ And PRB controls global reset and global error handling for NETC. Moreover,
+ for the i.MX platform, there is also a NETCMIX block for link configuration,
+ such as MII protocol, PCS protocol, etc.
+
+maintainers:
+ - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
+ - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ enum:
+ - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
+
+ reg:
+ minItems: 2
+ maxItems: 3
+
+ reg-names:
+ minItems: 2
+ items:
+ - const: ierb
+ - const: prb
+ - const: netcmix
+
+ "#address-cells":
+ const: 2
+
+ "#size-cells":
+ const: 2
+
+ ranges: true
+ assigned-clocks: true
+ assigned-clock-parents: true
+ assigned-clock-rates: true
+
+ clocks:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ clock-names:
+ const: ipg
+
+ power-domains:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+patternProperties:
+ "^pcie@[0-9a-f]+$":
+ $ref: /schemas/pci/host-generic-pci.yaml#
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - reg-names
+ - "#address-cells"
+ - "#size-cells"
+ - ranges
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ bus {
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+
+ netc-blk-ctrl@4cde0000 {
+ compatible = "nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl";
+ reg = <0x0 0x4cde0000 0x0 0x10000>,
+ <0x0 0x4cdf0000 0x0 0x10000>,
+ <0x0 0x4c81000c 0x0 0x18>;
+ reg-names = "ierb", "prb", "netcmix";
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+ ranges;
+ assigned-clocks = <&scmi_clk 98>, <&scmi_clk 102>;
+ assigned-clock-parents = <&scmi_clk 12>, <&scmi_clk 6>;
+ assigned-clock-rates = <666666666>, <250000000>;
+ clocks = <&scmi_clk 98>;
+ clock-names = "ipg";
+ power-domains = <&scmi_devpd 18>;
+
+ pcie@4cb00000 {
+ compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic";
+ reg = <0x0 0x4cb00000 0x0 0x100000>;
+ #address-cells = <3>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+ device_type = "pci";
+ bus-range = <0x1 0x1>;
+ ranges = <0x82000000 0x0 0x4cce0000 0x0 0x4cce0000 0x0 0x20000
+ 0xc2000000 0x0 0x4cd10000 0x0 0x4cd10000 0x0 0x10000>;
+
+ mdio@0,0 {
+ compatible = "pci1131,ee00";
+ reg = <0x010000 0 0 0 0>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+ };
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 04/13] net: enetc: add initial netc-blk-ctrl driver support
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: extract common ENETC PF parts for LS1028A and i.MX95 platforms Wei Fang
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
The netc-blk-ctrl driver is used to configure Integrated Endpoint
Register Block (IERB) and Privileged Register Block (PRB) of NETC.
For i.MX platforms, it is also used to configure the NETCMIX block.
The IERB contains registers that are used for pre-boot initialization,
debug, and non-customer configuration. The PRB controls global reset
and global error handling for NETC. The NETCMIX block is mainly used
to set MII protocol and PCS protocol of the links, it also contains
settings for some other functions.
Note the IERB configuration registers can only be written after being
unlocked by PRB, otherwise, all write operations are inhibited. A warm
reset is performed when the IERB is unlocked, and it results in an FLR
to all NETC devices. Therefore, all NETC device drivers must be probed
or initialized after the warm reset is finished.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---
v2 changes:
1. Add linux/bits.h
2. Remove the useless check at the beginning of netc_blk_ctrl_probe().
3. Use dev_err_probe() in netc_blk_ctrl_probe().
v3 changes:
1. Change the compatible string to "pci1131,e101".
2. Add devm_clk_get_optional_enabled() instead of devm_clk_get_optional()
3. Directly return dev_err_probe().
4. Remove unused netc_read64().
v4 changes: Refine netc_prb_check_error().
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig | 14 +
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile | 3 +
.../ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c | 438 ++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/fsl/netc_global.h | 19 +
4 files changed, 474 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/fsl/netc_global.h
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
index 4d75e6807e92..51d80ea959d4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
@@ -75,3 +75,17 @@ config FSL_ENETC_QOS
enable/disable from user space via Qos commands(tc). In the kernel
side, it can be loaded by Qos driver. Currently, it is only support
taprio(802.1Qbv) and Credit Based Shaper(802.1Qbu).
+
+config NXP_NETC_BLK_CTRL
+ tristate "NETC blocks control driver"
+ help
+ This driver configures Integrated Endpoint Register Block (IERB) and
+ Privileged Register Block (PRB) of NETC. For i.MX platforms, it also
+ includes the configuration of NETCMIX block.
+ The IERB contains registers that are used for pre-boot initialization,
+ debug, and non-customer configuration. The PRB controls global reset
+ and global error handling for NETC. The NETCMIX block is mainly used
+ to set MII protocol and PCS protocol of the links, it also contains
+ settings for some other functions.
+
+ If compiled as module (M), the module name is nxp-netc-blk-ctrl.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
index b13cbbabb2ea..737c32f83ea5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
@@ -19,3 +19,6 @@ fsl-enetc-mdio-y := enetc_pci_mdio.o enetc_mdio.o
obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK) += fsl-enetc-ptp.o
fsl-enetc-ptp-y := enetc_ptp.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_NXP_NETC_BLK_CTRL) += nxp-netc-blk-ctrl.o
+nxp-netc-blk-ctrl-y := netc_blk_ctrl.o
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9bdee15ef013
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
@@ -0,0 +1,438 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause)
+/*
+ * NXP NETC Blocks Control Driver
+ *
+ * Copyright 2024 NXP
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bits.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/debugfs.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/fsl/netc_global.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/of_net.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/phy.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+
+/* NETCMIX registers */
+#define IMX95_CFG_LINK_IO_VAR 0x0
+#define IO_VAR_16FF_16G_SERDES 0x1
+#define IO_VAR(port, var) (((var) & 0xf) << ((port) << 2))
+
+#define IMX95_CFG_LINK_MII_PROT 0x4
+#define CFG_LINK_MII_PORT_0 GENMASK(3, 0)
+#define CFG_LINK_MII_PORT_1 GENMASK(7, 4)
+#define MII_PROT_MII 0x0
+#define MII_PROT_RMII 0x1
+#define MII_PROT_RGMII 0x2
+#define MII_PROT_SERIAL 0x3
+#define MII_PROT(port, prot) (((prot) & 0xf) << ((port) << 2))
+
+#define IMX95_CFG_LINK_PCS_PROT(a) (0x8 + (a) * 4)
+#define PCS_PROT_1G_SGMII BIT(0)
+#define PCS_PROT_2500M_SGMII BIT(1)
+#define PCS_PROT_XFI BIT(3)
+#define PCS_PROT_SFI BIT(4)
+#define PCS_PROT_10G_SXGMII BIT(6)
+
+/* NETC privileged register block register */
+#define PRB_NETCRR 0x100
+#define NETCRR_SR BIT(0)
+#define NETCRR_LOCK BIT(1)
+
+#define PRB_NETCSR 0x104
+#define NETCSR_ERROR BIT(0)
+#define NETCSR_STATE BIT(1)
+
+/* NETC integrated endpoint register block register */
+#define IERB_EMDIOFAUXR 0x344
+#define IERB_T0FAUXR 0x444
+#define IERB_EFAUXR(a) (0x3044 + 0x100 * (a))
+#define IERB_VFAUXR(a) (0x4004 + 0x40 * (a))
+#define FAUXR_LDID GENMASK(3, 0)
+
+/* Platform information */
+#define IMX95_ENETC0_BUS_DEVFN 0x0
+#define IMX95_ENETC1_BUS_DEVFN 0x40
+#define IMX95_ENETC2_BUS_DEVFN 0x80
+
+/* Flags for different platforms */
+#define NETC_HAS_NETCMIX BIT(0)
+
+struct netc_devinfo {
+ u32 flags;
+ int (*netcmix_init)(struct platform_device *pdev);
+ int (*ierb_init)(struct platform_device *pdev);
+};
+
+struct netc_blk_ctrl {
+ void __iomem *prb;
+ void __iomem *ierb;
+ void __iomem *netcmix;
+
+ const struct netc_devinfo *devinfo;
+ struct platform_device *pdev;
+ struct dentry *debugfs_root;
+};
+
+static void netc_reg_write(void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 val)
+{
+ netc_write(base + offset, val);
+}
+
+static u32 netc_reg_read(void __iomem *base, u32 offset)
+{
+ return netc_read(base + offset);
+}
+
+static int netc_of_pci_get_bus_devfn(struct device_node *np)
+{
+ u32 reg[5];
+ int error;
+
+ error = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "reg", reg, ARRAY_SIZE(reg));
+ if (error)
+ return error;
+
+ return (reg[0] >> 8) & 0xffff;
+}
+
+static int netc_get_link_mii_protocol(phy_interface_t interface)
+{
+ switch (interface) {
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII:
+ return MII_PROT_MII;
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII:
+ return MII_PROT_RMII;
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID:
+ return MII_PROT_RGMII;
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GBASER:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XGMII:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII:
+ return MII_PROT_SERIAL;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+}
+
+static int imx95_netcmix_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ phy_interface_t interface;
+ int bus_devfn, mii_proto;
+ u32 val;
+ int err;
+
+ /* Default setting of MII protocol */
+ val = MII_PROT(0, MII_PROT_RGMII) | MII_PROT(1, MII_PROT_RGMII) |
+ MII_PROT(2, MII_PROT_SERIAL);
+
+ /* Update the link MII protocol through parsing phy-mode */
+ for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
+ for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(child, gchild) {
+ if (!of_device_is_compatible(gchild, "pci1131,e101"))
+ continue;
+
+ bus_devfn = netc_of_pci_get_bus_devfn(gchild);
+ if (bus_devfn < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (bus_devfn == IMX95_ENETC2_BUS_DEVFN)
+ continue;
+
+ err = of_get_phy_mode(gchild, &interface);
+ if (err)
+ continue;
+
+ mii_proto = netc_get_link_mii_protocol(interface);
+ if (mii_proto < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ switch (bus_devfn) {
+ case IMX95_ENETC0_BUS_DEVFN:
+ val = u32_replace_bits(val, mii_proto,
+ CFG_LINK_MII_PORT_0);
+ break;
+ case IMX95_ENETC1_BUS_DEVFN:
+ val = u32_replace_bits(val, mii_proto,
+ CFG_LINK_MII_PORT_1);
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Configure Link I/O variant */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->netcmix, IMX95_CFG_LINK_IO_VAR,
+ IO_VAR(2, IO_VAR_16FF_16G_SERDES));
+ /* Configure Link 2 PCS protocol */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->netcmix, IMX95_CFG_LINK_PCS_PROT(2),
+ PCS_PROT_10G_SXGMII);
+ netc_reg_write(priv->netcmix, IMX95_CFG_LINK_MII_PROT, val);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static bool netc_ierb_is_locked(struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv)
+{
+ return !!(netc_reg_read(priv->prb, PRB_NETCRR) & NETCRR_LOCK);
+}
+
+static int netc_lock_ierb(struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv)
+{
+ u32 val;
+
+ netc_reg_write(priv->prb, PRB_NETCRR, NETCRR_LOCK);
+
+ return read_poll_timeout(netc_reg_read, val, !(val & NETCSR_STATE),
+ 100, 2000, false, priv->prb, PRB_NETCSR);
+}
+
+static int netc_unlock_ierb_with_warm_reset(struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv)
+{
+ u32 val;
+
+ netc_reg_write(priv->prb, PRB_NETCRR, 0);
+
+ return read_poll_timeout(netc_reg_read, val, !(val & NETCRR_LOCK),
+ 1000, 100000, true, priv->prb, PRB_NETCRR);
+}
+
+static int imx95_ierb_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ /* EMDIO : No MSI-X intterupt */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_EMDIOFAUXR, 0);
+ /* ENETC0 PF */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_EFAUXR(0), 0);
+ /* ENETC0 VF0 */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_VFAUXR(0), 1);
+ /* ENETC0 VF1 */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_VFAUXR(1), 2);
+ /* ENETC1 PF */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_EFAUXR(1), 3);
+ /* ENETC1 VF0 */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_VFAUXR(2), 5);
+ /* ENETC1 VF1 */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_VFAUXR(3), 6);
+ /* ENETC2 PF */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_EFAUXR(2), 4);
+ /* ENETC2 VF0 */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_VFAUXR(4), 5);
+ /* ENETC2 VF1 */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_VFAUXR(5), 6);
+ /* NETC TIMER */
+ netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_T0FAUXR, 7);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int netc_ierb_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ const struct netc_devinfo *devinfo = priv->devinfo;
+ int err;
+
+ if (netc_ierb_is_locked(priv)) {
+ err = netc_unlock_ierb_with_warm_reset(priv);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unlock IERB failed.\n");
+ return err;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (devinfo->ierb_init) {
+ err = devinfo->ierb_init(pdev);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ err = netc_lock_ierb(priv);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Lock IERB failed.\n");
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
+static int netc_prb_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
+{
+ struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = s->private;
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = netc_reg_read(priv->prb, PRB_NETCRR);
+ seq_printf(s, "[PRB NETCRR] Lock:%d SR:%d\n",
+ (val & NETCRR_LOCK) ? 1 : 0,
+ (val & NETCRR_SR) ? 1 : 0);
+
+ val = netc_reg_read(priv->prb, PRB_NETCSR);
+ seq_printf(s, "[PRB NETCSR] State:%d Error:%d\n",
+ (val & NETCSR_STATE) ? 1 : 0,
+ (val & NETCSR_ERROR) ? 1 : 0);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(netc_prb);
+
+static void netc_blk_ctrl_create_debugfs(struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv)
+{
+ struct dentry *root;
+
+ root = debugfs_create_dir("netc_blk_ctrl", NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(root))
+ return;
+
+ priv->debugfs_root = root;
+
+ debugfs_create_file("prb", 0444, root, priv, &netc_prb_fops);
+}
+
+static void netc_blk_ctrl_remove_debugfs(struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv)
+{
+ debugfs_remove_recursive(priv->debugfs_root);
+ priv->debugfs_root = NULL;
+}
+
+#else
+
+static void netc_blk_ctrl_create_debugfs(struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv)
+{
+}
+
+static void netc_blk_ctrl_remove_debugfs(struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
+static int netc_prb_check_error(struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv)
+{
+ if (netc_reg_read(priv->prb, PRB_NETCSR) & NETCSR_ERROR)
+ return -1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct netc_devinfo imx95_devinfo = {
+ .flags = NETC_HAS_NETCMIX,
+ .netcmix_init = imx95_netcmix_init,
+ .ierb_init = imx95_ierb_init,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id netc_blk_ctrl_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl", .data = &imx95_devinfo },
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, netc_blk_ctrl_match);
+
+static int netc_blk_ctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ const struct netc_devinfo *devinfo;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ const struct of_device_id *id;
+ struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv;
+ struct clk *ipg_clk;
+ void __iomem *regs;
+ int err;
+
+ priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!priv)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ priv->pdev = pdev;
+ ipg_clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, "ipg");
+ if (IS_ERR(ipg_clk))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(ipg_clk),
+ "Set ipg clock failed\n");
+
+ id = of_match_device(netc_blk_ctrl_match, dev);
+ if (!id)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Cannot match device\n");
+
+ devinfo = (struct netc_devinfo *)id->data;
+ if (!devinfo)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "No device information\n");
+
+ priv->devinfo = devinfo;
+ regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "ierb");
+ if (IS_ERR(regs))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(regs),
+ "Missing IERB resource\n");
+
+ priv->ierb = regs;
+ regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "prb");
+ if (IS_ERR(regs))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(regs),
+ "Missing PRB resource\n");
+
+ priv->prb = regs;
+ if (devinfo->flags & NETC_HAS_NETCMIX) {
+ regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "netcmix");
+ if (IS_ERR(regs))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(regs),
+ "Missing NETCMIX resource\n");
+ priv->netcmix = regs;
+ }
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
+ if (devinfo->netcmix_init) {
+ err = devinfo->netcmix_init(pdev);
+ if (err)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, err,
+ "Initializing NETCMIX failed\n");
+ }
+
+ err = netc_ierb_init(pdev);
+ if (err)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Initializing IERB failed\n");
+
+ if (netc_prb_check_error(priv) < 0)
+ dev_warn(dev, "The current IERB configuration is invalid\n");
+
+ netc_blk_ctrl_create_debugfs(priv);
+
+ err = of_platform_populate(node, NULL, NULL, dev);
+ if (err) {
+ netc_blk_ctrl_remove_debugfs(priv);
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "of_platform_populate failed\n");
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void netc_blk_ctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ of_platform_depopulate(&pdev->dev);
+ netc_blk_ctrl_remove_debugfs(priv);
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver netc_blk_ctrl_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "nxp-netc-blk-ctrl",
+ .of_match_table = netc_blk_ctrl_match,
+ },
+ .probe = netc_blk_ctrl_probe,
+ .remove = netc_blk_ctrl_remove,
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(netc_blk_ctrl_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NXP NETC Blocks Control Driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
diff --git a/include/linux/fsl/netc_global.h b/include/linux/fsl/netc_global.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fdecca8c90f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/fsl/netc_global.h
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause) */
+/* Copyright 2024 NXP
+ */
+#ifndef __NETC_GLOBAL_H
+#define __NETC_GLOBAL_H
+
+#include <linux/io.h>
+
+static inline u32 netc_read(void __iomem *reg)
+{
+ return ioread32(reg);
+}
+
+static inline void netc_write(void __iomem *reg, u32 val)
+{
+ iowrite32(val, reg);
+}
+
+#endif
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: extract common ENETC PF parts for LS1028A and i.MX95 platforms
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 04/13] net: enetc: add initial netc-blk-ctrl driver support Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-23 6:38 ` Claudiu Manoil
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module Wei Fang
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
The ENETC PF driver of LS1028A (rev 1.0) is incompatible with the version
used on the i.MX95 platform (rev 4.1), except for the station interface
(SI) part. To reduce code redundancy and prepare for a new driver for rev
4.1 and later, extract shared interfaces from enetc_pf.c and move them to
enetc_pf_common.c. This refactoring lays the groundwork for compiling
enetc_pf_common.c into a shared driver for both platforms' PF drivers.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---
v2 changes:
This patch is separated from v1 patch 5 ("net: enetc: add enetc-pf-common
driver support"), it just moved some common functions from enetc_pf.c to
enetc_pf_common.c.
v3 changes:
Change the title and refactor the commit message.
v4: no changes.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile | 2 +-
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c | 297 +-----------------
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h | 13 +
.../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c | 295 +++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 313 insertions(+), 294 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
index 737c32f83ea5..8f4d8e9c37a0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_CORE) += fsl-enetc-core.o
fsl-enetc-core-y := enetc.o enetc_cbdr.o enetc_ethtool.o
obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC) += fsl-enetc.o
-fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o
+fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o enetc_pf_common.o
fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_PCI_IOV) += enetc_msg.o
fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_QOS) += enetc_qos.o
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
index 8f6b0bf48139..3cdd149056f9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
@@ -2,11 +2,8 @@
/* Copyright 2017-2019 NXP */
#include <linux/unaligned.h>
-#include <linux/mdio.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/fsl/enetc_mdio.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
-#include <linux/of_mdio.h>
#include <linux/of_net.h>
#include <linux/pcs-lynx.h>
#include "enetc_ierb.h"
@@ -14,7 +11,7 @@
#define ENETC_DRV_NAME_STR "ENETC PF driver"
-static void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
+void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
{
u32 upper = __raw_readl(hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR0(si));
u16 lower = __raw_readw(hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR1(si));
@@ -23,8 +20,8 @@ static void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
put_unaligned_le16(lower, addr + 4);
}
-static void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
- const u8 *addr)
+void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
+ const u8 *addr)
{
u32 upper = get_unaligned_le32(addr);
u16 lower = get_unaligned_le16(addr + 4);
@@ -33,20 +30,6 @@ static void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
__raw_writew(lower, hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR1(si));
}
-static int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr)
-{
- struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
- struct sockaddr *saddr = addr;
-
- if (!is_valid_ether_addr(saddr->sa_data))
- return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
-
- eth_hw_addr_set(ndev, saddr->sa_data);
- enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(&priv->si->hw, 0, saddr->sa_data);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static void enetc_set_vlan_promisc(struct enetc_hw *hw, char si_map)
{
u32 val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC_PSIPVMR);
@@ -393,56 +376,6 @@ static int enetc_pf_set_vf_spoofchk(struct net_device *ndev, int vf, bool en)
return 0;
}
-static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
- int si)
-{
- struct device *dev = &pf->si->pdev->dev;
- struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
- u8 mac_addr[ETH_ALEN] = { 0 };
- int err;
-
- /* (1) try to get the MAC address from the device tree */
- if (np) {
- err = of_get_mac_address(np, mac_addr);
- if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- return err;
- }
-
- /* (2) bootloader supplied MAC address */
- if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr))
- enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(hw, si, mac_addr);
-
- /* (3) choose a random one */
- if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr)) {
- eth_random_addr(mac_addr);
- dev_info(dev, "no MAC address specified for SI%d, using %pM\n",
- si, mac_addr);
- }
-
- enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(hw, si, mac_addr);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node *np,
- struct enetc_pf *pf)
-{
- int err, i;
-
- /* The PF might take its MAC from the device tree */
- err = enetc_setup_mac_address(np, pf, 0);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
- for (i = 0; i < pf->total_vfs; i++) {
- err = enetc_setup_mac_address(NULL, pf, i + 1);
- if (err)
- return err;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static void enetc_port_assign_rfs_entries(struct enetc_si *si)
{
struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
@@ -775,187 +708,6 @@ static const struct net_device_ops enetc_ndev_ops = {
.ndo_xdp_xmit = enetc_xdp_xmit,
};
-static void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
- const struct net_device_ops *ndev_ops)
-{
- struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
-
- SET_NETDEV_DEV(ndev, &si->pdev->dev);
- priv->ndev = ndev;
- priv->si = si;
- priv->dev = &si->pdev->dev;
- si->ndev = ndev;
-
- priv->msg_enable = (NETIF_MSG_WOL << 1) - 1;
- ndev->netdev_ops = ndev_ops;
- enetc_set_ethtool_ops(ndev);
- ndev->watchdog_timeo = 5 * HZ;
- ndev->max_mtu = ENETC_MAX_MTU;
-
- ndev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
- NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
- NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER | NETIF_F_LOOPBACK |
- NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
- ndev->features = NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
- NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
- NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
- NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
- ndev->vlan_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM |
- NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
-
- if (si->num_rss)
- ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_RXHASH;
-
- ndev->priv_flags |= IFF_UNICAST_FLT;
- ndev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT |
- NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_RX_SG |
- NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT_SG;
-
- if (si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_PSFP && !enetc_psfp_enable(priv)) {
- priv->active_offloads |= ENETC_F_QCI;
- ndev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
- ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
- }
-
- /* pick up primary MAC address from SI */
- enetc_load_primary_mac_addr(&si->hw, ndev);
-}
-
-static int enetc_mdio_probe(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *np)
-{
- struct device *dev = &pf->si->pdev->dev;
- struct enetc_mdio_priv *mdio_priv;
- struct mii_bus *bus;
- int err;
-
- bus = devm_mdiobus_alloc_size(dev, sizeof(*mdio_priv));
- if (!bus)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- bus->name = "Freescale ENETC MDIO Bus";
- bus->read = enetc_mdio_read_c22;
- bus->write = enetc_mdio_write_c22;
- bus->read_c45 = enetc_mdio_read_c45;
- bus->write_c45 = enetc_mdio_write_c45;
- bus->parent = dev;
- mdio_priv = bus->priv;
- mdio_priv->hw = &pf->si->hw;
- mdio_priv->mdio_base = ENETC_EMDIO_BASE;
- snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s", dev_name(dev));
-
- err = of_mdiobus_register(bus, np);
- if (err)
- return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "cannot register MDIO bus\n");
-
- pf->mdio = bus;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void enetc_mdio_remove(struct enetc_pf *pf)
-{
- if (pf->mdio)
- mdiobus_unregister(pf->mdio);
-}
-
-static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
-{
- struct device *dev = &pf->si->pdev->dev;
- struct enetc_mdio_priv *mdio_priv;
- struct phylink_pcs *phylink_pcs;
- struct mii_bus *bus;
- int err;
-
- bus = mdiobus_alloc_size(sizeof(*mdio_priv));
- if (!bus)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- bus->name = "Freescale ENETC internal MDIO Bus";
- bus->read = enetc_mdio_read_c22;
- bus->write = enetc_mdio_write_c22;
- bus->read_c45 = enetc_mdio_read_c45;
- bus->write_c45 = enetc_mdio_write_c45;
- bus->parent = dev;
- bus->phy_mask = ~0;
- mdio_priv = bus->priv;
- mdio_priv->hw = &pf->si->hw;
- mdio_priv->mdio_base = ENETC_PM_IMDIO_BASE;
- snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s-imdio", dev_name(dev));
-
- err = mdiobus_register(bus);
- if (err) {
- dev_err(dev, "cannot register internal MDIO bus (%d)\n", err);
- goto free_mdio_bus;
- }
-
- phylink_pcs = lynx_pcs_create_mdiodev(bus, 0);
- if (IS_ERR(phylink_pcs)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(phylink_pcs);
- dev_err(dev, "cannot create lynx pcs (%d)\n", err);
- goto unregister_mdiobus;
- }
-
- pf->imdio = bus;
- pf->pcs = phylink_pcs;
-
- return 0;
-
-unregister_mdiobus:
- mdiobus_unregister(bus);
-free_mdio_bus:
- mdiobus_free(bus);
- return err;
-}
-
-static void enetc_imdio_remove(struct enetc_pf *pf)
-{
- if (pf->pcs)
- lynx_pcs_destroy(pf->pcs);
- if (pf->imdio) {
- mdiobus_unregister(pf->imdio);
- mdiobus_free(pf->imdio);
- }
-}
-
-static bool enetc_port_has_pcs(struct enetc_pf *pf)
-{
- return (pf->if_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII ||
- pf->if_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX ||
- pf->if_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX ||
- pf->if_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII);
-}
-
-static int enetc_mdiobus_create(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *node)
-{
- struct device_node *mdio_np;
- int err;
-
- mdio_np = of_get_child_by_name(node, "mdio");
- if (mdio_np) {
- err = enetc_mdio_probe(pf, mdio_np);
-
- of_node_put(mdio_np);
- if (err)
- return err;
- }
-
- if (enetc_port_has_pcs(pf)) {
- err = enetc_imdio_create(pf);
- if (err) {
- enetc_mdio_remove(pf);
- return err;
- }
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf)
-{
- enetc_mdio_remove(pf);
- enetc_imdio_remove(pf);
-}
-
static struct phylink_pcs *
enetc_pl_mac_select_pcs(struct phylink_config *config, phy_interface_t iface)
{
@@ -1101,47 +853,6 @@ static const struct phylink_mac_ops enetc_mac_phylink_ops = {
.mac_link_down = enetc_pl_mac_link_down,
};
-static int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv,
- struct device_node *node)
-{
- struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(priv->si);
- struct phylink *phylink;
- int err;
-
- pf->phylink_config.dev = &priv->ndev->dev;
- pf->phylink_config.type = PHYLINK_NETDEV;
- pf->phylink_config.mac_capabilities = MAC_ASYM_PAUSE | MAC_SYM_PAUSE |
- MAC_10 | MAC_100 | MAC_1000 | MAC_2500FD;
-
- __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL,
- pf->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
- __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII,
- pf->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
- __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX,
- pf->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
- __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX,
- pf->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
- __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII,
- pf->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
- phy_interface_set_rgmii(pf->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
-
- phylink = phylink_create(&pf->phylink_config, of_fwnode_handle(node),
- pf->if_mode, &enetc_mac_phylink_ops);
- if (IS_ERR(phylink)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(phylink);
- return err;
- }
-
- priv->phylink = phylink;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
-{
- phylink_destroy(priv->phylink);
-}
-
/* Initialize the entire shared memory for the flow steering entries
* of this port (PF + VFs)
*/
@@ -1338,7 +1049,7 @@ static int enetc_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
if (err)
goto err_mdiobus_create;
- err = enetc_phylink_create(priv, node);
+ err = enetc_phylink_create(priv, node, &enetc_mac_phylink_ops);
if (err)
goto err_phylink_create;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
index c26bd66e4597..92a26b09cf57 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
@@ -58,3 +58,16 @@ struct enetc_pf {
int enetc_msg_psi_init(struct enetc_pf *pf);
void enetc_msg_psi_free(struct enetc_pf *pf);
void enetc_msg_handle_rxmsg(struct enetc_pf *pf, int mbox_id, u16 *status);
+
+void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr);
+void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
+ const u8 *addr);
+int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr);
+int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf);
+void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
+ const struct net_device_ops *ndev_ops);
+int enetc_mdiobus_create(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *node);
+void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf);
+int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node *node,
+ const struct phylink_mac_ops *ops);
+void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..bce81a4f6f88
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause)
+/* Copyright 2024 NXP */
+
+#include <linux/fsl/enetc_mdio.h>
+#include <linux/of_mdio.h>
+#include <linux/of_net.h>
+#include <linux/pcs-lynx.h>
+
+#include "enetc_pf.h"
+
+int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr)
+{
+ struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+ struct sockaddr *saddr = addr;
+
+ if (!is_valid_ether_addr(saddr->sa_data))
+ return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
+
+ eth_hw_addr_set(ndev, saddr->sa_data);
+ enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(&priv->si->hw, 0, saddr->sa_data);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
+ int si)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pf->si->pdev->dev;
+ struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
+ u8 mac_addr[ETH_ALEN] = { 0 };
+ int err;
+
+ /* (1) try to get the MAC address from the device tree */
+ if (np) {
+ err = of_get_mac_address(np, mac_addr);
+ if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ /* (2) bootloader supplied MAC address */
+ if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr))
+ enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(hw, si, mac_addr);
+
+ /* (3) choose a random one */
+ if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr)) {
+ eth_random_addr(mac_addr);
+ dev_info(dev, "no MAC address specified for SI%d, using %pM\n",
+ si, mac_addr);
+ }
+
+ enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(hw, si, mac_addr);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ int err, i;
+
+ /* The PF might take its MAC from the device tree */
+ err = enetc_setup_mac_address(np, pf, 0);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < pf->total_vfs; i++) {
+ err = enetc_setup_mac_address(NULL, pf, i + 1);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
+ const struct net_device_ops *ndev_ops)
+{
+ struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+
+ SET_NETDEV_DEV(ndev, &si->pdev->dev);
+ priv->ndev = ndev;
+ priv->si = si;
+ priv->dev = &si->pdev->dev;
+ si->ndev = ndev;
+
+ priv->msg_enable = (NETIF_MSG_WOL << 1) - 1;
+ ndev->netdev_ops = ndev_ops;
+ enetc_set_ethtool_ops(ndev);
+ ndev->watchdog_timeo = 5 * HZ;
+ ndev->max_mtu = ENETC_MAX_MTU;
+
+ ndev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
+ NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
+ NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER | NETIF_F_LOOPBACK |
+ NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
+ ndev->features = NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
+ NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
+ NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
+ NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
+ ndev->vlan_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM |
+ NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
+
+ if (si->num_rss)
+ ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_RXHASH;
+
+ ndev->priv_flags |= IFF_UNICAST_FLT;
+ ndev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT |
+ NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_RX_SG |
+ NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT_SG;
+
+ if (si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_PSFP && !enetc_psfp_enable(priv)) {
+ priv->active_offloads |= ENETC_F_QCI;
+ ndev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
+ ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
+ }
+
+ /* pick up primary MAC address from SI */
+ enetc_load_primary_mac_addr(&si->hw, ndev);
+}
+
+static int enetc_mdio_probe(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *np)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pf->si->pdev->dev;
+ struct enetc_mdio_priv *mdio_priv;
+ struct mii_bus *bus;
+ int err;
+
+ bus = devm_mdiobus_alloc_size(dev, sizeof(*mdio_priv));
+ if (!bus)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ bus->name = "Freescale ENETC MDIO Bus";
+ bus->read = enetc_mdio_read_c22;
+ bus->write = enetc_mdio_write_c22;
+ bus->read_c45 = enetc_mdio_read_c45;
+ bus->write_c45 = enetc_mdio_write_c45;
+ bus->parent = dev;
+ mdio_priv = bus->priv;
+ mdio_priv->hw = &pf->si->hw;
+ mdio_priv->mdio_base = ENETC_EMDIO_BASE;
+ snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s", dev_name(dev));
+
+ err = of_mdiobus_register(bus, np);
+ if (err)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "cannot register MDIO bus\n");
+
+ pf->mdio = bus;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void enetc_mdio_remove(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ if (pf->mdio)
+ mdiobus_unregister(pf->mdio);
+}
+
+static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pf->si->pdev->dev;
+ struct enetc_mdio_priv *mdio_priv;
+ struct phylink_pcs *phylink_pcs;
+ struct mii_bus *bus;
+ int err;
+
+ bus = mdiobus_alloc_size(sizeof(*mdio_priv));
+ if (!bus)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ bus->name = "Freescale ENETC internal MDIO Bus";
+ bus->read = enetc_mdio_read_c22;
+ bus->write = enetc_mdio_write_c22;
+ bus->read_c45 = enetc_mdio_read_c45;
+ bus->write_c45 = enetc_mdio_write_c45;
+ bus->parent = dev;
+ bus->phy_mask = ~0;
+ mdio_priv = bus->priv;
+ mdio_priv->hw = &pf->si->hw;
+ mdio_priv->mdio_base = ENETC_PM_IMDIO_BASE;
+ snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s-imdio", dev_name(dev));
+
+ err = mdiobus_register(bus);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "cannot register internal MDIO bus (%d)\n", err);
+ goto free_mdio_bus;
+ }
+
+ phylink_pcs = lynx_pcs_create_mdiodev(bus, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(phylink_pcs)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(phylink_pcs);
+ dev_err(dev, "cannot create lynx pcs (%d)\n", err);
+ goto unregister_mdiobus;
+ }
+
+ pf->imdio = bus;
+ pf->pcs = phylink_pcs;
+
+ return 0;
+
+unregister_mdiobus:
+ mdiobus_unregister(bus);
+free_mdio_bus:
+ mdiobus_free(bus);
+ return err;
+}
+
+static void enetc_imdio_remove(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ if (pf->pcs)
+ lynx_pcs_destroy(pf->pcs);
+
+ if (pf->imdio) {
+ mdiobus_unregister(pf->imdio);
+ mdiobus_free(pf->imdio);
+ }
+}
+
+static bool enetc_port_has_pcs(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ return (pf->if_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII ||
+ pf->if_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX ||
+ pf->if_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX ||
+ pf->if_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII);
+}
+
+int enetc_mdiobus_create(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *node)
+{
+ struct device_node *mdio_np;
+ int err;
+
+ mdio_np = of_get_child_by_name(node, "mdio");
+ if (mdio_np) {
+ err = enetc_mdio_probe(pf, mdio_np);
+
+ of_node_put(mdio_np);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ if (enetc_port_has_pcs(pf)) {
+ err = enetc_imdio_create(pf);
+ if (err) {
+ enetc_mdio_remove(pf);
+ return err;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ enetc_mdio_remove(pf);
+ enetc_imdio_remove(pf);
+}
+
+int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node *node,
+ const struct phylink_mac_ops *ops)
+{
+ struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(priv->si);
+ struct phylink *phylink;
+ int err;
+
+ pf->phylink_config.dev = &priv->ndev->dev;
+ pf->phylink_config.type = PHYLINK_NETDEV;
+ pf->phylink_config.mac_capabilities = MAC_ASYM_PAUSE | MAC_SYM_PAUSE |
+ MAC_10 | MAC_100 | MAC_1000 | MAC_2500FD;
+
+ __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL,
+ pf->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
+ __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII,
+ pf->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
+ __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX,
+ pf->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
+ __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX,
+ pf->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
+ __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII,
+ pf->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
+ phy_interface_set_rgmii(pf->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
+
+ phylink = phylink_create(&pf->phylink_config, of_fwnode_handle(node),
+ pf->if_mode, ops);
+ if (IS_ERR(phylink)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(phylink);
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ priv->phylink = phylink;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
+{
+ phylink_destroy(priv->phylink);
+}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: extract common ENETC PF parts for LS1028A and i.MX95 platforms Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-22 16:20 ` Frank Li
2024-10-23 6:38 ` Claudiu Manoil
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 07/13] net: enetc: remove ERR050089 workaround for i.MX95 Wei Fang
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 2 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
Compile enetc_pf_common.c as a standalone module to allow shared usage
between ENETC v1 and v4 PF drivers. Add struct enetc_pf_ops to register
different hardware operation interfaces for both ENETC v1 and v4 PF
drivers.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
---
v2 changes:
This patch is separated from v1 patch 5 ("net: enetc: add enetc-pf-common
driver support"), only the changes to compile enetc_pf_common.c into a
separated driver are kept.
