From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>,
"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"David Jander" <david@protonic.nl>,
"Martin Sperl" <kernel@martin.sperl.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 15/15] iio: adc: ad4695: Add support for SPI offload
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:00:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241026170038.4b629cff@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241023-dlech-mainline-spi-engine-offload-2-v4-15-f8125b99f5a1@baylibre.com>
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:59:22 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> Add support for SPI offload to the ad4695 driver. SPI offload allows
> sampling data at the max sample rate (500kSPS or 1MSPS).
>
> This is developed and tested against the ADI example FPGA design for
> this family of ADCs [1].
>
> [1]: http://analogdevicesinc.github.io/hdl/projects/ad469x_fmc/index.html
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
A few questions inline. In general looks ok, but it's complex code and I'm
too snowed under for a very close look at the whole thing for a least a few weeks.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/iio/adc/ad4695.c | 470 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 440 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
> index 92dfb495a8ce..f76a3f62a9ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ config AD4695
> depends on SPI
> select REGMAP_SPI
> select IIO_BUFFER
> + select IIO_BUFFER_DMAENGINE
> select IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER
> help
> Say yes here to build support for Analog Devices AD4695 and similar
> +static int ad4695_offload_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> + struct ad4695_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + struct spi_offload_trigger_config config = {
> + .type = SPI_OFFLOAD_TRIGGER_DATA_READY,
> + };
> + struct spi_transfer *xfer = &st->buf_read_xfer[0];
> + struct pwm_state state;
> + u8 temp_chan_bit = st->chip_info->num_voltage_inputs;
> + u8 num_slots = 0;
> + u8 temp_en = 0;
> + unsigned int bit;
> + int ret;
> +
> + iio_for_each_active_channel(indio_dev, bit) {
> + if (bit == temp_chan_bit) {
> + temp_en = 1;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, AD4695_REG_AS_SLOT(num_slots),
> + FIELD_PREP(AD4695_REG_AS_SLOT_INX, bit));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + num_slots++;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * For non-offload, we could discard data to work around this
> + * restriction, but with offload, that is not possible.
> + */
> + if (num_slots < 2) {
> + dev_err(&st->spi->dev,
> + "At least two voltage channels must be enabled.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(st->regmap, AD4695_REG_TEMP_CTRL,
> + AD4695_REG_TEMP_CTRL_TEMP_EN,
> + FIELD_PREP(AD4695_REG_TEMP_CTRL_TEMP_EN,
> + temp_en));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Each BUSY event means just one sample for one channel is ready. */
> + memset(xfer, 0, sizeof(*xfer));
> + xfer->offload_flags = SPI_OFFLOAD_XFER_RX_STREAM;
> + xfer->bits_per_word = 16;
> + xfer->len = 2;
> +
> + spi_message_init_with_transfers(&st->buf_read_msg, xfer, 1);
> + st->buf_read_msg.offload = st->offload;
> +
> + st->spi->max_speed_hz = st->spi_max_speed_hz;
> + ret = spi_optimize_message(st->spi, &st->buf_read_msg);
> + st->spi->max_speed_hz = AD4695_REG_ACCESS_SCLK_HZ;
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * NB: technically, this is part the SPI offload trigger enable, but it
> + * doesn't work to call it from the offload trigger enable callback
> + * due to issues with ordering with respect to entering/exiting
> + * conversion mode.
Give some detail on the operations order.
> + */
> + ret = regmap_set_bits(st->regmap, AD4695_REG_GP_MODE,
> + AD4695_REG_GP_MODE_BUSY_GP_EN);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_unoptimize_message;
> +
> + ret = spi_offload_trigger_enable(st->offload, st->offload_trigger,
> + &config);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_disable_busy_output;
> +
> + ret = ad4695_enter_advanced_sequencer_mode(st, num_slots);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_offload_trigger_disable;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&st->cnv_pwm_lock);
> + pwm_get_state(st->cnv_pwm, &state);
> + /*
> + * PWM subsystem generally rounds down, so requesting 2x minimum high
> + * time ensures that we meet the minimum high time in any case.
