From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: POPESCU Catalin <catalin.popescu@leica-geosystems.com>
Cc: Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@yeah.net>,
"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
"krzk+dt@kernel.org" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"m.felsch@pengutronix.de" <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
GEO-CHHER-bsp-development
<bsp-development.geo@leica-geosystems.com>,
"stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com" <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add cpuidle state "cpu-pd-wait"
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:52:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250415155239.GH9439@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415154724.GG9439@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 06:47:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Catalin,
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 03:42:22PM +0000, POPESCU Catalin wrote:
> > Hi Jai,
> >
> > This issue was already reported by Stefan. The problem is that I don't
> > have a Debix board to investigate.
> > The main difference b/w WFI and cpu-pd-wait is that the first doesn't
> > call PSCI/TF-A. So, the issue looks to be related to some settings in
> > the TF-A.
>
> Jai, are you using mainline U-Boot and TF-A, or a downstream version of
> either (or both) ?
Actually, same question for Calatin :-)
I'm running mainline U-Boot 2025.01 and TF-A rel_imx_5.4.70_2.3.6 (from
https://github.com/nxp-imx/imx-atf) and don't seem to experience the
issue:
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpuidle/state1/disable
0
0
0
0
$ ping debix
PING debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.03 ms
64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.800 ms
64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.935 ms
64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.902 ms
64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.738 ms
64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.939 ms
> > What I don't get is why I don't see this issue neither on our IMX8MP
> > specific design nor on the EVK, which uses the same PHY as the Debix board.
> >
> > On 14/04/2025 14:07, Jai Luthra wrote:
> > > On Oct 21, 2024 at 17:42:34 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 03:44:24PM +0200, Catalin Popescu wrote:
> > >>> So far, only WFI is supported on i.MX8mp platform. Add support for
> > >>> deeper cpuidle state "cpu-pd-wait" that would allow for better power
> > >>> usage during runtime. This is a port from NXP downstream kernel.
> > >>>
> > > Since the introduction of this patch in mainline, I am facing sluggish
> > > network performance with my Debix Model-A board with i.MX8mp SoC.
> > >
> > > The network latency jumps to >1s after almost every other packet:
> > >
> > > PING debix (10.0.42.5) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1008 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.488 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1025 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.810 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=590 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.351 ms
> > > ^C
> > > --- debix ping statistics ---
> > > 7 packets transmitted, 6 received, 14.2857% packet loss, time 6126ms
> > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.351/437.416/1024.755/459.370 ms, pipe 2
> > > darkapex at freya in ~
> > >
> > > If I revert the patch, or disable the deeper cpuidle state through
> > > sysfs, the issue goes away.
> > >
> > > # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$i/cpuidle/state1/disable
> > >
> > > PING debix (10.0.42.5) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.482 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.28 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.26 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.848 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.406 ms
> > > ^C
> > > --- debix ping statistics ---
> > > 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4051ms
> > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.406/1.255/2.280/0.842 ms
> > >
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Catalin Popescu <catalin.popescu@leica-geosystems.com>
> > >>
> > >> Applied, thanks!
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-07 13:44 [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add cpuidle state "cpu-pd-wait" Catalin Popescu
2024-10-21 9:42 ` Shawn Guo
2025-04-14 12:07 ` Jai Luthra
2025-04-15 15:42 ` POPESCU Catalin
2025-04-15 15:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-04-15 15:52 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2025-04-15 18:14 ` Marco Felsch
2025-04-15 23:01 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-04-16 4:59 ` Jai Luthra
2025-04-16 8:46 ` Jai Luthra
2025-04-16 6:57 ` POPESCU Catalin
2025-04-16 17:04 ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-10-23 8:59 ` POPESCU Catalin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250415155239.GH9439@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=bsp-development.geo@leica-geosystems.com \
--cc=catalin.popescu@leica-geosystems.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo2@yeah.net \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox