Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] misc: Support TI FPC202 dual-port controller

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 12:46:53AM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > Romain Gantois (9):
> >       dt-bindings: misc: Describe TI FPC202 dual port controller
> >       media: i2c: ds90ub960: Replace aliased clients list with address list
> >       media: i2c: ds90ub960: Protect alias_use_mask with a mutex
> >       i2c: use client addresses directly in ATR interface
> >       i2c: move ATR alias pool to a separate struct
> >       i2c: rename field 'alias_list' of struct i2c_atr_chan to 'alias_pairs'
> >       i2c: support per-channel ATR alias pools
> >       i2c: Support dynamic address translation
> >       misc: add FPC202 dual port controller driver
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/misc/ti,fpc202.yaml        |  94 ++++
> >  MAINTAINERS                                        |   7 +
> >  drivers/i2c/i2c-atr.c                              | 483 ++++++++++++++-------
> >  drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub913.c                      |   9 +-
> >  drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub953.c                      |   9 +-
> >  drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c                      |  49 ++-
> >  drivers/misc/Kconfig                               |  12 +
> >  drivers/misc/Makefile                              |   1 +
> >  drivers/misc/ti_fpc202.c                           | 438 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/i2c-atr.h                            |  54 ++-
> >  10 files changed, 965 insertions(+), 191 deletions(-)
> 
> how are we going to take this? I think we are at the last bits of
> reviews and it's time to plan merging this series.
> 
> Do we need to wait for media and then take i2c? Or shall wee take
> everything via i2c.
> 
> I had a look at the whole series and looks quite all right to me.

I recommend just taking it all through i2c, thanks.

greg k-h