> + */
> + state.duty_cycle = AD4695_T_CNVH_NS * 2;
> + ret = pwm_apply_might_sleep(st->cnv_pwm, &state);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_offload_exit_conversion_mode;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_offload_exit_conversion_mode:
> + /* have to unwind in a different order to avoid triggering offload */
Needs more details here.
> + spi_offload_trigger_disable(st->offload, st->offload_trigger);
> + ad4695_cnv_manual_trigger(st);
> + ad4695_exit_conversion_mode(st);
> + goto err_disable_busy_output;
> +
> +err_offload_trigger_disable:
> + spi_offload_trigger_disable(st->offload, st->offload_trigger);
> +
> +err_disable_busy_output:
> + regmap_clear_bits(st->regmap, AD4695_REG_GP_MODE,
> + AD4695_REG_GP_MODE_BUSY_GP_EN);
> +
> +err_unoptimize_message:
> + spi_unoptimize_message(&st->buf_read_msg);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int ad4695_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> int val, int val2, long mask)
> @@ -779,6 +992,17 @@ static int ad4695_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ: {
> + struct pwm_state state;
> +
> + if (val <= 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&st->cnv_pwm_lock);
> + pwm_get_state(st->cnv_pwm, &state);
What limits this to rates the ADC can cope with?
> + state.period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, val);
> + return pwm_apply_might_sleep(st->cnv_pwm, &state);
> + }
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> static int ad4695_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> struct device *dev = &spi->dev;
> struct ad4695_state *st;
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> - struct gpio_desc *cnv_gpio;
> bool use_internal_ldo_supply;
> bool use_internal_ref_buffer;
> int ret;
>
> - cnv_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "cnv", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> - if (IS_ERR(cnv_gpio))
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(cnv_gpio),
> - "Failed to get CNV GPIO\n");
> -
> - /* Driver currently requires CNV pin to be connected to SPI CS */
> - if (cnv_gpio)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV,
> - "CNV GPIO is not supported\n");
> -
> indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*st));
> if (!indio_dev)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1002,8 +1374,13 @@ static int ad4695_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* Registers cannot be read at the max allowable speed */
> + st->spi_max_speed_hz = spi->max_speed_hz;
> spi->max_speed_hz = AD4695_REG_ACCESS_SCLK_HZ;
>
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ad4695_restore_spi_max_speed_hz, st);
Why do you need to put it back in devm? What happens after this but without
a driver restart that uses that faster rate?
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> st->regmap = devm_regmap_init_spi(spi, &ad4695_regmap_config);
> if (IS_ERR(st->regmap))
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(st->regmap),
> @@ -1014,6 +1391,11 @@ static int ad4695_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(st->regmap16),
> "Failed to initialize regmap16\n");
>
> + st->cnv_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "cnv", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(st->cnv_gpio))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(st->cnv_gpio),
> + "Failed to get CNV GPIO\n");
> +
> ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get_enable(dev,
> ARRAY_SIZE(ad4695_power_supplies),
> ad4695_power_supplies);
> @@ -1139,14 +1521,39 @@ static int ad4695_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> indio_dev->info = &ad4695_info;
> indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> indio_dev->channels = st->iio_chan;
> - indio_dev->num_channels = st->chip_info->num_voltage_inputs + 2;
>
> - ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(dev, indio_dev,
> - iio_pollfunc_store_time,
> - ad4695_trigger_handler,
> - &ad4695_buffer_setup_ops);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + static const struct spi_offload_config ad4695_offload_config = {
> + .capability_flags = SPI_OFFLOAD_CAP_TRIGGER
> + | SPI_OFFLOAD_CAP_RX_STREAM_DMA,
> + };
> +
> + st->offload = devm_spi_offload_get(dev, spi, &ad4695_offload_config);
> + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(st->offload);
> + if (ret && ret != -ENODEV)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get SPI offload\n");
> +
> + if (ret == -ENODEV) {
> + /* If no SPI offload, fall back to low speed usage. */
> + dev_info(dev, "SPI offload not available\n");
As previous. Too noisy for a normal thing that might happen.
