devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@icloud.com>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] of: Correct property name comparison in __of_add_property()
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:38:44 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250225143844.GA2279028-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224-of_bugfix-v1-3-03640ae8c3a6@quicinc.com>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:27:59PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
> 
> __of_add_property() compares property name by strcmp(), and that is
> improper for SPARC which wants strcasecmp().

Except that 'name' is the nodename (usually, with a few rare 
exceptions). Sparc node names are case sensitive, so strcmp was correct. 

My hope is to get rid of case insensitive comparisions, so if nothing 
cares that we're doing a case sensitive comparision, I want to keep 
that. 

I also want to get rid of storing both 'name' as a property and 
device_node.name. The name property is an ABI issue though if no one is 
looking, then it's not an ABI issue. Also, we should be able to generate 
device_node.name from device_node.full_name. There's still a bunch of 
direct users of device_node.name which have to be fixed. Mostly in clock 
drivers from what I remember.

> Fix by using dedicated property name comparison macro of_prop_cmp().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/base.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 001ff6ce4abf85c07f13649d5a9f691f549a8ccc..c810014957e81171675b63f25eaabe391cc903e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -1651,7 +1651,7 @@ int __of_add_property(struct device_node *np, struct property *prop)
>  	prop->next = NULL;
>  	next = &np->properties;
>  	while (*next) {
> -		if (strcmp(prop->name, (*next)->name) == 0) {
> +		if (of_prop_cmp(prop->name, (*next)->name) == 0) {
>  			/* duplicate ! don't insert it */
>  			rc = -EEXIST;
>  			goto out_unlock;
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-25 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24 14:27 [PATCH 0/5] of: Trivial cleanup Zijun Hu
2025-02-24 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] of: Compare property names by of_prop_cmp() in of_alias_scan() Zijun Hu
2025-02-25 14:42   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-24 14:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] of: Introduce and apply private is_pseudo_property() Zijun Hu
2025-02-25 14:44   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-24 14:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] of: Correct property name comparison in __of_add_property() Zijun Hu
2025-02-25 14:38   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2025-02-25 15:04     ` Zijun Hu
2025-02-25 19:57       ` Rob Herring
2025-02-24 14:28 ` [PATCH 4/5] of: Do not change property state under __of_add_property() failure Zijun Hu
2025-02-25 14:41   ` Rob Herring
2025-02-25 15:24     ` Zijun Hu
2025-02-25 15:25     ` Zijun Hu
2025-02-24 14:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] of/platform: Do not use of_get_property() to test property presence Zijun Hu
2025-02-25 14:44   ` Rob Herring (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250225143844.GA2279028-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=zijun_hu@icloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).