v3 changes:
Refactor the commit message.
v4 changes: Remove the input prompt of CONFIG_NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig | 9 ++++
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile | 5 +-
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c | 26 ++++++++--
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h | 21 ++++++--
.../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++---
5 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
index 51d80ea959d4..e1b151a98b41 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
@@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ config FSL_ENETC_CORE
If compiled as module (M), the module name is fsl-enetc-core.
+config NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON
+ tristate
+ help
+ This module supports common functionality between drivers of
+ different versions of NXP ENETC PF controllers.
+
+ If compiled as module (M), the module name is nxp-enetc-pf-common.
+
config FSL_ENETC
tristate "ENETC PF driver"
depends on PCI_MSI
@@ -14,6 +22,7 @@ config FSL_ENETC
select FSL_ENETC_CORE
select FSL_ENETC_IERB
select FSL_ENETC_MDIO
+ select NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON
select PHYLINK
select PCS_LYNX
select DIMLIB
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
index 8f4d8e9c37a0..ebe232673ed4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
@@ -3,8 +3,11 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_CORE) += fsl-enetc-core.o
fsl-enetc-core-y := enetc.o enetc_cbdr.o enetc_ethtool.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON) += nxp-enetc-pf-common.o
+nxp-enetc-pf-common-y := enetc_pf_common.o
+
obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC) += fsl-enetc.o
-fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o enetc_pf_common.o
+fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o
fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_PCI_IOV) += enetc_msg.o
fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_QOS) += enetc_qos.o
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
index 3cdd149056f9..7522316ddfea 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
#define ENETC_DRV_NAME_STR "ENETC PF driver"
-void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
+static void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
{
u32 upper = __raw_readl(hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR0(si));
u16 lower = __raw_readw(hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR1(si));
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
put_unaligned_le16(lower, addr + 4);
}
-void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
- const u8 *addr)
+static void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
+ const u8 *addr)
{
u32 upper = get_unaligned_le32(addr);
u16 lower = get_unaligned_le16(addr + 4);
@@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
__raw_writew(lower, hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR1(si));
}
+static struct phylink_pcs *enetc_pf_create_pcs(struct enetc_pf *pf,
+ struct mii_bus *bus)
+{
+ return lynx_pcs_create_mdiodev(bus, 0);
+}
+
+static void enetc_pf_destroy_pcs(struct phylink_pcs *pcs)
+{
+ lynx_pcs_destroy(pcs);
+}
+
static void enetc_set_vlan_promisc(struct enetc_hw *hw, char si_map)
{
u32 val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC_PSIPVMR);
@@ -970,6 +981,14 @@ static void enetc_psi_destroy(struct pci_dev *pdev)
enetc_pci_remove(pdev);
}
+static const struct enetc_pf_ops enetc_pf_ops = {
+ .set_si_primary_mac = enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr,
+ .get_si_primary_mac = enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr,
+ .create_pcs = enetc_pf_create_pcs,
+ .destroy_pcs = enetc_pf_destroy_pcs,
+ .enable_psfp = enetc_psfp_enable,
+};
+
static int enetc_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
const struct pci_device_id *ent)
{
@@ -997,6 +1016,7 @@ static int enetc_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
pf->si = si;
pf->total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
+ enetc_pf_ops_register(pf, &enetc_pf_ops);
err = enetc_setup_mac_addresses(node, pf);
if (err)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
index 92a26b09cf57..39db9d5c2e50 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
@@ -28,6 +28,16 @@ struct enetc_vf_state {
enum enetc_vf_flags flags;
};
+struct enetc_pf;
+
+struct enetc_pf_ops {
+ void (*set_si_primary_mac)(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, const u8 *addr);
+ void (*get_si_primary_mac)(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr);
+ struct phylink_pcs *(*create_pcs)(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct mii_bus *bus);
+ void (*destroy_pcs)(struct phylink_pcs *pcs);
+ int (*enable_psfp)(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv);
+};
+
struct enetc_pf {
struct enetc_si *si;
int num_vfs; /* number of active VFs, after sriov_init */
@@ -50,6 +60,8 @@ struct enetc_pf {
phy_interface_t if_mode;
struct phylink_config phylink_config;
+
+ const struct enetc_pf_ops *ops;
};
#define phylink_to_enetc_pf(config) \
@@ -59,9 +71,6 @@ int enetc_msg_psi_init(struct enetc_pf *pf);
void enetc_msg_psi_free(struct enetc_pf *pf);
void enetc_msg_handle_rxmsg(struct enetc_pf *pf, int mbox_id, u16 *status);
-void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr);
-void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
- const u8 *addr);
int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr);
int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf);
void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
@@ -71,3 +80,9 @@ void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf);
int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node *node,
const struct phylink_mac_ops *ops);
void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv);
+
+static inline void enetc_pf_ops_register(struct enetc_pf *pf,
+ const struct enetc_pf_ops *ops)
+{
+ pf->ops = ops;
+}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
index bce81a4f6f88..94690ed92e3f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
@@ -8,19 +8,37 @@
#include "enetc_pf.h"
+static int enetc_set_si_hw_addr(struct enetc_pf *pf, int si, u8 *mac_addr)
+{
+ struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
+
+ if (pf->ops->set_si_primary_mac)
+ pf->ops->set_si_primary_mac(hw, si, mac_addr);
+ else
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr)
{
struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+ struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(priv->si);
struct sockaddr *saddr = addr;
+ int err;
if (!is_valid_ether_addr(saddr->sa_data))
return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
+ err = enetc_set_si_hw_addr(pf, 0, saddr->sa_data);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
eth_hw_addr_set(ndev, saddr->sa_data);
- enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(&priv->si->hw, 0, saddr->sa_data);
return 0;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_pf_set_mac_addr);
static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
int si)
@@ -38,8 +56,8 @@ static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
}
/* (2) bootloader supplied MAC address */
- if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr))
- enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(hw, si, mac_addr);
+ if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr) && pf->ops->get_si_primary_mac)
+ pf->ops->get_si_primary_mac(hw, si, mac_addr);
/* (3) choose a random one */
if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr)) {
@@ -48,7 +66,9 @@ static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
si, mac_addr);
}
- enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(hw, si, mac_addr);
+ err = enetc_set_si_hw_addr(pf, si, mac_addr);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
return 0;
}
@@ -70,11 +90,13 @@ int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf)
return 0;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_setup_mac_addresses);
void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
const struct net_device_ops *ndev_ops)
{
struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+ struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
SET_NETDEV_DEV(ndev, &si->pdev->dev);
priv->ndev = ndev;
@@ -107,7 +129,8 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_RX_SG |
NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT_SG;
- if (si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_PSFP && !enetc_psfp_enable(priv)) {
+ if (si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_PSFP && pf->ops->enable_psfp &&
+ !pf->ops->enable_psfp(priv)) {
priv->active_offloads |= ENETC_F_QCI;
ndev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
@@ -116,6 +139,7 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
/* pick up primary MAC address from SI */
enetc_load_primary_mac_addr(&si->hw, ndev);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_pf_netdev_setup);
static int enetc_mdio_probe(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *np)
{
@@ -162,6 +186,9 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
struct mii_bus *bus;
int err;
+ if (!pf->ops->create_pcs)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
bus = mdiobus_alloc_size(sizeof(*mdio_priv));
if (!bus)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -184,7 +211,7 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
goto free_mdio_bus;
}
- phylink_pcs = lynx_pcs_create_mdiodev(bus, 0);
+ phylink_pcs = pf->ops->create_pcs(pf, bus);
if (IS_ERR(phylink_pcs)) {
err = PTR_ERR(phylink_pcs);
dev_err(dev, "cannot create lynx pcs (%d)\n", err);
@@ -205,8 +232,8 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
static void enetc_imdio_remove(struct enetc_pf *pf)
{
- if (pf->pcs)
- lynx_pcs_destroy(pf->pcs);
+ if (pf->pcs && pf->ops->destroy_pcs)
+ pf->ops->destroy_pcs(pf->pcs);
if (pf->imdio) {
mdiobus_unregister(pf->imdio);
@@ -246,12 +273,14 @@ int enetc_mdiobus_create(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *node)
return 0;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_mdiobus_create);
void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf)
{
enetc_mdio_remove(pf);
enetc_imdio_remove(pf);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_mdiobus_destroy);
int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node *node,
const struct phylink_mac_ops *ops)
@@ -288,8 +317,13 @@ int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node *node,
return 0;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_phylink_create);
void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
{
phylink_destroy(priv->phylink);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_phylink_destroy);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NXP ENETC PF common functionality driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 07/13] net: enetc: remove ERR050089 workaround for i.MX95
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 08/13] PCI: Add NXP NETC vendor ID and device IDs Wei Fang
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
The ERR050089 workaround causes performance degradation and potential
functional issues (e.g., RCU stalls) under certain workloads. Since
new SoCs like i.MX95 do not require this workaround, use a static key
to compile out enetc_lock_mdio() and enetc_unlock_mdio() at runtime,
improving performance and avoiding unnecessary logic.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---
v2 changes: no changes
v3 changes: Change the title and refactor the commit message.
v4: no changes.
---
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h | 34 +++++++++++++------
.../ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c | 17 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
index 1619943fb263..6a7b9b75d660 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
@@ -396,18 +396,22 @@ struct enetc_hw {
*/
extern rwlock_t enetc_mdio_lock;
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(enetc_has_err050089);
+
/* use this locking primitive only on the fast datapath to
* group together multiple non-MDIO register accesses to
* minimize the overhead of the lock
*/
static inline void enetc_lock_mdio(void)
{
- read_lock(&enetc_mdio_lock);
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&enetc_has_err050089))
+ read_lock(&enetc_mdio_lock);
}
static inline void enetc_unlock_mdio(void)
{
- read_unlock(&enetc_mdio_lock);
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&enetc_has_err050089))
+ read_unlock(&enetc_mdio_lock);
}
/* use these accessors only on the fast datapath under
@@ -416,14 +420,16 @@ static inline void enetc_unlock_mdio(void)
*/
static inline u32 enetc_rd_reg_hot(void __iomem *reg)
{
- lockdep_assert_held(&enetc_mdio_lock);
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&enetc_has_err050089))
+ lockdep_assert_held(&enetc_mdio_lock);
return ioread32(reg);
}
static inline void enetc_wr_reg_hot(void __iomem *reg, u32 val)
{
- lockdep_assert_held(&enetc_mdio_lock);
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&enetc_has_err050089))
+ lockdep_assert_held(&enetc_mdio_lock);
iowrite32(val, reg);
}
@@ -452,9 +458,13 @@ static inline u32 _enetc_rd_mdio_reg_wa(void __iomem *reg)
unsigned long flags;
u32 val;
- write_lock_irqsave(&enetc_mdio_lock, flags);
- val = ioread32(reg);
- write_unlock_irqrestore(&enetc_mdio_lock, flags);
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&enetc_has_err050089)) {
+ write_lock_irqsave(&enetc_mdio_lock, flags);
+ val = ioread32(reg);
+ write_unlock_irqrestore(&enetc_mdio_lock, flags);
+ } else {
+ val = ioread32(reg);
+ }
return val;
}
@@ -463,9 +473,13 @@ static inline void _enetc_wr_mdio_reg_wa(void __iomem *reg, u32 val)
{
unsigned long flags;
- write_lock_irqsave(&enetc_mdio_lock, flags);
- iowrite32(val, reg);
- write_unlock_irqrestore(&enetc_mdio_lock, flags);
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&enetc_has_err050089)) {
+ write_lock_irqsave(&enetc_mdio_lock, flags);
+ iowrite32(val, reg);
+ write_unlock_irqrestore(&enetc_mdio_lock, flags);
+ } else {
+ iowrite32(val, reg);
+ }
}
#ifdef ioread64
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c
index a1b595bd7993..2445e35a764a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c
@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
#define ENETC_MDIO_BUS_NAME ENETC_MDIO_DEV_NAME " Bus"
#define ENETC_MDIO_DRV_NAME ENETC_MDIO_DEV_NAME " driver"
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(enetc_has_err050089);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_has_err050089);
+
static int enetc_pci_mdio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
const struct pci_device_id *ent)
{
@@ -62,6 +65,12 @@ static int enetc_pci_mdio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
goto err_pci_mem_reg;
}
+ if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE &&
+ pdev->device == ENETC_MDIO_DEV_ID) {
+ static_branch_inc(&enetc_has_err050089);
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Enabled ERR050089 workaround\n");
+ }
+
err = of_mdiobus_register(bus, dev->of_node);
if (err)
goto err_mdiobus_reg;
@@ -88,6 +97,14 @@ static void enetc_pci_mdio_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
struct enetc_mdio_priv *mdio_priv;
mdiobus_unregister(bus);
+
+ if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE &&
+ pdev->device == ENETC_MDIO_DEV_ID) {
+ static_branch_dec(&enetc_has_err050089);
+ if (!static_key_enabled(&enetc_has_err050089.key))
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Disabled ERR050089 workaround\n");
+ }
+
mdio_priv = bus->priv;
iounmap(mdio_priv->hw->port);
pci_release_region(pdev, 0);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 08/13] PCI: Add NXP NETC vendor ID and device IDs
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 07/13] net: enetc: remove ERR050089 workaround for i.MX95 Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 09/13] net: enetc: add i.MX95 EMDIO support Wei Fang
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
NXP NETC is a multi-function RCiEP and it contains multiple functions,
such as EMDIO, PTP Timer, ENETC PF and VF. Therefore, add these device
IDs to pci_ids.h.
Below are the device IDs and corresponding drivers.
PCI_DEVICE_ID_NXP2_ENETC_PF: nxp-enetc4
PCI_DEVICE_ID_NXP2_NETC_EMDIO: fsl-enetc-mdio
PCI_DEVICE_ID_NXP2_NETC_TIMER: ptp_netc
PCI_DEVICE_ID_NXP2_ENETC_VF: fsl-enetc-vf
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
v2 changes: Refine the commit message.
v3: no changes.
v4: no changes.
---
include/linux/pci_ids.h | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
index 4cf6aaed5f35..acd7ae774913 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
@@ -1556,6 +1556,13 @@
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_PHILIPS_SAA7146 0x7146
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_PHILIPS_SAA9730 0x9730
+/* NXP has two vendor IDs, the other one is 0x1957 */
+#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_NXP2 PCI_VENDOR_ID_PHILIPS
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_NXP2_ENETC_PF 0xe101
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_NXP2_NETC_EMDIO 0xee00
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_NXP2_NETC_TIMER 0xee02
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_NXP2_ENETC_VF 0xef00
+
#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_EICON 0x1133
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_EICON_DIVA20 0xe002
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_EICON_DIVA20_U 0xe004
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 09/13] net: enetc: add i.MX95 EMDIO support
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 08/13] PCI: Add NXP NETC vendor ID and device IDs Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix() Wei Fang
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
The verdor ID and device ID of i.MX95 EMDIO are different from LS1028A
EMDIO, so add new vendor ID and device ID to pci_device_id table to
support i.MX95 EMDIO. And the i.MX95 EMDIO has two pins that need to be
controlled, namely MDC and MDIO.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---
v2: no changes
v3: no changes
v4: no changes
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c
index 2445e35a764a..9968a1e9b5ef 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pci_mdio.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
/* Copyright 2019 NXP */
#include <linux/fsl/enetc_mdio.h>
#include <linux/of_mdio.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
#include "enetc_pf.h"
#define ENETC_MDIO_DEV_ID 0xee01
@@ -71,6 +72,8 @@ static int enetc_pci_mdio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Enabled ERR050089 workaround\n");
}
+ pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev);
+
err = of_mdiobus_register(bus, dev->of_node);
if (err)
goto err_mdiobus_reg;
@@ -113,6 +116,7 @@ static void enetc_pci_mdio_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
static const struct pci_device_id enetc_pci_mdio_id_table[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, ENETC_MDIO_DEV_ID) },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NXP2, PCI_DEVICE_ID_NXP2_NETC_EMDIO) },
{ 0, } /* End of table. */
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, enetc_pci_mdio_id_table);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix()
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 09/13] net: enetc: add i.MX95 EMDIO support Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-23 6:37 ` Claudiu Manoil
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 11/13] net: enetc: optimize the allocation of tx_bdr Wei Fang
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
From: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
Extract enetc_int_vector_init() and enetc_int_vector_destroy() from
enetc_alloc_msix() so that the code is more concise and readable. In
addition, slightly different from before, the cleanup helper function
is used to manage dynamically allocated memory resources.
Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---
v2 changes:
This patch is separated from v1 patch 9 ("net: enetc: optimize the
allocation of tx_bdr"). Separate enetc_int_vector_init() from the
original patch. In addition, add new help function
enetc_int_vector_destroy().
v3 changes:
1. Add the description of cleanup helper function used
enetc_int_vector_init() to the commit message.
2. Fix the 'err' uninitialized issue when enetc_int_vector_init()
returns error.
v4: no changes
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 172 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
index 032d8eadd003..bd725561b8a2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
@@ -2965,6 +2965,87 @@ int enetc_ioctl(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_ioctl);
+static int enetc_int_vector_init(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int i,
+ int v_tx_rings)
+{
+ struct enetc_int_vector *v __free(kfree);
+ struct enetc_bdr *bdr;
+ int j, err;
+
+ v = kzalloc(struct_size(v, tx_ring, v_tx_rings), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!v)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ bdr = &v->rx_ring;
+ bdr->index = i;
+ bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
+ bdr->dev = priv->dev;
+ bdr->bd_count = priv->rx_bd_count;
+ bdr->buffer_offset = ENETC_RXB_PAD;
+ priv->rx_ring[i] = bdr;
+
+ err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&bdr->xdp.rxq, priv->ndev, i, 0);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&bdr->xdp.rxq,
+ MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED, NULL);
+ if (err) {
+ xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&bdr->xdp.rxq);
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ /* init defaults for adaptive IC */
+ if (priv->ic_mode & ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE) {
+ v->rx_ictt = 0x1;
+ v->rx_dim_en = true;
+ }
+
+ INIT_WORK(&v->rx_dim.work, enetc_rx_dim_work);
+ netif_napi_add(priv->ndev, &v->napi, enetc_poll);
+ v->count_tx_rings = v_tx_rings;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < v_tx_rings; j++) {
+ int idx;
+
+ /* default tx ring mapping policy */
+ idx = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
+ __set_bit(idx, &v->tx_rings_map);
+ bdr = &v->tx_ring[j];
+ bdr->index = idx;
+ bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
+ bdr->dev = priv->dev;
+ bdr->bd_count = priv->tx_bd_count;
+ priv->tx_ring[idx] = bdr;
+ }
+
+ priv->int_vector[i] = no_free_ptr(v);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void enetc_int_vector_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int i)
+{
+ struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[i];
+ struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring = &v->rx_ring;
+ int j, tx_ring_index;
+
+ xdp_rxq_info_unreg_mem_model(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
+ xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
+ netif_napi_del(&v->napi);
+ cancel_work_sync(&v->rx_dim.work);
+
+ priv->rx_ring[i] = NULL;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < v->count_tx_rings; j++) {
+ tx_ring_index = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
+ priv->tx_ring[tx_ring_index] = NULL;
+ }
+
+ kfree(v);
+ priv->int_vector[i] = NULL;
+}
+
int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = priv->si->pdev;
@@ -2987,62 +3068,9 @@ int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
v_tx_rings = priv->num_tx_rings / priv->bdr_int_num;
for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
- struct enetc_int_vector *v;
- struct enetc_bdr *bdr;
- int j;
-
- v = kzalloc(struct_size(v, tx_ring, v_tx_rings), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!v) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
- goto fail;
- }
-
- priv->int_vector[i] = v;
-
- bdr = &v->rx_ring;
- bdr->index = i;
- bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
- bdr->dev = priv->dev;
- bdr->bd_count = priv->rx_bd_count;
- bdr->buffer_offset = ENETC_RXB_PAD;
- priv->rx_ring[i] = bdr;
-
- err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&bdr->xdp.rxq, priv->ndev, i, 0);
- if (err) {
- kfree(v);
- goto fail;
- }
-
- err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&bdr->xdp.rxq,
- MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED, NULL);
- if (err) {
- xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&bdr->xdp.rxq);
- kfree(v);
+ err = enetc_int_vector_init(priv, i, v_tx_rings);
+ if (err)
goto fail;
- }
-
- /* init defaults for adaptive IC */
- if (priv->ic_mode & ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE) {
- v->rx_ictt = 0x1;
- v->rx_dim_en = true;
- }
- INIT_WORK(&v->rx_dim.work, enetc_rx_dim_work);
- netif_napi_add(priv->ndev, &v->napi, enetc_poll);
- v->count_tx_rings = v_tx_rings;
-
- for (j = 0; j < v_tx_rings; j++) {
- int idx;
-
- /* default tx ring mapping policy */
- idx = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
- __set_bit(idx, &v->tx_rings_map);
- bdr = &v->tx_ring[j];
- bdr->index = idx;
- bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
- bdr->dev = priv->dev;
- bdr->bd_count = priv->tx_bd_count;
- priv->tx_ring[idx] = bdr;
- }
}
num_stack_tx_queues = enetc_num_stack_tx_queues(priv);
@@ -3062,16 +3090,8 @@ int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
return 0;
fail:
- while (i--) {
- struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[i];
- struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring = &v->rx_ring;
-
- xdp_rxq_info_unreg_mem_model(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
- xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
- netif_napi_del(&v->napi);
- cancel_work_sync(&v->rx_dim.work);
- kfree(v);
- }
+ while (i--)
+ enetc_int_vector_destroy(priv, i);
pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
@@ -3083,26 +3103,8 @@ void enetc_free_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
{
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
- struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[i];
- struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring = &v->rx_ring;
-
- xdp_rxq_info_unreg_mem_model(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
- xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
- netif_napi_del(&v->napi);
- cancel_work_sync(&v->rx_dim.work);
- }
-
- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_rings; i++)
- priv->rx_ring[i] = NULL;
-
- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_rings; i++)
- priv->tx_ring[i] = NULL;
-
- for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
- kfree(priv->int_vector[i]);
- priv->int_vector[i] = NULL;
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++)
+ enetc_int_vector_destroy(priv, i);
/* disable all MSIX for this device */
pci_free_irq_vectors(priv->si->pdev);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 11/13] net: enetc: optimize the allocation of tx_bdr
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix() Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 13/13] MAINTAINERS: update ENETC driver files and maintainers Wei Fang
12 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
From: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
There is a situation where num_tx_rings cannot be divided by bdr_int_num.
