Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: media: clarify stm32 csi & simplify example

Conor Dooley
2024-12-19T18:26:44Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1327 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 03:32:49PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 18:31:09 +0000
> Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 05:55:40PM -0500, Mikael Gonella-Bolduc via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > From: Mikael Gonella-Bolduc <mgonellabolduc@dimonoff.com>
> > >
> > > Add device tree bindings for APDS9160
> > > Note: Using alternate email for maintainer
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mikael Gonella-Bolduc <mgonellabolduc@dimonoff.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>
> Conor, any idea how we got that title on a reply to a completely different series?

mutt bug? I actually noticed that the subject line was not correct when
I sent the mail, but I thought it was a visual bug in mutt rather than
one that affected the mail itself. mutt sometimes lags pretty badly for
me, there's a good chance I queued up the actions required to delete
the $subject thread, jump to this patch and initiate the reply-all
process during one of these periods of lag? I'm not entirely sure of
that, but I do know for sure that I saw the erroneous subject in mutt's
"mail configuration" screen after I had hit y to send it.

> Anyhow, I'll assume you intended to give RB to Mikael's patch!

Ye, content of the mail is what's correct here.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]