devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	andrew@lunn.ch, Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
	horatiu.vultur@microchip.com,
	jensemil.schulzostergaard@microchip.com,
	Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com,
	Raju.Lakkaraju@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	jacob.e.keller@intel.com, ast@fiberby.net,
	maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/15] net: sparx5: add compatible strings for lan969x and verify the target
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:35:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241022133508.GT402847@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241022120842.uf575qwaulufjyv6@DEN-DL-M70577>

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:08:42PM +0000, Daniel Machon wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> > > Add compatible strings for the twelve lan969x SKU's (Stock Keeping Unit)
> > > that we support, and verify that the devicetree target is supported by
> > > the chip target.
> > >
> > > Each SKU supports different bandwidths and features (see [1] for
> > > details). We want to be able to run a SKU with a lower bandwidth and/or
> > > feature set, than what is supported by the actual chip. In order to
> > > accomplish this we:
> > >
> > >     - add new field sparx5->target_dt that reflects the target from the
> > >       devicetree (compatible string).
> > >
> > >     - compare the devicetree target with the actual chip target. If the
> > >       bandwidth and features provided by the devicetree target is
> > >       supported by the chip, we approve - otherwise reject.
> > >
> > >     - set the core clock and features based on the devicetree target
> > >
> > > [1] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/product/lan9698
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/Makefile     |   1 +
> > >  .../net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c    | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  .../net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.h    |   1 +
> > >  3 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/Makefile
> > > index 3435ca86dd70..8fe302415563 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/Makefile
> > > @@ -19,3 +19,4 @@ sparx5-switch-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) += sparx5_vcap_debugfs.o
> > >  # Provide include files
> > >  ccflags-y += -I$(srctree)/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap
> > >  ccflags-y += -I$(srctree)/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/fdma
> > > +ccflags-y += -I$(srctree)/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan969x
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
> > > index 5c986c373b3e..edbe639d98c5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
> > > @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> > >  #include <linux/types.h>
> > >  #include <linux/reset.h>
> > >
> > > +#include "lan969x.h" /* lan969x_desc */
> > > +
> > 
> > Hi Daniel,
> > 
> > Perhaps this will change when Krzysztof's comment elsewhere in this thread
> > is addressed. But as it stands the construction in the above two hunks
> > appears to cause a build failure.
> > 
> >   CC      drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.o
> > In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c:27:
> > ./drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan969x/lan969x.h:10:10: fatal error: sparx5_main.h: No such file or directory
> >    10 | #include "sparx5_main.h"
> >       |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 
> > My preference would be to move away from adding -I directives and, rather,
> > use relative includes as is common practice in Networking drivers (at least).
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > --
> > pw-bot: changes-requested
> 
> I didn't see this build failure when I ran my tests, nor did the NIPA
> tests reveal it. I can only reproduce it if I point to the microchip
> subdir when building - but maybe that's what you did too?
> 
> Anyway, I will skip the -I includes and resort to relative includes, as
> per your request. Thanks.

Thanks Daniel,

Yes I did see the problem when pointing to the subdir.
But I was also able to see it without doing so when
using a config based on tinyconfigi on x86_64.

I can dig further if you like, or provide that config.
But I did see that relative includes (or an extra -I)
resolved the problem.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-22 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-21 13:58 [PATCH net-next 00/15] net: sparx5: add support for lan969x switch device Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] net: sparx5: add support for lan969x SKU's and core clock Daniel Machon
2024-10-22  8:57   ` Simon Horman
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] net: sparx5: change spx5_wr to spx5_rmw in cal update() Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] net: sparx5: change frequency calculation for SDLB's Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] net: sparx5: add sparx5 context pointer to a few functions Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] net: sparx5: add registers required by lan969x Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 17:33   ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-10-21 19:10     ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] net: lan969x: add match data for lan969x Daniel Machon
2024-10-23  1:32   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-23 20:53   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-24 15:52   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] net: lan969x: add register diffs to match data Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] net: lan969x: add constants " Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] net: lan969x: add lan969x ops " Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] net: lan969x: add PTP handler function Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 17:46   ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-10-21 19:12     ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] net: lan969x: add function for calculating the DSM calendar Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 17:51   ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-10-21 19:13     ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] net: sparx5: use is_sparx5() macro throughout Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] dt-bindings: net: add compatible strings for lan969x SKU's Daniel Machon
2024-10-22  6:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] net: sparx5: add compatible strings for lan969x and verify the target Daniel Machon
2024-10-22  6:09   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-22  8:32     ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-22  8:50   ` Simon Horman
2024-10-22 12:08     ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-22 13:35       ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-10-23  8:14   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-23 11:00     ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-23 12:06       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-23 18:33         ` Daniel Machon
2024-10-21 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] net: sparx5: add feature support Daniel Machon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241022133508.GT402847@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com \
    --cc=Raju.Lakkaraju@microchip.com \
    --cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ast@fiberby.net \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jensemil.schulzostergaard@microchip.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars.povlsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).