For example, num_tx_rings is 8 and bdr_int_num is 3. According to the
previous logic, this results in two tx_bdr corresponding memories not
being allocated, so when sending packets to tx ring 6 or 7, wild pointers
will be accessed. Of course, this issue doesn't exist on LS1028A, because
its num_tx_rings is 8, and bdr_int_num is either 1 or 2. However, there
is a risk for the upcoming i.MX95. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure
that each tx_bdr can be allocated to the corresponding memory.
Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---
v2 changes:
This patch is separated from v1 patch 9 ("net: enetc: optimize the
allocation of tx_bdr"). Only the optimized part is kept.
v3: no changes, just rebase the patch from the previous one.
v4: no changes
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
index bd725561b8a2..bccbeb1f355c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
@@ -3049,10 +3049,10 @@ static void enetc_int_vector_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int i)
int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = priv->si->pdev;
+ int v_tx_rings, v_remainder;
int num_stack_tx_queues;
int first_xdp_tx_ring;
int i, n, err, nvec;
- int v_tx_rings;
nvec = ENETC_BDR_INT_BASE_IDX + priv->bdr_int_num;
/* allocate MSIX for both messaging and Rx/Tx interrupts */
@@ -3066,9 +3066,12 @@ int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
/* # of tx rings per int vector */
v_tx_rings = priv->num_tx_rings / priv->bdr_int_num;
+ v_remainder = priv->num_tx_rings % priv->bdr_int_num;
for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
- err = enetc_int_vector_init(priv, i, v_tx_rings);
+ int num_tx_rings = i < v_remainder ? v_tx_rings + 1 : v_tx_rings;
+
+ err = enetc_int_vector_init(priv, i, num_tx_rings);
if (err)
goto fail;
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 11/13] net: enetc: optimize the allocation of tx_bdr Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-22 19:27 ` Frank Li
2024-10-23 6:15 ` Claudiu Manoil
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 13/13] MAINTAINERS: update ENETC driver files and maintainers Wei Fang
12 siblings, 2 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
The i.MX95 ENETC has been upgraded to revision 4.1, which is different
from the LS1028A ENETC (revision 1.0) except for the SI part. Therefore,
the fsl-enetc driver is incompatible with i.MX95 ENETC PF. So add new
nxp-enetc4 driver to support i.MX95 ENETC PF, and this driver will be
used to support the ENETC PF with major revision 4 for other SoCs in the
future.
Currently, the nxp-enetc4 driver only supports basic transmission feature
for i.MX95 ENETC PF, the more basic and advanced features will be added
in the subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
---
v2 changes:
1. Refine the commit message.
2. Sort the header files.
3. Use dev_err_probe() in enetc4_pf_probe().
4. Remove unused variable 'pf' from enetc4_pf_remove().
v3 changes:
1. Remove is_enetc_rev1() from enetc_init_si_rings_params().
2. Use devm_add_action_or_reset() in enetc4_pf_probe().
3. Directly return dev_err_probe() in enetc4_pf_probe().
v4 changes:
1. Move clk_freq from enect_si to enetc_ndev_priv.
2. Remove is_enetc_rev4().
3. Add enetc4_pf_ethtool_ops for i.MX95 ENETC PF.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig | 17 +
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile | 3 +
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 38 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h | 13 +-
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h | 151 ++++
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c | 753 ++++++++++++++++++
.../ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c | 36 +-
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h | 13 +-
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h | 9 +
.../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c | 13 +-
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c | 2 +-
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c | 2 +
12 files changed, 1024 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h
create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
index e1b151a98b41..6c2779047dcd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
@@ -33,6 +33,23 @@ config FSL_ENETC
If compiled as module (M), the module name is fsl-enetc.
+config NXP_ENETC4
+ tristate "ENETC4 PF driver"
+ depends on PCI_MSI
+ select MDIO_DEVRES
+ select FSL_ENETC_CORE
+ select FSL_ENETC_MDIO
+ select NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON
+ select PHYLINK
+ select DIMLIB
+ help
+ This driver supports NXP ENETC devices with major revision 4. ENETC is
+ as the NIC functionality in NETC, it supports virtualization/isolation
+ based on PCIe Single Root IO Virtualization (SR-IOV) and a full range
+ of TSN standards and NIC offload capabilities.
+
+ If compiled as module (M), the module name is nxp-enetc4.
+
config FSL_ENETC_VF
tristate "ENETC VF driver"
depends on PCI_MSI
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
index ebe232673ed4..6fd27ee4fcd1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o
fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_PCI_IOV) += enetc_msg.o
fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_QOS) += enetc_qos.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_NXP_ENETC4) += nxp-enetc4.o
+nxp-enetc4-y := enetc4_pf.o
+
obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_VF) += fsl-enetc-vf.o
fsl-enetc-vf-y := enetc_vf.o
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
index bccbeb1f355c..1541c1bb888f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
/* Copyright 2017-2019 NXP */
#include "enetc.h"
+#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/bpf_trace.h>
#include <linux/tcp.h>
#include <linux/udp.h>
@@ -21,7 +22,7 @@ void enetc_port_mac_wr(struct enetc_si *si, u32 reg, u32 val)
{
enetc_port_wr(&si->hw, reg, val);
if (si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_QBU)
- enetc_port_wr(&si->hw, reg + ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET, val);
+ enetc_port_wr(&si->hw, reg + si->pmac_offset, val);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_port_mac_wr);
@@ -700,8 +701,9 @@ static void enetc_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *w)
net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode, dim->profile_ix);
struct enetc_int_vector *v =
container_of(dim, struct enetc_int_vector, rx_dim);
+ struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(v->rx_ring.ndev);
- v->rx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(moder.usec);
+ v->rx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(moder.usec, priv->sysclk_freq);
dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
}
@@ -1726,9 +1728,15 @@ void enetc_get_si_caps(struct enetc_si *si)
si->num_rx_rings = (val >> 16) & 0xff;
si->num_tx_rings = val & 0xff;
- val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIRFSCAPR);
- si->num_fs_entries = ENETC_SIRFSCAPR_GET_NUM_RFS(val);
- si->num_fs_entries = min(si->num_fs_entries, ENETC_MAX_RFS_SIZE);
+ val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIPCAPR0);
+ if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_RFS) {
+ val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIRFSCAPR);
+ si->num_fs_entries = ENETC_SIRFSCAPR_GET_NUM_RFS(val);
+ si->num_fs_entries = min(si->num_fs_entries, ENETC_MAX_RFS_SIZE);
+ } else {
+ /* ENETC which not supports RFS */
+ si->num_fs_entries = 0;
+ }
si->num_rss = 0;
val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIPCAPR0);
@@ -1742,8 +1750,11 @@ void enetc_get_si_caps(struct enetc_si *si)
if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBV)
si->hw_features |= ENETC_SI_F_QBV;
- if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU)
+ if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU) {
si->hw_features |= ENETC_SI_F_QBU;
+ si->pmac_offset = is_enetc_rev1(si) ? ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET :
+ ENETC4_PMAC_OFFSET;
+ }
if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_PSFP)
si->hw_features |= ENETC_SI_F_PSFP;
@@ -2056,7 +2067,7 @@ int enetc_configure_si(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
/* enable SI */
enetc_wr(hw, ENETC_SIMR, ENETC_SIMR_EN);
- if (si->num_rss) {
+ if (si->num_rss && is_enetc_rev1(si)) {
err = enetc_setup_default_rss_table(si, priv->num_rx_rings);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -2080,9 +2091,9 @@ void enetc_init_si_rings_params(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
*/
priv->num_rx_rings = min_t(int, cpus, si->num_rx_rings);
priv->num_tx_rings = si->num_tx_rings;
- priv->bdr_int_num = cpus;
+ priv->bdr_int_num = priv->num_rx_rings;
priv->ic_mode = ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE | ENETC_IC_TX_MANUAL;
- priv->tx_ictt = ENETC_TXIC_TIMETHR;
+ priv->tx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(600, priv->sysclk_freq);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_init_si_rings_params);
@@ -2475,10 +2486,14 @@ int enetc_open(struct net_device *ndev)
extended = !!(priv->active_offloads & ENETC_F_RX_TSTAMP);
- err = enetc_setup_irqs(priv);
+ err = clk_prepare_enable(priv->ref_clk);
if (err)
return err;
+ err = enetc_setup_irqs(priv);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_setup_irqs;
+
err = enetc_phylink_connect(ndev);
if (err)
goto err_phy_connect;
@@ -2510,6 +2525,8 @@ int enetc_open(struct net_device *ndev)
phylink_disconnect_phy(priv->phylink);
err_phy_connect:
enetc_free_irqs(priv);
+err_setup_irqs:
+ clk_disable_unprepare(priv->ref_clk);
return err;
}
@@ -2559,6 +2576,7 @@ int enetc_close(struct net_device *ndev)
enetc_assign_tx_resources(priv, NULL);
enetc_free_irqs(priv);
+ clk_disable_unprepare(priv->ref_clk);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
index 97524dfa234c..fe4bc082b3cf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <net/xdp.h>
#include "enetc_hw.h"
+#include "enetc4_hw.h"
#define ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE 9600
#define ENETC_MAX_MTU (ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE - \
@@ -247,10 +248,16 @@ struct enetc_si {
int num_rss; /* number of RSS buckets */
unsigned short pad;
int hw_features;
+ int pmac_offset; /* Only valid for PSI which supports 802.1Qbu */
};
#define ENETC_SI_ALIGN 32
+static inline bool is_enetc_rev1(struct enetc_si *si)
+{
+ return si->pdev->revision == ENETC_REV1;
+}
+
static inline void *enetc_si_priv(const struct enetc_si *si)
{
return (char *)si + ALIGN(sizeof(struct enetc_si), ENETC_SI_ALIGN);
@@ -302,7 +309,7 @@ struct enetc_cls_rule {
int used;
};
-#define ENETC_MAX_BDR_INT 2 /* fixed to max # of available cpus */
+#define ENETC_MAX_BDR_INT 6 /* fixed to max # of available cpus */
struct psfp_cap {
u32 max_streamid;
u32 max_psfp_filter;
@@ -340,7 +347,6 @@ enum enetc_ic_mode {
#define ENETC_RXIC_PKTTHR min_t(u32, 256, ENETC_RX_RING_DEFAULT_SIZE / 2)
#define ENETC_TXIC_PKTTHR min_t(u32, 128, ENETC_TX_RING_DEFAULT_SIZE / 2)
-#define ENETC_TXIC_TIMETHR enetc_usecs_to_cycles(600)
struct enetc_ndev_priv {
struct net_device *ndev;
@@ -388,6 +394,9 @@ struct enetc_ndev_priv {
* and link state updates
*/
struct mutex mm_lock;
+
+ struct clk *ref_clk; /* RGMII/RMII reference clock */
+ u64 sysclk_freq; /* NETC system clock frequency */
};
/* Messaging */
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b53549e810c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause) */
+/*
+ * This header file defines the register offsets and bit fields
+ * of ENETC4 PF and VFs. Note that the same registers as ENETC
+ * version 1.0 are defined in the enetc_hw.h file.
+ *
+ * Copyright 2024 NXP
+ */
+#ifndef __ENETC4_HW_H_
+#define __ENETC4_HW_H_
+
+/***************************ENETC port registers**************************/
+#define ENETC4_ECAPR0 0x0
+#define ECAPR0_RFS BIT(2)
+#define ECAPR0_TSD BIT(5)
+#define ECAPR0_RSS BIT(8)
+#define ECAPR0_RSC BIT(9)
+#define ECAPR0_LSO BIT(10)
+#define ECAPR0_WO BIT(13)
+
+#define ENETC4_ECAPR1 0x4
+#define ECAPR1_NUM_TCS GENMASK(6, 4)
+#define ECAPR1_NUM_MCH GENMASK(9, 8)
+#define ECAPR1_NUM_UCH GENMASK(11, 10)
+#define ECAPR1_NUM_MSIX GENMASK(22, 12)
+#define ECAPR1_NUM_VSI GENMASK(27, 24)
+#define ECAPR1_NUM_IPV BIT(31)
+
+#define ENETC4_ECAPR2 0x8
+#define ECAPR2_NUM_TX_BDR GENMASK(9, 0)
+#define ECAPR2_NUM_RX_BDR GENMASK(25, 16)
+
+#define ENETC4_PMR 0x10
+#define PMR_SI_EN(a) BIT((16 + (a)))
+
+/* Port Pause ON/OFF threshold register */
+#define ENETC4_PPAUONTR 0x108
+#define ENETC4_PPAUOFFTR 0x10c
+
+/* Port Station interface promiscuous MAC mode register */
+#define ENETC4_PSIPMMR 0x200
+#define PSIPMMR_SI_MAC_UP(a) BIT(a) /* a = SI index */
+#define PSIPMMR_SI_MAC_MP(a) BIT((a) + 16)
+
+/* Port Station interface promiscuous VLAN mode register */
+#define ENETC4_PSIPVMR 0x204
+
+/* Port RSS key register n. n = 0,1,2,...,9 */
+#define ENETC4_PRSSKR(n) ((n) * 0x4 + 0x250)
+
+/* Port station interface MAC address filtering capability register */
+#define ENETC4_PSIMAFCAPR 0x280
+#define PSIMAFCAPR_NUM_MAC_AFTE GENMASK(11, 0)
+
+/* Port station interface VLAN filtering capability register */
+#define ENETC4_PSIVLANFCAPR 0x2c0
+#define PSIVLANFCAPR_NUM_VLAN_FTE GENMASK(11, 0)
+
+/* Port station interface VLAN filtering mode register */
+#define ENETC4_PSIVLANFMR 0x2c4
+#define PSIVLANFMR_VS BIT(0)
+
+/* Port Station interface a primary MAC address registers */
+#define ENETC4_PSIPMAR0(a) ((a) * 0x80 + 0x2000)
+#define ENETC4_PSIPMAR1(a) ((a) * 0x80 + 0x2004)
+
+/* Port station interface a configuration register 0/2 */
+#define ENETC4_PSICFGR0(a) ((a) * 0x80 + 0x2010)
+#define PSICFGR0_VASE BIT(13)
+#define PSICFGR0_ASE BIT(15)
+#define PSICFGR0_ANTI_SPOOFING (PSICFGR0_VASE | PSICFGR0_ASE)
+
+#define ENETC4_PSICFGR2(a) ((a) * 0x80 + 0x2018)
+
+#define ENETC4_PMCAPR 0x4004
+#define PMCAPR_HD BIT(8)
+#define PMCAPR_FP GENMASK(10, 9)
+
+/* Port configuration register */
+#define ENETC4_PCR 0x4010
+#define PCR_HDR_FMT BIT(0)
+#define PCR_L2DOSE BIT(4)
+#define PCR_TIMER_CS BIT(8)
+#define PCR_PSPEED GENMASK(29, 16)
+#define PCR_PSPEED_VAL(speed) (((speed) / 10 - 1) << 16)
+
+/* Port MAC address register 0/1 */
+#define ENETC4_PMAR0 0x4020
+#define ENETC4_PMAR1 0x4024
+
+/* Port operational register */
+#define ENETC4_POR 0x4100
+
+/* Port traffic class a transmit maximum SDU register */
+#define ENETC4_PTCTMSDUR(a) ((a) * 0x20 + 0x4208)
+#define PTCTMSDUR_MAXSDU GENMASK(15, 0)
+#define PTCTMSDUR_SDU_TYPE GENMASK(17, 16)
+#define SDU_TYPE_PPDU 0
+#define SDU_TYPE_MPDU 1
+#define SDU_TYPE_MSDU 2
+
+#define ENETC4_PMAC_OFFSET 0x400
+#define ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(mac) (0x5008 + (mac) * 0x400)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_TX_EN BIT(0)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_RX_EN BIT(1)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_PAUSE_FWD BIT(7)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_PAUSE_IGN BIT(8)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_TX_ADDR_INS BIT(9)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_LOOP_EN BIT(10)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_LPBK_MODE GENMASK(12, 11)
+#define LPBCK_MODE_EXT_TX_CLK 0
+#define LPBCK_MODE_MAC_LEVEL 1
+#define LPBCK_MODE_INT_TX_CLK 2
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_CNT_FRM_EN BIT(13)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_TXP BIT(15)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_SEND_IDLE BIT(16)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_HD_FCEN BIT(18)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_SFD BIT(21)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_TX_FLUSH BIT(22)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_TX_LOWP_EN BIT(23)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_RX_LOWP_EMPTY BIT(24)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_SWR BIT(26)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_TS_MODE BIT(30)
+#define PM_CMD_CFG_MG BIT(31)
+
+/* Port MAC 0/1 Maximum Frame Length Register */
+#define ENETC4_PM_MAXFRM(mac) (0x5014 + (mac) * 0x400)
+
+/* Port MAC 0/1 Pause Quanta Register */
+#define ENETC4_PM_PAUSE_QUANTA(mac) (0x5054 + (mac) * 0x400)
+
+/* Port MAC 0/1 Pause Quanta Threshold Register */
+#define ENETC4_PM_PAUSE_THRESH(mac) (0x5064 + (mac) * 0x400)
+
+/* Port MAC 0 Interface Mode Control Register */
+#define ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(mac) (0x5300 + (mac) * 0x400)
+#define PM_IF_MODE_IFMODE GENMASK(2, 0)
+#define IFMODE_XGMII 0
+#define IFMODE_RMII 3
+#define IFMODE_RGMII 4
+#define IFMODE_SGMII 5
+#define PM_IF_MODE_REVMII BIT(3)
+#define PM_IF_MODE_M10 BIT(4)
+#define PM_IF_MODE_HD BIT(6)
+#define PM_IF_MODE_SSP GENMASK(14, 13)
+#define SSP_100M 0
+#define SSP_10M 1
+#define SSP_1G 2
+#define PM_IF_MODE_ENA BIT(15)
+
+#endif
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8e1b0a8f5ebe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,753 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause)
+/* Copyright 2024 NXP */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/fsl/netc_global.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_net.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned.h>
+
+#include "enetc_pf.h"
+
+#define ENETC_SI_MAX_RING_NUM 8
+
+static void enetc4_get_port_caps(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC4_ECAPR1);
+ pf->caps.num_vsi = (val & ECAPR1_NUM_VSI) >> 24;
+ pf->caps.num_msix = ((val & ECAPR1_NUM_MSIX) >> 12) + 1;
+
+ val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC4_ECAPR2);
+ pf->caps.num_rx_bdr = (val & ECAPR2_NUM_RX_BDR) >> 16;
+ pf->caps.num_tx_bdr = val & ECAPR2_NUM_TX_BDR;
+
+ val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC4_PMCAPR);
+ pf->caps.half_duplex = (val & PMCAPR_HD) ? 1 : 0;
+}
+
+static void enetc4_pf_set_si_primary_mac(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
+ const u8 *addr)
+{
+ u16 lower = get_unaligned_le16(addr + 4);
+ u32 upper = get_unaligned_le32(addr);
+
+ if (si != 0) {
+ __raw_writel(upper, hw->port + ENETC4_PSIPMAR0(si));
+ __raw_writew(lower, hw->port + ENETC4_PSIPMAR1(si));
+ } else {
+ __raw_writel(upper, hw->port + ENETC4_PMAR0);
+ __raw_writew(lower, hw->port + ENETC4_PMAR1);
+ }
+}
+
+static void enetc4_pf_get_si_primary_mac(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
+ u8 *addr)
+{
+ u32 upper;
+ u16 lower;
+
+ upper = __raw_readl(hw->port + ENETC4_PSIPMAR0(si));
+ lower = __raw_readw(hw->port + ENETC4_PSIPMAR1(si));
+
+ put_unaligned_le32(upper, addr);
+ put_unaligned_le16(lower, addr + 4);
+}
+
+static const struct enetc_pf_ops enetc4_pf_ops = {
+ .set_si_primary_mac = enetc4_pf_set_si_primary_mac,
+ .get_si_primary_mac = enetc4_pf_get_si_primary_mac,
+};
+
+static int enetc4_pf_struct_init(struct enetc_si *si)
+{
+ struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
+
+ pf->si = si;
+ pf->total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(si->pdev);
+
+ enetc4_get_port_caps(pf);
+ enetc_pf_ops_register(pf, &enetc4_pf_ops);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static u32 enetc4_psicfgr0_val_construct(bool is_vf, u32 num_tx_bdr, u32 num_rx_bdr)
+{
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = ENETC_PSICFGR0_SET_TXBDR(num_tx_bdr);
+ val |= ENETC_PSICFGR0_SET_RXBDR(num_rx_bdr);
+ val |= ENETC_PSICFGR0_SIVC(ENETC_VLAN_TYPE_C | ENETC_VLAN_TYPE_S);
+
+ if (is_vf)
+ val |= ENETC_PSICFGR0_VTE | ENETC_PSICFGR0_SIVIE;
+
+ return val;
+}
+
+static void enetc4_default_rings_allocation(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
+ u32 num_rx_bdr, num_tx_bdr, val;
+ u32 vf_tx_bdr, vf_rx_bdr;
+ int i, rx_rem, tx_rem;
+
+ if (pf->caps.num_rx_bdr < ENETC_SI_MAX_RING_NUM + pf->caps.num_vsi)
+ num_rx_bdr = pf->caps.num_rx_bdr - pf->caps.num_vsi;
+ else
+ num_rx_bdr = ENETC_SI_MAX_RING_NUM;
+
+ if (pf->caps.num_tx_bdr < ENETC_SI_MAX_RING_NUM + pf->caps.num_vsi)
+ num_tx_bdr = pf->caps.num_tx_bdr - pf->caps.num_vsi;
+ else
+ num_tx_bdr = ENETC_SI_MAX_RING_NUM;
+
+ val = enetc4_psicfgr0_val_construct(false, num_tx_bdr, num_rx_bdr);
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSICFGR0(0), val);
+
+ num_rx_bdr = pf->caps.num_rx_bdr - num_rx_bdr;
+ rx_rem = num_rx_bdr % pf->caps.num_vsi;
+ num_rx_bdr = num_rx_bdr / pf->caps.num_vsi;
+
+ num_tx_bdr = pf->caps.num_tx_bdr - num_tx_bdr;
+ tx_rem = num_tx_bdr % pf->caps.num_vsi;
+ num_tx_bdr = num_tx_bdr / pf->caps.num_vsi;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < pf->caps.num_vsi; i++) {
+ vf_tx_bdr = (i < tx_rem) ? num_tx_bdr + 1 : num_tx_bdr;
+ vf_rx_bdr = (i < rx_rem) ? num_rx_bdr + 1 : num_rx_bdr;
+ val = enetc4_psicfgr0_val_construct(true, vf_tx_bdr, vf_rx_bdr);
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSICFGR0(i + 1), val);
+ }
+}
+
+static void enetc4_allocate_si_rings(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ enetc4_default_rings_allocation(pf);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_pf_set_si_vlan_promisc(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, bool en)
+{
+ u32 val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC4_PSIPVMR);
+
+ if (en)
+ val |= BIT(si);
+ else
+ val &= ~BIT(si);
+
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSIPVMR, val);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_set_default_si_vlan_promisc(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
+ int num_si = pf->caps.num_vsi + 1;
+ int i;
+
+ /* enforce VLAN promisc mode for all SIs */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_si; i++)
+ enetc4_pf_set_si_vlan_promisc(hw, i, true);
+}
+
+/* Allocate the number of MSI-X vectors for per SI. */
+static void enetc4_set_si_msix_num(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
+ int i, num_msix, total_si;
+ u32 val;
+
+ total_si = pf->caps.num_vsi + 1;
+
+ num_msix = pf->caps.num_msix / total_si +
+ pf->caps.num_msix % total_si - 1;
+ val = num_msix & 0x3f;
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSICFGR2(0), val);
+
+ num_msix = pf->caps.num_msix / total_si - 1;
+ val = num_msix & 0x3f;
+ for (i = 0; i < pf->caps.num_vsi; i++)
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSICFGR2(i + 1), val);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_enable_all_si(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
+ int num_si = pf->caps.num_vsi + 1;
+ u32 si_bitmap = 0;
+ int i;
+
+ /* Master enable for all SIs */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_si; i++)
+ si_bitmap |= PMR_SI_EN(i);
+
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PMR, si_bitmap);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_configure_port_si(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
+
+ enetc4_allocate_si_rings(pf);
+
+ /* Outer VLAN tag will be used for VLAN filtering */
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSIVLANFMR, PSIVLANFMR_VS);
+
+ enetc4_set_default_si_vlan_promisc(pf);
+
+ /* Disable SI MAC multicast & unicast promiscuous */
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSIPMMR, 0);
+
+ enetc4_set_si_msix_num(pf);
+
+ enetc4_enable_all_si(pf);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_pf_reset_tc_msdu(struct enetc_hw *hw)
+{
+ u32 val = ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE;
+ int tc;
+
+ val = u32_replace_bits(val, SDU_TYPE_MPDU, PTCTMSDUR_SDU_TYPE);
+
+ for (tc = 0; tc < 8; tc++)
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PTCTMSDUR(tc), val);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_set_trx_frame_size(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
+
+ enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_MAXFRM(0),
+ ENETC_SET_MAXFRM(ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE));
+
+ enetc4_pf_reset_tc_msdu(&si->hw);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_set_rss_key(struct enetc_hw *hw, const u8 *bytes)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ENETC_RSSHASH_KEY_SIZE / 4; i++)
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PRSSKR(i), ((u32 *)bytes)[i]);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_set_default_rss_key(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ u8 hash_key[ENETC_RSSHASH_KEY_SIZE] = {0};
+ struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
+
+ /* set up hash key */
+ get_random_bytes(hash_key, ENETC_RSSHASH_KEY_SIZE);
+ enetc4_set_rss_key(hw, hash_key);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_enable_trx(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
+
+ /* Enable port transmit/receive */
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_POR, 0);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_configure_port(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ enetc4_configure_port_si(pf);
+ enetc4_set_trx_frame_size(pf);
+ enetc4_set_default_rss_key(pf);
+ enetc4_enable_trx(pf);
+}
+
+static int enetc4_pf_init(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pf->si->pdev->dev;
+ int err;
+
+ /* Initialize the MAC address for PF and VFs */
+ err = enetc_setup_mac_addresses(dev->of_node, pf);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to set MAC addresses\n");
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ enetc4_configure_port(pf);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct net_device_ops enetc4_ndev_ops = {
+ .ndo_open = enetc_open,
+ .ndo_stop = enetc_close,
+ .ndo_start_xmit = enetc_xmit,
+ .ndo_get_stats = enetc_get_stats,
+ .ndo_set_mac_address = enetc_pf_set_mac_addr,
+};
+
+static struct phylink_pcs *
+enetc4_pl_mac_select_pcs(struct phylink_config *config, phy_interface_t iface)
+{
+ struct enetc_pf *pf = phylink_to_enetc_pf(config);
+
+ return pf->pcs;
+}
+
+static void enetc4_mac_config(struct enetc_pf *pf, unsigned int mode,
+ phy_interface_t phy_mode)
+{
+ struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(pf->si->ndev);
+ struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = enetc_port_mac_rd(si, ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(0));
+ val &= ~(PM_IF_MODE_IFMODE | PM_IF_MODE_ENA);
+
+ switch (phy_mode) {
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID:
+ val |= IFMODE_RGMII;
+ /* We need to enable auto-negotiation for the MAC
+ * if its RGMII interface support In-Band status.
