Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: clock: ti: add ti,autoidle.yaml reference

[Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>]

Am Thu,  3 Apr 2025 18:45:00 -0700
schrieb Sukrut Bellary <sbellary@baylibre.com>:

> ti,divider-clock uses properties from ti,autoidle.
> 
> As we are converting autoidle binding to ti,autoidle.yaml,
> fix the reference here.
> 
> Add dual license.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sukrut Bellary <sbellary@baylibre.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/clock/ti/ti,divider-clock.yaml   | 24 ++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/ti,divider-clock.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/ti,divider-clock.yaml
> index 3fbe236eb565..aba879ae302d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/ti,divider-clock.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/ti,divider-clock.yaml
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>  %YAML 1.2
>  ---
>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/ti/ti,divider-clock.yaml#
> @@ -55,9 +55,10 @@ description: |
>    is missing it is the same as supplying a zero shift.
>  
>    This binding can also optionally provide support to the hardware autoidle
> -  feature, see [1].
> +  feature.
>  
> -  [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/autoidle.txt
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: /schemas/clock/ti/ti,autoidle.yaml#
>  
>  properties:
>    compatible:
> @@ -97,7 +98,6 @@ properties:
>      minimum: 1
>      default: 1
>  
> -
>    ti,max-div:
>      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>      description:
> @@ -116,20 +116,6 @@ properties:
>        valid divisor programming must be a power of two,
>        only valid if ti,dividers is not defined.
>  
> -  ti,autoidle-shift:
> -    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> -    description:
> -      bit shift of the autoidle enable bit for the clock,
> -      see [1].
> -    maximum: 31
> -    default: 0
> -
now you make ti,autoidle-shift required. That makes so sense. A clock
does not necessarily support autoidle.

Regards,
Andreas