From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
andrew@lunn.ch, Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
horatiu.vultur@microchip.com,
jensemil.schulzostergaard@microchip.com,
Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com,
Raju.Lakkaraju@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
jacob.e.keller@intel.com, ast@fiberby.net,
maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/15] net: sparx5: add compatible strings for lan969x and verify the target
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:35:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241022133508.GT402847@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241022120842.uf575qwaulufjyv6@DEN-DL-M70577>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:08:42PM +0000, Daniel Machon wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> > > Add compatible strings for the twelve lan969x SKU's (Stock Keeping Unit)
> > > that we support, and verify that the devicetree target is supported by
> > > the chip target.
> > >
> > > Each SKU supports different bandwidths and features (see [1] for
> > > details). We want to be able to run a SKU with a lower bandwidth and/or
> > > feature set, than what is supported by the actual chip. In order to
> > > accomplish this we:
> > >
> > > - add new field sparx5->target_dt that reflects the target from the
> > > devicetree (compatible string).
> > >
> > > - compare the devicetree target with the actual chip target. If the
> > > bandwidth and features provided by the devicetree target is
> > > supported by the chip, we approve - otherwise reject.
> > >
> > > - set the core clock and features based on the devicetree target
> > >
> > > [1] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/product/lan9698
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/Makefile | 1 +
> > > .../net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > .../net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.h | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/Makefile
> > > index 3435ca86dd70..8fe302415563 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/Makefile
> > > @@ -19,3 +19,4 @@ sparx5-switch-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) += sparx5_vcap_debugfs.o
> > > # Provide include files
> > > ccflags-y += -I$(srctree)/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap
> > > ccflags-y += -I$(srctree)/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/fdma
> > > +ccflags-y += -I$(srctree)/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan969x
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
> > > index 5c986c373b3e..edbe639d98c5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
> > > @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > > #include <linux/reset.h>
> > >
> > > +#include "lan969x.h" /* lan969x_desc */
> > > +
> >
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Perhaps this will change when Krzysztof's comment elsewhere in this thread
> > is addressed. But as it stands the construction in the above two hunks
> > appears to cause a build failure.
> >
> > CC drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.o
> > In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c:27:
> > ./drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan969x/lan969x.h:10:10: fatal error: sparx5_main.h: No such file or directory
> > 10 | #include "sparx5_main.h"
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > My preference would be to move away from adding -I directives and, rather,
> > use relative includes as is common practice in Networking drivers (at least).
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --
> > pw-bot: changes-requested
>
> I didn't see this build failure when I ran my tests, nor did the NIPA
> tests reveal it. I can only reproduce it if I point to the microchip
> subdir when building - but maybe that's what you did too?
>
> Anyway, I will skip the -I includes and resort to relative includes, as
> per your request. Thanks.
Thanks Daniel,
Yes I did see the problem when pointing to the subdir.
But I was also able to see it without doing so when
using a config based on tinyconfigi on x86_64.
I can dig further if you like, or provide that config.
But I did see that relative includes (or an extra -I)
resolved the problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-22 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-21 13:58 [PATCH net-next 00/15] net: sparx5: add support for lan969x switch device Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] net: sparx5: add support for lan969x SKU's and core clock Daniel Machon
2024-10-22 8:57 ` Simon Horman
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] net: sparx5: change spx5_wr to spx5_rmw in cal update() Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] net: sparx5: change frequency calculation for SDLB's Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] net: sparx5: add sparx5 context pointer to a few functions Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] net: sparx5: add registers required by lan969x Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 17:33 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-10-21 19:10 ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] net: lan969x: add match data for lan969x Daniel Machon
2024-10-23 1:32 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-23 20:53 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-24 15:52 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] net: lan969x: add register diffs to match data Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] net: lan969x: add constants " Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] net: lan969x: add lan969x ops " Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] net: lan969x: add PTP handler function Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 17:46 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-10-21 19:12 ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] net: lan969x: add function for calculating the DSM calendar Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 17:51 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-10-21 19:13 ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] net: sparx5: use is_sparx5() macro throughout Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] dt-bindings: net: add compatible strings for lan969x SKU's Daniel Machon
2024-10-22 6:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] net: sparx5: add compatible strings for lan969x and verify the target Daniel Machon
2024-10-22 6:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-22 8:32 ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-22 8:50 ` Simon Horman
2024-10-22 12:08 ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-22 13:35 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-10-23 8:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-23 11:00 ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-23 12:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-23 18:33 ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] net: sparx5: add feature support Daniel Machon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241022133508.GT402847@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com \
--cc=Raju.Lakkaraju@microchip.com \
--cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@fiberby.net \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jensemil.schulzostergaard@microchip.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lars.povlsen@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).