From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [220.197.31.3]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E268B26AF5; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 08:01:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.3 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737619270; cv=none; b=P+5sBwWLfnXEPjWQAj6xME6Yt3SvSLfifquDp9ACV65+sPbp2HqfL2mCCgiEo5tDqfPYRpA2qA3cmTd4MuS4gV5gFig7vENKrRt77KaMOrthw2SOiuWruqBfMSc5AFB8a2IjRLxoiR6sF498L69PM8GMAf9hEwVriBPjAJBQp7U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737619270; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lcYsCEpfujjplOGh05dnr/FrVbV2xk3xJMHLdrG3Twg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=uRs8tG3m4QvmmpVKIV5PU3Lvh3aqKKRKA6RN2ixZKNP3GyMwAHTO0DInDgV1hTVyxYbuY26WQ5MKxfg5mp7YdLKe+YKWP8hqd/04VfXiQdeeHF5k49kSGwLG+TdWve+hhxnD0djQ1eAyMVqiq5Y+qCPbQcu9R+UFMGXLxVuvx10= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=Hyh5BE2h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.3 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="Hyh5BE2h" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=ZKG0i gir4mFWmow2yjuKALw3vtyBOvdnOo2QP0afV7o=; b=Hyh5BE2hrz218+o3gTPkP 7wlO9fHOMJxMRqkHZohtXlWOtiDlp54a+bvh6axNdynU25ErThrz1Ve6BnkmrC7o 7n0iOlDfaz6BO31G8oqdECuQd2QCAbem9RhI6U93D9K8iD7U9g2szxiPcGLKTWg+ 769Mw28l55W8+/nyEcLLm0= Received: from silergy-System-Product-Name.silergy.inc (unknown []) by gzga-smtp-mtada-g1-4 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wD3P42Z9pFn_f9yHg--.56291S4; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:18 +0800 (CST) From: Wenliang Yan To: linux@roeck-us.net Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jdelvare@suse.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org, krzk@kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, wenliang202407@163.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings:Add SQ52206 to ina2xx devicetree bindings Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:02 +0800 Message-ID: <20250123075802.1105859-1-wenliang202407@163.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <0eda52b5-59c2-4ad2-bb2c-5846dbfbf3e9@roeck-us.net> References: <0eda52b5-59c2-4ad2-bb2c-5846dbfbf3e9@roeck-us.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:_____wD3P42Z9pFn_f9yHg--.56291S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoW7WrWxWw45JF4DCF15uryUJrb_yoW8AFyUpa 4fKF1FkFWUJryayws2vr10v3Wjq3s5tFyrXrn8WryruFn0gw1SqFWY9ws09w1kXwsagrWa qa1jqas3Aa1DZa7anT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0JUL0ePUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: xzhqzxhdqjjiisuqlqqrwthudrp/1tbiNQnd02eRqvTzgQABsp At 2025-01-23 11:30:59, "Guenter Roeck" wrote: >On 1/22/25 17:36, Wenliang Yan wrote: >> At 2025-01-22 15:59:02, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:29:39AM +0800, Wenliang Yan wrote: >>>> Add the sq52206 compatible to the ina2xx.yaml >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Wenliang Yan >>>> --- >>>> >>>> Add the meaning of 'shunt-gain' in SQ52206. >>> >>> You already sent v3... and you got comment from me. You ignored both >>> Conor and me, so me doing third time the same and expecting different >>> results would be definition of insanity. >>> >>> Please read carefully submitting patches before posting new version. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Krzysztof >> >> Sorry, I have received your comment and 'acked'. I was originally >> planning to resend [PATCH v3 2/2], because I have not received a >> response from Guenter Roeck. However, I forgot to >> add 'RESEND' in the title. Thank you for your patient reply. >> I apologize again. >> > >A resend after just four days, plus dropping all Acks ? Are you serious ? > >Please keep in mind that not all of us are getting paid for doing this. >If I am otherwise busy, it will take longer. Sometimes it will take >much longer. If you resend a patches, they will end up at the tail >of my review queue. If you drop Acks, expect me to dig it all up, >and figure out on my own what if anything changed, the patches will >end up even further down, as in "I'll look into this series if I have >nothing else left to review". > >Guenter Sorry for the inconvenience caused by my actions. I am just concerned that you did not receive the email, and I will continue to wait for your review and correction. Best regards, Wenliang Yan