From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Thippeswamy Havalige <thippeswamy.havalige@amd.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com,
michal.simek@amd.com, bharat.kumar.gogada@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] PCI: amd-mdb: Add AMD MDB Root Port driver
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 12:28:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250203182822.GA793389@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250129113029.64841-4-thippeswamy.havalige@amd.com>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 05:00:29PM +0530, Thippeswamy Havalige wrote:
> Add support for AMD MDB (Multimedia DMA Bridge) IP core as Root Port.
> +#define AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_STATUS_MISC 0x4C0
> +#define AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_MASK_MISC 0x4C4
> +#define AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_ENABLE_MISC 0x4C8
> +
> +#define AMD_MDB_PCIE_IDRN_SHIFT 16
Remove this _SHIFT #define and use something like this instead:
#define AMD_MDB_PCIE_INTX_BIT(x) FIELD_PREP(AMD_MDB_TLP_PCIE_INTX_MASK, BIT(x))
I don't know what exactly the right name for that is; it looks like
maybe these bits apply to all the above registers
(AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_STATUS_MISC, AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_MASK_MISC,
AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_ENABLE_MISC)
> +#define AMD_MDB_PCIE_INTR_INTA_ASSERT 16
> +#define AMD_MDB_PCIE_INTR_INTB_ASSERT 18
> +#define AMD_MDB_PCIE_INTR_INTC_ASSERT 20
> +#define AMD_MDB_PCIE_INTR_INTD_ASSERT 22
It's kind of weird that these skip the odd-numbered bits, since
dw_pcie_rp_intx_flow(), amd_mdb_mask_intx_irq(),
amd_mdb_unmask_intx_irq() only use bits 19:16. Something seems wrong
and needs either a fix or a comment about why this is the way it is.
> +#define IMR(x) BIT(AMD_MDB_PCIE_INTR_ ##x)
> +#define AMD_MDB_PCIE_IMR_ALL_MASK \
> + ( \
> + IMR(CMPL_TIMEOUT) | \
> + IMR(INTA_ASSERT) | \
> + IMR(INTB_ASSERT) | \
> + IMR(INTC_ASSERT) | \
> + IMR(INTD_ASSERT) | \
> + IMR(PM_PME_RCVD) | \
> + IMR(PME_TO_ACK_RCVD) | \
> + IMR(MISC_CORRECTABLE) | \
> + IMR(NONFATAL) | \
> + IMR(FATAL) \
> + )
> +
> +#define AMD_MDB_TLP_PCIE_INTX_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
I would drop AMD_MDB_PCIE_INTR_INTA_ASSERT, etc, and just use
AMD_MDB_TLP_PCIE_INTX_MASK in the AMD_MDB_PCIE_IMR_ALL_MASK
definition.
If there are really eight bits of INTx-related things here for the
four INTx interrupts, I think you should make two #defines to separate
them out.
> +static void amd_mdb_mask_intx_irq(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct amd_mdb_pcie *pcie = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci;
> + struct dw_pcie_rp *port = &pci->pp;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 mask, val;
> +
> + mask = BIT(data->hwirq + AMD_MDB_PCIE_IDRN_SHIFT);
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
> + val = pcie_read(pcie, AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_MASK_MISC);
val &= ~AMD_MDB_PCIE_INTX_BIT(data->hwirq);
pcie_write(pcie, val, AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_ENABLE_MISC);
> + pcie_write(pcie, (val & (~mask)), AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_ENABLE_MISC);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void amd_mdb_unmask_intx_irq(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct amd_mdb_pcie *pcie = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci;
> + struct dw_pcie_rp *port = &pci->pp;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 mask;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + mask = BIT(data->hwirq + AMD_MDB_PCIE_IDRN_SHIFT);
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
> + val = pcie_read(pcie, AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_MASK_MISC);
val |= AMD_MDB_PCIE_INTX_BIT(data->hwirq);
> + pcie_write(pcie, (val | mask), AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_ENABLE_MISC);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip amd_mdb_intx_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "AMD MDB INTx",
> + .irq_mask = amd_mdb_mask_intx_irq,
> + .irq_unmask = amd_mdb_unmask_intx_irq,
Prefer
.irq_mask = amd_mdb_intx_irq_mask,
.irq_unmask = amd_mdb_intx_irq_unmask,
so the function names match the grep pattern of the function pointers
(".*_irq_mask").
> +static struct irq_chip amd_mdb_event_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "AMD MDB RC-Event",
> + .irq_mask = amd_mdb_mask_event_irq,
> + .irq_unmask = amd_mdb_unmask_event_irq,
Same function name comment.
> +static irqreturn_t dw_pcie_rp_intx_flow(int irq, void *args)
> +{
> + struct amd_mdb_pcie *pcie = args;
> + unsigned long val;
> + int i;
> +
> + val = FIELD_GET(AMD_MDB_TLP_PCIE_INTX_MASK,
> + pcie_read(pcie, AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_STATUS_MISC));
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, &val, 4)
for_each_set_bit(..., PCI_NUM_INTX)
> + generic_handle_domain_irq(pcie->intx_domain, i);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t amd_mdb_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *args)
> +{
> + struct amd_mdb_pcie *pcie = args;
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct irq_data *d;
> +
> + dev = pcie->pci.dev;
> +
> + d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(pcie->mdb_domain, irq);
> + if (intr_cause[d->hwirq].str)
> + dev_warn(dev, "%s\n", intr_cause[d->hwirq].str);
> + else
> + dev_warn_once(dev, "Unknown IRQ %ld\n", d->hwirq);
What's the point of an interrupt handler that only logs it?
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +static int amd_mdb_add_pcie_port(struct amd_mdb_pcie *pcie,
> + struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci;
> + struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = &pci->pp;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pcie->slcr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "slcr");
> + if (IS_ERR(pcie->slcr))
> + return PTR_ERR(pcie->slcr);
> +
> + ret = amd_mdb_pcie_init_irq_domains(pcie, pdev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + amd_mdb_pcie_init_port(pcie);
amd_mdb_pcie_init_port() doesn't initialize anything other than
disabling/clearing/enabling interrupts. Seems like it could be
squashed into amd_mdb_setup_irq() or called from there so it's
obvious that it's interrupt-related.
> + ret = amd_mdb_setup_irq(pcie, pdev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set up interrupts\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + pp->ops = &amd_mdb_pcie_host_ops;
> +
> + ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize host\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out:
> + amd_mdb_pcie_free_irq_domains(pcie);
> + return ret;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-29 11:30 [PATCH v8 0/3] Add support for AMD MDB IP as Root Port Thippeswamy Havalige
2025-01-29 11:30 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Add AMD Versal2 mdb slcr support Thippeswamy Havalige
2025-01-29 11:30 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] dt-bindings: PCI: amd-mdb: Add AMD Versal2 MDB PCIe Root Port Bridge Thippeswamy Havalige
2025-01-29 11:30 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] PCI: amd-mdb: Add AMD MDB Root Port driver Thippeswamy Havalige
2025-02-03 6:23 ` Havalige, Thippeswamy
2025-02-03 17:41 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-03 18:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-02-04 9:37 ` Havalige, Thippeswamy
2025-02-04 22:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-05 11:37 ` Havalige, Thippeswamy
2025-02-05 11:53 ` Havalige, Thippeswamy
2025-02-05 14:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-07 16:45 ` Havalige, Thippeswamy
2025-02-05 15:10 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-06 16:07 ` Havalige, Thippeswamy
2025-02-06 20:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-07 6:39 ` [v8 " Markus Elfring
2025-02-07 6:59 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-07 9:45 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-11 23:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-12 5:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250203182822.GA793389@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bharat.kumar.gogada@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thippeswamy.havalige@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox