From: Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org>
To: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
benjamin.larsson@genexis.eu, bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com,
lkundrak@v3.sk, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, spacemit@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] serial: 8250_of: add support for an optional bus clock
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 23:59:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250409235909-GYB19066@gentoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04facbe3-cd40-4d79-a204-2b91880da331@riscstar.com>
Hi Alex,
On 17:47 Wed 09 Apr , Alex Elder wrote:
> On 4/9/25 4:43 PM, Yixun Lan wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > On 14:22 Wed 09 Apr , Alex Elder wrote:
> >> The SpacemiT UART requires a bus clock to be enabled, in addition to
> >> it's "normal" core clock. Look up the optional bus clock by name,
> >> and if that's found, look up the core clock using the name "core".
> >>
> >> Supplying a bus clock is optional. If no bus clock is needed, the
> >> the first/only clock is used for the core clock.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
> >> ---
> >> v2: Update logic to more check for the optional bus clock first
> >>
> >> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_of.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_of.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_of.c
> >> index 11c860ea80f60..a90a5462aa72a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_of.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_of.c
> >> @@ -123,7 +123,16 @@ static int of_platform_serial_setup(struct platform_device *ofdev,
> >>
> >> /* Get clk rate through clk driver if present */
> >> if (!port->uartclk) {
> >> - info->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, NULL);
> >> + struct clk *bus_clk;
> > we also need to handle clk in suspend/resume procedure, so
> > I think you need to put bus_clk inside struct of_serial_info..
>
> OK, I didn't do anything for that in previous versions of the
> series.
>
> I think that means we'd call clk_disable_unprepare() on
> the bus clock after doing so for the function clock. And
> clk_prepare_enable() on the bus clock before doing that for
> the function clock in of_serial_resume(). That's easy.
>
right, pretty much similar to info->clk
> Is there anything further you think is required? There is
> no clock rate associated with the bus clock that I know of,
> so even if the function clock rate changes, the bus clock
> can remain as-is.
>
no further info I know of, my best guess, the rate doesn't
really matter, a wide clk range should just work fine.
> >
> >> +
> >> + bus_clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, "bus");
> > for the 'optional', we can interpret it's optional for other vendor
> > UART, but a must required clk for SpacemiT's k1 UART controller
> >
> > would it better to guard this inside a compatible test or even introduce
> > a flag in compatible data?
>
> I don't personally think so. We could, but the DT binding is going
> out of its way to define when the bus clock is required. This is
> simpler, and generic.
>
I would personally choose the way of introducing a flag of compatible data,
but it's a lot change of the code (may not worth the effort)..
anyway, I'm fine with your current version, and yes, it's generic
thanks for doing this..
--
Yixun Lan (dlan)
Gentoo Linux Developer
GPG Key ID AABEFD55
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 19:22 [PATCH v2 0/2] serial: 8250_of: support an optional bus clock Alex Elder
2025-04-09 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: support an optional second clock Alex Elder
2025-04-10 13:01 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-04-09 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] serial: 8250_of: add support for an optional bus clock Alex Elder
2025-04-09 21:43 ` Yixun Lan
2025-04-09 22:47 ` Alex Elder
2025-04-09 23:59 ` Yixun Lan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250409235909-GYB19066@gentoo \
--to=dlan@gentoo.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com \
--cc=benjamin.larsson@genexis.eu \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=elder@riscstar.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkundrak@v3.sk \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=spacemit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).