From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6E8220C46A; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742303645; cv=none; b=QgCIkCr+55qoRLCZ9nxnE7HIlkHWL3bUqg1CLzHRpBXNdwMjM4cdAj4G7twQlYQDoeSdyf82K3AzE7Ryw+/6WofttaGcLUE2B6EGZ+fh3H4kbyMkgEKjep6i9LU13t+Po3UGg21LizlSajPHxADSyytvdwHKdmB7V5nQkApHLJo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742303645; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WzM66xIHTbmz3TlxtlPdmB+DWTWd2fsKUEx8GAB4jFc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IFg+u5N5Hlnnt3R6cNJmYU8V5RSxNOkZyJqu58jUjg5qa/uXWEJEVioKdyzVFo5HYWysH0eDFsOZ/S0VV8emW3EfxX95bkqmHoR17fViftrkncHUEnC9sgPgtccWkyo67jlAeLPjNg1MvwnK44oYXyzyFQyqmWXcCF1Jg45VChE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=Bcf4iqYd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="Bcf4iqYd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53CD7C4CEDD; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:14:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1742303644; bh=WzM66xIHTbmz3TlxtlPdmB+DWTWd2fsKUEx8GAB4jFc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Bcf4iqYd9/VZQZDY7zmHH1nIEz45x2vf+DHLPF3fOG3zYMnTSRZbJ1Pg69PNmEdEg kbN8o6ccr5Tg5241Wfi7wJ51JGIqC5cN4pR3mRupwl0fDXaGEzb0hVsnbFMu75YM1z YtCU2CFv3ccAoIQ9ztjQ2+Pitp2rMP+uPwA6gQxg= Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 14:12:46 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Xu Yang Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, peter.chen@kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, jun.li@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] add USB2.0 support for i.MX95-19x19 EVK board Message-ID: <2025031823-certainty-crewman-b90c@gregkh> References: <20250312082700.260260-1-xu.yang_2@nxp.com> <2025031443-rounding-subject-1f60@gregkh> <20250314092137.6m3gmj4irxqwpy22@hippo> <2025031404-elite-critter-05b7@gregkh> <20250318072414.x5y4kbe2ahl24uzg@hippo> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250318072414.x5y4kbe2ahl24uzg@hippo> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:24:14PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 01:37:19PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 05:21:37PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 09:18:51AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:26:54PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote: > > > > > The i.MX95-19x19 EVK board features a USB 2.0 Type-A port, with this > > > > > series primarily introducing USB 2.0 support. In the i.MX95 architecture, > > > > > the USB wake-up handling mechanism is integrated within the HSIO block > > > > > control module, utilizing a dedicated wake-up interrupt. Therefore, we > > > > > also implemented corresponding wake-up logic code to properly manage this > > > > > functionality. > > > > > > > > > > For detailed changes can refer to patch commit log. > > > > > > > > Does not apply to my tree :( > > > > > > It'd due to below dts patch #2,3 not in usb tree. However, linux-next already > > > have them. I see Shawn just send pull request for 6.15. To make it easy, > > > let me ping you when usb tree have them, is it ok? > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20241204050907.1081781-1-xu.yang_2@nxp.com/#t > > > > That will not be until after 6.15-rc1 is out. > > In this series, patch #1-4 should go to usb tree and path #5,6 should go to Shawn > tree. You can't apply patch #5,6, right? However, you can ignore patch #5,6 and > pick up patch #1-4, am my understanding right? Shawn will pick patch #5,6 to his > tree. Ok, can you resend just what you want me to take so I can suck in the whole patch series at once and don't have to do it "by hand"? thanks, greg k-h