From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6AC20012C; Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732725191; cv=none; b=cpppLdKhXUpTp+WdZ1C5rhQOuJDXiin3f1L0JL+z0xY2X28PiEDoLi73DEU/cAH/AvtJSypr42YGQmy36/izEBhWgF3Lu75OwIl8XZB+OZEDGBnQ2IeFK0q8oFCyjva3FzMBZLmDM9ie1bKlkfR5rOs+B3bD6AeEP9GqQ2O2xx0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732725191; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6s/n1/PmJoMYmBtsywl1+QbvSE5Me8uAzqbPZosEaIo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bSNZKFY4xidmBVQx2dDhwfc6ltunLt39DH9VpTw9UuWGofUvomK9pOQGEkWTP8TrQRPZ5VnrE4rl0Q/d7T1Utakdhm6q+o+10gDvLfZzdZkHHGcinWy9C+4pDvfaot132zRP9jRacnfXdpUP3wLyfSx0Bb21C8dfjIRbQ78EYHw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Rk/EY0Ms; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Rk/EY0Ms" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4513BC4CECC; Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:33:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1732725191; bh=6s/n1/PmJoMYmBtsywl1+QbvSE5Me8uAzqbPZosEaIo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Rk/EY0MsWAs8tIzOLBv4FheAv1QCDeVhaBoUdl1QSJB5EZC85FYQdk4GP0iD8JjUF YGcXvomN2SGLoIsAzy9BGRMW5zC9vxOiwV8l+7UfaS6PeuG6NK3BkjeSBPRTl9iNb3 F2WaXvsXnJjlE/phC3aZnHo4TktWUr/kt0UlFnFZOmgB9UV8QgV3WA2bsGZ8GaAlFN 4g4Mg4L4p/h9lzfMhk4qB0yXkyP4VRBUY7zC7enc5Nph+0gjr8Dh54AztT9cg++pR6 MSh165Az/Bv2fVTIgHdtMBrQ6rmQTYhDSwMSv6qCi7HIXkT3pm1Q6AyM2VVoCOQCMh O2pGWEAsPyh9A== Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:33:06 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Biju Das Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Prabhakar Mahadev Lad , "biju.das.au" Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] dt-bindings: soc: renesas: Document RZ/G3E SMARC SoM and Carrier-II EVK Message-ID: <20241127-epidural-violin-651fd0ee2526@spud> References: <20241122124558.149827-1-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> <20241122124558.149827-4-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> <20241125-straw-oozy-f95e18e4704f@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2J5vQnm8co+K8xFJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --2J5vQnm8co+K8xFJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 12:34:42PM +0000, Biju Das wrote: > Hi Conor Dooley, >=20 > Thanks for the feedback. >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Conor Dooley > > Sent: 25 November 2024 18:52 > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] dt-bindings: soc: renesas: Document RZ/G3E S= MARC SoM and Carrier-II EVK > >=20 > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:45:39PM +0000, Biju Das wrote: > > > Document the Renesas RZ/G3E SMARC Carrier-II EVK board which is based > > > on the Renesas RZ/G3E SMARC SoM. The RZ/G3E SMARC Carrier-II EVK > > > consists of an RZ/G3E SoM module and a SMARC Carrier-II carrier board. > > > The SoM module sits on top of the carrier board. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml | 4 ++++ > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml > > > index 7cc2bb97db13..1785142fc8da 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml > > > @@ -527,6 +527,10 @@ properties: > > > > > > - description: RZ/G3E (R9A09G047) > > > items: > > > + - enum: > > > + - renesas,smarc2-evk # RZ SMARC Carrier-II EVK > > > + - enum: > > > + - renesas,rzg3e-smarcm # RZ/G3E SMARC Module (SoM) > >=20 > > Why are these enums, when you have a single item in each? >=20 > I just followed the style used in [1] >=20 > [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.1/source/Documentation/devicet= ree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml#L531 It ain't the same though, since you additionally have the SoM. > Other than that, >=20 > In future some vendors can add their RZ/G3E SoM's here Only makes sense if their SoM is compatible with the smarc2-evk. > Or=20 >=20 > They can use Renesas RZ/G3E SMARC module and use their custom carrier boa= rds. But allowing this part does make sense. >=20 > Cheers, > Biju >=20 > >=20 > > > - enum: > > > - renesas,r9a09g047e58 # Quad Cortex-A55 + Cortex-M33 = + Ethos-U55 (21mm BGA) > > > - renesas,r9a09g047e57 # Quad Cortex-A55 + Cortex-M33 + > > > Ethos-U55 (15mm BGA) > > > -- > > > 2.43.0 > > > --2J5vQnm8co+K8xFJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZ0dJwgAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0tiEAQCCKgvVl3T7Rv7WkcXTxwnETv99aieRTnoT28JNuZJbvwEAopq4E4GEQhCI 3/llGDlvkO3/jrvQGLKdCSiCBg+DPAM= =QJWG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2J5vQnm8co+K8xFJ--