Maybe if we can't figure it out from anything userspace an see we could add
a print on the 'offload is enabled' side of things.
> +
> + /* Driver currently requires CNV pin to be connected to SPI CS */
> + if (st->cnv_gpio)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> + "CNV GPIO is not supported\n");
> +
> + indio_dev->num_channels = st->chip_info->num_voltage_inputs + 2;
> +
> + ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(dev, indio_dev,
> + iio_pollfunc_store_time,
> + ad4695_trigger_handler,
> + &ad4695_buffer_setup_ops);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + } else {
> + ret = ad4695_probe_spi_offload(indio_dev, st);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-26 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 20:59 [PATCH RFC v4 00/15] spi: axi-spi-engine: add offload support David Lechner
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 01/15] pwm: core: export pwm_get_state_hw() David Lechner
2024-10-29 8:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-10-29 15:30 ` David Lechner
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 02/15] spi: add basic support for SPI offloading David Lechner
2024-10-24 13:27 ` Nuno Sá
2024-10-24 14:49 ` David Lechner
2024-10-25 12:59 ` Nuno Sá
2024-10-25 16:39 ` Nuno Sá
2024-10-26 15:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-11-11 17:14 ` David Lechner
2024-11-11 19:02 ` David Lechner
2024-10-30 15:55 ` Mark Brown
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 03/15] spi: offload: add support for hardware triggers David Lechner
2024-10-24 14:04 ` Nuno Sá
2024-10-24 15:02 ` David Lechner
2024-10-25 6:29 ` Nuno Sá
2024-10-26 15:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-28 13:53 ` Nuno Sá
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 04/15] spi: dt-bindings: add trigger-source.yaml David Lechner
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 05/15] spi: dt-bindings: add PWM SPI offload trigger David Lechner
2024-10-26 15:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-27 0:20 ` David Lechner
2024-10-27 20:24 ` Conor Dooley
2024-10-31 18:16 ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-11 17:31 ` David Lechner
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 06/15] spi: offload-trigger: add PWM trigger driver David Lechner
2024-10-25 12:07 ` Nuno Sá
2024-10-25 16:28 ` David Lechner
2024-10-28 13:47 ` Nuno Sá
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 07/15] spi: add offload TX/RX streaming APIs David Lechner
2024-10-25 12:24 ` Nuno Sá
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 08/15] spi: dt-bindings: axi-spi-engine: add SPI offload properties David Lechner
2024-10-25 12:26 ` Nuno Sá
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 09/15] spi: axi-spi-engine: implement offload support David Lechner
2024-10-25 13:09 ` Nuno Sá
2024-10-25 16:35 ` David Lechner
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 10/15] iio: buffer-dmaengine: document iio_dmaengine_buffer_setup_ext David Lechner
2024-10-26 15:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 11/15] iio: buffer-dmaengine: add devm_iio_dmaengine_buffer_setup_ext2() David Lechner
2024-10-25 13:24 ` Nuno Sá
2024-10-25 16:42 ` David Lechner
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 12/15] iio: adc: ad7944: don't use storagebits for sizing David Lechner
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 13/15] iio: adc: ad7944: add support for SPI offload David Lechner
2024-10-26 15:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 14/15] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad4695: add SPI offload properties David Lechner
2024-10-23 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC v4 15/15] iio: adc: ad4695: Add support for SPI offload David Lechner
2024-10-26 16:00 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-10-27 0:01 ` David Lechner
2024-10-27 9:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-27 19:52 ` David Lechner
2024-10-28 16:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-27 0:05 ` David Lechner
2024-10-27 9:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-24 14:12 ` [PATCH RFC v4 00/15] spi: axi-spi-engine: add offload support Nuno Sá
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241026170038.4b629cff@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david@protonic.nl \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=kernel@martin.sperl.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox