Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor: add csot

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1775 bytes --]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 09:12:45AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:13 AM Langyan Ye
> <yelangyan@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add "csot" to the Devicetree Vendor Prefix Registry.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Langyan Ye <yelangyan@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > index 42d14899d584..375f1f7c79ef 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > @@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ patternProperties:
> >      description: Crystalfontz America, Inc.
> >    "^csky,.*":
> >      description: Hangzhou C-SKY Microsystems Co., Ltd
> > +  "^csot,.*":
> > +    description: Guangzhou China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd
> 
> Doing a `git log` on
> `Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml` shows that
> most patches use the subject prefix `dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes`,
> not `dt-bindings: vendor`. If device-tree folks care about this
> difference and they don't want to fix it when applying, they might
> request you to send a new version.
> 
> In any case, that's fairly minor so I'm OK with:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> 
> I would assume this will go through the DT tree, not drm-misc. If this
> is wrong then someone should shout.

idk, probably the whole series should go together via drm-misc.
%subject can change if there's a resubmission, otherwise
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]