+ */
+ if (phylink_autoneg_inband(mode))
+ val |= PM_IF_MODE_ENA;
+ break;
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII:
+ val |= IFMODE_RMII;
+ break;
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX:
+ val |= IFMODE_SGMII;
+ break;
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GBASER:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XGMII:
+ case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII:
+ val |= IFMODE_XGMII;
+ break;
+ default:
+ dev_err(priv->dev,
+ "Unsupported PHY mode:%d\n", phy_mode);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(0), val);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_pl_mac_config(struct phylink_config *config, unsigned int mode,
+ const struct phylink_link_state *state)
+{
+ struct enetc_pf *pf = phylink_to_enetc_pf(config);
+
+ enetc4_mac_config(pf, mode, state->interface);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_set_port_speed(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int speed)
+{
+ u32 old_speed = priv->speed;
+ u32 val;
+
+ if (speed == old_speed)
+ return;
+
+ val = enetc_port_rd(&priv->si->hw, ENETC4_PCR);
+ val &= ~PCR_PSPEED;
+
+ switch (speed) {
+ case SPEED_100:
+ case SPEED_1000:
+ case SPEED_2500:
+ case SPEED_10000:
+ val |= (PCR_PSPEED & PCR_PSPEED_VAL(speed));
+ break;
+ case SPEED_10:
+ default:
+ val |= (PCR_PSPEED & PCR_PSPEED_VAL(SPEED_10));
+ }
+
+ priv->speed = speed;
+ enetc_port_wr(&priv->si->hw, ENETC4_PCR, val);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_set_rgmii_mac(struct enetc_pf *pf, int speed, int duplex)
+{
+ struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
+ u32 old_val, val;
+
+ old_val = enetc_port_mac_rd(si, ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(0));
+ val = old_val & ~(PM_IF_MODE_ENA | PM_IF_MODE_M10 | PM_IF_MODE_REVMII);
+
+ switch (speed) {
+ case SPEED_1000:
+ val = u32_replace_bits(val, SSP_1G, PM_IF_MODE_SSP);
+ break;
+ case SPEED_100:
+ val = u32_replace_bits(val, SSP_100M, PM_IF_MODE_SSP);
+ break;
+ case SPEED_10:
+ val = u32_replace_bits(val, SSP_10M, PM_IF_MODE_SSP);
+ }
+
+ val = u32_replace_bits(val, duplex == DUPLEX_FULL ? 0 : 1,
+ PM_IF_MODE_HD);
+
+ if (val == old_val)
+ return;
+
+ enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(0), val);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_set_rmii_mac(struct enetc_pf *pf, int speed, int duplex)
+{
+ struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
+ u32 old_val, val;
+
+ old_val = enetc_port_mac_rd(si, ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(0));
+ val = old_val & ~(PM_IF_MODE_ENA | PM_IF_MODE_SSP);
+
+ switch (speed) {
+ case SPEED_100:
+ val &= ~PM_IF_MODE_M10;
+ break;
+ case SPEED_10:
+ val |= PM_IF_MODE_M10;
+ }
+
+ val = u32_replace_bits(val, duplex == DUPLEX_FULL ? 0 : 1,
+ PM_IF_MODE_HD);
+
+ if (val == old_val)
+ return;
+
+ enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(0), val);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_set_hd_flow_control(struct enetc_pf *pf, bool enable)
+{
+ struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
+ u32 old_val, val;
+
+ if (!pf->caps.half_duplex)
+ return;
+
+ old_val = enetc_port_mac_rd(si, ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(0));
+ val = u32_replace_bits(old_val, enable ? 1 : 0, PM_CMD_CFG_HD_FCEN);
+ if (val == old_val)
+ return;
+
+ enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(0), val);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_set_rx_pause(struct enetc_pf *pf, bool rx_pause)
+{
+ struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
+ u32 old_val, val;
+
+ old_val = enetc_port_mac_rd(si, ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(0));
+ val = u32_replace_bits(old_val, rx_pause ? 0 : 1, PM_CMD_CFG_PAUSE_IGN);
+ if (val == old_val)
+ return;
+
+ enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(0), val);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_set_tx_pause(struct enetc_pf *pf, int num_rxbdr, bool tx_pause)
+{
+ u32 pause_off_thresh = 0, pause_on_thresh = 0;
+ u32 init_quanta = 0, refresh_quanta = 0;
+ struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
+ u32 rbmr, old_rbmr;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_rxbdr; i++) {
+ old_rbmr = enetc_rxbdr_rd(hw, i, ENETC_RBMR);
+ rbmr = u32_replace_bits(old_rbmr, tx_pause ? 1 : 0, ENETC_RBMR_CM);
+ if (rbmr == old_rbmr)
+ continue;
+
+ enetc_rxbdr_wr(hw, i, ENETC_RBMR, rbmr);
+ }
+
+ if (tx_pause) {
+ /* When the port first enters congestion, send a PAUSE request
+ * with the maximum number of quanta. When the port exits
+ * congestion, it will automatically send a PAUSE frame with
+ * zero quanta.
+ */
+ init_quanta = 0xffff;
+
+ /* Also, set up the refresh timer to send follow-up PAUSE
+ * frames at half the quanta value, in case the congestion
+ * condition persists.
+ */
+ refresh_quanta = 0xffff / 2;
+
+ /* Start emitting PAUSE frames when 3 large frames (or more
+ * smaller frames) have accumulated in the FIFO waiting to be
+ * DMAed to the RX ring.
+ */
+ pause_on_thresh = 3 * ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE;
+ pause_off_thresh = 1 * ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE;
+ }
+
+ enetc_port_mac_wr(pf->si, ENETC4_PM_PAUSE_QUANTA(0), init_quanta);
+ enetc_port_mac_wr(pf->si, ENETC4_PM_PAUSE_THRESH(0), refresh_quanta);
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PPAUONTR, pause_on_thresh);
+ enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PPAUOFFTR, pause_off_thresh);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_enable_mac(struct enetc_pf *pf, bool en)
+{
+ struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = enetc_port_mac_rd(si, ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(0));
+ val &= ~(PM_CMD_CFG_TX_EN | PM_CMD_CFG_RX_EN);
+ val |= en ? (PM_CMD_CFG_TX_EN | PM_CMD_CFG_RX_EN) : 0;
+
+ enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(0), val);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_pl_mac_link_up(struct phylink_config *config,
+ struct phy_device *phy, unsigned int mode,
+ phy_interface_t interface, int speed,
+ int duplex, bool tx_pause, bool rx_pause)
+{
+ struct enetc_pf *pf = phylink_to_enetc_pf(config);
+ struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
+ struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv;
+ bool hd_fc = false;
+
+ priv = netdev_priv(si->ndev);
+ enetc4_set_port_speed(priv, speed);
+
+ if (!phylink_autoneg_inband(mode) &&
+ phy_interface_mode_is_rgmii(interface))
+ enetc4_set_rgmii_mac(pf, speed, duplex);
+
+ if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII)
+ enetc4_set_rmii_mac(pf, speed, duplex);
+
+ if (duplex == DUPLEX_FULL) {
+ /* When preemption is enabled, generation of PAUSE frames
+ * must be disabled, as stated in the IEEE 802.3 standard.
+ */
+ if (priv->active_offloads & ENETC_F_QBU)
+ tx_pause = false;
+ } else { /* DUPLEX_HALF */
+ if (tx_pause || rx_pause)
+ hd_fc = true;
+
+ /* As per 802.3 annex 31B, PAUSE frames are only supported
+ * when the link is configured for full duplex operation.
+ */
+ tx_pause = false;
+ rx_pause = false;
+ }
+
+ enetc4_set_hd_flow_control(pf, hd_fc);
+ enetc4_set_tx_pause(pf, priv->num_rx_rings, tx_pause);
+ enetc4_set_rx_pause(pf, rx_pause);
+ enetc4_enable_mac(pf, true);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_pl_mac_link_down(struct phylink_config *config,
+ unsigned int mode,
+ phy_interface_t interface)
+{
+ struct enetc_pf *pf = phylink_to_enetc_pf(config);
+
+ enetc4_enable_mac(pf, false);
+}
+
+static const struct phylink_mac_ops enetc_pl_mac_ops = {
+ .mac_select_pcs = enetc4_pl_mac_select_pcs,
+ .mac_config = enetc4_pl_mac_config,
+ .mac_link_up = enetc4_pl_mac_link_up,
+ .mac_link_down = enetc4_pl_mac_link_down,
+};
+
+static void enetc4_pci_remove(void *data)
+{
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = data;
+
+ enetc_pci_remove(pdev);
+}
+
+static int enetc4_link_init(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv,
+ struct device_node *node)
+{
+ struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(priv->si);
+ struct device *dev = priv->dev;
+ int err;
+
+ err = of_get_phy_mode(node, &pf->if_mode);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY mode\n");
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ err = enetc_mdiobus_create(pf, node);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to create MDIO bus\n");
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ err = enetc_phylink_create(priv, node, &enetc_pl_mac_ops);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to create phylink\n");
+ goto err_phylink_create;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_phylink_create:
+ enetc_mdiobus_destroy(pf);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+static void enetc4_link_deinit(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
+{
+ struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(priv->si);
+
+ enetc_phylink_destroy(priv);
+ enetc_mdiobus_destroy(pf);
+}
+
+static int enetc4_pf_netdev_create(struct enetc_si *si)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &si->pdev->dev;
+ struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv;
+ struct net_device *ndev;
+ int err;
+
+ ndev = alloc_etherdev_mqs(sizeof(struct enetc_ndev_priv),
+ si->num_tx_rings, si->num_rx_rings);
+ if (!ndev)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+ priv->ref_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "ref");
+ if (IS_ERR(priv->ref_clk)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Get referencce clock failed\n");
+ err = PTR_ERR(priv->ref_clk);
+ goto err_clk_get;
+ }
+
+ enetc_pf_netdev_setup(si, ndev, &enetc4_ndev_ops);
+
+ enetc_init_si_rings_params(priv);
+
+ err = enetc_configure_si(priv);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to configure SI\n");
+ goto err_config_si;
+ }
+
+ err = enetc_alloc_msix(priv);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to alloc MSI-X\n");
+ goto err_alloc_msix;
+ }
+
+ err = enetc4_link_init(priv, dev->of_node);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_link_init;
+
+ err = register_netdev(ndev);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to register netdev\n");
+ goto err_reg_netdev;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_reg_netdev:
+ enetc4_link_deinit(priv);
+err_link_init:
+ enetc_free_msix(priv);
+err_alloc_msix:
+err_config_si:
+err_clk_get:
+ mutex_destroy(&priv->mm_lock);
+ free_netdev(ndev);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+static void enetc4_pf_netdev_destroy(struct enetc_si *si)
+{
+ struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(si->ndev);
+ struct net_device *ndev = si->ndev;
+
+ unregister_netdev(ndev);
+ enetc_free_msix(priv);
+ free_netdev(ndev);
+}
+
+static int enetc4_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
+ const struct pci_device_id *ent)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct enetc_si *si;
+ struct enetc_pf *pf;
+ int err;
+
+ err = enetc_pci_probe(pdev, KBUILD_MODNAME, sizeof(*pf));
+ if (err)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "PCIe probing failed\n");
+
+ err = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, enetc4_pci_remove, pdev);
+ if (err)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, err,
+ "Add enetc4_pci_remove() action failed\n");
+
+ /* si is the private data. */
+ si = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ if (!si->hw.port || !si->hw.global)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV,
+ "Couldn't map PF only space\n");
+
+ err = enetc4_pf_struct_init(si);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
+ err = enetc4_pf_init(pf);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev);
+ enetc_get_si_caps(si);
+
+ return enetc4_pf_netdev_create(si);
+}
+
+static void enetc4_pf_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ struct enetc_si *si = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ enetc4_pf_netdev_destroy(si);
+}
+
+static const struct pci_device_id enetc4_pf_id_table[] = {
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NXP2, PCI_DEVICE_ID_NXP2_ENETC_PF) },
+ { 0, } /* End of table. */
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, enetc4_pf_id_table);
+
+static struct pci_driver enetc4_pf_driver = {
+ .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
+ .id_table = enetc4_pf_id_table,
+ .probe = enetc4_pf_probe,
+ .remove = enetc4_pf_remove,
+};
+module_pci_driver(enetc4_pf_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ENETC4 PF Driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
index 2563eb8ac7b6..ed44d27cc6bd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
@@ -775,9 +775,10 @@ static int enetc_get_coalesce(struct net_device *ndev,
{
struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[0];
+ u64 clk_freq = priv->sysclk_freq;
- ic->tx_coalesce_usecs = enetc_cycles_to_usecs(priv->tx_ictt);
- ic->rx_coalesce_usecs = enetc_cycles_to_usecs(v->rx_ictt);
+ ic->tx_coalesce_usecs = enetc_cycles_to_usecs(priv->tx_ictt, clk_freq);
+ ic->rx_coalesce_usecs = enetc_cycles_to_usecs(v->rx_ictt, clk_freq);
ic->tx_max_coalesced_frames = ENETC_TXIC_PKTTHR;
ic->rx_max_coalesced_frames = ENETC_RXIC_PKTTHR;
@@ -793,12 +794,13 @@ static int enetc_set_coalesce(struct net_device *ndev,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+ u64 clk_freq = priv->sysclk_freq;
u32 rx_ictt, tx_ictt;
int i, ic_mode;
bool changed;
- tx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(ic->tx_coalesce_usecs);
- rx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(ic->rx_coalesce_usecs);
+ tx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(ic->tx_coalesce_usecs, clk_freq);
+ rx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(ic->rx_coalesce_usecs, clk_freq);
if (ic->rx_max_coalesced_frames != ENETC_RXIC_PKTTHR)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -1234,13 +1236,33 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops enetc_vf_ethtool_ops = {
.get_ts_info = enetc_get_ts_info,
};
+static const struct ethtool_ops enetc4_pf_ethtool_ops = {
+ .supported_coalesce_params = ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USECS |
+ ETHTOOL_COALESCE_MAX_FRAMES |
+ ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USE_ADAPTIVE_RX,
+ .get_ringparam = enetc_get_ringparam,
+ .get_coalesce = enetc_get_coalesce,
+ .set_coalesce = enetc_set_coalesce,
+ .get_link_ksettings = enetc_get_link_ksettings,
+ .set_link_ksettings = enetc_set_link_ksettings,
+ .get_link = ethtool_op_get_link,
+ .get_wol = enetc_get_wol,
+ .set_wol = enetc_set_wol,
+ .get_pauseparam = enetc_get_pauseparam,
+ .set_pauseparam = enetc_set_pauseparam,
+};
+
void enetc_set_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *ndev)
{
struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
- if (enetc_si_is_pf(priv->si))
- ndev->ethtool_ops = &enetc_pf_ethtool_ops;
- else
+ if (enetc_si_is_pf(priv->si)) {
+ if (is_enetc_rev1(priv->si))
+ ndev->ethtool_ops = &enetc_pf_ethtool_ops;
+ else
+ ndev->ethtool_ops = &enetc4_pf_ethtool_ops;
+ } else {
ndev->ethtool_ops = &enetc_vf_ethtool_ops;
+ }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_set_ethtool_ops);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
index 6a7b9b75d660..a9b61925b291 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#define ENETC_SIPCAPR0_RSS BIT(8)
#define ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBV BIT(4)
#define ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU BIT(3)
+#define ENETC_SIPCAPR0_RFS BIT(2)
#define ENETC_SIPCAPR1 0x24
#define ENETC_SITGTGR 0x30
#define ENETC_SIRBGCR 0x38
@@ -971,15 +972,17 @@ struct enetc_cbd {
u8 status_flags;
};
-#define ENETC_CLK 400000000ULL
-static inline u32 enetc_cycles_to_usecs(u32 cycles)
+#define ENETC_CLK_400M 400000000ULL
+#define ENETC_CLK_333M 333000000ULL
+
+static inline u32 enetc_cycles_to_usecs(u32 cycles, u64 clk_freq)
{
- return (u32)div_u64(cycles * 1000000ULL, ENETC_CLK);
+ return (u32)div_u64(cycles * 1000000ULL, clk_freq);
}
-static inline u32 enetc_usecs_to_cycles(u32 usecs)
+static inline u32 enetc_usecs_to_cycles(u32 usecs, u64 clk_freq)
{
- return (u32)div_u64(usecs * ENETC_CLK, 1000000ULL);
+ return (u32)div_u64(usecs * clk_freq, 1000000ULL);
}
/* Port traffic class frame preemption register */
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
index 39db9d5c2e50..5ed97137e5c5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
@@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ struct enetc_vf_state {
enum enetc_vf_flags flags;
};
+struct enetc_port_caps {
+ u32 half_duplex:1;
+ int num_vsi;
+ int num_msix;
+ int num_rx_bdr;
+ int num_tx_bdr;
+};
+
struct enetc_pf;
struct enetc_pf_ops {
@@ -61,6 +69,7 @@ struct enetc_pf {
phy_interface_t if_mode;
struct phylink_config phylink_config;
+ struct enetc_port_caps caps;
const struct enetc_pf_ops *ops;
};
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
index 94690ed92e3f..6ce0facd2e97 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
@@ -121,10 +121,20 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
ndev->vlan_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM |
NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
+ ndev->priv_flags |= IFF_UNICAST_FLT;
+
+ /* TODO: currently, i.MX95 ENETC driver does not support advanced features */
+ if (is_enetc_rev1(si)) {
+ priv->sysclk_freq = ENETC_CLK_400M;
+ } else {
+ ndev->hw_features &= ~(NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER | NETIF_F_LOOPBACK);
+ priv->sysclk_freq = ENETC_CLK_333M;
+ goto end;
+ }
+
if (si->num_rss)
ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_RXHASH;
- ndev->priv_flags |= IFF_UNICAST_FLT;
ndev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT |
NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_RX_SG |
NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT_SG;
@@ -136,6 +146,7 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
}
+end:
/* pick up primary MAC address from SI */
enetc_load_primary_mac_addr(&si->hw, ndev);
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
index b65da49dd926..5fa2f1db87f3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ int enetc_setup_tc_cbs(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data)
*
* (enetClockFrequency / portTransmitRate) * 100
*/
- hi_credit_reg = (u32)div_u64((ENETC_CLK * 100ULL) * hi_credit_bit,
+ hi_credit_reg = (u32)div_u64((ENETC_CLK_400M * 100ULL) * hi_credit_bit,
port_transmit_rate * 1000000ULL);
enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC_PTCCBSR1(tc), hi_credit_reg);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
index dfcaac302e24..2295742b7090 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
@@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ static void enetc_vf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
ndev->watchdog_timeo = 5 * HZ;
ndev->max_mtu = ENETC_MAX_MTU;
+ priv->sysclk_freq = ENETC_CLK_400M;
+
ndev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 net-next 13/13] MAINTAINERS: update ENETC driver files and maintainers
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 5:52 ` Wei Fang
12 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-22 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms
Cc: imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
Add related YAML documentation and header files. Also, add maintainers
from the i.MX side as ENETC starts to be used on i.MX platforms.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
---
v2 changes: Use regular expressions to match related files.
v3: no changes
v4: no changes
---
MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 560a65b85297..cf442fcb9b49 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -9018,9 +9018,16 @@ F: drivers/dma/fsl-edma*.*
FREESCALE ENETC ETHERNET DRIVERS
M: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
M: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
+M: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
+M: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
+L: imx@lists.linux.dev
L: netdev@vger.kernel.org
S: Maintained
+F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc*.yaml
+F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
F: drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/
+F: include/linux/fsl/enetc_mdio.h
+F: include/linux/fsl/netc_global.h
FREESCALE eTSEC ETHERNET DRIVER (GIANFAR)
M: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 02/13] dt-bindings: net: add i.MX95 ENETC support
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 02/13] dt-bindings: net: add i.MX95 ENETC support Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 16:13 ` Frank Li
2024-10-23 1:40 ` Wei Fang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2024-10-22 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, christophe.leroy,
linux, bhelgaas, horms, imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel,
linux-pci, alexander.stein
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:52:12PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> The ENETC of i.MX95 has been upgraded to revision 4.1, and the vendor
> ID and device ID have also changed, so add the new compatible strings
> for i.MX95 ENETC. In addition, i.MX95 supports configuration of RGMII
> or RMII reference clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---
> v2: Remove "nxp,imx95-enetc" compatible string.
> v3:
> 1. Add restriction to "clcoks" and "clock-names" properties and rename
> the clock, also remove the items from these two properties.
> 2. Remove unnecessary items for "pci1131,e101" compatible string.
> v4: Move clocks and clock-names to top level.
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc.yaml | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc.yaml
> index e152c93998fe..7a4d9c53f8aa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,enetc.yaml
> @@ -20,14 +20,23 @@ maintainers:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - items:
> + oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + - pci1957,e100
> + - const: fsl,enetc
> - enum:
> - - pci1957,e100
> - - const: fsl,enetc
> + - pci1131,e101
>
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
>
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clock-names:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> mdio:
> $ref: mdio.yaml
> unevaluatedProperties: false
> @@ -40,6 +49,24 @@ required:
> allOf:
> - $ref: /schemas/pci/pci-device.yaml
> - $ref: ethernet-controller.yaml
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - pci1131,e101
> + then:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description: MAC transmit/receiver reference clock
items:
- description: MAC transmit/receiver reference clock
> +
> + clock-names:
> + const: ref
items:
- const: ref
Frank
> + else:
> + properties:
> + clocks: false
> + clock-names: false
>
> unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 16:17 ` Frank Li
2024-10-23 1:46 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-23 6:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
1 sibling, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2024-10-22 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, christophe.leroy,
linux, bhelgaas, horms, imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel,
linux-pci, alexander.stein
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:52:13PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> Add bindings for NXP NETC blocks control. Usually, NETC has 2 blocks of
> 64KB registers, integrated endpoint register block (IERB) and privileged
> register block (PRB). IERB is used for pre-boot initialization for all
> NETC devices, such as ENETC, Timer, EMDIO and so on. And PRB controls
> global reset and global error handling for NETC. Moreover, for the i.MX
> platform, there is also a NETCMIX block for link configuration, such as
> MII protocol, PCS protocol, etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---
> v2 changes:
> 1. Rephrase the commit message.
> 2. Change unevaluatedProperties to additionalProperties.
> 3. Remove the useless lables from examples.
> v3 changes:
> 1. Remove the items from clocks and clock-names, add maxItems to clocks
> and rename the clock.
> v4 changes:
> 1. Reorder the required properties.
> 2. Add assigned-clocks, assigned-clock-parents and assigned-clock-rates.
> ---
> .../bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml | 111 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0b7fd2c5e0d8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: NETC Blocks Control
> +
> +description:
> + Usually, NETC has 2 blocks of 64KB registers, integrated endpoint register
> + block (IERB) and privileged register block (PRB). IERB is used for pre-boot
> + initialization for all NETC devices, such as ENETC, Timer, EMIDO and so on.
> + And PRB controls global reset and global error handling for NETC. Moreover,
> + for the i.MX platform, there is also a NETCMIX block for link configuration,
> + such as MII protocol, PCS protocol, etc.
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
> +
> + reg:
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 3
> +
> + reg-names:
> + minItems: 2
> + items:
> + - const: ierb
> + - const: prb
> + - const: netcmix
> +
> + "#address-cells":
> + const: 2
> +
> + "#size-cells":
> + const: 2
> +
> + ranges: true
> + assigned-clocks: true
> + assigned-clock-parents: true
> + assigned-clock-rates: true
I am not sure if it necessary. But if add restriction, it should be
assigned-clocks:
maxItems: 2
> +
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clock-names:
> + const: ipg
> +
> + power-domains:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> +patternProperties:
> + "^pcie@[0-9a-f]+$":
> + $ref: /schemas/pci/host-generic-pci.yaml#
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - reg-names
> + - "#address-cells"
> + - "#size-cells"
> + - ranges
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + bus {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + netc-blk-ctrl@4cde0000 {
> + compatible = "nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl";
> + reg = <0x0 0x4cde0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> + <0x0 0x4cdf0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> + <0x0 0x4c81000c 0x0 0x18>;
> + reg-names = "ierb", "prb", "netcmix";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> + assigned-clocks = <&scmi_clk 98>, <&scmi_clk 102>;
> + assigned-clock-parents = <&scmi_clk 12>, <&scmi_clk 6>;
> + assigned-clock-rates = <666666666>, <250000000>;
> + clocks = <&scmi_clk 98>;
> + clock-names = "ipg";
> + power-domains = <&scmi_devpd 18>;
> +
> + pcie@4cb00000 {
> + compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic";
> + reg = <0x0 0x4cb00000 0x0 0x100000>;
> + #address-cells = <3>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + device_type = "pci";
> + bus-range = <0x1 0x1>;
> + ranges = <0x82000000 0x0 0x4cce0000 0x0 0x4cce0000 0x0 0x20000
> + 0xc2000000 0x0 0x4cd10000 0x0 0x4cd10000 0x0 0x10000>;
> +
> + mdio@0,0 {
> + compatible = "pci1131,ee00";
> + reg = <0x010000 0 0 0 0>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 16:20 ` Frank Li
2024-10-23 6:38 ` Claudiu Manoil
1 sibling, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2024-10-22 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, christophe.leroy,
linux, bhelgaas, horms, imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel,
linux-pci, alexander.stein
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:52:16PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> Compile enetc_pf_common.c as a standalone module to allow shared usage
> between ENETC v1 and v4 PF drivers. Add struct enetc_pf_ops to register
> different hardware operation interfaces for both ENETC v1 and v4 PF
> drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
> v2 changes:
> This patch is separated from v1 patch 5 ("net: enetc: add enetc-pf-common
> driver support"), only the changes to compile enetc_pf_common.c into a
> separated driver are kept.
> v3 changes:
> Refactor the commit message.
> v4 changes: Remove the input prompt of CONFIG_NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig | 9 ++++
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile | 5 +-
> .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c | 26 ++++++++--
> .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h | 21 ++++++--
> .../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++---
> 5 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> index 51d80ea959d4..e1b151a98b41 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ config FSL_ENETC_CORE
>
> If compiled as module (M), the module name is fsl-enetc-core.
>
> +config NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON
> + tristate
> + help
> + This module supports common functionality between drivers of
> + different versions of NXP ENETC PF controllers.
> +
> + If compiled as module (M), the module name is nxp-enetc-pf-common.
> +
> config FSL_ENETC
> tristate "ENETC PF driver"
> depends on PCI_MSI
> @@ -14,6 +22,7 @@ config FSL_ENETC
> select FSL_ENETC_CORE
> select FSL_ENETC_IERB
> select FSL_ENETC_MDIO
> + select NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON
> select PHYLINK
> select PCS_LYNX
> select DIMLIB
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> index 8f4d8e9c37a0..ebe232673ed4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> @@ -3,8 +3,11 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_CORE) += fsl-enetc-core.o
> fsl-enetc-core-y := enetc.o enetc_cbdr.o enetc_ethtool.o
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON) += nxp-enetc-pf-common.o
> +nxp-enetc-pf-common-y := enetc_pf_common.o
> +
> obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC) += fsl-enetc.o
> -fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o enetc_pf_common.o
> +fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o
> fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_PCI_IOV) += enetc_msg.o
> fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_QOS) += enetc_qos.o
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
> index 3cdd149056f9..7522316ddfea 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>
> #define ENETC_DRV_NAME_STR "ENETC PF driver"
>
> -void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
> +static void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
> {
> u32 upper = __raw_readl(hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR0(si));
> u16 lower = __raw_readw(hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR1(si));
> @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
> put_unaligned_le16(lower, addr + 4);
> }
>
> -void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> - const u8 *addr)
> +static void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> + const u8 *addr)
> {
> u32 upper = get_unaligned_le32(addr);
> u16 lower = get_unaligned_le16(addr + 4);
> @@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> __raw_writew(lower, hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR1(si));
> }
>
> +static struct phylink_pcs *enetc_pf_create_pcs(struct enetc_pf *pf,
> + struct mii_bus *bus)
> +{
> + return lynx_pcs_create_mdiodev(bus, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc_pf_destroy_pcs(struct phylink_pcs *pcs)
> +{
> + lynx_pcs_destroy(pcs);
> +}
> +
> static void enetc_set_vlan_promisc(struct enetc_hw *hw, char si_map)
> {
> u32 val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC_PSIPVMR);
> @@ -970,6 +981,14 @@ static void enetc_psi_destroy(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> enetc_pci_remove(pdev);
> }
>
> +static const struct enetc_pf_ops enetc_pf_ops = {
> + .set_si_primary_mac = enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr,
> + .get_si_primary_mac = enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr,
> + .create_pcs = enetc_pf_create_pcs,
> + .destroy_pcs = enetc_pf_destroy_pcs,
> + .enable_psfp = enetc_psfp_enable,
> +};
> +
> static int enetc_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> {
> @@ -997,6 +1016,7 @@ static int enetc_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
> pf->si = si;
> pf->total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
> + enetc_pf_ops_register(pf, &enetc_pf_ops);
>
> err = enetc_setup_mac_addresses(node, pf);
> if (err)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> index 92a26b09cf57..39db9d5c2e50 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,16 @@ struct enetc_vf_state {
> enum enetc_vf_flags flags;
> };
>
> +struct enetc_pf;
> +
> +struct enetc_pf_ops {
> + void (*set_si_primary_mac)(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, const u8 *addr);
> + void (*get_si_primary_mac)(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr);
> + struct phylink_pcs *(*create_pcs)(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct mii_bus *bus);
> + void (*destroy_pcs)(struct phylink_pcs *pcs);
> + int (*enable_psfp)(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv);
> +};
> +
> struct enetc_pf {
> struct enetc_si *si;
> int num_vfs; /* number of active VFs, after sriov_init */
> @@ -50,6 +60,8 @@ struct enetc_pf {
>
> phy_interface_t if_mode;
> struct phylink_config phylink_config;
> +
> + const struct enetc_pf_ops *ops;
> };
>
> #define phylink_to_enetc_pf(config) \
> @@ -59,9 +71,6 @@ int enetc_msg_psi_init(struct enetc_pf *pf);
> void enetc_msg_psi_free(struct enetc_pf *pf);
> void enetc_msg_handle_rxmsg(struct enetc_pf *pf, int mbox_id, u16 *status);
>
> -void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr);
> -void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> - const u8 *addr);
> int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr);
> int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf);
> void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> @@ -71,3 +80,9 @@ void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf);
> int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node *node,
> const struct phylink_mac_ops *ops);
> void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv);
> +
> +static inline void enetc_pf_ops_register(struct enetc_pf *pf,
> + const struct enetc_pf_ops *ops)
> +{
> + pf->ops = ops;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> index bce81a4f6f88..94690ed92e3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> @@ -8,19 +8,37 @@
>
> #include "enetc_pf.h"
>
> +static int enetc_set_si_hw_addr(struct enetc_pf *pf, int si, u8 *mac_addr)
> +{
> + struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
> +
> + if (pf->ops->set_si_primary_mac)
> + pf->ops->set_si_primary_mac(hw, si, mac_addr);
> + else
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr)
> {
> struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(priv->si);
> struct sockaddr *saddr = addr;
> + int err;
>
> if (!is_valid_ether_addr(saddr->sa_data))
> return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>
> + err = enetc_set_si_hw_addr(pf, 0, saddr->sa_data);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> eth_hw_addr_set(ndev, saddr->sa_data);
> - enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(&priv->si->hw, 0, saddr->sa_data);
>
> return 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_pf_set_mac_addr);
>
> static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
> int si)
> @@ -38,8 +56,8 @@ static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
> }
>
> /* (2) bootloader supplied MAC address */
> - if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr))
> - enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(hw, si, mac_addr);
> + if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr) && pf->ops->get_si_primary_mac)
> + pf->ops->get_si_primary_mac(hw, si, mac_addr);
>
> /* (3) choose a random one */
> if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr)) {
> @@ -48,7 +66,9 @@ static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
> si, mac_addr);
> }
>
> - enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(hw, si, mac_addr);
> + err = enetc_set_si_hw_addr(pf, si, mac_addr);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -70,11 +90,13 @@ int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_setup_mac_addresses);
>
> void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> const struct net_device_ops *ndev_ops)
> {
> struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
>
> SET_NETDEV_DEV(ndev, &si->pdev->dev);
> priv->ndev = ndev;
> @@ -107,7 +129,8 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_RX_SG |
> NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT_SG;
>
> - if (si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_PSFP && !enetc_psfp_enable(priv)) {
> + if (si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_PSFP && pf->ops->enable_psfp &&
> + !pf->ops->enable_psfp(priv)) {
> priv->active_offloads |= ENETC_F_QCI;
> ndev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
> ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
> @@ -116,6 +139,7 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> /* pick up primary MAC address from SI */
> enetc_load_primary_mac_addr(&si->hw, ndev);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_pf_netdev_setup);
>
> static int enetc_mdio_probe(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *np)
> {
> @@ -162,6 +186,9 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> struct mii_bus *bus;
> int err;
>
> + if (!pf->ops->create_pcs)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> bus = mdiobus_alloc_size(sizeof(*mdio_priv));
> if (!bus)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -184,7 +211,7 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> goto free_mdio_bus;
> }
>
> - phylink_pcs = lynx_pcs_create_mdiodev(bus, 0);
> + phylink_pcs = pf->ops->create_pcs(pf, bus);
> if (IS_ERR(phylink_pcs)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(phylink_pcs);
> dev_err(dev, "cannot create lynx pcs (%d)\n", err);
> @@ -205,8 +232,8 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
>
> static void enetc_imdio_remove(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> {
> - if (pf->pcs)
> - lynx_pcs_destroy(pf->pcs);
> + if (pf->pcs && pf->ops->destroy_pcs)
> + pf->ops->destroy_pcs(pf->pcs);
>
> if (pf->imdio) {
> mdiobus_unregister(pf->imdio);
> @@ -246,12 +273,14 @@ int enetc_mdiobus_create(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *node)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_mdiobus_create);
>
> void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> {
> enetc_mdio_remove(pf);
> enetc_imdio_remove(pf);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_mdiobus_destroy);
>
> int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node *node,
> const struct phylink_mac_ops *ops)
> @@ -288,8 +317,13 @@ int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node *node,
>
> return 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_phylink_create);
>
> void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> {
> phylink_destroy(priv->phylink);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_phylink_destroy);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NXP ENETC PF common functionality driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-22 19:27 ` Frank Li
2024-10-23 1:57 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-23 6:15 ` Claudiu Manoil
1 sibling, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2024-10-22 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, christophe.leroy,
linux, bhelgaas, horms, imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel,
linux-pci, alexander.stein
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:52:22PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> The i.MX95 ENETC has been upgraded to revision 4.1, which is different
> from the LS1028A ENETC (revision 1.0) except for the SI part. Therefore,
> the fsl-enetc driver is incompatible with i.MX95 ENETC PF. So add new
> nxp-enetc4 driver to support i.MX95 ENETC PF, and this driver will be
> used to support the ENETC PF with major revision 4 for other SoCs in the
> future.
