From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A1BC1B6CE5; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739261795; cv=none; b=WkOmjy9cC79wdV6yWTWBqWQ3AggLqEkzt6YXO6mMuDliDhUXJb24Yto1yN5fiBQBnkbZQbByu9iKFKI/iX3nf4eGDJ3HwKFw56sEVG7ir5QIAypZI8ofiypaVBlAC4HCWvw4+vqfeO6WAVf4NYwgz6q/reKtjWOwzL/G9K9qPTA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739261795; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+u+5GUAVu2gY43K/hasdrUu8RXdP+Ha6+AiaUUtPgl0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=RTHeDCSk9HL08zGr/2Q28ieTPs9x2AetrsXS5+45bcF9spaJCVDCJlvboaqBxoVHew2ZPxQCmxlUf9QQyWTzce8q5llKZv9e/5drrDjh8YjWclAmUDUslIUfx0AJFq2TENRfKYC4CMrlkc/LDjlpvQ4S6/rjoC0uF7gyeqy/6IE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TinWPZjg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TinWPZjg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE823C4CEDD; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:16:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739261794; bh=+u+5GUAVu2gY43K/hasdrUu8RXdP+Ha6+AiaUUtPgl0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=TinWPZjgpSeo38CN9Be9w4b0lLOtgzlBPWr47JtzIpP4gvZ16FxD96VxkGp0krQFh 4bMeOpIaaUdPaVFTAVkNRTMLLYmQbIb5pMxTObMWrBcRe2bkU8eH/9SX0bOfOJ6S0P ejFiT9S9zg0tf/M7UELbCGqT+F6Szf+MrE0Y8P33zgMB/fKfgcS3xRBvDX605FyFGx ZvquVVzXXGf110FQPuabOC9JryVhUc1sYMI3kQuaWINwMFLts15mLabaogNdB1GOQW tQiuNs7fl19NUHDS9273aNxNRxtodIRNlK3CbhFrXcJF7w+1fret4n+4GqyzYrtiO8 1znYlrYbPN99Q== Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:16:31 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Antoniu Miclaus , robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 5/9] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add ad485x axi variant Message-ID: <20250211-industrious-rugged-gecko-9b5c02@krzk-bin> References: <20250207140918.7814-1-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com> <20250207140918.7814-6-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com> <20250208162058.3b50ae20@jic23-huawei> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250208162058.3b50ae20@jic23-huawei> On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 04:20:58PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:09:14 +0200 > Antoniu Miclaus wrote: > > > Add a new compatible and related bindings for the fpga-based > > AD485x AXI IP core, a variant of the generic AXI ADC IP. > > > > The AXI AD485x IP is a very similar HDL (fpga) variant of the > > generic AXI ADC IP, intended to control ad485x familiy. > > Hmm. Should we name this after a specific part? Very unlikely > the wildcard will go wrong here because of how specific this > binding is anyway but we should perhaps stick to normal rules > of no wild cards. I am pretty sure we had this discussion about this or other block already and we reached some sort of concensus... which is undocumented in commit msg, so we are doomed to repeat the discussion. Best regards, Krzysztof