From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E911A00F0; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742232610; cv=none; b=lJuYB1Hrbd4unSIrNF4T+6rBKr6WnIG8OcD9z2YqkFP32r9R85OA4xLb+vON6WO47usbHn+TDk1+Fmsx1gwcBoP39sTAnCeVlCzcEM4K2TGym58FFHiRynQtEj7c6W5NdIOLTGRSQs6d9eDqpX2CWkC1jUdvNOpVbVBcb2KgJGY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742232610; c=relaxed/simple; bh=srOc0Uaub0/6YRvw1cYQN4PBXQGkUPQK1F4bq+yDgG0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mpuWtM9A+B8pUmwVCLp5KxJtvRxkLL+N7gBAs6pLLdXdIGMLZGshzM9lX5/Pcm8g0MHRv1d6KyT0LZiK77qnOXmG+LIOYg10TASAL8eKw6D3/EuZUDdvV32XRFM+ROTHD3s+YCwXsEGBZaMDiNC45ulMUIa0thRnF+VBpDLgnyw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=M9PMCKWa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="M9PMCKWa" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADD60C4CEE3; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742232609; bh=srOc0Uaub0/6YRvw1cYQN4PBXQGkUPQK1F4bq+yDgG0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=M9PMCKWa0bj+/nVaCIFk0FoMJUZXz5fwtB08nGvANg8fa+tSb/Ui2IPjY/nYC53QS 9LeFzkfiX0lRYjdvjLwxnErliWj5zXn/A8puoJwJ+86QqeGn8dn9YfOXu8wk/BZYVM +oL0FLW3uHGXVApJZKpCPgLRzIF4Chld9ncJVtPoilruw6RyTTwBx7+FMtXfa+J+79 nmBcAwHoEP8VzAyKpT7bi52exvbI+Qgdh1rBrVUo2pD4K4XL47rb6BFuK8rO5P1F1S ryNweBX/Kr3+ht+twGVZsqzfJMQ5ez6Bq/26XLYdPdbYeenBf8pP9KmwBQvOCXQ29y QagecCswBBEzQ== Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 12:30:08 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Manivannan Sadhasivam Cc: Frank Li , Tony Lindgren , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Vignesh Raghavendra , Siddharth Vadapalli , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC NOT TESTED 0/2] PCI: dra7xx: Try to clean up dra7xx_pcie_cpu_addr_fixup() Message-ID: <20250317173008.GA933389@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250313060521.kjue4la47xd7g4te@thinkpad> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:35:21AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 11:20:21AM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > > This patches basic on > > https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20250128-pci_fixup_addr-v9-0-3c4bb506f665@nxp.com/ > > > > I have not hardware to test. > > > > Look for driver owner, who help test this and start move forward to remove > > cpu_addr_fixup() work. > > If you remove cpu_addr_fixup() callback, it will break backwards > compatibility with old DTs. Do you have any pointers to DTs that will be broken? Or to commits where they were fixed? > You should fix the existing DTs and continue carrying the callback > for a while. Any insight into where these existing DTs are used and how long they're likely to live? Bjorn