>
> Currently, the nxp-enetc4 driver only supports basic transmission feature
> for i.MX95 ENETC PF, the more basic and advanced features will be added
> in the subsequent patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---
> v2 changes:
> 1. Refine the commit message.
> 2. Sort the header files.
> 3. Use dev_err_probe() in enetc4_pf_probe().
> 4. Remove unused variable 'pf' from enetc4_pf_remove().
> v3 changes:
> 1. Remove is_enetc_rev1() from enetc_init_si_rings_params().
> 2. Use devm_add_action_or_reset() in enetc4_pf_probe().
> 3. Directly return dev_err_probe() in enetc4_pf_probe().
> v4 changes:
> 1. Move clk_freq from enect_si to enetc_ndev_priv.
> 2. Remove is_enetc_rev4().
> 3. Add enetc4_pf_ethtool_ops for i.MX95 ENETC PF.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig | 17 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile | 3 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 38 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h | 13 +-
> .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h | 151 ++++
> .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c | 753 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c | 36 +-
> .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h | 13 +-
> .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h | 9 +
> .../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c | 13 +-
> .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c | 2 +-
> .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c | 2 +
> 12 files changed, 1024 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> index e1b151a98b41..6c2779047dcd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> @@ -33,6 +33,23 @@ config FSL_ENETC
>
> If compiled as module (M), the module name is fsl-enetc.
>
> +config NXP_ENETC4
> + tristate "ENETC4 PF driver"
> + depends on PCI_MSI
> + select MDIO_DEVRES
> + select FSL_ENETC_CORE
> + select FSL_ENETC_MDIO
> + select NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON
> + select PHYLINK
> + select DIMLIB
> + help
> + This driver supports NXP ENETC devices with major revision 4. ENETC is
> + as the NIC functionality in NETC, it supports virtualization/isolation
> + based on PCIe Single Root IO Virtualization (SR-IOV) and a full range
> + of TSN standards and NIC offload capabilities.
> +
> + If compiled as module (M), the module name is nxp-enetc4.
> +
> config FSL_ENETC_VF
> tristate "ENETC VF driver"
> depends on PCI_MSI
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> index ebe232673ed4..6fd27ee4fcd1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o
> fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_PCI_IOV) += enetc_msg.o
> fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_QOS) += enetc_qos.o
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_NXP_ENETC4) += nxp-enetc4.o
> +nxp-enetc4-y := enetc4_pf.o
> +
> obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_VF) += fsl-enetc-vf.o
> fsl-enetc-vf-y := enetc_vf.o
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> index bccbeb1f355c..1541c1bb888f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> /* Copyright 2017-2019 NXP */
>
> #include "enetc.h"
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/bpf_trace.h>
> #include <linux/tcp.h>
> #include <linux/udp.h>
> @@ -21,7 +22,7 @@ void enetc_port_mac_wr(struct enetc_si *si, u32 reg, u32 val)
> {
> enetc_port_wr(&si->hw, reg, val);
> if (si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_QBU)
> - enetc_port_wr(&si->hw, reg + ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET, val);
> + enetc_port_wr(&si->hw, reg + si->pmac_offset, val);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_port_mac_wr);
>
> @@ -700,8 +701,9 @@ static void enetc_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *w)
> net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode, dim->profile_ix);
> struct enetc_int_vector *v =
> container_of(dim, struct enetc_int_vector, rx_dim);
> + struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(v->rx_ring.ndev);
>
> - v->rx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(moder.usec);
> + v->rx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(moder.usec, priv->sysclk_freq);
> dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> }
>
> @@ -1726,9 +1728,15 @@ void enetc_get_si_caps(struct enetc_si *si)
> si->num_rx_rings = (val >> 16) & 0xff;
> si->num_tx_rings = val & 0xff;
>
> - val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIRFSCAPR);
> - si->num_fs_entries = ENETC_SIRFSCAPR_GET_NUM_RFS(val);
> - si->num_fs_entries = min(si->num_fs_entries, ENETC_MAX_RFS_SIZE);
> + val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIPCAPR0);
> + if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_RFS) {
> + val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIRFSCAPR);
> + si->num_fs_entries = ENETC_SIRFSCAPR_GET_NUM_RFS(val);
> + si->num_fs_entries = min(si->num_fs_entries, ENETC_MAX_RFS_SIZE);
> + } else {
> + /* ENETC which not supports RFS */
> + si->num_fs_entries = 0;
> + }
>
> si->num_rss = 0;
> val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIPCAPR0);
> @@ -1742,8 +1750,11 @@ void enetc_get_si_caps(struct enetc_si *si)
> if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBV)
> si->hw_features |= ENETC_SI_F_QBV;
>
> - if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU)
> + if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU) {
> si->hw_features |= ENETC_SI_F_QBU;
> + si->pmac_offset = is_enetc_rev1(si) ? ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET :
> + ENETC4_PMAC_OFFSET;
pmac_offset should not relate with ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU.
such data should be in drvdata generally.
pmac_offset always be ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET at ver1 and ENETC4_PMAC_OFFSET
at rev4 regardless if support ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU.
> + }
>
> if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_PSFP)
> si->hw_features |= ENETC_SI_F_PSFP;
> @@ -2056,7 +2067,7 @@ int enetc_configure_si(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> /* enable SI */
> enetc_wr(hw, ENETC_SIMR, ENETC_SIMR_EN);
>
> - if (si->num_rss) {
> + if (si->num_rss && is_enetc_rev1(si)) {
> err = enetc_setup_default_rss_table(si, priv->num_rx_rings);
> if (err)
> return err;
> @@ -2080,9 +2091,9 @@ void enetc_init_si_rings_params(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> */
> priv->num_rx_rings = min_t(int, cpus, si->num_rx_rings);
> priv->num_tx_rings = si->num_tx_rings;
> - priv->bdr_int_num = cpus;
> + priv->bdr_int_num = priv->num_rx_rings;
> priv->ic_mode = ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE | ENETC_IC_TX_MANUAL;
> - priv->tx_ictt = ENETC_TXIC_TIMETHR;
> + priv->tx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(600, priv->sysclk_freq);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_init_si_rings_params);
>
> @@ -2475,10 +2486,14 @@ int enetc_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>
> extended = !!(priv->active_offloads & ENETC_F_RX_TSTAMP);
>
> - err = enetc_setup_irqs(priv);
> + err = clk_prepare_enable(priv->ref_clk);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + err = enetc_setup_irqs(priv);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_setup_irqs;
> +
> err = enetc_phylink_connect(ndev);
> if (err)
> goto err_phy_connect;
> @@ -2510,6 +2525,8 @@ int enetc_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> phylink_disconnect_phy(priv->phylink);
> err_phy_connect:
> enetc_free_irqs(priv);
> +err_setup_irqs:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->ref_clk);
>
> return err;
> }
> @@ -2559,6 +2576,7 @@ int enetc_close(struct net_device *ndev)
> enetc_assign_tx_resources(priv, NULL);
>
> enetc_free_irqs(priv);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->ref_clk);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> index 97524dfa234c..fe4bc082b3cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <net/xdp.h>
>
> #include "enetc_hw.h"
> +#include "enetc4_hw.h"
>
> #define ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE 9600
> #define ENETC_MAX_MTU (ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE - \
> @@ -247,10 +248,16 @@ struct enetc_si {
> int num_rss; /* number of RSS buckets */
> unsigned short pad;
> int hw_features;
> + int pmac_offset; /* Only valid for PSI which supports 802.1Qbu */
> };
>
> #define ENETC_SI_ALIGN 32
>
> +static inline bool is_enetc_rev1(struct enetc_si *si)
> +{
> + return si->pdev->revision == ENETC_REV1;
> +}
> +
> static inline void *enetc_si_priv(const struct enetc_si *si)
> {
> return (char *)si + ALIGN(sizeof(struct enetc_si), ENETC_SI_ALIGN);
> @@ -302,7 +309,7 @@ struct enetc_cls_rule {
> int used;
> };
>
> -#define ENETC_MAX_BDR_INT 2 /* fixed to max # of available cpus */
> +#define ENETC_MAX_BDR_INT 6 /* fixed to max # of available cpus */
> struct psfp_cap {
> u32 max_streamid;
> u32 max_psfp_filter;
> @@ -340,7 +347,6 @@ enum enetc_ic_mode {
>
> #define ENETC_RXIC_PKTTHR min_t(u32, 256, ENETC_RX_RING_DEFAULT_SIZE / 2)
> #define ENETC_TXIC_PKTTHR min_t(u32, 128, ENETC_TX_RING_DEFAULT_SIZE / 2)
> -#define ENETC_TXIC_TIMETHR enetc_usecs_to_cycles(600)
>
> struct enetc_ndev_priv {
> struct net_device *ndev;
> @@ -388,6 +394,9 @@ struct enetc_ndev_priv {
> * and link state updates
> */
> struct mutex mm_lock;
> +
> + struct clk *ref_clk; /* RGMII/RMII reference clock */
> + u64 sysclk_freq; /* NETC system clock frequency */
You can get ref_clk from dt, why not get sysclk from dt also and fetch
frequency from clock provider instead of hardcode in driver.
> };
>
> /* Messaging */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b53549e810c9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause) */
> +/*
> + * This header file defines the register offsets and bit fields
> + * of ENETC4 PF and VFs. Note that the same registers as ENETC
> + * version 1.0 are defined in the enetc_hw.h file.
> + *
> + * Copyright 2024 NXP
> + */
> +#ifndef __ENETC4_HW_H_
> +#define __ENETC4_HW_H_
> +
> +/***************************ENETC port registers**************************/
> +#define ENETC4_ECAPR0 0x0
> +#define ECAPR0_RFS BIT(2)
> +#define ECAPR0_TSD BIT(5)
> +#define ECAPR0_RSS BIT(8)
> +#define ECAPR0_RSC BIT(9)
> +#define ECAPR0_LSO BIT(10)
> +#define ECAPR0_WO BIT(13)
> +
> +#define ENETC4_ECAPR1 0x4
> +#define ECAPR1_NUM_TCS GENMASK(6, 4)
> +#define ECAPR1_NUM_MCH GENMASK(9, 8)
> +#define ECAPR1_NUM_UCH GENMASK(11, 10)
> +#define ECAPR1_NUM_MSIX GENMASK(22, 12)
> +#define ECAPR1_NUM_VSI GENMASK(27, 24)
> +#define ECAPR1_NUM_IPV BIT(31)
> +
> +#define ENETC4_ECAPR2 0x8
> +#define ECAPR2_NUM_TX_BDR GENMASK(9, 0)
> +#define ECAPR2_NUM_RX_BDR GENMASK(25, 16)
> +
> +#define ENETC4_PMR 0x10
> +#define PMR_SI_EN(a) BIT((16 + (a)))
> +
> +/* Port Pause ON/OFF threshold register */
> +#define ENETC4_PPAUONTR 0x108
> +#define ENETC4_PPAUOFFTR 0x10c
> +
> +/* Port Station interface promiscuous MAC mode register */
> +#define ENETC4_PSIPMMR 0x200
> +#define PSIPMMR_SI_MAC_UP(a) BIT(a) /* a = SI index */
> +#define PSIPMMR_SI_MAC_MP(a) BIT((a) + 16)
> +
> +/* Port Station interface promiscuous VLAN mode register */
> +#define ENETC4_PSIPVMR 0x204
> +
> +/* Port RSS key register n. n = 0,1,2,...,9 */
> +#define ENETC4_PRSSKR(n) ((n) * 0x4 + 0x250)
> +
> +/* Port station interface MAC address filtering capability register */
> +#define ENETC4_PSIMAFCAPR 0x280
> +#define PSIMAFCAPR_NUM_MAC_AFTE GENMASK(11, 0)
> +
> +/* Port station interface VLAN filtering capability register */
> +#define ENETC4_PSIVLANFCAPR 0x2c0
> +#define PSIVLANFCAPR_NUM_VLAN_FTE GENMASK(11, 0)
> +
> +/* Port station interface VLAN filtering mode register */
> +#define ENETC4_PSIVLANFMR 0x2c4
> +#define PSIVLANFMR_VS BIT(0)
> +
> +/* Port Station interface a primary MAC address registers */
> +#define ENETC4_PSIPMAR0(a) ((a) * 0x80 + 0x2000)
> +#define ENETC4_PSIPMAR1(a) ((a) * 0x80 + 0x2004)
> +
> +/* Port station interface a configuration register 0/2 */
> +#define ENETC4_PSICFGR0(a) ((a) * 0x80 + 0x2010)
> +#define PSICFGR0_VASE BIT(13)
> +#define PSICFGR0_ASE BIT(15)
> +#define PSICFGR0_ANTI_SPOOFING (PSICFGR0_VASE | PSICFGR0_ASE)
> +
> +#define ENETC4_PSICFGR2(a) ((a) * 0x80 + 0x2018)
> +
> +#define ENETC4_PMCAPR 0x4004
> +#define PMCAPR_HD BIT(8)
> +#define PMCAPR_FP GENMASK(10, 9)
> +
> +/* Port configuration register */
> +#define ENETC4_PCR 0x4010
> +#define PCR_HDR_FMT BIT(0)
> +#define PCR_L2DOSE BIT(4)
> +#define PCR_TIMER_CS BIT(8)
> +#define PCR_PSPEED GENMASK(29, 16)
> +#define PCR_PSPEED_VAL(speed) (((speed) / 10 - 1) << 16)
> +
> +/* Port MAC address register 0/1 */
> +#define ENETC4_PMAR0 0x4020
> +#define ENETC4_PMAR1 0x4024
> +
> +/* Port operational register */
> +#define ENETC4_POR 0x4100
> +
> +/* Port traffic class a transmit maximum SDU register */
> +#define ENETC4_PTCTMSDUR(a) ((a) * 0x20 + 0x4208)
> +#define PTCTMSDUR_MAXSDU GENMASK(15, 0)
> +#define PTCTMSDUR_SDU_TYPE GENMASK(17, 16)
> +#define SDU_TYPE_PPDU 0
> +#define SDU_TYPE_MPDU 1
> +#define SDU_TYPE_MSDU 2
> +
> +#define ENETC4_PMAC_OFFSET 0x400
> +#define ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(mac) (0x5008 + (mac) * 0x400)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_TX_EN BIT(0)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_RX_EN BIT(1)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_PAUSE_FWD BIT(7)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_PAUSE_IGN BIT(8)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_TX_ADDR_INS BIT(9)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_LOOP_EN BIT(10)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_LPBK_MODE GENMASK(12, 11)
> +#define LPBCK_MODE_EXT_TX_CLK 0
> +#define LPBCK_MODE_MAC_LEVEL 1
> +#define LPBCK_MODE_INT_TX_CLK 2
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_CNT_FRM_EN BIT(13)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_TXP BIT(15)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_SEND_IDLE BIT(16)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_HD_FCEN BIT(18)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_SFD BIT(21)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_TX_FLUSH BIT(22)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_TX_LOWP_EN BIT(23)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_RX_LOWP_EMPTY BIT(24)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_SWR BIT(26)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_TS_MODE BIT(30)
> +#define PM_CMD_CFG_MG BIT(31)
> +
> +/* Port MAC 0/1 Maximum Frame Length Register */
> +#define ENETC4_PM_MAXFRM(mac) (0x5014 + (mac) * 0x400)
> +
> +/* Port MAC 0/1 Pause Quanta Register */
> +#define ENETC4_PM_PAUSE_QUANTA(mac) (0x5054 + (mac) * 0x400)
> +
> +/* Port MAC 0/1 Pause Quanta Threshold Register */
> +#define ENETC4_PM_PAUSE_THRESH(mac) (0x5064 + (mac) * 0x400)
> +
> +/* Port MAC 0 Interface Mode Control Register */
> +#define ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(mac) (0x5300 + (mac) * 0x400)
> +#define PM_IF_MODE_IFMODE GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define IFMODE_XGMII 0
> +#define IFMODE_RMII 3
> +#define IFMODE_RGMII 4
> +#define IFMODE_SGMII 5
> +#define PM_IF_MODE_REVMII BIT(3)
> +#define PM_IF_MODE_M10 BIT(4)
> +#define PM_IF_MODE_HD BIT(6)
> +#define PM_IF_MODE_SSP GENMASK(14, 13)
> +#define SSP_100M 0
> +#define SSP_10M 1
> +#define SSP_1G 2
> +#define PM_IF_MODE_ENA BIT(15)
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8e1b0a8f5ebe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,753 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause)
> +/* Copyright 2024 NXP */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/fsl/netc_global.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_net.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/unaligned.h>
> +
> +#include "enetc_pf.h"
> +
> +#define ENETC_SI_MAX_RING_NUM 8
> +
> +static void enetc4_get_port_caps(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC4_ECAPR1);
> + pf->caps.num_vsi = (val & ECAPR1_NUM_VSI) >> 24;
> + pf->caps.num_msix = ((val & ECAPR1_NUM_MSIX) >> 12) + 1;
> +
> + val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC4_ECAPR2);
> + pf->caps.num_rx_bdr = (val & ECAPR2_NUM_RX_BDR) >> 16;
> + pf->caps.num_tx_bdr = val & ECAPR2_NUM_TX_BDR;
> +
> + val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC4_PMCAPR);
> + pf->caps.half_duplex = (val & PMCAPR_HD) ? 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_pf_set_si_primary_mac(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> + const u8 *addr)
> +{
> + u16 lower = get_unaligned_le16(addr + 4);
> + u32 upper = get_unaligned_le32(addr);
> +
> + if (si != 0) {
> + __raw_writel(upper, hw->port + ENETC4_PSIPMAR0(si));
> + __raw_writew(lower, hw->port + ENETC4_PSIPMAR1(si));
> + } else {
> + __raw_writel(upper, hw->port + ENETC4_PMAR0);
> + __raw_writew(lower, hw->port + ENETC4_PMAR1);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_pf_get_si_primary_mac(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> + u8 *addr)
> +{
> + u32 upper;
> + u16 lower;
> +
> + upper = __raw_readl(hw->port + ENETC4_PSIPMAR0(si));
> + lower = __raw_readw(hw->port + ENETC4_PSIPMAR1(si));
> +
> + put_unaligned_le32(upper, addr);
> + put_unaligned_le16(lower, addr + 4);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct enetc_pf_ops enetc4_pf_ops = {
> + .set_si_primary_mac = enetc4_pf_set_si_primary_mac,
> + .get_si_primary_mac = enetc4_pf_get_si_primary_mac,
> +};
> +
> +static int enetc4_pf_struct_init(struct enetc_si *si)
> +{
> + struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
> +
> + pf->si = si;
> + pf->total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(si->pdev);
> +
> + enetc4_get_port_caps(pf);
> + enetc_pf_ops_register(pf, &enetc4_pf_ops);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 enetc4_psicfgr0_val_construct(bool is_vf, u32 num_tx_bdr, u32 num_rx_bdr)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = ENETC_PSICFGR0_SET_TXBDR(num_tx_bdr);
> + val |= ENETC_PSICFGR0_SET_RXBDR(num_rx_bdr);
> + val |= ENETC_PSICFGR0_SIVC(ENETC_VLAN_TYPE_C | ENETC_VLAN_TYPE_S);
> +
> + if (is_vf)
> + val |= ENETC_PSICFGR0_VTE | ENETC_PSICFGR0_SIVIE;
> +
> + return val;
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_default_rings_allocation(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
> + u32 num_rx_bdr, num_tx_bdr, val;
> + u32 vf_tx_bdr, vf_rx_bdr;
> + int i, rx_rem, tx_rem;
> +
> + if (pf->caps.num_rx_bdr < ENETC_SI_MAX_RING_NUM + pf->caps.num_vsi)
> + num_rx_bdr = pf->caps.num_rx_bdr - pf->caps.num_vsi;
> + else
> + num_rx_bdr = ENETC_SI_MAX_RING_NUM;
> +
> + if (pf->caps.num_tx_bdr < ENETC_SI_MAX_RING_NUM + pf->caps.num_vsi)
> + num_tx_bdr = pf->caps.num_tx_bdr - pf->caps.num_vsi;
> + else
> + num_tx_bdr = ENETC_SI_MAX_RING_NUM;
> +
> + val = enetc4_psicfgr0_val_construct(false, num_tx_bdr, num_rx_bdr);
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSICFGR0(0), val);
> +
> + num_rx_bdr = pf->caps.num_rx_bdr - num_rx_bdr;
> + rx_rem = num_rx_bdr % pf->caps.num_vsi;
> + num_rx_bdr = num_rx_bdr / pf->caps.num_vsi;
> +
> + num_tx_bdr = pf->caps.num_tx_bdr - num_tx_bdr;
> + tx_rem = num_tx_bdr % pf->caps.num_vsi;
> + num_tx_bdr = num_tx_bdr / pf->caps.num_vsi;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pf->caps.num_vsi; i++) {
> + vf_tx_bdr = (i < tx_rem) ? num_tx_bdr + 1 : num_tx_bdr;
> + vf_rx_bdr = (i < rx_rem) ? num_rx_bdr + 1 : num_rx_bdr;
> + val = enetc4_psicfgr0_val_construct(true, vf_tx_bdr, vf_rx_bdr);
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSICFGR0(i + 1), val);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_allocate_si_rings(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + enetc4_default_rings_allocation(pf);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_pf_set_si_vlan_promisc(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, bool en)
> +{
> + u32 val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC4_PSIPVMR);
> +
> + if (en)
> + val |= BIT(si);
> + else
> + val &= ~BIT(si);
> +
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSIPVMR, val);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_set_default_si_vlan_promisc(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
> + int num_si = pf->caps.num_vsi + 1;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* enforce VLAN promisc mode for all SIs */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_si; i++)
> + enetc4_pf_set_si_vlan_promisc(hw, i, true);
> +}
> +
> +/* Allocate the number of MSI-X vectors for per SI. */
> +static void enetc4_set_si_msix_num(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
> + int i, num_msix, total_si;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + total_si = pf->caps.num_vsi + 1;
> +
> + num_msix = pf->caps.num_msix / total_si +
> + pf->caps.num_msix % total_si - 1;
> + val = num_msix & 0x3f;
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSICFGR2(0), val);
> +
> + num_msix = pf->caps.num_msix / total_si - 1;
> + val = num_msix & 0x3f;
> + for (i = 0; i < pf->caps.num_vsi; i++)
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSICFGR2(i + 1), val);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_enable_all_si(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
> + int num_si = pf->caps.num_vsi + 1;
> + u32 si_bitmap = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* Master enable for all SIs */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_si; i++)
> + si_bitmap |= PMR_SI_EN(i);
> +
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PMR, si_bitmap);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_configure_port_si(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
> +
> + enetc4_allocate_si_rings(pf);
> +
> + /* Outer VLAN tag will be used for VLAN filtering */
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSIVLANFMR, PSIVLANFMR_VS);
> +
> + enetc4_set_default_si_vlan_promisc(pf);
> +
> + /* Disable SI MAC multicast & unicast promiscuous */
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PSIPMMR, 0);
> +
> + enetc4_set_si_msix_num(pf);
> +
> + enetc4_enable_all_si(pf);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_pf_reset_tc_msdu(struct enetc_hw *hw)
> +{
> + u32 val = ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE;
> + int tc;
> +
> + val = u32_replace_bits(val, SDU_TYPE_MPDU, PTCTMSDUR_SDU_TYPE);
> +
> + for (tc = 0; tc < 8; tc++)
hard code 8? can you macro for it?
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PTCTMSDUR(tc), val);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_set_trx_frame_size(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
> +
> + enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_MAXFRM(0),
> + ENETC_SET_MAXFRM(ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE));
> +
> + enetc4_pf_reset_tc_msdu(&si->hw);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_set_rss_key(struct enetc_hw *hw, const u8 *bytes)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ENETC_RSSHASH_KEY_SIZE / 4; i++)
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PRSSKR(i), ((u32 *)bytes)[i]);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_set_default_rss_key(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + u8 hash_key[ENETC_RSSHASH_KEY_SIZE] = {0};
> + struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
> +
> + /* set up hash key */
> + get_random_bytes(hash_key, ENETC_RSSHASH_KEY_SIZE);
> + enetc4_set_rss_key(hw, hash_key);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_enable_trx(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
> +
> + /* Enable port transmit/receive */
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_POR, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_configure_port(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + enetc4_configure_port_si(pf);
> + enetc4_set_trx_frame_size(pf);
> + enetc4_set_default_rss_key(pf);
> + enetc4_enable_trx(pf);
> +}
> +
> +static int enetc4_pf_init(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pf->si->pdev->dev;
> + int err;
> +
> + /* Initialize the MAC address for PF and VFs */
> + err = enetc_setup_mac_addresses(dev->of_node, pf);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set MAC addresses\n");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + enetc4_configure_port(pf);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct net_device_ops enetc4_ndev_ops = {
> + .ndo_open = enetc_open,
> + .ndo_stop = enetc_close,
> + .ndo_start_xmit = enetc_xmit,
> + .ndo_get_stats = enetc_get_stats,
> + .ndo_set_mac_address = enetc_pf_set_mac_addr,
> +};
> +
> +static struct phylink_pcs *
> +enetc4_pl_mac_select_pcs(struct phylink_config *config, phy_interface_t iface)
> +{
> + struct enetc_pf *pf = phylink_to_enetc_pf(config);
> +
> + return pf->pcs;
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_mac_config(struct enetc_pf *pf, unsigned int mode,
> + phy_interface_t phy_mode)
> +{
> + struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(pf->si->ndev);
> + struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = enetc_port_mac_rd(si, ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(0));
> + val &= ~(PM_IF_MODE_IFMODE | PM_IF_MODE_ENA);
> +
> + switch (phy_mode) {
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID:
> + val |= IFMODE_RGMII;
> + /* We need to enable auto-negotiation for the MAC
> + * if its RGMII interface support In-Band status.
> + */
> + if (phylink_autoneg_inband(mode))
> + val |= PM_IF_MODE_ENA;
> + break;
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII:
> + val |= IFMODE_RMII;
> + break;
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX:
> + val |= IFMODE_SGMII;
> + break;
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GBASER:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XGMII:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII:
> + val |= IFMODE_XGMII;
> + break;
> + default:
> + dev_err(priv->dev,
> + "Unsupported PHY mode:%d\n", phy_mode);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(0), val);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_pl_mac_config(struct phylink_config *config, unsigned int mode,
> + const struct phylink_link_state *state)
> +{
> + struct enetc_pf *pf = phylink_to_enetc_pf(config);
> +
> + enetc4_mac_config(pf, mode, state->interface);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_set_port_speed(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int speed)
> +{
> + u32 old_speed = priv->speed;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + if (speed == old_speed)
> + return;
> +
> + val = enetc_port_rd(&priv->si->hw, ENETC4_PCR);
> + val &= ~PCR_PSPEED;
> +
> + switch (speed) {
> + case SPEED_100:
> + case SPEED_1000:
> + case SPEED_2500:
> + case SPEED_10000:
> + val |= (PCR_PSPEED & PCR_PSPEED_VAL(speed));
> + break;
> + case SPEED_10:
> + default:
> + val |= (PCR_PSPEED & PCR_PSPEED_VAL(SPEED_10));
> + }
> +
> + priv->speed = speed;
> + enetc_port_wr(&priv->si->hw, ENETC4_PCR, val);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_set_rgmii_mac(struct enetc_pf *pf, int speed, int duplex)
> +{
> + struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
> + u32 old_val, val;
> +
> + old_val = enetc_port_mac_rd(si, ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(0));
> + val = old_val & ~(PM_IF_MODE_ENA | PM_IF_MODE_M10 | PM_IF_MODE_REVMII);
> +
> + switch (speed) {
> + case SPEED_1000:
> + val = u32_replace_bits(val, SSP_1G, PM_IF_MODE_SSP);
> + break;
> + case SPEED_100:
> + val = u32_replace_bits(val, SSP_100M, PM_IF_MODE_SSP);
> + break;
> + case SPEED_10:
> + val = u32_replace_bits(val, SSP_10M, PM_IF_MODE_SSP);
> + }
> +
> + val = u32_replace_bits(val, duplex == DUPLEX_FULL ? 0 : 1,
> + PM_IF_MODE_HD);
> +
> + if (val == old_val)
> + return;
> +
> + enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(0), val);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_set_rmii_mac(struct enetc_pf *pf, int speed, int duplex)
> +{
> + struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
> + u32 old_val, val;
> +
> + old_val = enetc_port_mac_rd(si, ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(0));
> + val = old_val & ~(PM_IF_MODE_ENA | PM_IF_MODE_SSP);
> +
> + switch (speed) {
> + case SPEED_100:
> + val &= ~PM_IF_MODE_M10;
> + break;
> + case SPEED_10:
> + val |= PM_IF_MODE_M10;
> + }
> +
> + val = u32_replace_bits(val, duplex == DUPLEX_FULL ? 0 : 1,
> + PM_IF_MODE_HD);
> +
> + if (val == old_val)
> + return;
> +
> + enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_IF_MODE(0), val);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_set_hd_flow_control(struct enetc_pf *pf, bool enable)
> +{
> + struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
> + u32 old_val, val;
> +
> + if (!pf->caps.half_duplex)
> + return;
> +
> + old_val = enetc_port_mac_rd(si, ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(0));
> + val = u32_replace_bits(old_val, enable ? 1 : 0, PM_CMD_CFG_HD_FCEN);
> + if (val == old_val)
> + return;
> +
> + enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(0), val);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_set_rx_pause(struct enetc_pf *pf, bool rx_pause)
> +{
> + struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
> + u32 old_val, val;
> +
> + old_val = enetc_port_mac_rd(si, ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(0));
> + val = u32_replace_bits(old_val, rx_pause ? 0 : 1, PM_CMD_CFG_PAUSE_IGN);
> + if (val == old_val)
> + return;
> +
> + enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(0), val);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_set_tx_pause(struct enetc_pf *pf, int num_rxbdr, bool tx_pause)
> +{
> + u32 pause_off_thresh = 0, pause_on_thresh = 0;
> + u32 init_quanta = 0, refresh_quanta = 0;
> + struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
> + u32 rbmr, old_rbmr;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_rxbdr; i++) {
> + old_rbmr = enetc_rxbdr_rd(hw, i, ENETC_RBMR);
> + rbmr = u32_replace_bits(old_rbmr, tx_pause ? 1 : 0, ENETC_RBMR_CM);
> + if (rbmr == old_rbmr)
> + continue;
> +
> + enetc_rxbdr_wr(hw, i, ENETC_RBMR, rbmr);
> + }
> +
> + if (tx_pause) {
> + /* When the port first enters congestion, send a PAUSE request
> + * with the maximum number of quanta. When the port exits
> + * congestion, it will automatically send a PAUSE frame with
> + * zero quanta.
> + */
> + init_quanta = 0xffff;
> +
> + /* Also, set up the refresh timer to send follow-up PAUSE
> + * frames at half the quanta value, in case the congestion
> + * condition persists.
> + */
> + refresh_quanta = 0xffff / 2;
> +
> + /* Start emitting PAUSE frames when 3 large frames (or more
> + * smaller frames) have accumulated in the FIFO waiting to be
> + * DMAed to the RX ring.
> + */
> + pause_on_thresh = 3 * ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE;
> + pause_off_thresh = 1 * ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE;
> + }
> +
> + enetc_port_mac_wr(pf->si, ENETC4_PM_PAUSE_QUANTA(0), init_quanta);
> + enetc_port_mac_wr(pf->si, ENETC4_PM_PAUSE_THRESH(0), refresh_quanta);
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PPAUONTR, pause_on_thresh);
> + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PPAUOFFTR, pause_off_thresh);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_enable_mac(struct enetc_pf *pf, bool en)
> +{
> + struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = enetc_port_mac_rd(si, ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(0));
> + val &= ~(PM_CMD_CFG_TX_EN | PM_CMD_CFG_RX_EN);
> + val |= en ? (PM_CMD_CFG_TX_EN | PM_CMD_CFG_RX_EN) : 0;
> +
> + enetc_port_mac_wr(si, ENETC4_PM_CMD_CFG(0), val);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_pl_mac_link_up(struct phylink_config *config,
> + struct phy_device *phy, unsigned int mode,
> + phy_interface_t interface, int speed,
> + int duplex, bool tx_pause, bool rx_pause)
> +{
> + struct enetc_pf *pf = phylink_to_enetc_pf(config);
> + struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
> + struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv;
> + bool hd_fc = false;
> +
> + priv = netdev_priv(si->ndev);
> + enetc4_set_port_speed(priv, speed);
> +
> + if (!phylink_autoneg_inband(mode) &&
> + phy_interface_mode_is_rgmii(interface))
> + enetc4_set_rgmii_mac(pf, speed, duplex);
> +
> + if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII)
> + enetc4_set_rmii_mac(pf, speed, duplex);
> +
> + if (duplex == DUPLEX_FULL) {
> + /* When preemption is enabled, generation of PAUSE frames
> + * must be disabled, as stated in the IEEE 802.3 standard.
> + */
> + if (priv->active_offloads & ENETC_F_QBU)
> + tx_pause = false;
> + } else { /* DUPLEX_HALF */
> + if (tx_pause || rx_pause)
> + hd_fc = true;
> +
> + /* As per 802.3 annex 31B, PAUSE frames are only supported
> + * when the link is configured for full duplex operation.
> + */
> + tx_pause = false;
> + rx_pause = false;
> + }
> +
> + enetc4_set_hd_flow_control(pf, hd_fc);
> + enetc4_set_tx_pause(pf, priv->num_rx_rings, tx_pause);
> + enetc4_set_rx_pause(pf, rx_pause);
> + enetc4_enable_mac(pf, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_pl_mac_link_down(struct phylink_config *config,
> + unsigned int mode,
> + phy_interface_t interface)
> +{
> + struct enetc_pf *pf = phylink_to_enetc_pf(config);
> +
> + enetc4_enable_mac(pf, false);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct phylink_mac_ops enetc_pl_mac_ops = {
> + .mac_select_pcs = enetc4_pl_mac_select_pcs,
> + .mac_config = enetc4_pl_mac_config,
> + .mac_link_up = enetc4_pl_mac_link_up,
> + .mac_link_down = enetc4_pl_mac_link_down,
> +};
> +
> +static void enetc4_pci_remove(void *data)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = data;
> +
> + enetc_pci_remove(pdev);
> +}
> +
> +static int enetc4_link_init(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv,
> + struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(priv->si);
> + struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = of_get_phy_mode(node, &pf->if_mode);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY mode\n");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + err = enetc_mdiobus_create(pf, node);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to create MDIO bus\n");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + err = enetc_phylink_create(priv, node, &enetc_pl_mac_ops);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to create phylink\n");
> + goto err_phylink_create;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_phylink_create:
> + enetc_mdiobus_destroy(pf);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_link_deinit(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> +{
> + struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(priv->si);
> +
> + enetc_phylink_destroy(priv);
> + enetc_mdiobus_destroy(pf);
> +}
> +
> +static int enetc4_pf_netdev_create(struct enetc_si *si)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &si->pdev->dev;
> + struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv;
> + struct net_device *ndev;
> + int err;
> +
> + ndev = alloc_etherdev_mqs(sizeof(struct enetc_ndev_priv),
> + si->num_tx_rings, si->num_rx_rings);
> + if (!ndev)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + priv->ref_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "ref");
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->ref_clk)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Get referencce clock failed\n");
> + err = PTR_ERR(priv->ref_clk);
> + goto err_clk_get;
> + }
> +
> + enetc_pf_netdev_setup(si, ndev, &enetc4_ndev_ops);
> +
> + enetc_init_si_rings_params(priv);
> +
> + err = enetc_configure_si(priv);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to configure SI\n");
> + goto err_config_si;
> + }
> +
> + err = enetc_alloc_msix(priv);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to alloc MSI-X\n");
> + goto err_alloc_msix;
> + }
> +
> + err = enetc4_link_init(priv, dev->of_node);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_link_init;
> +
> + err = register_netdev(ndev);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register netdev\n");
> + goto err_reg_netdev;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_reg_netdev:
> + enetc4_link_deinit(priv);
> +err_link_init:
> + enetc_free_msix(priv);
> +err_alloc_msix:
> +err_config_si:
> +err_clk_get:
> + mutex_destroy(&priv->mm_lock);
> + free_netdev(ndev);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_pf_netdev_destroy(struct enetc_si *si)
> +{
> + struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(si->ndev);
> + struct net_device *ndev = si->ndev;
> +
> + unregister_netdev(ndev);
> + enetc_free_msix(priv);
> + free_netdev(ndev);
> +}
> +
> +static int enetc4_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct enetc_si *si;
> + struct enetc_pf *pf;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = enetc_pci_probe(pdev, KBUILD_MODNAME, sizeof(*pf));
> + if (err)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "PCIe probing failed\n");
> +
> + err = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, enetc4_pci_remove, pdev);
> + if (err)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, err,
> + "Add enetc4_pci_remove() action failed\n");
> +
> + /* si is the private data. */
> + si = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + if (!si->hw.port || !si->hw.global)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV,
> + "Couldn't map PF only space\n");
> +
> + err = enetc4_pf_struct_init(si);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
> + err = enetc4_pf_init(pf);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev);
> + enetc_get_si_caps(si);
> +
> + return enetc4_pf_netdev_create(si);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc4_pf_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct enetc_si *si = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + enetc4_pf_netdev_destroy(si);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pci_device_id enetc4_pf_id_table[] = {
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NXP2, PCI_DEVICE_ID_NXP2_ENETC_PF) },
> + { 0, } /* End of table. */
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, enetc4_pf_id_table);
> +
> +static struct pci_driver enetc4_pf_driver = {
> + .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> + .id_table = enetc4_pf_id_table,
> + .probe = enetc4_pf_probe,
> + .remove = enetc4_pf_remove,
> +};
> +module_pci_driver(enetc4_pf_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ENETC4 PF Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> index 2563eb8ac7b6..ed44d27cc6bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> @@ -775,9 +775,10 @@ static int enetc_get_coalesce(struct net_device *ndev,
> {
> struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[0];
> + u64 clk_freq = priv->sysclk_freq;
>
> - ic->tx_coalesce_usecs = enetc_cycles_to_usecs(priv->tx_ictt);
> - ic->rx_coalesce_usecs = enetc_cycles_to_usecs(v->rx_ictt);
> + ic->tx_coalesce_usecs = enetc_cycles_to_usecs(priv->tx_ictt, clk_freq);
> + ic->rx_coalesce_usecs = enetc_cycles_to_usecs(v->rx_ictt, clk_freq);
>
> ic->tx_max_coalesced_frames = ENETC_TXIC_PKTTHR;
> ic->rx_max_coalesced_frames = ENETC_RXIC_PKTTHR;
> @@ -793,12 +794,13 @@ static int enetc_set_coalesce(struct net_device *ndev,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + u64 clk_freq = priv->sysclk_freq;
> u32 rx_ictt, tx_ictt;
> int i, ic_mode;
> bool changed;
>
> - tx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(ic->tx_coalesce_usecs);
> - rx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(ic->rx_coalesce_usecs);
> + tx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(ic->tx_coalesce_usecs, clk_freq);
> + rx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(ic->rx_coalesce_usecs, clk_freq);
>
> if (ic->rx_max_coalesced_frames != ENETC_RXIC_PKTTHR)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> @@ -1234,13 +1236,33 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops enetc_vf_ethtool_ops = {
> .get_ts_info = enetc_get_ts_info,
> };
>
> +static const struct ethtool_ops enetc4_pf_ethtool_ops = {
> + .supported_coalesce_params = ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USECS |
> + ETHTOOL_COALESCE_MAX_FRAMES |
> + ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USE_ADAPTIVE_RX,
> + .get_ringparam = enetc_get_ringparam,
> + .get_coalesce = enetc_get_coalesce,
> + .set_coalesce = enetc_set_coalesce,
> + .get_link_ksettings = enetc_get_link_ksettings,
> + .set_link_ksettings = enetc_set_link_ksettings,
> + .get_link = ethtool_op_get_link,
> + .get_wol = enetc_get_wol,
> + .set_wol = enetc_set_wol,
> + .get_pauseparam = enetc_get_pauseparam,
> + .set_pauseparam = enetc_set_pauseparam,
> +};
> +
> void enetc_set_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *ndev)
> {
> struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>
> - if (enetc_si_is_pf(priv->si))
> - ndev->ethtool_ops = &enetc_pf_ethtool_ops;
> - else
> + if (enetc_si_is_pf(priv->si)) {
> + if (is_enetc_rev1(priv->si))
> + ndev->ethtool_ops = &enetc_pf_ethtool_ops;
> + else
> + ndev->ethtool_ops = &enetc4_pf_ethtool_ops;
> + } else {
> ndev->ethtool_ops = &enetc_vf_ethtool_ops;
> + }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_set_ethtool_ops);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> index 6a7b9b75d660..a9b61925b291 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #define ENETC_SIPCAPR0_RSS BIT(8)
> #define ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBV BIT(4)
> #define ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU BIT(3)
> +#define ENETC_SIPCAPR0_RFS BIT(2)
> #define ENETC_SIPCAPR1 0x24
> #define ENETC_SITGTGR 0x30
> #define ENETC_SIRBGCR 0x38
> @@ -971,15 +972,17 @@ struct enetc_cbd {
> u8 status_flags;
> };
>
> -#define ENETC_CLK 400000000ULL
> -static inline u32 enetc_cycles_to_usecs(u32 cycles)
> +#define ENETC_CLK_400M 400000000ULL
> +#define ENETC_CLK_333M 333000000ULL
> +
> +static inline u32 enetc_cycles_to_usecs(u32 cycles, u64 clk_freq)
> {
> - return (u32)div_u64(cycles * 1000000ULL, ENETC_CLK);
> + return (u32)div_u64(cycles * 1000000ULL, clk_freq);
> }
>
> -static inline u32 enetc_usecs_to_cycles(u32 usecs)
> +static inline u32 enetc_usecs_to_cycles(u32 usecs, u64 clk_freq)
> {
> - return (u32)div_u64(usecs * ENETC_CLK, 1000000ULL);
> + return (u32)div_u64(usecs * clk_freq, 1000000ULL);
> }
>
> /* Port traffic class frame preemption register */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> index 39db9d5c2e50..5ed97137e5c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ struct enetc_vf_state {
> enum enetc_vf_flags flags;
> };
>
> +struct enetc_port_caps {
> + u32 half_duplex:1;
> + int num_vsi;
> + int num_msix;
> + int num_rx_bdr;
> + int num_tx_bdr;
> +};
> +
> struct enetc_pf;
>
> struct enetc_pf_ops {
> @@ -61,6 +69,7 @@ struct enetc_pf {
> phy_interface_t if_mode;
> struct phylink_config phylink_config;
>
> + struct enetc_port_caps caps;
> const struct enetc_pf_ops *ops;
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> index 94690ed92e3f..6ce0facd2e97 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> @@ -121,10 +121,20 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> ndev->vlan_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM |
> NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
>
> + ndev->priv_flags |= IFF_UNICAST_FLT;
> +
> + /* TODO: currently, i.MX95 ENETC driver does not support advanced features */
> + if (is_enetc_rev1(si)) {
> + priv->sysclk_freq = ENETC_CLK_400M;
> + } else {
> + ndev->hw_features &= ~(NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER | NETIF_F_LOOPBACK);
> + priv->sysclk_freq = ENETC_CLK_333M;
> + goto end;
> + }
> +
> if (si->num_rss)
> ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_RXHASH;
>
> - ndev->priv_flags |= IFF_UNICAST_FLT;
> ndev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT |
> NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_RX_SG |
> NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT_SG;
> @@ -136,6 +146,7 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
> }
>
> +end:
> /* pick up primary MAC address from SI */
> enetc_load_primary_mac_addr(&si->hw, ndev);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> index b65da49dd926..5fa2f1db87f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ int enetc_setup_tc_cbs(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data)
> *
> * (enetClockFrequency / portTransmitRate) * 100
> */
> - hi_credit_reg = (u32)div_u64((ENETC_CLK * 100ULL) * hi_credit_bit,
> + hi_credit_reg = (u32)div_u64((ENETC_CLK_400M * 100ULL) * hi_credit_bit,
> port_transmit_rate * 1000000ULL);
>
> enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC_PTCCBSR1(tc), hi_credit_reg);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> index dfcaac302e24..2295742b7090 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ static void enetc_vf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> ndev->watchdog_timeo = 5 * HZ;
> ndev->max_mtu = ENETC_MAX_MTU;
>
> + priv->sysclk_freq = ENETC_CLK_400M;
> +
why vf is fixed at 400M?
Frank
> ndev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 02/13] dt-bindings: net: add i.MX95 ENETC support
2024-10-22 16:13 ` Frank Li
@ 2024-10-23 1:40 ` Wei Fang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-23 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Li
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean, Claudiu Manoil, Clark Wang,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> > allOf:
> > - $ref: /schemas/pci/pci-device.yaml
> > - $ref: ethernet-controller.yaml
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + enum:
> > + - pci1131,e101
> > + then:
> > + properties:
> > + clocks:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > + description: MAC transmit/receiver reference clock
>
> items:
> - description: MAC transmit/receiver reference clock
I remember Rob said maxItems:1 is enough, I think items is no needed here.
>
> > +
> > + clock-names:
> > + const: ref
>
> items:
> - const: ref
I think const: ref is enough, I referenced several other YAML files, such as
cortina,gemini-ethernet.yaml, allwinner,sun8i-a83t-emac.yaml.
> >
> > + else:
> > + properties:
> > + clocks: false
> > + clock-names: false
> >
> > unevaluatedProperties: false
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-22 16:17 ` Frank Li
@ 2024-10-23 1:46 ` Wei Fang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-23 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Li
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean, Claudiu Manoil, Clark Wang,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>
> Sent: 2024年10月23日 0:18
> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Cc: davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org;
> pabeni@redhat.com; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org;
> conor+dt@kernel.org; Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>; Claudiu
> Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>;
> christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu; linux@armlinux.org.uk; bhelgaas@google.com;
> horms@kernel.org; imx@lists.linux.dev; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC
> blocks control
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:52:13PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> > Add bindings for NXP NETC blocks control. Usually, NETC has 2 blocks
> > of 64KB registers, integrated endpoint register block (IERB) and
> > privileged register block (PRB). IERB is used for pre-boot
> > initialization for all NETC devices, such as ENETC, Timer, EMDIO and
> > so on. And PRB controls global reset and global error handling for
> > NETC. Moreover, for the i.MX platform, there is also a NETCMIX block
> > for link configuration, such as MII protocol, PCS protocol, etc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > v2 changes:
> > 1. Rephrase the commit message.
> > 2. Change unevaluatedProperties to additionalProperties.
> > 3. Remove the useless lables from examples.
> > v3 changes:
> > 1. Remove the items from clocks and clock-names, add maxItems to
> > clocks and rename the clock.
> > v4 changes:
> > 1. Reorder the required properties.
> > 2. Add assigned-clocks, assigned-clock-parents and assigned-clock-rates.
> > ---
> > .../bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml | 111 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..0b7fd2c5e0d8
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) %YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: NETC Blocks Control
> > +
> > +description:
> > + Usually, NETC has 2 blocks of 64KB registers, integrated endpoint
> > +register
> > + block (IERB) and privileged register block (PRB). IERB is used for
> > +pre-boot
> > + initialization for all NETC devices, such as ENETC, Timer, EMIDO and so on.
> > + And PRB controls global reset and global error handling for NETC.
> > +Moreover,
> > + for the i.MX platform, there is also a NETCMIX block for link
> > +configuration,
> > + such as MII protocol, PCS protocol, etc.
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> > + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + minItems: 2
> > + maxItems: 3
> > +
> > + reg-names:
> > + minItems: 2
> > + items:
> > + - const: ierb
> > + - const: prb
> > + - const: netcmix
> > +
> > + "#address-cells":
> > + const: 2
> > +
> > + "#size-cells":
> > + const: 2
> > +
> > + ranges: true
> > + assigned-clocks: true
> > + assigned-clock-parents: true
> > + assigned-clock-rates: true
>
> I am not sure if it necessary. But if add restriction, it should be
>
> assigned-clocks:
> maxItems: 2
>
There is no need to add restrictions here, different SoCs have different
clocks that need to be configured. For example, the upcoming SoC has
more clocks to be configured.
> > +
> > + clocks:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + clock-names:
> > + const: ipg
> > +
> > + power-domains:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
> > + "^pcie@[0-9a-f]+$":
> > + $ref: /schemas/pci/host-generic-pci.yaml#
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - reg-names
> > + - "#address-cells"
> > + - "#size-cells"
> > + - ranges
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + bus {
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > + netc-blk-ctrl@4cde0000 {
> > + compatible = "nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x4cde0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> > + <0x0 0x4cdf0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> > + <0x0 0x4c81000c 0x0 0x18>;
> > + reg-names = "ierb", "prb", "netcmix";
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + ranges;
> > + assigned-clocks = <&scmi_clk 98>, <&scmi_clk 102>;
> > + assigned-clock-parents = <&scmi_clk 12>, <&scmi_clk 6>;
> > + assigned-clock-rates = <666666666>, <250000000>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk 98>;
> > + clock-names = "ipg";
> > + power-domains = <&scmi_devpd 18>;
> > +
> > + pcie@4cb00000 {
> > + compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x4cb00000 0x0 0x100000>;
> > + #address-cells = <3>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + device_type = "pci";
> > + bus-range = <0x1 0x1>;
> > + ranges = <0x82000000 0x0 0x4cce0000 0x0
> 0x4cce0000 0x0 0x20000
> > + 0xc2000000 0x0 0x4cd10000 0x0
> 0x4cd10000
> > + 0x0 0x10000>;
> > +
> > + mdio@0,0 {
> > + compatible = "pci1131,ee00";
> > + reg = <0x010000 0 0 0 0>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF
2024-10-22 19:27 ` Frank Li
@ 2024-10-23 1:57 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-23 2:16 ` Wei Fang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-23 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Li
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean, Claudiu Manoil, Clark Wang,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> > @@ -1726,9 +1728,15 @@ void enetc_get_si_caps(struct enetc_si *si)
> > si->num_rx_rings = (val >> 16) & 0xff;
> > si->num_tx_rings = val & 0xff;
> >
> > - val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIRFSCAPR);
> > - si->num_fs_entries = ENETC_SIRFSCAPR_GET_NUM_RFS(val);
> > - si->num_fs_entries = min(si->num_fs_entries, ENETC_MAX_RFS_SIZE);
> > + val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIPCAPR0);
> > + if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_RFS) {
> > + val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIRFSCAPR);
> > + si->num_fs_entries = ENETC_SIRFSCAPR_GET_NUM_RFS(val);
> > + si->num_fs_entries = min(si->num_fs_entries, ENETC_MAX_RFS_SIZE);
> > + } else {
> > + /* ENETC which not supports RFS */
> > + si->num_fs_entries = 0;
> > + }
> >
> > si->num_rss = 0;
> > val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIPCAPR0);
> > @@ -1742,8 +1750,11 @@ void enetc_get_si_caps(struct enetc_si *si)
> > if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBV)
> > si->hw_features |= ENETC_SI_F_QBV;
> >
> > - if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU)
> > + if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU) {
> > si->hw_features |= ENETC_SI_F_QBU;
> > + si->pmac_offset = is_enetc_rev1(si) ? ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET :
> > + ENETC4_PMAC_OFFSET;
>
> pmac_offset should not relate with ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU.
> such data should be in drvdata generally.
>
> pmac_offset always be ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET at ver1 and
> ENETC4_PMAC_OFFSET at rev4 regardless if support ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU.
>
> > + }
> >
> > if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_PSFP)
> > si->hw_features |= ENETC_SI_F_PSFP; @@ -2056,7 +2067,7 @@ int
> > enetc_configure_si(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> > /* enable SI */
> > enetc_wr(hw, ENETC_SIMR, ENETC_SIMR_EN);
> >
> > - if (si->num_rss) {
> > + if (si->num_rss && is_enetc_rev1(si)) {
> > err = enetc_setup_default_rss_table(si, priv->num_rx_rings);
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> > @@ -2080,9 +2091,9 @@ void enetc_init_si_rings_params(struct
> enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> > */
> > priv->num_rx_rings = min_t(int, cpus, si->num_rx_rings);
> > priv->num_tx_rings = si->num_tx_rings;
> > - priv->bdr_int_num = cpus;
> > + priv->bdr_int_num = priv->num_rx_rings;
> > priv->ic_mode = ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE | ENETC_IC_TX_MANUAL;
> > - priv->tx_ictt = ENETC_TXIC_TIMETHR;
> > + priv->tx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(600, priv->sysclk_freq);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_init_si_rings_params);
> >
> > @@ -2475,10 +2486,14 @@ int enetc_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> >
> > extended = !!(priv->active_offloads & ENETC_F_RX_TSTAMP);
> >
> > - err = enetc_setup_irqs(priv);
> > + err = clk_prepare_enable(priv->ref_clk);
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> >
> > + err = enetc_setup_irqs(priv);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto err_setup_irqs;
> > +
> > err = enetc_phylink_connect(ndev);
> > if (err)
> > goto err_phy_connect;
> > @@ -2510,6 +2525,8 @@ int enetc_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> > phylink_disconnect_phy(priv->phylink);
> > err_phy_connect:
> > enetc_free_irqs(priv);
> > +err_setup_irqs:
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->ref_clk);
> >
> > return err;
> > }
> > @@ -2559,6 +2576,7 @@ int enetc_close(struct net_device *ndev)
> > enetc_assign_tx_resources(priv, NULL);
> >
> > enetc_free_irqs(priv);
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->ref_clk);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > index 97524dfa234c..fe4bc082b3cf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > #include <net/xdp.h>
> >
> > #include "enetc_hw.h"
> > +#include "enetc4_hw.h"
> >
> > #define ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE 9600
> > #define ENETC_MAX_MTU (ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE - \
> > @@ -247,10 +248,16 @@ struct enetc_si {
> > int num_rss; /* number of RSS buckets */
> > unsigned short pad;
> > int hw_features;
> > + int pmac_offset; /* Only valid for PSI which supports 802.1Qbu */
> > };
> >
> > #define ENETC_SI_ALIGN 32
> >
> > +static inline bool is_enetc_rev1(struct enetc_si *si) {
> > + return si->pdev->revision == ENETC_REV1; }
> > +
> > static inline void *enetc_si_priv(const struct enetc_si *si) {
> > return (char *)si + ALIGN(sizeof(struct enetc_si), ENETC_SI_ALIGN);
> > @@ -302,7 +309,7 @@ struct enetc_cls_rule {
> > int used;
> > };
> >
> > -#define ENETC_MAX_BDR_INT 2 /* fixed to max # of available cpus */
> > +#define ENETC_MAX_BDR_INT 6 /* fixed to max # of available cpus */
> > struct psfp_cap {
> > u32 max_streamid;
> > u32 max_psfp_filter;
> > @@ -340,7 +347,6 @@ enum enetc_ic_mode {
> >
> > #define ENETC_RXIC_PKTTHR min_t(u32, 256,
> ENETC_RX_RING_DEFAULT_SIZE / 2)
> > #define ENETC_TXIC_PKTTHR min_t(u32, 128,
> ENETC_TX_RING_DEFAULT_SIZE / 2)
> > -#define ENETC_TXIC_TIMETHR enetc_usecs_to_cycles(600)
> >
> > struct enetc_ndev_priv {
> > struct net_device *ndev;
> > @@ -388,6 +394,9 @@ struct enetc_ndev_priv {
> > * and link state updates
> > */
> > struct mutex mm_lock;
> > +
> > + struct clk *ref_clk; /* RGMII/RMII reference clock */
> > + u64 sysclk_freq; /* NETC system clock frequency */
>
> You can get ref_clk from dt, why not get sysclk from dt also and fetch frequency
> from clock provider instead of hardcode in driver.
>
I explained it in the v3 patch, maybe you missed the reply.
There are two reasons are as follows.
The first reason is that ENETC VF does not have a DT node, so VF cannot get the system
clock from DT.
The second reason is that S32 platform also not use the clocks property in DT, so this
solution is not suitable for S32 platform. In addition, for i.MX platforms, there is a 1/2
divider inside the NETCMIX, the clock rate we get from clk_get_rate() is 666MHz, and
we need to divide by 2 to get the correct system clock rate. But S32 does not have a
NETCMIX so there may not have a 1/2 divider or may have other dividers, even if it
supports the clocks property, the calculation of getting the system clock rate is different.
Therefore, the hardcode based on the IP revision is simpler and clearer, and can be
shared by both PF and VFs.
> > };
> > +static void enetc4_pf_reset_tc_msdu(struct enetc_hw *hw) {
> > + u32 val = ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE;
> > + int tc;
> > +
> > + val = u32_replace_bits(val, SDU_TYPE_MPDU, PTCTMSDUR_SDU_TYPE);
> > +
> > + for (tc = 0; tc < 8; tc++)
>
> hard code 8? can you macro for it?
>
Okay, I will add a macro for the TC number.
> > + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PTCTMSDUR(tc), val); }
> > +
> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> > index dfcaac302e24..2295742b7090 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> > @@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ static void enetc_vf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si,
> struct net_device *ndev,
> > ndev->watchdog_timeo = 5 * HZ;
> > ndev->max_mtu = ENETC_MAX_MTU;
> >
> > + priv->sysclk_freq = ENETC_CLK_400M;
> > +
>
> why vf is fixed at 400M?
>
Because I have not added the VF support for i.MX95 ENETC, so the current VF
driver is still only available for LS1028A ENETC. I can add a comment here, so
as not to confuse others.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF
2024-10-23 1:57 ` Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-23 2:16 ` Wei Fang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-23 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Li
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean, Claudiu Manoil, Clark Wang,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> > > @@ -1726,9 +1728,15 @@ void enetc_get_si_caps(struct enetc_si *si)
> > > si->num_rx_rings = (val >> 16) & 0xff;
> > > si->num_tx_rings = val & 0xff;
> > >
> > > - val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIRFSCAPR);
> > > - si->num_fs_entries = ENETC_SIRFSCAPR_GET_NUM_RFS(val);
> > > - si->num_fs_entries = min(si->num_fs_entries, ENETC_MAX_RFS_SIZE);
> > > + val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIPCAPR0);
> > > + if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_RFS) {
> > > + val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIRFSCAPR);
> > > + si->num_fs_entries = ENETC_SIRFSCAPR_GET_NUM_RFS(val);
> > > + si->num_fs_entries = min(si->num_fs_entries,
> ENETC_MAX_RFS_SIZE);
> > > + } else {
> > > + /* ENETC which not supports RFS */
> > > + si->num_fs_entries = 0;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > si->num_rss = 0;
> > > val = enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_SIPCAPR0); @@ -1742,8 +1750,11 @@
> void
> > > enetc_get_si_caps(struct enetc_si *si)
> > > if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBV)
> > > si->hw_features |= ENETC_SI_F_QBV;
> > >
> > > - if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU)
> > > + if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU) {
> > > si->hw_features |= ENETC_SI_F_QBU;
> > > + si->pmac_offset = is_enetc_rev1(si) ? ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET :
> > > + ENETC4_PMAC_OFFSET;
> >
> > pmac_offset should not relate with ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU.
> > such data should be in drvdata generally.
> >
> > pmac_offset always be ENETC_PMAC_OFFSET at ver1 and
> ENETC4_PMAC_OFFSET
> > at rev4 regardless if support ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBU.
> >
>
Sorry, I missed this comment.
pmac_offset is related with 802.1 Qbu (preemption), the ENETC has two MACs if
it supports 802.1 Qbu, one is the express MAC (eMAC), the other is the preemptive
MAC (pMAC). If the ENETC does not support 802.1 Qbu, it only has eMAC.
>
> > > + }
> > >
> > > if (val & ENETC_SIPCAPR0_PSFP)
> > > si->hw_features |= ENETC_SI_F_PSFP; @@ -2056,7 +2067,7 @@
> int
> > > enetc_configure_si(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> > > /* enable SI */
> > > enetc_wr(hw, ENETC_SIMR, ENETC_SIMR_EN);
> > >
> > > - if (si->num_rss) {
> > > + if (si->num_rss && is_enetc_rev1(si)) {
> > > err = enetc_setup_default_rss_table(si, priv->num_rx_rings);
> > > if (err)
> > > return err;
> > > @@ -2080,9 +2091,9 @@ void enetc_init_si_rings_params(struct
> > enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> > > */
> > > priv->num_rx_rings = min_t(int, cpus, si->num_rx_rings);
> > > priv->num_tx_rings = si->num_tx_rings;
> > > - priv->bdr_int_num = cpus;
> > > + priv->bdr_int_num = priv->num_rx_rings;
> > > priv->ic_mode = ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE | ENETC_IC_TX_MANUAL;
> > > - priv->tx_ictt = ENETC_TXIC_TIMETHR;
> > > + priv->tx_ictt = enetc_usecs_to_cycles(600, priv->sysclk_freq);
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_init_si_rings_params);
> > >
> > > @@ -2475,10 +2486,14 @@ int enetc_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> > >
> > > extended = !!(priv->active_offloads & ENETC_F_RX_TSTAMP);
> > >
> > > - err = enetc_setup_irqs(priv);
> > > + err = clk_prepare_enable(priv->ref_clk);
> > > if (err)
> > > return err;
> > >
> > > + err = enetc_setup_irqs(priv);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + goto err_setup_irqs;
> > > +
> > > err = enetc_phylink_connect(ndev);
> > > if (err)
> > > goto err_phy_connect;
> > > @@ -2510,6 +2525,8 @@ int enetc_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> > > phylink_disconnect_phy(priv->phylink);
> > > err_phy_connect:
> > > enetc_free_irqs(priv);
> > > +err_setup_irqs:
> > > + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->ref_clk);
> > >
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > > @@ -2559,6 +2576,7 @@ int enetc_close(struct net_device *ndev)
> > > enetc_assign_tx_resources(priv, NULL);
> > >
> > > enetc_free_irqs(priv);
> > > + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->ref_clk);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > > index 97524dfa234c..fe4bc082b3cf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > > #include <net/xdp.h>
> > >
> > > #include "enetc_hw.h"
> > > +#include "enetc4_hw.h"
> > >
> > > #define ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE 9600
> > > #define ENETC_MAX_MTU (ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE - \
> > > @@ -247,10 +248,16 @@ struct enetc_si {
> > > int num_rss; /* number of RSS buckets */
> > > unsigned short pad;
> > > int hw_features;
> > > + int pmac_offset; /* Only valid for PSI which supports 802.1Qbu */
> > > };
> > >
> > > #define ENETC_SI_ALIGN 32
> > >
> > > +static inline bool is_enetc_rev1(struct enetc_si *si) {
> > > + return si->pdev->revision == ENETC_REV1; }
> > > +
> > > static inline void *enetc_si_priv(const struct enetc_si *si) {
> > > return (char *)si + ALIGN(sizeof(struct enetc_si),
> > > ENETC_SI_ALIGN); @@ -302,7 +309,7 @@ struct enetc_cls_rule {
> > > int used;
> > > };
> > >
> > > -#define ENETC_MAX_BDR_INT 2 /* fixed to max # of available cpus */
> > > +#define ENETC_MAX_BDR_INT 6 /* fixed to max # of available cpus */
> > > struct psfp_cap {
> > > u32 max_streamid;
> > > u32 max_psfp_filter;
> > > @@ -340,7 +347,6 @@ enum enetc_ic_mode {
> > >
> > > #define ENETC_RXIC_PKTTHR min_t(u32, 256,
> > ENETC_RX_RING_DEFAULT_SIZE / 2)
> > > #define ENETC_TXIC_PKTTHR min_t(u32, 128,
> > ENETC_TX_RING_DEFAULT_SIZE / 2)
> > > -#define ENETC_TXIC_TIMETHR enetc_usecs_to_cycles(600)
> > >
> > > struct enetc_ndev_priv {
> > > struct net_device *ndev;
> > > @@ -388,6 +394,9 @@ struct enetc_ndev_priv {
> > > * and link state updates
> > > */
> > > struct mutex mm_lock;
> > > +
> > > + struct clk *ref_clk; /* RGMII/RMII reference clock */
> > > + u64 sysclk_freq; /* NETC system clock frequency */
> >
> > You can get ref_clk from dt, why not get sysclk from dt also and fetch
> > frequency from clock provider instead of hardcode in driver.
> >
>
> I explained it in the v3 patch, maybe you missed the reply.
>
> There are two reasons are as follows.
> The first reason is that ENETC VF does not have a DT node, so VF cannot get the
> system clock from DT.
>
> The second reason is that S32 platform also not use the clocks property in DT, so
> this solution is not suitable for S32 platform. In addition, for i.MX platforms,
> there is a 1/2 divider inside the NETCMIX, the clock rate we get from
> clk_get_rate() is 666MHz, and we need to divide by 2 to get the correct system
> clock rate. But S32 does not have a NETCMIX so there may not have a 1/2
> divider or may have other dividers, even if it supports the clocks property, the
> calculation of getting the system clock rate is different.
> Therefore, the hardcode based on the IP revision is simpler and clearer, and can
> be shared by both PF and VFs.
>
> > > };
> > > +static void enetc4_pf_reset_tc_msdu(struct enetc_hw *hw) {
> > > + u32 val = ENETC_MAC_MAXFRM_SIZE;
> > > + int tc;
> > > +
> > > + val = u32_replace_bits(val, SDU_TYPE_MPDU,
> PTCTMSDUR_SDU_TYPE);
> > > +
> > > + for (tc = 0; tc < 8; tc++)
> >
> > hard code 8? can you macro for it?
> >
>
> Okay, I will add a macro for the TC number.
>
> > > + enetc_port_wr(hw, ENETC4_PTCTMSDUR(tc), val); }
> > > +
> > > a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> > > index dfcaac302e24..2295742b7090 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> > > @@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ static void enetc_vf_netdev_setup(struct
> > > enetc_si *si,
> > struct net_device *ndev,
> > > ndev->watchdog_timeo = 5 * HZ;
> > > ndev->max_mtu = ENETC_MAX_MTU;
> > >
> > > + priv->sysclk_freq = ENETC_CLK_400M;
> > > +
> >
> > why vf is fixed at 400M?
> >
>
> Because I have not added the VF support for i.MX95 ENETC, so the current VF
> driver is still only available for LS1028A ENETC. I can add a comment here, so as
> not to confuse others.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF Wei Fang
2024-10-22 19:27 ` Frank Li
@ 2024-10-23 6:15 ` Claudiu Manoil
1 sibling, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Claudiu Manoil @ 2024-10-23 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean,
Clark Wang, Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 8:52 AM
[...]
> Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for
> i.MX95 ENETC PF
>
> The i.MX95 ENETC has been upgraded to revision 4.1, which is different
> from the LS1028A ENETC (revision 1.0) except for the SI part. Therefore,
> the fsl-enetc driver is incompatible with i.MX95 ENETC PF. So add new
> nxp-enetc4 driver to support i.MX95 ENETC PF, and this driver will be
> used to support the ENETC PF with major revision 4 for other SoCs in the
> future.
>
> Currently, the nxp-enetc4 driver only supports basic transmission feature
> for i.MX95 ENETC PF, the more basic and advanced features will be added
> in the subsequent patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix()
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix() Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-23 6:37 ` Claudiu Manoil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Claudiu Manoil @ 2024-10-23 6:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean,
Clark Wang, Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 8:52 AM
[...]
> Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract
> enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix()
>
> From: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
>
> Extract enetc_int_vector_init() and enetc_int_vector_destroy() from
> enetc_alloc_msix() so that the code is more concise and readable. In
> addition, slightly different from before, the cleanup helper function
> is used to manage dynamically allocated memory resources.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: extract common ENETC PF parts for LS1028A and i.MX95 platforms
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: extract common ENETC PF parts for LS1028A and i.MX95 platforms Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-23 6:38 ` Claudiu Manoil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Claudiu Manoil @ 2024-10-23 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean,
Clark Wang, Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 8:52 AM
[...]
> Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: extract common ENETC PF
> parts for LS1028A and i.MX95 platforms
>
> The ENETC PF driver of LS1028A (rev 1.0) is incompatible with the version
> used on the i.MX95 platform (rev 4.1), except for the station interface
> (SI) part. To reduce code redundancy and prepare for a new driver for rev
> 4.1 and later, extract shared interfaces from enetc_pf.c and move them to
> enetc_pf_common.c. This refactoring lays the groundwork for compiling
> enetc_pf_common.c into a shared driver for both platforms' PF drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module Wei Fang
2024-10-22 16:20 ` Frank Li
@ 2024-10-23 6:38 ` Claudiu Manoil
1 sibling, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Claudiu Manoil @ 2024-10-23 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean,
Clark Wang, Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 8:52 AM
[...]
> Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a
> separate module
>
> Compile enetc_pf_common.c as a standalone module to allow shared usage
> between ENETC v1 and v4 PF drivers. Add struct enetc_pf_ops to register
> different hardware operation interfaces for both ENETC v1 and v4 PF
> drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control Wei Fang
2024-10-22 16:17 ` Frank Li
@ 2024-10-23 6:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-23 8:18 ` Wei Fang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2024-10-23 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
vladimir.oltean, claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li,
christophe.leroy, linux, bhelgaas, horms, imx, netdev, devicetree,
linux-kernel, linux-pci, alexander.stein
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:52:13PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> Add bindings for NXP NETC blocks control. Usually, NETC has 2 blocks of
> 64KB registers, integrated endpoint register block (IERB) and privileged
> register block (PRB). IERB is used for pre-boot initialization for all
> NETC devices, such as ENETC, Timer, EMDIO and so on. And PRB controls
> global reset and global error handling for NETC. Moreover, for the i.MX
> platform, there is also a NETCMIX block for link configuration, such as
> MII protocol, PCS protocol, etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---
> v2 changes:
> 1. Rephrase the commit message.
> 2. Change unevaluatedProperties to additionalProperties.
> 3. Remove the useless lables from examples.
> v3 changes:
> 1. Remove the items from clocks and clock-names, add maxItems to clocks
> and rename the clock.
> v4 changes:
> 1. Reorder the required properties.
> 2. Add assigned-clocks, assigned-clock-parents and assigned-clock-rates.
> ---
> .../bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml | 111 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0b7fd2c5e0d8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/nxp,netc-blk-ctrl.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: NETC Blocks Control
> +
> +description:
> + Usually, NETC has 2 blocks of 64KB registers, integrated endpoint register
> + block (IERB) and privileged register block (PRB). IERB is used for pre-boot
> + initialization for all NETC devices, such as ENETC, Timer, EMIDO and so on.
> + And PRB controls global reset and global error handling for NETC. Moreover,
> + for the i.MX platform, there is also a NETCMIX block for link configuration,
> + such as MII protocol, PCS protocol, etc.
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
> +
> + reg:
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 3
You have one device, why this is flexible? Device either has exactly 2
or exactly 3 IO spaces, not both depending on the context.
> +
> + reg-names:
> + minItems: 2
> + items:
> + - const: ierb
> + - const: prb
> + - const: netcmix
> +
> + "#address-cells":
> + const: 2
> +
> + "#size-cells":
> + const: 2
> +
> + ranges: true
> + assigned-clocks: true
> + assigned-clock-parents: true
> + assigned-clock-rates: true
Drop these three.
> +
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clock-names:
> + const: ipg
> +
> + power-domains:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> +patternProperties:
> + "^pcie@[0-9a-f]+$":
> + $ref: /schemas/pci/host-generic-pci.yaml#
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - reg-names
> + - "#address-cells"
> + - "#size-cells"
> + - ranges
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + bus {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + netc-blk-ctrl@4cde0000 {
system-controller? Don't use compatible as node name.
Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-23 6:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2024-10-23 8:18 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-23 8:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-24 14:32 ` Vladimir Oltean
0 siblings, 2 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-23 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean, Claudiu Manoil, Clark Wang,
Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> > + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + minItems: 2
> > + maxItems: 3
>
> You have one device, why this is flexible? Device either has exactly 2
> or exactly 3 IO spaces, not both depending on the context.
>
There are three register blocks, IERB and PRB are inside NETC IP, but NETCMIX
is outside NETC. There are dependencies between these three blocks, so it is
better to configure them in one driver. But for other platforms like S32, it does
not have NETCMIX, so NETCMIX is optional.
> > +
> > + reg-names:
> > + minItems: 2
> > + items:
> > + - const: ierb
> > + - const: prb
> > + - const: netcmix
> > +
> > + "#address-cells":
> > + const: 2
> > +
> > + "#size-cells":
> > + const: 2
> > +
> > + ranges: true
> > + assigned-clocks: true
> > + assigned-clock-parents: true
> > + assigned-clock-rates: true
>
> Drop these three.
>
Okay, I will drop them. Thanks.
> > +
> > + clocks:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + clock-names:
> > + const: ipg
> > +
> > + power-domains:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
> > + "^pcie@[0-9a-f]+$":
> > + $ref: /schemas/pci/host-generic-pci.yaml#
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - reg-names
> > + - "#address-cells"
> > + - "#size-cells"
> > + - ranges
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + bus {
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > + netc-blk-ctrl@4cde0000 {
>
> system-controller? Don't use compatible as node name.
>
netc-blk-ctrl provides pre-configuration and warm reset services for the entire NETC
IP, so system-controller sounds good.
> Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
> examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdevicetr
> ee-specification.readthedocs.io%2Fen%2Flatest%2Fchapter2-devicetree-basics.
> html%23generic-names-recommendation&data=05%7C02%7Cwei.fang%40nx
> p.com%7C35715ef05b824c5d479f08dcf32fd256%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd
> 99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638652633944352532%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb
> GZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6
> Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=unWcE1OaH2Id%2FEny9UFAUH%2F5Xablg
> PM0Yj4Br2jfQuI%3D&reserved=0
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-23 8:18 ` Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-23 8:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-23 10:03 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-24 14:32 ` Vladimir Oltean
1 sibling, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2024-10-23 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean, Claudiu Manoil, Clark Wang,
Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
On 23/10/2024 10:18, Wei Fang wrote:
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
>>> + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + enum:
>>> + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
>>> +
>>> + reg:
>>> + minItems: 2
>>> + maxItems: 3
>>
>> You have one device, why this is flexible? Device either has exactly 2
>> or exactly 3 IO spaces, not both depending on the context.
>>
>
> There are three register blocks, IERB and PRB are inside NETC IP, but NETCMIX
> is outside NETC. There are dependencies between these three blocks, so it is
> better to configure them in one driver. But for other platforms like S32, it does
> not have NETCMIX, so NETCMIX is optional.
But how s32 is related here? That's a different device.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-23 8:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2024-10-23 10:03 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-24 13:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-23 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean, Claudiu Manoil, Clark Wang,
Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: 2024年10月23日 16:56
> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Cc: davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org;
> pabeni@redhat.com; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org;
> conor+dt@kernel.org; Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>; Claudiu
> Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>;
> Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>; christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu;
> linux@armlinux.org.uk; bhelgaas@google.com; horms@kernel.org;
> imx@lists.linux.dev; netdev@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC
> blocks control
>
> On 23/10/2024 10:18, Wei Fang wrote:
> >>> +maintainers:
> >>> + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> >>> + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> >>> +
> >>> +properties:
> >>> + compatible:
> >>> + enum:
> >>> + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
> >>> +
> >>> + reg:
> >>> + minItems: 2
> >>> + maxItems: 3
> >>
> >> You have one device, why this is flexible? Device either has exactly
> >> 2 or exactly 3 IO spaces, not both depending on the context.
> >>
> >
> > There are three register blocks, IERB and PRB are inside NETC IP, but
> > NETCMIX is outside NETC. There are dependencies between these three
> > blocks, so it is better to configure them in one driver. But for other
> > platforms like S32, it does not have NETCMIX, so NETCMIX is optional.
>
> But how s32 is related here? That's a different device.
>
The S32 SoC also uses the NETC IP, so this YAML should be compatible with
S32 SoC. Or do you mean when S32 NETC is supported, we then add restrictions
to the reg property for S32?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-23 10:03 ` Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-24 13:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-25 7:15 ` Wei Fang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2024-10-24 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean, Claudiu Manoil, Clark Wang,
Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
On 23/10/2024 12:03, Wei Fang wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>> Sent: 2024年10月23日 16:56
>> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
>> Cc: davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org;
>> pabeni@redhat.com; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org;
>> conor+dt@kernel.org; Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>; Claudiu
>> Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>;
>> Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>; christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu;
>> linux@armlinux.org.uk; bhelgaas@google.com; horms@kernel.org;
>> imx@lists.linux.dev; netdev@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
>> alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC
>> blocks control
>>
>> On 23/10/2024 10:18, Wei Fang wrote:
>>>>> +maintainers:
>>>>> + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
>>>>> + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +properties:
>>>>> + compatible:
>>>>> + enum:
>>>>> + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
>>>>> +
>>>>> + reg:
>>>>> + minItems: 2
>>>>> + maxItems: 3
>>>>
>>>> You have one device, why this is flexible? Device either has exactly
>>>> 2 or exactly 3 IO spaces, not both depending on the context.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There are three register blocks, IERB and PRB are inside NETC IP, but
>>> NETCMIX is outside NETC. There are dependencies between these three
>>> blocks, so it is better to configure them in one driver. But for other
>>> platforms like S32, it does not have NETCMIX, so NETCMIX is optional.
>>
>> But how s32 is related here? That's a different device.
>>
>
> The S32 SoC also uses the NETC IP, so this YAML should be compatible with
> S32 SoC.
What? How? Where is this compatible documented?
> Or do you mean when S32 NETC is supported, we then add restrictions
> to the reg property for S32?
I don't know what you are creating here. That's a binding for one
specific device (see writing bindings guideline).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: add compatible string for i.MX95 EMDIO
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: add compatible string for i.MX95 EMDIO Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-24 14:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-10-24 14:16 ` Vladimir Oltean
0 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2024-10-24 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li, christophe.leroy, linux,
bhelgaas, horms, imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci,
alexander.stein
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:52:11PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> The EMDIO of i.MX95 has been upgraded to revision 4.1, and the vendor
> ID and device ID have also changed, so add the new compatible strings
> for i.MX95 EMDIO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: add compatible string for i.MX95 EMDIO
2024-10-24 14:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
@ 2024-10-24 14:16 ` Vladimir Oltean
0 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2024-10-24 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
claudiu.manoil, xiaoning.wang, Frank.Li, christophe.leroy, linux,
bhelgaas, horms, imx, netdev, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-pci,
alexander.stein
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:06:23PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:52:11PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> > The EMDIO of i.MX95 has been upgraded to revision 4.1, and the vendor
> > ID and device ID have also changed, so add the new compatible strings
> > for i.MX95 EMDIO.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Sorry, the v4 thread popped up in the top of my email client list due to
the unfinished dt-bindings discussion, I meant to post the tag on v5
(which I now see that it shouldn't have been posted until said discussion
had settled).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-23 8:18 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-23 8:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2024-10-24 14:32 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-10-25 8:22 ` Wei Fang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2024-10-24 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Claudiu Manoil,
Clark Wang, Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:18:43AM +0300, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > +maintainers:
> > > + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> > > + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + enum:
> > > + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
> > > +
> > > + reg:
> > > + minItems: 2
> > > + maxItems: 3
> >
> > You have one device, why this is flexible? Device either has exactly 2
> > or exactly 3 IO spaces, not both depending on the context.
> >
>
> There are three register blocks, IERB and PRB are inside NETC IP, but NETCMIX
> is outside NETC. There are dependencies between these three blocks, so it is
> better to configure them in one driver. But for other platforms like S32, it does
> not have NETCMIX, so NETCMIX is optional.
Looking at this patch (in v5), I was confused as to why you've made pcie@4cb00000
a child of system-controller@4cde0000, when there's no obvious parent/child
relationship between them (the ECAM node is not even within the same address
space as the "system-controller@4cde0000" address space, and it's not
even clear what the "system-controller@4cde0000" node _represents_:
examples:
- |
bus {
#address-cells = <2>;
#size-cells = <2>;
system-controller@4cde0000 {
compatible = "nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl";
reg = <0x0 0x4cde0000 0x0 0x10000>,
<0x0 0x4cdf0000 0x0 0x10000>,
<0x0 0x4c81000c 0x0 0x18>;
reg-names = "ierb", "prb", "netcmix";
#address-cells = <2>;
#size-cells = <2>;
ranges;
clocks = <&scmi_clk 98>;
clock-names = "ipg";
power-domains = <&scmi_devpd 18>;
pcie@4cb00000 {
compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic";
reg = <0x0 0x4cb00000 0x0 0x100000>;
#address-cells = <3>;
#size-cells = <2>;
device_type = "pci";
bus-range = <0x1 0x1>;
ranges = <0x82000000 0x0 0x4cce0000 0x0 0x4cce0000 0x0 0x20000
0xc2000000 0x0 0x4cd10000 0x0 0x4cd10000 0x0 0x10000>;
But then I saw your response, and I think your response answers my confusion.
The "system-controller@4cde0000" node doesn't represent anything in and
of itself, it is just a container to make the implementation easier.
The Linux driver treatment should not have a definitive say in the device tree bindings.
To solve the dependencies problem, you have options such as the component API at
your disposal to have a "component master" driver which waits until all its
components have probed.
But if the IERB, PRB and NETCMIX are separate register blocks, they should have
separate OF nodes under their respective buses, and the ECAM should be on the same
level. You should describe the hierarchy from the perspective of the SoC address
space, and not abuse the "ranges" property here.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-24 13:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2024-10-25 7:15 ` Wei Fang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-25 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean, Claudiu Manoil, Clark Wang,
Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> On 23/10/2024 12:03, Wei Fang wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> >> Sent: 2024年10月23日 16:56
> >> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> >> Cc: davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org;
> >> pabeni@redhat.com; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org;
> >> conor+dt@kernel.org; Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>;
> >> conor+Claudiu
> >> Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>; Clark Wang
> <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>;
> >> Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>; christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu;
> >> linux@armlinux.org.uk; bhelgaas@google.com; horms@kernel.org;
> >> imx@lists.linux.dev; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> >> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> >> linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings
> >> for NETC blocks control
> >>
> >> On 23/10/2024 10:18, Wei Fang wrote:
> >>>>> +maintainers:
> >>>>> + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> >>>>> + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +properties:
> >>>>> + compatible:
> >>>>> + enum:
> >>>>> + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + reg:
> >>>>> + minItems: 2
> >>>>> + maxItems: 3
> >>>>
> >>>> You have one device, why this is flexible? Device either has
> >>>> exactly
> >>>> 2 or exactly 3 IO spaces, not both depending on the context.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> There are three register blocks, IERB and PRB are inside NETC IP,
> >>> but NETCMIX is outside NETC. There are dependencies between these
> >>> three blocks, so it is better to configure them in one driver. But
> >>> for other platforms like S32, it does not have NETCMIX, so NETCMIX is
> optional.
> >>
> >> But how s32 is related here? That's a different device.
> >>
> >
> > The S32 SoC also uses the NETC IP, so this YAML should be compatible
> > with
> > S32 SoC.
>
> What? How? Where is this compatible documented?
>
Yes, it is not added yet, so that is why I asked the below question. I should
only focus on i.MX95.
> > Or do you mean when S32 NETC is supported, we then add restrictions to
> > the reg property for S32?
>
> I don't know what you are creating here. That's a binding for one specific device
> (see writing bindings guideline).
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-24 14:32 ` Vladimir Oltean
@ 2024-10-25 8:22 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-25 8:48 ` Wei Fang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-25 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Oltean
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Claudiu Manoil,
Clark Wang, Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:18:43AM +0300, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > > +maintainers:
> > > > + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> > > > + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> > > > +
> > > > +properties:
> > > > + compatible:
> > > > + enum:
> > > > + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
> > > > +
> > > > + reg:
> > > > + minItems: 2
> > > > + maxItems: 3
> > >
> > > You have one device, why this is flexible? Device either has exactly 2
> > > or exactly 3 IO spaces, not both depending on the context.
> > >
> >
> > There are three register blocks, IERB and PRB are inside NETC IP, but NETCMIX
> > is outside NETC. There are dependencies between these three blocks, so it is
> > better to configure them in one driver. But for other platforms like S32, it
> does
> > not have NETCMIX, so NETCMIX is optional.
>
> Looking at this patch (in v5), I was confused as to why you've made
> pcie@4cb00000
> a child of system-controller@4cde0000, when there's no obvious parent/child
> relationship between them (the ECAM node is not even within the same
> address
> space as the "system-controller@4cde0000" address space, and it's not
> even clear what the "system-controller@4cde0000" node _represents_:
>
> examples:
> - |
> bus {
> #address-cells = <2>;
> #size-cells = <2>;
>
> system-controller@4cde0000 {
> compatible = "nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl";
> reg = <0x0 0x4cde0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> <0x0 0x4cdf0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> <0x0 0x4c81000c 0x0 0x18>;
> reg-names = "ierb", "prb", "netcmix";
> #address-cells = <2>;
> #size-cells = <2>;
> ranges;
> clocks = <&scmi_clk 98>;
> clock-names = "ipg";
> power-domains = <&scmi_devpd 18>;
>
> pcie@4cb00000 {
> compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic";
> reg = <0x0 0x4cb00000 0x0 0x100000>;
> #address-cells = <3>;
> #size-cells = <2>;
> device_type = "pci";
> bus-range = <0x1 0x1>;
> ranges = <0x82000000 0x0 0x4cce0000 0x0 0x4cce0000
> 0x0 0x20000
> 0xc2000000 0x0 0x4cd10000 0x0
> 0x4cd10000 0x0 0x10000>;
>
> But then I saw your response, and I think your response answers my confusion.
> The "system-controller@4cde0000" node doesn't represent anything in and
> of itself, it is just a container to make the implementation easier.
>
> The Linux driver treatment should not have a definitive say in the device tree
> bindings.
> To solve the dependencies problem, you have options such as the component
> API at
> your disposal to have a "component master" driver which waits until all its
> components have probed.
>
> But if the IERB, PRB and NETCMIX are separate register blocks, they should
> have
> separate OF nodes under their respective buses, and the ECAM should be on
> the same
> level. You should describe the hierarchy from the perspective of the SoC
> address
> space, and not abuse the "ranges" property here.
I don't know much about component API. Today I spent some time to learn
about the component API framework. In my opinion, the framework is also
implemented based on DTS. For example, the master device specifies the
slave devices through a port child node or a property of phandle-array type.
For i.MX95 NETC, according to your suggestion, the probe sequence is as
follows:
--> netxmix_probe() # NETCMIX
--> netc_prb_ierb_probe() # IERB and PRB
--> enetc4_probe() # ENETC 0/1/2
--> netc_timer_probe() #PTP Timer
--> enetc_pci_mdio_probe() # NETC EMDIO
From this sequence, there are two levels. The first level is IERB&PRB is
the master device, NETCMIX is the slave device. The second level is
IERB&PRB is the slave device, and ENETC, TIMER and EMDIO are the master
devices. First of all, I am not sure whether the component API supports
mapping a slave device to multiple master devices, I only know that
multiple slave devices can be mapped to one master device. Secondly,
the two levels will make the driver more complicated, which is a greater
challenge for us to support suspend/resume in the future. As far as I
know, the component helper also doesn't solve runtime dependencies, e.g.
for system suspend and resume operations.
I don't think there is anything wrong with the current approach. First,
as you said, it makes implementation easier. Second, establishing this
parent-child relationship in DTS can solve the suspend/resume operation
order problem, which we have verified locally. Why do we need each register
block to has a separated node? These are obviously different register
blocks in the NETC system.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-25 8:22 ` Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-25 8:48 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-25 13:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
0 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-25 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Oltean
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Claudiu Manoil,
Clark Wang, Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:18:43AM +0300, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > > > +maintainers:
> > > > > + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> > > > > + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> > > > > +
> > > > > +properties:
> > > > > + compatible:
> > > > > + enum:
> > > > > + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
> > > > > +
> > > > > + reg:
> > > > > + minItems: 2
> > > > > + maxItems: 3
> > > >
> > > > You have one device, why this is flexible? Device either has
> > > > exactly 2 or exactly 3 IO spaces, not both depending on the context.
> > > >
> > >
> > > There are three register blocks, IERB and PRB are inside NETC IP,
> > > but NETCMIX is outside NETC. There are dependencies between these
> > > three blocks, so it is better to configure them in one driver. But
> > > for other platforms like S32, it
> > does
> > > not have NETCMIX, so NETCMIX is optional.
> >
> > Looking at this patch (in v5), I was confused as to why you've made
> > pcie@4cb00000
> > a child of system-controller@4cde0000, when there's no obvious
> > parent/child relationship between them (the ECAM node is not even
> > within the same address space as the "system-controller@4cde0000"
> > address space, and it's not even clear what the
> > "system-controller@4cde0000" node _represents_:
> >
> > examples:
> > - |
> > bus {
> > #address-cells = <2>;
> > #size-cells = <2>;
> >
> > system-controller@4cde0000 {
> > compatible = "nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl";
> > reg = <0x0 0x4cde0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> > <0x0 0x4cdf0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> > <0x0 0x4c81000c 0x0 0x18>;
> > reg-names = "ierb", "prb", "netcmix";
> > #address-cells = <2>;
> > #size-cells = <2>;
> > ranges;
> > clocks = <&scmi_clk 98>;
> > clock-names = "ipg";
> > power-domains = <&scmi_devpd 18>;
> >
> > pcie@4cb00000 {
> > compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic";
> > reg = <0x0 0x4cb00000 0x0 0x100000>;
> > #address-cells = <3>;
> > #size-cells = <2>;
> > device_type = "pci";
> > bus-range = <0x1 0x1>;
> > ranges = <0x82000000 0x0 0x4cce0000 0x0 0x4cce0000
> > 0x0 0x20000
> > 0xc2000000 0x0 0x4cd10000 0x0
> > 0x4cd10000 0x0 0x10000>;
> >
> > But then I saw your response, and I think your response answers my confusion.
> > The "system-controller@4cde0000" node doesn't represent anything in
> > and of itself, it is just a container to make the implementation easier.
> >
> > The Linux driver treatment should not have a definitive say in the
> > device tree bindings.
> > To solve the dependencies problem, you have options such as the
> > component API at your disposal to have a "component master" driver
> > which waits until all its components have probed.
> >
> > But if the IERB, PRB and NETCMIX are separate register blocks, they
> > should have separate OF nodes under their respective buses, and the
> > ECAM should be on the same level. You should describe the hierarchy
> > from the perspective of the SoC address space, and not abuse the
> > "ranges" property here.
>
> I don't know much about component API. Today I spent some time to learn
> about the component API framework. In my opinion, the framework is also
> implemented based on DTS. For example, the master device specifies the slave
> devices through a port child node or a property of phandle-array type.
>
> For i.MX95 NETC, according to your suggestion, the probe sequence is as
> follows:
>
> --> netxmix_probe() # NETCMIX
> --> netc_prb_ierb_probe() # IERB and PRB
> --> enetc4_probe() # ENETC 0/1/2
> --> netc_timer_probe() #PTP Timer
> --> enetc_pci_mdio_probe() # NETC EMDIO
>
>
> From this sequence, there are two levels. The first level is IERB&PRB is the
> master device, NETCMIX is the slave device. The second level is IERB&PRB is the
> slave device, and ENETC, TIMER and EMDIO are the master devices. First of all, I
> am not sure whether the component API supports mapping a slave device to
> multiple master devices, I only know that multiple slave devices can be mapped
> to one master device. Secondly, the two levels will make the driver more
> complicated, which is a greater challenge for us to support suspend/resume in
> the future. As far as I know, the component helper also doesn't solve runtime
> dependencies, e.g.
> for system suspend and resume operations.
>
> I don't think there is anything wrong with the current approach. First, as you
> said, it makes implementation easier. Second, establishing this parent-child
> relationship in DTS can solve the suspend/resume operation order problem,
> which we have verified locally. Why do we need each register block to has a
> separated node? These are obviously different register blocks in the NETC
> system.
Another reason as you know, many customers require Ethernet to work as soon
as possible after Linux boots up. If the component API is used, this may delay the
ENETC probe time, which may be unacceptable to customers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-25 8:48 ` Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-25 13:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-10-26 3:01 ` Wei Fang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2024-10-25 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Claudiu Manoil,
Clark Wang, Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 11:48:18AM +0300, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:18:43AM +0300, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > > > > +maintainers:
> > > > > > + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> > > > > > + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +properties:
> > > > > > + compatible:
> > > > > > + enum:
> > > > > > + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + reg:
> > > > > > + minItems: 2
> > > > > > + maxItems: 3
> > > > >
> > > > > You have one device, why this is flexible? Device either has
> > > > > exactly 2 or exactly 3 IO spaces, not both depending on the context.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > There are three register blocks, IERB and PRB are inside NETC IP,
> > > > but NETCMIX is outside NETC. There are dependencies between these
> > > > three blocks, so it is better to configure them in one driver. But
> > > > for other platforms like S32, it does
> > > > not have NETCMIX, so NETCMIX is optional.
> > >
> > > Looking at this patch (in v5), I was confused as to why you've made
> > > pcie@4cb00000
> > > a child of system-controller@4cde0000, when there's no obvious
> > > parent/child relationship between them (the ECAM node is not even
> > > within the same address space as the "system-controller@4cde0000"
> > > address space, and it's not even clear what the
> > > "system-controller@4cde0000" node _represents_:
> > >
> > > examples:
> > > - |
> > > bus {
> > > #address-cells = <2>;
> > > #size-cells = <2>;
> > >
> > > system-controller@4cde0000 {
> > > compatible = "nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl";
> > > reg = <0x0 0x4cde0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> > > <0x0 0x4cdf0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> > > <0x0 0x4c81000c 0x0 0x18>;
> > > reg-names = "ierb", "prb", "netcmix";
> > > #address-cells = <2>;
> > > #size-cells = <2>;
> > > ranges;
> > > clocks = <&scmi_clk 98>;
> > > clock-names = "ipg";
> > > power-domains = <&scmi_devpd 18>;
> > >
> > > pcie@4cb00000 {
> > > compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic";
> > > reg = <0x0 0x4cb00000 0x0 0x100000>;
> > > #address-cells = <3>;
> > > #size-cells = <2>;
> > > device_type = "pci";
> > > bus-range = <0x1 0x1>;
> > > ranges = <0x82000000 0x0 0x4cce0000 0x0 0x4cce0000 0x0 0x20000
> > > 0xc2000000 0x0 0x4cd10000 0x0 0x4cd10000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > >
> > > But then I saw your response, and I think your response answers my confusion.
> > > The "system-controller@4cde0000" node doesn't represent anything in
> > > and of itself, it is just a container to make the implementation easier.
> > >
> > > The Linux driver treatment should not have a definitive say in the
> > > device tree bindings.
> > > To solve the dependencies problem, you have options such as the
> > > component API at your disposal to have a "component master" driver
> > > which waits until all its components have probed.
> > >
> > > But if the IERB, PRB and NETCMIX are separate register blocks, they
> > > should have separate OF nodes under their respective buses, and the
> > > ECAM should be on the same level. You should describe the hierarchy
> > > from the perspective of the SoC address space, and not abuse the
> > > "ranges" property here.
> >
> > I don't know much about component API. Today I spent some time to learn
> > about the component API framework. In my opinion, the framework is also
> > implemented based on DTS. For example, the master device specifies the slave
> > devices through a port child node or a property of phandle-array type.
> >
> > For i.MX95 NETC, according to your suggestion, the probe sequence is as
> > follows:
> >
> > --> netxmix_probe() # NETCMIX
> > --> netc_prb_ierb_probe() # IERB and PRB
> > --> enetc4_probe() # ENETC 0/1/2
> > --> netc_timer_probe() #PTP Timer
> > --> enetc_pci_mdio_probe() # NETC EMDIO
> >
> > From this sequence, there are two levels. The first level is IERB&PRB is the
> > master device, NETCMIX is the slave device. The second level is IERB&PRB is the
> > slave device, and ENETC, TIMER and EMDIO are the master devices. First of all, I
> > am not sure whether the component API supports mapping a slave device to
> > multiple master devices, I only know that multiple slave devices can be mapped
> > to one master device.
I meant that the component master would be an aggregate driver for the
IERB and PRB, not the NETC, PTP, MDIO (PCIe function) drivers as you
seem to have understood. The component master driver could be an
abstract entity which is not necessarily represented in OF. It can
simply be a platform driver instantiated with platform_device_add().
Only its components (IERB etc) can be represented in OF.
The PCIe function drivers would be outside of the component API scheme.
They would all get a reference to the aggregate driver through some
other mechanism - such as a function call to netcmix_get() from their
probe function. If a platform device for the aggregate driver doesn't
exist, it is created using platform_device_add(). If it does exist
already, just get_device() on it.
Anyway, I wasn't suggesting you _have_ to use the component API, and I
don't have enough knowledge about this SoC to make a concrete design
suggestion. Just suggesting to not model the dt-bindings after the
driver implementation.
> > Secondly, the two levels will make the driver more complicated, which is a
> > greater challenge for us to support suspend/resume in the future. As far as
> > I know, the component helper also doesn't solve runtime dependencies, e.g.
> > for system suspend and resume operations.
Indeed it doesn't. Device links should take care of that (saying in
general, not necessarily applied to this context).
> > I don't think there is anything wrong with the current approach. First, as you
> > said, it makes implementation easier. Second, establishing this parent-child
> > relationship in DTS can solve the suspend/resume operation order problem,
> > which we have verified locally. Why do we need each register block to has a
> > separated node? These are obviously different register blocks in the NETC
> > system.
Let's concentrate on getting the device tree representation of the hardware
accurate first, then figure out driver implementation issues later.
I'm concerned that there is no parent/child relationship from an address
space perspective between system-controller@4cde0000 and pcie@4cb00000.
I don't see a strong reason to not place these 2 nodes on the same
hierarchical level. If the dt-binding maintainers do not share this
concern, I will drop it.
> Another reason as you know, many customers require Ethernet to work as soon
> as possible after Linux boots up. If the component API is used, this may delay the
> ENETC probe time, which may be unacceptable to customers.
I mean, if I were to look at the big picture here, the huge problem is
the SoC suspend/resume flow, where the NETC requires Linux to reconfigure
the NETCMIX in the first place, before it becomes operational.
The use (or not) of the component API to achieve that (avoidable
in principle) purpose seems like splitting hairs at this point.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-25 13:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
@ 2024-10-26 3:01 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-31 12:45 ` Vladimir Oltean
0 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-10-26 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Oltean
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Claudiu Manoil,
Clark Wang, Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> Sent: 2024年10月25日 21:06
> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>; davem@davemloft.net;
> edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org; pabeni@redhat.com;
> robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; Claudiu Manoil
> <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>; Frank Li
> <frank.li@nxp.com>; christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu; linux@armlinux.org.uk;
> bhelgaas@google.com; horms@kernel.org; imx@lists.linux.dev;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC
> blocks control
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 11:48:18AM +0300, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:18:43AM +0300, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > > > > > +maintainers:
> > > > > > > + - Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> > > > > > > + - Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +properties:
> > > > > > > + compatible:
> > > > > > > + enum:
> > > > > > > + - nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + reg:
> > > > > > > + minItems: 2
> > > > > > > + maxItems: 3
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You have one device, why this is flexible? Device either has
> > > > > > exactly 2 or exactly 3 IO spaces, not both depending on the context.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > There are three register blocks, IERB and PRB are inside NETC IP,
> > > > > but NETCMIX is outside NETC. There are dependencies between these
> > > > > three blocks, so it is better to configure them in one driver. But
> > > > > for other platforms like S32, it does
> > > > > not have NETCMIX, so NETCMIX is optional.
> > > >
> > > > Looking at this patch (in v5), I was confused as to why you've made
> > > > pcie@4cb00000
> > > > a child of system-controller@4cde0000, when there's no obvious
> > > > parent/child relationship between them (the ECAM node is not even
> > > > within the same address space as the "system-controller@4cde0000"
> > > > address space, and it's not even clear what the
> > > > "system-controller@4cde0000" node _represents_:
> > > >
> > > > examples:
> > > > - |
> > > > bus {
> > > > #address-cells = <2>;
> > > > #size-cells = <2>;
> > > >
> > > > system-controller@4cde0000 {
> > > > compatible = "nxp,imx95-netc-blk-ctrl";
> > > > reg = <0x0 0x4cde0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> > > > <0x0 0x4cdf0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> > > > <0x0 0x4c81000c 0x0 0x18>;
> > > > reg-names = "ierb", "prb", "netcmix";
> > > > #address-cells = <2>;
> > > > #size-cells = <2>;
> > > > ranges;
> > > > clocks = <&scmi_clk 98>;
> > > > clock-names = "ipg";
> > > > power-domains = <&scmi_devpd 18>;
> > > >
> > > > pcie@4cb00000 {
> > > > compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic";
> > > > reg = <0x0 0x4cb00000 0x0 0x100000>;
> > > > #address-cells = <3>;
> > > > #size-cells = <2>;
> > > > device_type = "pci";
> > > > bus-range = <0x1 0x1>;
> > > > ranges = <0x82000000 0x0 0x4cce0000 0x0
> 0x4cce0000 0x0 0x20000
> > > > 0xc2000000 0x0 0x4cd10000 0x0
> 0x4cd10000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > > >
> > > > But then I saw your response, and I think your response answers my
> confusion.
> > > > The "system-controller@4cde0000" node doesn't represent anything in
> > > > and of itself, it is just a container to make the implementation easier.
> > > >
> > > > The Linux driver treatment should not have a definitive say in the
> > > > device tree bindings.
> > > > To solve the dependencies problem, you have options such as the
> > > > component API at your disposal to have a "component master" driver
> > > > which waits until all its components have probed.
> > > >
> > > > But if the IERB, PRB and NETCMIX are separate register blocks, they
> > > > should have separate OF nodes under their respective buses, and the
> > > > ECAM should be on the same level. You should describe the hierarchy
> > > > from the perspective of the SoC address space, and not abuse the
> > > > "ranges" property here.
> > >
> > > I don't know much about component API. Today I spent some time to learn
> > > about the component API framework. In my opinion, the framework is also
> > > implemented based on DTS. For example, the master device specifies the
> slave
> > > devices through a port child node or a property of phandle-array type.
> > >
> > > For i.MX95 NETC, according to your suggestion, the probe sequence is as
> > > follows:
> > >
> > > --> netxmix_probe() # NETCMIX
> > > --> netc_prb_ierb_probe() # IERB and PRB
> > > --> enetc4_probe() # ENETC 0/1/2
> > > --> netc_timer_probe() #PTP Timer
> > > --> enetc_pci_mdio_probe() # NETC EMDIO
> > >
> > > From this sequence, there are two levels. The first level is IERB&PRB is the
> > > master device, NETCMIX is the slave device. The second level is IERB&PRB is
> the
> > > slave device, and ENETC, TIMER and EMDIO are the master devices. First of
> all, I
> > > am not sure whether the component API supports mapping a slave device
> to
> > > multiple master devices, I only know that multiple slave devices can be
> mapped
> > > to one master device.
>
> I meant that the component master would be an aggregate driver for the
> IERB and PRB, not the NETC, PTP, MDIO (PCIe function) drivers as you
> seem to have understood. The component master driver could be an
> abstract entity which is not necessarily represented in OF. It can
> simply be a platform driver instantiated with platform_device_add().
> Only its components (IERB etc) can be represented in OF.
>
> The PCIe function drivers would be outside of the component API scheme.
> They would all get a reference to the aggregate driver through some
> other mechanism - such as a function call to netcmix_get() from their
> probe function. If a platform device for the aggregate driver doesn't
> exist, it is created using platform_device_add(). If it does exist
> already, just get_device() on it.
>
> Anyway, I wasn't suggesting you _have_ to use the component API, and I
> don't have enough knowledge about this SoC to make a concrete design
> suggestion. Just suggesting to not model the dt-bindings after the
> driver implementation.
>
> > > Secondly, the two levels will make the driver more complicated, which is a
> > > greater challenge for us to support suspend/resume in the future. As far as
> > > I know, the component helper also doesn't solve runtime dependencies,
> e.g.
> > > for system suspend and resume operations.
>
> Indeed it doesn't. Device links should take care of that (saying in
> general, not necessarily applied to this context).
>
> > > I don't think there is anything wrong with the current approach. First, as
> you
> > > said, it makes implementation easier. Second, establishing this parent-child
> > > relationship in DTS can solve the suspend/resume operation order problem,
> > > which we have verified locally. Why do we need each register block to has a
> > > separated node? These are obviously different register blocks in the NETC
> > > system.
>
> Let's concentrate on getting the device tree representation of the hardware
> accurate first, then figure out driver implementation issues later.
>
> I'm concerned that there is no parent/child relationship from an address
> space perspective between system-controller@4cde0000 and pcie@4cb00000.
> I don't see a strong reason to not place these 2 nodes on the same
> hierarchical level. If the dt-binding maintainers do not share this
> concern, I will drop it.
system-controller not only configure the endpoints of the NETC, but also
can configure the ECAM space, such as the vendor ID, device ID, the RID
of endpoint, VF stride and so on. For this perspective, I don't think the
ECAM space should placed at the same hierarchical level with system-controller.
If they are placed at the same level, then before pci_host_common_probe() is
called, we need to ensure that IERB completes probe(), which means we need
to modify the PCI host common driver, component API or add a callback function
or something else, which I don't think is a good idea.
>
> > Another reason as you know, many customers require Ethernet to work as
> soon
> > as possible after Linux boots up. If the component API is used, this may delay
> the
> > ENETC probe time, which may be unacceptable to customers.
>
> I mean, if I were to look at the big picture here, the huge problem is
> the SoC suspend/resume flow, where the NETC requires Linux to reconfigure
> the NETCMIX in the first place, before it becomes operational.
> The use (or not) of the component API to achieve that (avoidable
> in principle) purpose seems like splitting hairs at this point.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-26 3:01 ` Wei Fang
@ 2024-10-31 12:45 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-11-01 2:18 ` Wei Fang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2024-10-31 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Claudiu Manoil,
Clark Wang, Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 06:01:37AM +0300, Wei Fang wrote:
> system-controller not only configure the endpoints of the NETC, but also
> can configure the ECAM space, such as the vendor ID, device ID, the RID
> of endpoint, VF stride and so on. For this perspective, I don't think the
> ECAM space should placed at the same hierarchical level with system-controller.
>
> If they are placed at the same level, then before pci_host_common_probe() is
> called, we need to ensure that IERB completes probe(), which means we need
> to modify the PCI host common driver, component API or add a callback function
> or something else, which I don't think is a good idea.
Ok, that does sound important. If the NETCMIX block were to actually
modify the ECAM space, what would be the primary source of information
for how the ECAM device descriptions should look like?
I remember a use case being discussed internally a while ago was that
where the Cortex-A cores are only guests which only have ownership of
some Ethernet ports discovered through the ECAM, but not of the entire
NETCMIX block and not of physical Ethernet ports. How would that be
described in the device tree? The ECAM node would no longer be placed
under system-controller?
At what point does it simply just make more sense to have a different
PCIe ECAM driver than pcie-host-ecam-generic, which just handles
internally the entire NETCMIX?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-10-31 12:45 ` Vladimir Oltean
@ 2024-11-01 2:18 ` Wei Fang
2024-11-01 10:34 ` Vladimir Oltean
0 siblings, 1 reply; 42+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2024-11-01 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Oltean
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Claudiu Manoil,
Clark Wang, Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 06:01:37AM +0300, Wei Fang wrote:
> > system-controller not only configure the endpoints of the NETC, but also
> > can configure the ECAM space, such as the vendor ID, device ID, the RID
> > of endpoint, VF stride and so on. For this perspective, I don't think the
> > ECAM space should placed at the same hierarchical level with
> system-controller.
> >
> > If they are placed at the same level, then before pci_host_common_probe() is
> > called, we need to ensure that IERB completes probe(), which means we need
> > to modify the PCI host common driver, component API or add a callback
> function
> > or something else, which I don't think is a good idea.
>
> Ok, that does sound important. If the NETCMIX block were to actually
> modify the ECAM space, what would be the primary source of information
> for how the ECAM device descriptions should look like?
>
I think the related info should be provided by DTS, but currently, we do not
have such requirement that needs Linux to change the ECAM space, this may
be supported in the future if we have the requirement.
> I remember a use case being discussed internally a while ago was that
> where the Cortex-A cores are only guests which only have ownership of
> some Ethernet ports discovered through the ECAM, but not of the entire
> NETCMIX block and not of physical Ethernet ports. How would that be
> described in the device tree? The ECAM node would no longer be placed
> under system-controller?
Yes, we indeed have this use case on i.MX95, only the VFs of 10G ENETC
are owned by Cortex-A, the entire ECAM space and other NETC devices
are all owned by Cortex-M. In this case, the system-controller is no needed
in DTS, because Linux have no permission to access these resources.
>
> At what point does it simply just make more sense to have a different
> PCIe ECAM driver than pcie-host-ecam-generic, which just handles
> internally the entire NETCMIX?
Currently, I have not idea in what use case we need a different ECAM driver
to handle internally the entire system-controller.
For the use case I mentioned above, we use a different ECAM driver, which
is implemented by RPMSG, because the entire ECAM space is owned by
Cortex-M. So we use the ECAM driver to notify the Cortex-M to enable/disable
VFs or do FLR for VFs and so on. But this ECAM driver does not need to
configure the system-controller.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control
2024-11-01 2:18 ` Wei Fang
@ 2024-11-01 10:34 ` Vladimir Oltean
0 siblings, 0 replies; 42+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2024-11-01 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Claudiu Manoil,
Clark Wang, Frank Li, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 04:18:55AM +0200, Wei Fang wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 06:01:37AM +0300, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > system-controller not only configure the endpoints of the NETC, but also
> > > can configure the ECAM space, such as the vendor ID, device ID, the RID
> > > of endpoint, VF stride and so on. For this perspective, I don't think the
> > > ECAM space should placed at the same hierarchical level with system-controller.
> > >
> > > If they are placed at the same level, then before pci_host_common_probe() is
> > > called, we need to ensure that IERB completes probe(), which means we need
> > > to modify the PCI host common driver, component API or add a callback function
> > > or something else, which I don't think is a good idea.
> >
> > Ok, that does sound important. If the NETCMIX block were to actually
> > modify the ECAM space, what would be the primary source of information
> > for how the ECAM device descriptions should look like?
> >
>
> I think the related info should be provided by DTS, but currently, we do not
> have such requirement that needs Linux to change the ECAM space, this may
> be supported in the future if we have the requirement.
>
> > I remember a use case being discussed internally a while ago was that
> > where the Cortex-A cores are only guests which only have ownership of
> > some Ethernet ports discovered through the ECAM, but not of the entire
> > NETCMIX block and not of physical Ethernet ports. How would that be
> > described in the device tree? The ECAM node would no longer be placed
> > under system-controller?
>
> Yes, we indeed have this use case on i.MX95, only the VFs of 10G ENETC
> are owned by Cortex-A, the entire ECAM space and other NETC devices
> are all owned by Cortex-M. In this case, the system-controller is no needed
> in DTS, because Linux have no permission to access these resources.
>
> >
> > At what point does it simply just make more sense to have a different
> > PCIe ECAM driver than pcie-host-ecam-generic, which just handles
> > internally the entire NETCMIX?
>
> Currently, I have not idea in what use case we need a different ECAM driver
> to handle internally the entire system-controller.
>
> For the use case I mentioned above, we use a different ECAM driver, which
> is implemented by RPMSG, because the entire ECAM space is owned by
> Cortex-M. So we use the ECAM driver to notify the Cortex-M to enable/disable
> VFs or do FLR for VFs and so on. But this ECAM driver does not need to
> configure the system-controller.
Ok, I was actually wondering if it makes sense for the the parent bus of
the NETC PCIe functions to be described through a unified binding that
covers all of the above use cases, so that major device tree modifications
aren't necessary to adapt between the 'Linux as host' and 'Linux as guest'
use cases. But you're saying it doesn't make much sense, because the
device tree in the guest case would contain descriptions of inaccessible
resources (the NETCMIX block). Oh well, this is just another case where
"device tree should describe hardware" actually means "device tree describes
what software wants to know about the hardware".
Anyway, I am now convinced by your design choices at least to the extent
that they appear self-consistent to me (I still don't really have an
independent opinion). If somebody has a different idea on how the PCIe
bus should be described, feel free to chime in.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 42+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-01 10:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-22 5:52 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: add compatible string for i.MX95 EMDIO Wei Fang
2024-10-24 14:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-10-24 14:16 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 02/13] dt-bindings: net: add i.MX95 ENETC support Wei Fang
2024-10-22 16:13 ` Frank Li
2024-10-23 1:40 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control Wei Fang
2024-10-22 16:17 ` Frank Li
2024-10-23 1:46 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-23 6:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-23 8:18 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-23 8:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-23 10:03 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-24 13:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-25 7:15 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-24 14:32 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-10-25 8:22 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-25 8:48 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-25 13:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-10-26 3:01 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-31 12:45 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-11-01 2:18 ` Wei Fang
2024-11-01 10:34 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 04/13] net: enetc: add initial netc-blk-ctrl driver support Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: extract common ENETC PF parts for LS1028A and i.MX95 platforms Wei Fang
2024-10-23 6:38 ` Claudiu Manoil
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module Wei Fang
2024-10-22 16:20 ` Frank Li
2024-10-23 6:38 ` Claudiu Manoil
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 07/13] net: enetc: remove ERR050089 workaround for i.MX95 Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 08/13] PCI: Add NXP NETC vendor ID and device IDs Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 09/13] net: enetc: add i.MX95 EMDIO support Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix() Wei Fang
2024-10-23 6:37 ` Claudiu Manoil
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 11/13] net: enetc: optimize the allocation of tx_bdr Wei Fang
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF Wei Fang
2024-10-22 19:27 ` Frank Li
2024-10-23 1:57 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-23 2:16 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-23 6:15 ` Claudiu Manoil
2024-10-22 5:52 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 13/13] MAINTAINERS: update ENETC driver files and maintainers Wei Fang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).